Tuesday, 2026-09-01

fungirelease-openstack-python succeeded for openstacksdk 4.20.0 this time: https://pypi.org/project/openstacksdk/4.20.0/#files00:23
fungicardoe: ^00:23
fungiwe should be all clear to resume approving release requests now00:23
fungithe propose-update-constraints job is still queued for openstacksdk 4.20.0 but i assume it's going to work. if it fails for some reason we can pick this back up tomorrow, but i really need to step away from the keyboard for the evening00:27
cardoehttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/1003192 popped up so I think it’s good.04:48
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Release final python-cinderclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100205307:45
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Release final python-tackerclient for 2026.2 Hibiscus  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100278007:47
elodillesthere they are ^^^07:48
*** Gues__________________________ is now known as mmagr08:05
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/releases master: os-vif 5.2.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100325711:29
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Release final NGS for 2026.2 Hibiscus  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100282313:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Release final ironic-python-agent-builder for 2026.2 Hibiscus  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100282614:00
opendevreviewDoug Goldstein proposed openstack/releases master: ironic 35.0.2 for OSSN  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100328814:18
elodillesfungi: are you around? the last client lib releases are out, so stable/2026.2 branch cutting for libs should be good to go15:15
fungielodilles: thanks! i was going to try to run it later today during meetings, just wanted to make sure we had the prerequisite step complete15:18
fungii also got the highlights reminder out to the ml a few minutes ago and i'll keep pestering folks to get those in asap15:19
elodillescool \o/ thanks fungi15:21
elodillesfungi: feel free to ping me if you need any help15:23
fungiwill do, thanks!15:23
fungielodilles: when running the `bulk_review.sh` script, do you typically pass the commit message body as a heredoc or a quoted string with embedded newlines? looking at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/978399 as an example of a resulting commit17:00
fungii'll try doing it as a quoted string with embedded newlines17:06
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [nova] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100331117:07
fungiokay, weird, i'm getting a lot of errors17:09
fungitoo may for my terminal buffer to hold17:09
fungia lot of "fatal: Exiting because of an unresolved conflict." even though i worked on a detached copy of origin/master when running propose-library-branches17:10
fungidoes this require that i be checked out into a branch instead?17:11
fungiour process documentation doesn't seem to say that17:11
fungii'll abort and abandon the nova change, then try again from a branch checkout17:11
fungiah, yeah the script was doing something with my local master branch rather than HEAD17:14
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [octavia] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100331317:15
fungiokay, apparently it can't re-push the nova change even though i abandoned the first one17:16
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [oslo] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100331417:18
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [zun] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100331517:18
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [cloudkitty] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100331617:18
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [mistral] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100331717:18
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [cyborg] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100331817:19
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [ironic] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100331917:19
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [trove] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100332017:19
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [zaqar] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100332117:19
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [neutron] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100332217:20
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [heat] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100332317:21
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [Telemetry] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100332417:21
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [magnum] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100332617:21
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [freezer] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100332717:21
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [cinder] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100332817:21
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [keystone] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100332917:21
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [watcher] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100333017:21
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [OpenStackSDK] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100333117:22
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [designate] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100333217:22
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [masakari] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100333317:22
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [swift] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100333417:22
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [barbican] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100333517:22
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [glance] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100333617:22
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [adjutant] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100333817:22
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [manila] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100333917:22
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [tacker] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100334017:22
opendevreviewJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: [blazar] Create 2026.2 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100334217:23
fungiokay, that should be all of them17:23
tkajinamwondering where/how I should request a new release of diskimage-builder ?17:43
tkajinamI want a new release which contains https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/1000680 , so that I can bump old hacking pin remaining in a few repos.17:44
tkajinambut diskimage-builder isn't managed by the usual release process, it seems17:44
fricklerit belongs to the tact sig. so ... ask fungi mostly? ;)17:45
fungii usually just push a tag17:45
fungitkajinam: there is a #openstack-dib irc channel by the way, usually we discuss new dib releases there17:46
tkajinamah, I didn't know that channel. will join it.17:47
tkajinamfungi, I'll move the discussion there.17:50
fungithanks!17:50
elodillesfungi: oh, i was afk. what was the problem? :-o the bulk_review script uses git stash, was there some interference with stashed patches? :-o17:51
fungino, i didn't have anything stashed, but i usually work on a detached head and don't keep my master branch in sync with the origin17:51
elodillesanyway, the patches look good as far as i see now17:52
fungiseems like the script wanted me to be working from an actual branch17:52
elodilleshmmm. yes. maybe that was the problem then. i'm usually on master and i do a git pull before i use the script17:53
elodillesif i'm not mistaken then the nova patch can be restored, right?17:53
elodilleshttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100331117:54
elodillesthis one ^^^17:54
elodillesyeah, there is no other nova patch, so i've restored it17:56
fungidid my restoring it not work?18:00
fungii guess gertty wasn't able to un-abandon it when i tried, and i didn't spot the sync error18:00
fungiand yes, my normal workflow starts with `git remote update ; git checkout origin/master` and then i work from that detatched head rather than creating random throwaway branches for things i'm just going to push to gerrit anyway18:01
opendevreviewGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/releases master: [security] Release keystone 27.0.3, 28.0.3, 29.0.3  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100337920:43

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!