| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release trove for stable/2024.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/974518 | 12:58 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-watcherclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977674 | 13:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-manilaclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977655 | 13:07 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-troveclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977668 | 13:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-aodhclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977636 | 13:18 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-cyborgclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977644 | 13:22 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-brick-cinderclient-ext for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977639 | 13:24 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-brick-cinderclient-ext for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977639 | 13:54 |
| elodilles | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Feb 27 14:00:36 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is elodilles. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| elodilles | o/ | 14:00 |
| elodilles | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/gazpacho-relmgt-tracking | 14:00 |
| elodilles | we are @ line 305 | 14:01 |
| elodilles | ttx is traveling all week, fricker is traveling today :) | 14:01 |
| fungi | i'll keep you company ;) | 14:01 |
| elodilles | so let's just quickly run through the agenda :) | 14:01 |
| elodilles | yay fungi o/ | 14:02 |
| elodilles | :) | 14:02 |
| elodilles | #topic Review R-5 week task completion | 14:02 |
| elodilles | 1st task was: | 14:02 |
| elodilles | Process any remaining library freeze exception. (all) | 14:02 |
| elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:gazpacho-final-non-client-libs+is:open | 14:02 |
| elodilles | all done \o/ | 14:03 |
| elodilles | some even not once, but twice | 14:03 |
| fungi | so nice | 14:03 |
| elodilles | as some libraries needed a 2nd final release o:) | 14:03 |
| elodilles | 2nd task: | 14:04 |
| elodilles | Ensure that all new-release patches in requirements repository for the library releases are merged. (all) | 14:04 |
| elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/requirements+branch:master+is:open+topic:new-release | 14:04 |
| elodilles | this is not empty now, but the library version bumps are all merged | 14:04 |
| elodilles | so this is also good | 14:05 |
| fungi | that castellan bump from tuesday failed testing | 14:05 |
| elodilles | and we have to continue keeping an eye on this list for client libs version bump | 14:05 |
| elodilles | hmmm | 14:05 |
| elodilles | fungi: you are right | 14:05 |
| fungi | noting that one of the two failing jobs for the castellan increase was the barnican one, that needs a close look | 14:06 |
| elodilles | so we have one remaining library version bump :S | 14:06 |
| fungi | manila is more likely to be a stray failure | 14:06 |
| elodilles | ACK, thanks for the heads up fungi | 14:07 |
| elodilles | i'm adding this now to next week's task so that i won't forget this again :S | 14:07 |
| fungi | yeah, those are castellan-related tests failing in the barbican job, specifically | 14:07 |
| fungi | so castellan may have an unspotted regression in the most recent version, or maybe there are pending fixes in barbican that needed to merge | 14:08 |
| fungi | the team was leaderless in the current election, but the prior ptl sent word to openstack-discuss today indicating they were interested in continuing so may be around to look closer at that | 14:09 |
| elodilles | sounds promising | 14:09 |
| fungi | the manila job failure on the castellan increase has error messages related to barbican secrets too | 14:10 |
| fungi | so i expect both those failures are legitimate regressions | 14:10 |
| elodilles | noted. thanks for the details fungi | 14:10 |
| elodilles | i'll try to track this closely next week | 14:11 |
| elodilles | (added it to the tasks list) | 14:11 |
| elodilles | i think we can move on to the next task -> 3rd task | 14:12 |
| fungi | i pinged him in #openstack-barbican just now | 14:12 |
| elodilles | thx o/ | 14:12 |
| elodilles | Propose autoreleases for cycle-with-intermediary client libraries. (elod) | 14:12 |
| elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:gazpacho-milestone-3 | 14:12 |
| elodilles | this is also progressing, more than half have merged of the patches already | 14:13 |
| elodilles | and i'll double check and force-merge the rest that does not have response from its team | 14:14 |
| elodilles | 4th task: | 14:14 |
| elodilles | Evaluate any non-client libraries that did not have any change merged over the cycle to see if it is time to transition them to the independent release model if applicable. (elod) | 14:14 |
| elodilles | only python-<project>client libs are listed by the tool, and we don't want to change their model to cycle independent, historically | 14:15 |
| elodilles | 5th task: | 14:15 |
| elodilles | List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been released yet. (elod) | 14:15 |
| elodilles | i've sent a mail to the teams: | 14:15 |
| elodilles | https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/36GRVJHWEH7YZSPBKC6DT35LHT3T42AQ/ | 14:15 |
| elodilles | horizon PTL responded that they need some time to fix some issue (pkg_resources ones are fixed, but urllib3 version bump caused issue for them and they are working on it :S) | 14:17 |
| fungi | yeah, seems they're pinned to a very old selenium for their tests | 14:17 |
| elodilles | and after those are fixed they'll propose a release | 14:17 |
| elodilles | fungi: i saw a selenium version bump patch from Clark in requirements, will that fix their issue? | 14:18 |
| fungi | not sure, i think that was a test to see what would happen | 14:18 |
| fungi | it also came to my attention yesterday that translations for horizon and its plugins were broken by the pkg_resources removal because they use a 7-year-old abandoned library for django-babel integration | 14:18 |
| elodilles | O.o | 14:19 |
| elodilles | okay, so there are definitely things to fix | 14:19 |
| fungi | "enmerkar" is the library, for the record | 14:19 |
| elodilles | we will see | 14:19 |
| elodilles | +1 | 14:19 |
| fungi | someone put up a pr on its github repo at the beginning of this week, but i doubt anyone is around to merge and release it | 14:20 |
| fungi | we might be able to temporarily downgrade setuptools in the translation update jobs, but that's not a long-term solution | 14:20 |
| elodilles | yeah, it's not a nice thing on master branch :/ | 14:21 |
| elodilles | to continue the list: the rest of the deliverables are ironic deliverables, and release patches started to appearing (ironic-ui so far) | 14:24 |
