| frickler | do we have some reference as to how this process is handled? 2025.1 is going eom very soon, not sure whether that would be worth the effort. also as a minimum requirement I think we would need to be able to create a stable branch for every open release, we must not introduce gaps | 07:15 |
|---|---|---|
| elodilles | yes, we had the problem a couple of cycles ago with some oslo libs :/ and the only thing (i remember) we did was to moved them back to cwi, but we didn't cut stable branches, afair | 07:32 |
| *** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel | 08:04 | |
| tkajinam | it's ok that we do not create branches for older releases, especially older than 2026.2 . | 10:11 |
| tkajinam | maybe we can at least move 2027.1 to cwi model, and revisit older branches when we actually need these | 10:12 |
| frickler | ack | 10:54 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/releases master: tooz 9.2.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010145 | 11:23 |
| *** haleyb|out is now known as haleyb | 12:55 | |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/releases master: data: Use boolean values for series_status slurp field https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1006110 | 13:43 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/releases master: data: Encode supported Python versions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/993557 | 13:43 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Move back tooz to the CWI model https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010039 | 14:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!