Tuesday, 2026-10-06

opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/releases master: Release os-vif 5.3.0 version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100844505:55
opendevreviewRiccardo Pittau proposed openstack/releases master: Release sushy 5.14.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100669507:25
opendevreviewRiccardo Pittau proposed openstack/releases master: Release networking-generic-switch 10.2.0 for indri  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100892307:28
*** bauzas67 is now known as bauzas08:38
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/releases master: Release Hibiscus rc1 for kolla-ansible/ansible-collection-kolla  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100900309:05
iurygregory_release cores in case you have some time today https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1006695 13:12
elodille1iurygregory_: looking14:00
iurygregory_tks!14:01
elodille1iurygregory_: quick question: is that intentional that the hash is not the tip of the branch?14:04
iurygregory_elodille1, humm at that time we created the patch I think it was the tip of the branch...14:05
iurygregory_rpittau, do you want to bump the sushy hash? I would say we are ok without bumping to the tip of the branch so we can bump sushy version and Jacob can continue the work14:06
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-observabilityclient 1.5.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100669814:10
rpittauiurygregory_ elodille1 no  need to bump the hash, we can proceed with the release14:19
iurygregory_++14:20
*** elodille1 is now known as elodilles14:23
elodillesthanks, +2+W'd it o/14:26
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Release sushy 5.14.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100669514:39
iurygregory_tks elodilles !16:32
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/releases master: pbr 7.1.3  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/100908516:38
fungia second set of release manager eyeballs on ^ would be good just so we have additional awareness that the setup.cfg/setup.py removal support experiment is moving forward again16:42
tkajinamdoes anyone know who maintains https://www.openstack.org/software/openstack-hibiscus/ ? I assume it is manged by foundation but I could be wrong.17:30
tkajinamcontext: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/KEOML3MB7IXC4OSZCVLXPNNCRE5SWIVX/17:30
fungitkajinam: i think Clark[m] is about to reply to them saying they've been added17:37
tkajinamah, ok.17:38
fungithe list is, as you suspected, built from a list of people who did things during the development cycle that would qualify them officially for "active contributor" rights per the openstack tc charter's definition, which doesn't include people solely listed in co-authored-by commit message trailers, but we can be flexible17:38
fungiespecially since this looks like it was implemented by a student group at a university and i really, really want to do whatever we can to encourage more of that17:39
tkajinamyeah I totally agree17:41
tkajinamClark[m], thanks for the update !17:44
Clark[m]All I did was pass the info along, but yes I think its good to encourage more contribution if we can18:04

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!