| elodilles | otherwise we'll cover the rest anyway with next week's task | 14:25 |
| elodilles | On Friday, remind the requirements team to freeze changes to openstack/requirements by applying -2 to all open patches. Ensure that reviewers do not approve changes created by the proposal bot, but do approve changes for new OpenStack deliverable releases. (elod) | 14:26 |
| elodilles | prometheanfire tonyb frickler mnasiadka ^^^ | 14:26 |
| elodilles | note that today i'll try to merge the rest of the non-client lib patches | 14:26 |
| elodilles | otherwise other requirements should not get any update from now on | 14:28 |
| elodilles | (we had already a late mass-req-bump merge early this week anyway, which is quite unfortunate around Feature Freeze :/ but those were hanging there for months now...) | 14:29 |
| elodilles | and that was all about R-5 week's tasks | 14:30 |
| elodilles | #topic Assign R-4 week tasks | 14:30 |
| elodilles | all taken, except the meeting chair role, i'll ping ttx on Monday if he can cover that o:) | 14:31 |
| elodilles | thanks fungi o/ | 14:31 |
| fungi | i've set myself a reminder to send the highlights notice on monday | 14:31 |
| elodilles | ++ | 14:31 |
| elodilles | #topic Review weekly countdown email | 14:32 |
| elodilles | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:32 |
| elodilles | please review the mail for week R-4 ^^^ | 14:32 |
| fungi | looking | 14:32 |
| fungi | r4 e-mail lgtm | 14:35 |
| elodilles | thx! | 14:36 |
| elodilles | will send it after the meeting some time | 14:36 |
| elodilles | #topic Open Discussion | 14:37 |
| elodilles | anything to mention here? | 14:37 |
| fungi | i didn't have anything | 14:37 |
| elodilles | me neither | 14:38 |
| elodilles | let's cut this short then | 14:38 |
| elodilles | thanks fungi for keeping me company :) | 14:39 |
| fungi | thanks elodilles! | 14:39 |
| fungi | it's my pleasure | 14:39 |
| elodilles | :) | 14:39 |
| elodilles | #endmeeting | 14:39 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Feb 27 14:39:43 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:39 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2026/releaseteam.2026-02-27-14.00.html | 14:39 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2026/releaseteam.2026-02-27-14.00.txt | 14:39 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2026/releaseteam.2026-02-27-14.00.log.html | 14:39 |
| fungi | i'll pass along anything i hear from mharley in #openstack-barbican | 14:39 |
| fungi | i gave him the basic rundown of the castellan situation | 14:40 |
| elodilles | awesome! thanks fungi o/ | 14:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-tackerclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977667 | 15:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-octaviaclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977664 | 15:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-venusclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977669 | 15:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-vitrageclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977673 | 15:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-zunclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977680 | 15:13 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-freezerclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977648 | 15:13 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-glanceclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977649 | 15:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-barbicanclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977637 | 15:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-keystoneclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977652 | 15:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-masakariclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977656 | 15:28 |
| opendevreview | Ronelle Landy proposed openstack/releases master: Update watcher 2026.1 cycle highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/976016 | 15:31 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-magnumclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977653 | 15:32 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-watcherclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977674 | 15:32 |
| sean-k-mooney | so we agreed to move novaclient to independnet and freeze teh python lib in antelope https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/030979.html | 18:59 |
| sean-k-mooney | but it has continued to be incorrectly relased each cycle https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/gazpacho/python-novaclient.yaml | 19:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | even those we are not supproting nay new apis and didnt plan to do any new release of it flor like 2 years | 19:01 |
| sean-k-mooney | we technialy didnt freeze the pythyon binding unitl caracal | 19:02 |
| sean-k-mooney | but i was not expecting to see new release after that or stable branches | 19:02 |
| sean-k-mooney | so it look liek the change to move it to indepenent and stop creating branches and release was never reflected in the tooling | 19:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | freezing it in caracal was intened to signal taht all project shoudl use the sdk to talk to nova since it had fully partity an we only extend the sdk now | 19:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | i assume we need to do somethin here https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/projects.yaml#L882-L884 to correct that | 19:10 |
| carloss | elodilles fungi: https://github.com/openstack/castellan/commit/a227bd9c4c29707239a46211af1af276df2a1464 - I think this broke Manila, hence the unit test failures | 19:33 |
| carloss | we're looking into it | 19:33 |
| carloss | we used to rely on _create_secret_ref - which was removed by the commit above | 19:33 |
| fungi | makes sense | 19:41 |
| fungi | carloss: barbican itself seems to be broken by the new castellan release too though | 19:42 |
| carloss | fungi: we're attempting to address the issue with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/978259 | 20:20 |
| carloss | just submitted though. local unit tests and pep8 seemed to be fine, I think functional tests should too | 20:20 |
| fungi | thanks, i was mostly wondering if the regression was even intentional since if castellan doesn't work with barbican i think they have bigger problems | 20:26 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-cinderclient for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/977640 | 23:16 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/releases master: Cut stable/2026.1 for os-brick https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/978279 | 23:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!