| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-magnumclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002063 | 08:38 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-keystoneclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002062 | 08:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-brick-cinderclient-ext for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002052 | 08:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-barbicanclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002050 | 08:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-novaclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002069 | 08:47 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final osc-placement for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002047 | 08:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-troveclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002074 | 08:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-swiftclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002073 | 08:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-zunclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002077 | 08:49 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-watcherclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002075 | 08:52 |
| opendevreview | Carlos Eduardo proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-manilaclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002064 | 10:53 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-manilaclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002064 | 11:22 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Publish the 2027.1/Indri key for future use https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1000917 | 12:26 |
| elodilles | note that it seems we have now a calm day, gerrit looked fine, so i've run the EOL branch cleanup script and have the result: | 13:01 |
| elodilles | https://paste.opendev.org/show/b1yV3IjzEYvCDI0CswDi/ | 13:01 |
| frickler | ah, nice, thx, I meant to ask about the osa cleanup, but did forget about it. I didn't even remember the cinderlib ones | 13:04 |
| elodilles | yep, i've checked the tracking page and saw that rosmaita added a topic for today ;) | 13:05 |
| fungi | i'm about to put together the cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that haven't been released | 13:22 |
| elodilles | +1 | 13:23 |
| fungi | tox just congratulated me, i guess it would normally output a list of missing deliverables? | 13:29 |
| fungi | so doesn't seem like we need to send a reminder e-mail about it | 13:30 |
| fungi | when i -2 the open non-release-related open requirements changes, should i skip any which already have a -2 or add a second one of my own? | 13:33 |
| fungi | and do i also skip tooling-related changes? there are a bunch of those | 13:36 |
| fungi | there are still some with a -2 from last cycle which never got unblocked at the start of this cycle | 13:38 |
| fungi | oh, found one that still has a reqs freeze -2 from a year ago | 13:40 |
| elodilles | fungi: to tell you the truth it's more like a req team's duty afaik o:) so in the past we just asked them, really. | 13:46 |
| fungi | ah okay. do we do that by e-mailing the mailing list or just ping them in irc? | 13:47 |
| fungi | our process says "remind the requirements team to freeze changes to openstack/requirements by applying -2 to all open patches" which could stand to be reworded for clarity. i'll propose a fix | 13:48 |
| elodilles | as i understand it's really just for avoid any change in requirements/upper constraints, things like this. the whole text says "On Friday, remind the requirements team to freeze changes to openstack/requirements by applying -2 to all open patches. Ensure that reviewers do not approve changes created by the proposal bot, but do approve changes for new OpenStack deliverable releases." | 13:50 |
| elodilles | and then comes the RFEs o:) | 13:50 |
| fungi | yes, that could be interpreted as saying that the release team should -2 those changes as a reminder to the requirements team | 13:50 |
| fungi | which is why i'm working to clarify it now | 13:50 |
| fungi | english is such a terrible language sometimes | 13:51 |
| elodilles | as i remember we just pinged req team via IRC | 13:51 |
| elodilles | thanks in advance, if you make it more clear for the future o:) | 13:52 |
| opendevreview | Jeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: process: Clarify requirements team communication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002762 | 13:57 |
| fungi | okay, i've let them know | 13:59 |
| ttx | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Aug 28 14:00:21 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| elodilles | o/ | 14:00 |
