Friday, 2026-03-06

*** ralonsoh_ is now known as ralonsoh11:39
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Add Pierre Riteau as Blazar release liaison  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97733512:50
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [adjutant] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97842213:03
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [manila] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97842313:11
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [freezer] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97841213:12
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [vitrage] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97842613:12
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [masakari] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97841813:12
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [barbican] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97842013:12
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [zun] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97840013:15
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [watcher] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97841513:15
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [glance] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97842113:15
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [swift] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97841913:15
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [Telemetry] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97841013:16
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [cyborg] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97840313:16
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [venus] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97842413:16
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [trove] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97840513:18
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [oslo] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97839913:43
ttxo/13:59
ttx#startmeeting releaseteam14:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Fri Mar  6 14:00:29 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'14:00
ttxHi everyone...14:00
ttxOur agenda lives at:14:01
ttx#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/gazpacho-relmgt-tracking#L32814:01
fungiahoy14:01
ttxping elodilles release-team14:01
elodilleso/14:02
ttx#topic Review R-4 week task completion14:03
ttx- manage castellan version bump: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/977783 (elod)14:03
elodillesmerged yesterday :)14:03
elodillesthanks to frickler 14:03
elodilleswho pushed the issue to be solved14:04
ttx- Process any remaining client library freeze exception. (all)14:04
ttx#link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:gazpacho-final-non-client-libs+is:open14:05
ttxList is empty14:05
ttxso I assume it's all done?14:05
elodillesyepp14:05
ttx- Ensure that all new-release patches in requirements repository for the client library releases are merged. (all)14:05
ttx#link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/requirements+branch:master+is:open+topic:new-release14:06
ttxsame14:06
elodilles+114:06
ttx- Early in the week, email openstack-discuss list to remind PTLs that cycle-highlights are due this week so that they can be included in release marketing preparations. (fungi)14:06
fungidid, link is in the agenda14:06
ttx#link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/4EHBVM7XDMQYGMR3YYC32UVGXRTH74RF/14:06
fungidesignate and ironic have already merged some14:06
ttx- Freeze all cycle-based library releases except for release-critical bugs. Independently-released libraries may still be released, but constraint or requirement changes will be held until after the freeze period. (all)14:07
ttxThat's more a process note than a task...14:07
elodillesyepp14:07
elodilleswe got a couple of RFE's though14:07
ttx- Propose stable/2026.1 branch creation for all client and non-client libraries that had not requested it at freeze time. (elod)14:07
ttx#link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:gazpacho-stable-branches14:07
ttxOnly the cloudkitty one is still tbd14:08
elodillesi've force merged the ones today that haven't got any response from their release liaison14:08
elodillesyepp14:08
ttx#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97840114:08
elodillesthough i think there is a mismatch there ( python-cloudkitty )14:08
elodillesi think Rafael wrote about cloudkitty and not python-cloudkitty14:09
ttxyeah probably. Let's add a task to track it next week and it does not fall through the cracks14:09
elodillesso probably that could be merged soon14:09
elodillesttx: +114:09
ttx- List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been refreshed in the last 2 months. For this, use the following command, with YYYY-MM-DD being the day two months ago. (elod)14:09
elodillesironic did a couple of releases this week14:10
elodillesso finally only 2 deliverables remained14:10
elodillesbifrost: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97845314:10
elodilleshorizon: PTL signalled last week that the team needs a bit more time14:10
ttxok as long as they are aware...14:11
ttx- Send weekly email (ttx)14:11
ttxwill do in a few14:11
ttx#topic Assign R-3 week tasks14:11
ttxAll covered, thanks elodilles !14:11
elodillesnp14:11
ttx#topic Review weekly countdown email14:12
ttx#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails14:12
elodillesone $series was missed from the template, fixed it14:14
elodillesLGTM14:14
ttxok will send in a few14:16
ttx#topic Open Discussion14:16
ttxAny red flag looming over our release?14:16
elodillesnot really. though it might be worth to note,14:16
elodillesthat we had yesterday again some new tox release which caused some turbulence in CI :S14:17
elodillesas a workaround frickler pinned tox version in tox jobs14:17
elodillesso this just a sign that similar issues can come anytime...14:18
ttxwell, otherwise releasing would be no fun14:19
elodilles:D14:19
elodillestrue :)14:19
elodillesnothing else from me14:19
fungiyeah, just more of the same really14:20
ttxfungi: anything from you?14:20
funginothing worth noting, just trying to spend more time coming up to speed on release management activities14:23
ttxalright then14:23
ttx#endmeeting14:23
opendevmeetMeeting ended Fri Mar  6 14:23:40 2026 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:23
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2026/releaseteam.2026-03-06-14.00.html14:23
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2026/releaseteam.2026-03-06-14.00.txt14:23
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2026/releaseteam.2026-03-06-14.00.log.html14:23
elodillesthanks o/14:24
fungijust finished reading the weekly e-mail, and it lgtm too14:28
