| *** elodilles_pto is now known as elodilles | 07:01 | |
| opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/releases master: Create watcher 14.1.3, 15.1.3, 16.0.3, 17.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1012892 | 08:13 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/releases master: [watcher] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010956 | 08:13 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [ironic] Final release of stable/2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1012791 | 10:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: tooz 9.2.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010145 | 12:36 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release virtualbmc 3.4.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1012868 | 12:36 |
| opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/releases master: Create watcher 14.2.0, 15.1.3, 16.0.3, 17.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1012892 | 12:50 |
| opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/releases master: [watcher] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010956 | 12:50 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Create watcher 14.2.0, 15.1.3, 16.0.3, 17.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1012892 | 13:38 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/releases master: [cinder] Final Epoxy release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1012738 | 14:26 |
| opendevreview | Jeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: keystonemiddleware: OSSA-2026-050 stable releases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1013045 | 14:36 |
| elodilles | fyi, i'm planning to start merging the Epoxy transition patches today, where it is possible (more than ~half have PTL-Approved+1 and can be merged i think). i'll double check the hashes before merging, of course. | 14:45 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cinder] Final Epoxy release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1012738 | 14:47 |
| elodilles | and then run the script to abandon open patches on the closed stable/2025.1 branches + if i'll get there, then i'll start the branch deletion as well... (if i run out of time, then i'll do that on Monday. we'll see) | 14:48 |
| fungi | elodilles: this batch is just the services essentially, not libs yet, right? | 14:48 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/releases master: [cinder] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010953 | 14:48 |
| elodilles | fungi: libs + services as well. everything, basically. why? | 14:49 |
| fungi | oh, i didn't see one specifically for keystonemiddleware, but i just pushed a change to tag 2025.1 with a new security release | 14:49 |
| elodilles | fungi: this is the patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010955 | 14:50 |
| elodilles | i saw your release and plan to review that ASAP o:) | 14:50 |
| fungi | i wasn't originally going to include it in the advisory, but since the stable branch was still open yesterday i went ahead and covered it | 14:50 |
| elodilles | fungi: no problem | 14:51 |
| elodilles | will wait for that to merge | 14:51 |
| elodilles | i just hope we haven't introduce any regression with these late releases on stable/2025.1 o:) | 14:52 |
| elodilles | (...as we won't have a 2nd chance to release if there is any regression... :X) | 14:52 |
| fungi | yeah, me too | 14:52 |
| elodilles | but anyway, beyond official releases, folks can do downstream releases from unmaintained/2025.1 if they need... | 14:53 |
| elodilles | fungi: i've commented on the keystonemiddleware release patch, can you please take a look? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1013045 | 15:06 |
| fungi | checking | 15:06 |
| fungi | elodilles: i'm good with switching to minor increases if keystone folks are | 15:09 |
| elodilles | fungi: ACK. i think it's a bit better to highlight a bit more the default value change to operators as this upgrade can have impact on them as far as i understand | 15:49 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [venus] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010968 | 16:19 |
| elodilles | release-team: we have a tag-release job failure, it's on an inactive project (venus). it seems that bot could not push 'create-2025.1' patches to it on the new unmaintained/2025.1 branch: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/97548728166443729749f5984e6b9fb7/log/job-output.txt#2066 | 16:36 |
| elodilles | i guess this is only an issue because of the inactivity, right? O.o | 16:37 |
| fungi | i'll double-check | 16:37 |
| elodilles | (the 2025.1-eom tag and the unmaintained/2025.1 branching was successful, fwiw) | 16:38 |
| fungi | venus was retired 2026-06-02 | 16:39 |
| fungi | looks like it did not get stable branches after 2025.2 but the stable/2025.1 to unmaintained/2025.1 migration shouldn't need them | 16:41 |
| elodilles | the last release was done for 2025.2 Flamingo | 16:41 |
| fungi | yeah, so the repository in gerrit uses the openstack "retired" acl | 16:43 |
| fungi | https://opendev.org/openstack/project-config/src/branch/master/gerrit/acls/openstack/retired.config | 16:44 |
| fungi | that also inherits some permissions and settings from https://opendev.org/openstack/project-config/src/branch/master/gerrit/acls/openstack/meta-config.config | 16:45 |
| fungi | "You need 'Create Change' rights to upload code review requests." is the hint in the gerrit output | 16:46 |
| elodilles | +1 | 16:46 |
| fungi | maybe we should confirm with the tc to give the release managers group permissions in the retired acl, to allow closing down old branches? | 16:47 |
| fungi | either that, or we skip these tasks for retired repositories | 16:48 |
| elodilles | fungi: note that the tagging and branch creation was successful. the script / bot wanted to push the create-2025.1 patch to change 'defaultbranch=stable/2025.1' to 'defaultbranch=unmaintained/2025.1'. | 16:50 |
| fungi | yeah, which the acl doesn't currently allow for groups the release bot account is in | 16:50 |
| elodilles | and i wonder if folks want to push bug fixes to a retired but open project's stable branch (e.g. stable/2025.2 in this case) then it is possible or not. (should it be possible?) | 16:50 |
| fungi | i think we should clarify with the tc, but probably they don't expect stable branches for retired projects to transition to unmaintained at all? | 16:51 |
| fungi | i can get it on their meeting agenda for tuesday | 16:52 |
| elodilles | maybe frickler remembers as he was always objecting to do this o:) | 16:52 |
| elodilles | fungi: ACK, thanks o/ | 16:52 |
| elodilles | anyway, this time it was only venus project | 16:53 |
| fungi | https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20230724-unmaintained-branches.html doesn't make reference to retired projects/deliverables, fwiw | 16:53 |
| elodilles | i think there is no other inactive project | 16:53 |