| fungi | ahoy! | 14:00 |
| ttx | Ping list: release-team | 14:00 |
| ttx | Our agenda is at: | 14:00 |
| ttx | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/hibiscus-relmgt-tracking#L308 | 14:01 |
| ttx | #topic Review task completion | 14:01 |
| ttx | - On Monday. force-merge https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22hibiscus-final-non-client-libs%22 where no -1 was posted (ttx/elod) | 14:01 |
| ttx | That was done as team work | 14:01 |
| elodilles | yepp \o/ | 14:02 |
| ttx | - Process any remaining library freeze exception during the week (all) | 14:02 |
| ttx | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22hibiscus-final-non-client-libs%22 | 14:02 |
| ttx | Looks like everything was processed | 14:02 |
| elodilles | ~o~ | 14:02 |
| ttx | - Ensure that all new-release patches in requirements repository for the library releases are merged (all) | 14:03 |
| ttx | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/requirements+branch:master+is:open+topic:new-release | 14:03 |
| ttx | Those seem to be blocked a bit? | 14:04 |
| elodilles | these are already the client libs version bump patches ^^^ | 14:04 |
| ttx | ah ok | 14:04 |
| fungi | they're in the gate since 1.5 hours or so | 14:04 |
| fungi | probably a backlog | 14:04 |
| fungi | one hit a test failure in check | 14:04 |
| ttx | - Propose autoreleases for cycle-with-intermediary client libraries (elod) | 14:05 |
| ttx | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:hibiscus-milestone-3 | 14:05 |
| fungi | looks like heat may have a problem | 14:05 |
| fungi | (on the previous task) | 14:05 |
| ttx | fungi: that's actually next week's task (new-release patches for client libs) | 14:05 |
| elodilles | fungi: yeah, that heat error is weird :S | 14:06 |
| elodilles | but kind of feels like some glitch... to me... | 14:06 |
| fungi | ah, okay, and also i think it may actually be manilaclient causing the heat job to fail | 14:06 |
| ttx | On the client libs front looks like all merged except one -1 | 14:06 |
| elodilles | i don't think it's related, but have to check | 14:06 |
| ttx | which we'll track early next week | 14:06 |
| ttx | (python-cinderclient) | 14:07 |
| elodilles | yepp, all but one merged. i've force-merged the ones that haven't got any response till today morning | 14:07 |
| ttx | ++ | 14:07 |
| ttx | - Evaluate any non-client libraries that did not have any change merged over the cycle to see if it is time to transition them to the independent release model if applicable (ttx) | 14:07 |
| ttx | So I found two... | 14:08 |
| elodilles | and yes, cinder team had a request to wait for some packages, but no progress on that one. <<< rosmaita fyi o:) | 14:08 |
| ttx | python-tackerclient and tosca-parser (Tacker) | 14:08 |
| ttx | The first one should stay cycle-tied. We'll probably need to do a noop minor release for it | 14:08 |
| ttx | The second one I guess we could have a conversation about it... | 14:09 |
| ttx | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/tosca-parser | 14:09 |
| fungi | they're both tacker team deliverables, looks like | 14:09 |
| ttx | Not much activity there lately | 14:10 |
| elodilles | hmmm. tosca-parser is a non-client lib, and python-tackerclient is a client lib. do we want to branch them with stable/2026.2? in that case we have to cut a release from them. | 14:10 |
| ttx | python-tackerclient we have to | 14:10 |
| ttx | tosca-parser we could propose to migrate to independent | 14:10 |
| elodilles | well, i mean, if we don't remove them from Hibiscus, then we need to release them :/ | 14:10 |
| ttx | if it's not really moving anymore | 14:10 |
| ttx | also from the name of it it seems generally useful | 14:11 |
| ttx | OK let's add a task for next week to engage with Tacker team on tosca-parser | 14:11 |
| fungi | probably also worth noting this inactivity to the tc, we've seen some similar signs on the vmt side too | 14:11 |
| elodilles | ttx: maybe then we should re-tag the tip of their branches, i.e. cut a release for hibiscus | 14:12 |
| ttx | For python-tackerclient can someone propose a minor noop hibiscus release? | 14:12 |
| elodilles | ttx: i can do that | 14:12 |
| ttx | OK let's do that immediately to queue it with the other client-libs | 14:12 |
| elodilles | +1 | 14:12 |
| ttx | - List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been released yet. (fungi) | 14:14 |
| fungi | i think there were none? unless i'm holding it wrong | 14:14 |
| fungi | the linked paste contains the output from tox where i ran it | 14:14 |
| fungi | #link https://paste.opendev.org/show/bJWQ1ivi9BJ9iE531zfq/ list-deliverables output | 14:15 |