fungioh, a process note on behalf of the vmt, we've got an advisory scheduled for one of the services during the rc period (thursday 2026-03-19), so are planning for that project to need an rc2, just a heads up14:32
elodillesfungi: ah, good to know that. i'll keep an eye on the releases that day.14:36
fungiyeah, we usually try to avoid that if we can, because it's more work for the vmt and maintainers too, but this time it didn't work out14:37
sean-k-mooneyelodilles: not urgent for this relase bu ti realsied i have not updated and merged all the bot patches on python-cycborg client14:46
sean-k-mooneyelodilles: i wen therouh and did that on the main repo but ill do a review fo the same for the clinent in the next week or two. i have approved the bot patches for the creation of the sable 2026.1 branch and master changes alereay14:47
sean-k-mooneyill see if i can follow up with the opther project i have core right on to get those merged today or early next week14:47
elodillessean-k-mooney: thanks for doing that o:)14:57
elodillesi usually urge people to merge those ASAP o:) (and +2+W those where i have +2 rights)14:57
sean-k-mooneyi ment to do it this cycle but i forgot about the client. its not worth an rc to adress but ill fix it on master14:58
sean-k-mooneyya i like to make sure they get done quickly14:58
sean-k-mooneythere is not really anything gained in lettign them sit if the pass ci14:58
elodillesyepp14:59
elodillesnext week we'll cur rc releases and with that stable branches as well, so be prepared that more bot generated patches will arrive o:)14:59
ralonsohelodilles, is it still possible to push an update for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/978407/1/deliverables/gazpacho/ovsdbapp.yaml?15:04
ralonsohthere will be a patch merged today (I hope) that would be nice to have in 2026.115:04
sean-k-mooneyelodilles: looks like we have a tox cofnig issue breaking the watchercliet patches ill adress taht and update them15:07
sean-k-mooneyhttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7560ffb7066b49c8b4c8a94b67d14ac6/log/job-output.txt#121515:07
sean-k-mooneyelodilles: on the topic or RC candiates i created https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97904715:08
sean-k-mooneythat also included the cycle highlights15:08
sean-k-mooneyfor cyborg15:08
sean-k-mooneyim not really expecting to merge anything else to 2026.1 until after the offial release beyond the gitreview/tox url updates on teh stable branch when it gets created15:09
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/releases master: oslotest 6.1.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97929115:40
elodillesralonsoh: the branch is already there, so the patch you want to include to stable/2026.1 needs to be backported from master. on the other hand, there is already FF, but i guess you want to backport a bug fix anyway, right?15:51
elodillessean-k-mooney: the tox issue is a known issue related to latest tox release (4.48.0, 4.48.1). a general workaround was to pin tox: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/979118 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/97914015:55
elodillesi guess tox-cover needs a similar fix :S15:55
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [cloudkitty] Create 2026.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97840116:02
ralonsohelodilles, yes, most probably we'll need that in 2026.116:02
ralonsohI'll do that, thanks!16:02
sean-k-mooneyelodilles: im a littel convuse why pinning it for openstack-tox didnt also fix the openstack-tox-cover job16:23
sean-k-mooney*confused16:24
sean-k-mooneythe cover jobs hsould inherit form it16:24
sean-k-mooneyelodilles: i wonder if its because the patch is on stable/2026.1?16:32
sean-k-mooneyi.e. do we need to ping it on the new stabel brance as well16:32
elodillessean-k-mooney: it's not inherited from openstack-tox16:32
elodillessean-k-mooney: i've created this patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/97930816:32
elodillesfrickler: ^^^16:32
sean-k-mooneyoh its intereited form tox-cover16:33
elodillesyes16:33
sean-k-mooneyok it could just inherit form openstack-tox with tox_envlist: cover16:33
sean-k-mooneybut ok that should work16:34
sean-k-mooneyits doing 16:34
sean-k-mooney    branches:16:35
sean-k-mooney      regex: ^.*/(victoria|wallaby|xena|yoga|zed|2023.1|2023.2|2024.1|2024.2)$16:35
sean-k-mooney      negate: true16:35
sean-k-mooneyso that will work for 2026.1 as well16:35
elodillesyepp. this is for ubuntu-noble based tox-cover16:38
elodillesi haven't checked yet whether this is needed for ubuntu-jammy based jobs as well. (though on stable branches we cap tox (in tox.ini) already a lot of places...)16:39
elodillesrelease-team: it seems that publish-tox-docs-releases job is also broken due to the latest tox release :/ and now we have a lots of failed release post jobs /o\16:46
elodillesrelease-team: anyway, i've created the same workaround (cap tox) to publish-tox-docs-releases job as well: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/97931216:47
sean-k-mooneywell 2024.2 is going to go eol in a few weeks and the rest are unmaintaned or already eol so i suspsec the number of jammy job will reduce in the next little while16:47
sean-k-mooneyat least in terms fo jobs the release team has to maintain16:48
elodillesyepp16:49
fricklerelodilles: I'm hoping that https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/979136 can avoid all the caps16:57
elodillesfrickler: ah, good, thanks17:00
sean-k-mooneyfrickler: ah ok. i was going to ask if we needed ot so anything on the service side too17:19
sean-k-mooneyin many repos we have not needed to use fature form 4.0+17:20
sean-k-mooneyso we have not bothered to bump the min version17:20
sean-k-mooneyis this somethign we shoudl plan to do next cycle?17:20
sean-k-mooneyminversion = 3.18.0 is what nova and many other repso use i bleive17:21
sean-k-mooneyhttps://codesearch.opendev.org/?q=minversion%20%3D%203.18.0&i=nope&literal=nope&files=&excludeFiles=&repos=17:22
sean-k-mooneyhttps://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/979136 obviously still supproting older verison but i asume at somepoint supprot for older version would be droped17:24
clarkbsean-k-mooney: I think the main driver/pressure will come from tox and its python version compatibility19:01
clarkbeventually you'll need to run 4 bceuse 3 won't run on the current python platform19:01
opendevreviewCarlos Eduardo proposed openstack/releases master: [manila] Gazpacho cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97908521:24
haleybfrickler: somehow the tox pin and --showconfig change didn't fix the neutron-functional job, but i now see the revert and hoping that will do the trick. if not we'll need to dig into it some more21:29
haleyboh, maybe it was ignoring the pin, etc21:30
opendevreviewBrian Haley proposed openstack/releases master: Add Neutron cycle highlights (Gazpacho release)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/97935921:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!