| fungi | well, venus isn't inactive, it's retired | 16:54 |
| fungi | the error was due to the specific acl which gets applied to retired projects | 16:54 |
| elodilles | oh, sorry, retired, yes o:) | 16:54 |
| elodilles | anyway, then i'm confident in continuing checking and approving the transition patches | 16:56 |
| elodilles | o:) | 16:56 |
| fungi | empirically speaking, the acl says that retired projects aren't expected to receive new changes on any branch, so creating unmaintained branches for them does seem pointless. maybe for clarity all remaining branches of a retired project should transition to eol at retirement, but that could get in the way of resurrecting a retired project too, which is why it would be good | 16:57 |
| fungi | to get clear guidance from the tc on expectations | 16:57 |
| elodilles | +1 | 16:59 |
| elodilles | i do remember that in the past frickler suggested to move retired projects to EOL rather than moving to Unmaintained and we created EOL patches for them instead. but i forgot about that :( now the memories have started to come back... late.... :/ | 17:01 |
| elodilles | also, there are release-job-failures coming for x/networking-mlnx but i haven't checked the reason. note, that they are out of release team scope. jovial doing manual tagging as far as i understand, which triggers the jobs, but something is not setup correctly for them either :/ | 17:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [adjutant] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010965 | 17:14 |
| elodilles | okay, tag-release job succeeded for this patch ^^^ and the patches are pushed by the script: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:create-2025.1+branch:unmaintained/2025.1 | 17:23 |
| elodilles | so it's safe to continue | 17:23 |
| opendevreview | Jeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: keystonemiddleware: OSSA-2026-050 stable releases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1013045 | 17:32 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [blazar] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010971 | 17:35 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [zun] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010928 | 17:35 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [storlets] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010935 | 17:37 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [tacker] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010969 | 17:39 |
| fungi | elodilles: gtema okayed the update to 1013045 now | 17:41 |
| elodilles | fungi: ack, thanks, will process that as well o/ | 17:41 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [zaqar] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010941 | 17:43 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [skyline] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010932 | 17:43 |
| elodilles | fungi: this is just a heads-up, that there was a job failure the day before yesterday, it's probably a temporary infra issue: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010926/2#message-1c24a5a23cf0a1f2b019f64f063cfe575488dca0 | 17:46 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [heat] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010947 | 17:47 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cyborg] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010931 | 17:47 |
| fungi | elodilles: thanks, `fatal: failed to iterate over '/opt/git/opendev.org/openstack/octavia-lib/.git/objects/'` looks like the first hint of a problem there? | 17:50 |
| fungi | and on the other job, `warning: error reading directory '/opt/git/opendev.org/openstack/octavia-lib/.git/objects/4f/': Bad message` | 17:52 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [mistral] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010930 | 17:52 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cinder] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010953 | 17:53 |
| elodilles | i guess octavia-lib was not properly available under /opt/git/opendev.org, some syncing issue? O.o | 17:53 |
| fungi | i wonder if we have a corrupt openstack/octavia-lib git repository on one of the zuul executors | 17:53 |
| fungi | or in the prepopulated cache on our test node images | 17:54 |
| elodilles | i remember you found one some time ago, didn't you? :-o | 17:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [watcher] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010956 | 17:54 |
| Clark[m] | //opt/git is the cache | 17:55 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [ironic] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010939 | 17:56 |
| fungi | Clark[m]: good point, so that's not what would have been pushed from the executor's cache | 17:56 |
| fungi | sounds more likely to be baked into the test node image then | 17:56 |
| elodilles | just a note, that the clone succeded some time after, when the patch was rechecked | 17:57 |
| elodilles | so it was a temporary issue | 17:57 |
| Clark[m] | Ya it's probably specific to that image in that region. Last time this happened I think we booted a node manually there and confirmed the broken repo | 17:58 |
| Clark[m] | Then we deleted the image(s) | 17:58 |
| fungi | both ran on ubuntu-noble-8GB in raxflex-sjc3 | 17:58 |
| fungi | so could be a corrupt upload to that one region, right | 17:58 |
| Clark[m] | I think we decided last time this was a cloud software but not something we did. Anyone know the folks building Openstack software? :P | 17:58 |
| fungi | i've met an openstack developer once | 17:59 |
| elodilles | :D | 17:59 |
| elodilles | maybe if we could get some logs we could open a bug to them o:) | 18:13 |
| elodilles | but now i need to go AFK :S | 18:14 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [octavia] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010926 | 18:15 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [nova] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010924 | 18:15 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [designate] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010959 | 18:15 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [swift] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010961 | 18:15 |
| opendevreview | Jeremy Stanley proposed openstack/releases master: keystonemiddleware: OSSA-2026-050 stable releases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1013045 | 18:18 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [oslo] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010927 | 18:22 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [neutron] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010944 | 18:22 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [Telemetry] Transition 2025.1 Epoxy to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1010948 | 18:22 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!