| elodilles | yep, it only lists 'requirements' which should be ignored | 14:15 |
| fungi | oh! that is a line of output i overlooked, yes | 14:16 |
| fungi | so not actually epmty, but effectively empty | 14:17 |
| elodilles | yepp | 14:17 |
| ttx | quick gut check finds the same | 14:17 |
| elodilles | means that every horizon-plugins, service, and 'other' released at least once in hibiscus already \o/ | 14:18 |
| ttx | - On Friday, remind the requirements team to freeze changes to openstack/requirements by applying -2 to all open patches. Ensure that reviewers do not approve changes created by the proposal bot, but do approve changes for new OpenStack deliverable releases. (fungi) | 14:18 |
| fungi | i did that a few minutes ago via irc | 14:18 |
| fungi | i've also proposed an update to the wording in our process document for clarity | 14:18 |
| ttx | - Send weekly countdown email (ttx) | 14:18 |
| fungi | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002762 process: Clarify requirements team communication | 14:19 |
| ttx | to be done soon after the meeting | 14:19 |
| ttx | #topic Assign R-4 week tasks | 14:19 |
| ttx | My week will be pretty busy prepping for China, so I only took one | 14:19 |
| fungi | i can try the branch creation task, is there a particular point in the week where it should be done? any blockers that need to merge first? | 14:20 |
| elodilles | fungi: +2'd | 14:20 |
| elodilles | fungi: feel free to ping me if you need help with any tasks | 14:21 |
| fungi | will do, thanks! | 14:21 |
| ttx | fungi: we try to wait until the client-library releases are all done | 14:21 |
| elodilles | np | 14:21 |
| fungi | ttx: perfect, that's what i was trying to figure out | 14:21 |
| ttx | #topic Review weekly countdown email | 14:22 |
| ttx | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:22 |
| elodilles | ^^^ LGTM | 14:23 |
| ttx | alright, will send after this | 14:24 |
| ttx | #topic Open Discussion | 14:24 |
| fungi | e-mail lgtm too (slow reader, sorry!) | 14:24 |
| ttx | do we need to discuss retire cinderlib (rosmaita)? | 14:25 |
| elodilles | i've read it in advance and deleted the cinderlib branches https://paste.opendev.org/show/b1yV3IjzEYvCDI0CswDi/ | 14:26 |
| elodilles | so probably we are good o:) | 14:26 |
| ttx | perfect. Anything else? | 14:26 |
| elodilles | nothing from me | 14:26 |
| fungi | i didn't have anything | 14:26 |
| ttx | alright then | 14:28 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 14:28 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Aug 28 14:28:08 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:28 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2026/releaseteam.2026-08-28-14.00.html | 14:28 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2026/releaseteam.2026-08-28-14.00.txt | 14:28 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2026/releaseteam.2026-08-28-14.00.log.html | 14:28 |
| fungi | thanks! | 14:28 |
| ttx | Thanks all! | 14:28 |
| elodilles | thanks too o/ | 14:31 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-tackerclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002780 | 15:06 |
| elodilles | ttx fungi ^^^ | 15:06 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/releases master: keystoneauth 5.17.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002786 | 15:37 |
| stephenfin | elodilles: ttx: That's the release for the FFE cardoe requested earlier in the week ☝️ | 15:38 |
| elodilles | stephenfin: ACK, +2+W'd it. (friday afternoon, after FF, in the middle of RF, what could go wrong :D fingers crossed :X) | 15:56 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: keystoneauth 5.17.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002786 | 16:06 |
| opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/releases master: openstacksdk 4.20.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002790 | 16:27 |
| cardoe | I know you folks are off so I won't ping you. I thought the first patch after 4.19.1 made it into 4.19 originally but it didn't. That's purely a quality of life change. The second change is also a quality of life change for users of federation plugins. | 16:28 |
| fungi | cardoe: it'll need confirmation by the sdks ptl or release liaison first of course | 16:39 |
| cardoe | of course | 16:41 |
| opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: Release final NGS for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002823 | 20:26 |
| opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: Release final ironic-python-agent-builder for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1002826 | 20:40 |
| cardoe | fungi: got the PTL nod. | 23:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!