| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible Epoxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/967169 | 09:21 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible Dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/967170 | 09:23 |
| noonedeadpunk | hey folks. I was wondering on what to do with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/966298 | 09:24 |
| noonedeadpunk | should we instead just do a normal release of Caracal? | 09:24 |
| elodilles | noonedeadpunk: it wouldn't make any difference. the issue is that 2024.1 Caracal is marked as Unmaintained already. I haven't got there yet to add the exemption case to cycle-trailing typed deliverables in the validator | 09:53 |
| elodilles | the workaround we did previously a couple of times was to simply mark Caracal as active temporarily | 09:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | which kinda sucks, as this is a patch for roles. and then we need to merge some other change and propose for integrated repo | 10:20 |
| noonedeadpunk | but got it... | 10:20 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/releases master: EOL Kolla Antelope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/967217 | 13:51 |
| ttx | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Nov 14 14:00:05 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| ttx | Ping list: release-team elod | 14:00 |
| ttx | Agenda at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/gazpacho-relmgt-tracking#L86 | 14:00 |
| elodilles | o/ | 14:01 |
| ttx | Hi! | 14:01 |
| ttx | #topic Review R-20 task completion | 14:01 |
| ttx | - Ensure that all trailing projects have been branched for the previous series. (elod) | 14:01 |
| elodilles | so, i've run the script to check the state | 14:02 |
| elodilles | and kayobe and OSA were the projects that haven't released yet | 14:02 |
| elodilles | i did not propose release patches but pinged the PTLs and they confirmed that they are working on the releases | 14:03 |
| ttx | should we add a task to cheeck on them in a coming week? | 14:03 |
| elodilles | yes, maybe that's OK | 14:04 |
| ttx | ok task added | 14:05 |
| ttx | - Propose autoreleases for cycle-with-intermediary libraries which did not release since the previous release. (elod) | 14:05 |
| elodilles | we have a task on R-17 about the final release patches, but probably would be better to have the RC1 and stable/2025.1 branch cuts prior that | 14:05 |
| elodilles | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:gazpacho-milestone-1 | 14:05 |
| elodilles | the release patches ^^^ | 14:05 |
| elodilles | around 1/3rd have landed already | 14:06 |
| elodilles | we have 2 requests to wait for some patches to merge | 14:06 |
| ttx | Should we post a message on them saying we'll approve them Monday if nobody says -1 | 14:06 |
| elodilles | question is whether we want to force-release the rest, or should we just abandon them | 14:06 |
| ttx | oh right, milestone-1 | 14:07 |
| ttx | probably simpler to drop them | 14:07 |
| ttx | teach them a lesson! | 14:07 |
| elodilles | :) | 14:07 |
| ttx | Let's abandon them with "no feedback from release liaison, abandoned" | 14:08 |
| elodilles | most of the release patches don't have serious content, to be honest | 14:08 |
| ttx | (on Monday) | 14:08 |
| elodilles | though we have already caught some breaking release: oslo.service made heat code to break o:) | 14:08 |
| ttx | I can add a task for that | 14:08 |
| elodilles | +1 | 14:09 |
| ttx | - Catch if there are acl issues in newly created repositories (ttx) | 14:10 |
| ttx | no issues found | 14:10 |
| ttx | - Send weekly email (ttx) | 14:10 |
| elodilles | \o/ | 14:10 |
| ttx | to be done shortly | 14:10 |
| fungi | we haven't been creating that many new repos in openstack lately | 14:10 |
| ttx | #topic Assign R-19 and R-17 week tasks | 14:11 |
| ttx | I think they are all assigned | 14:11 |
| ttx | #topic Review weekly countdown email | 14:11 |
| ttx | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:11 |
| * elodilles clicks | 14:11 | |
| elodilles | LGTM | 14:13 |
| ttx | Will send when meeting ends | 14:13 |
| ttx | #topic Open Discussion | 14:13 |
| ttx | Anything to cover? | 14:14 |
| ttx | going once... | 14:15 |
| elodilles | maybe worth to mention the cycle-trailing projects' transitioning issue: OSA is about to move its stable/2024.1 to Unmaintained | 14:15 |
| ttx | how is that an issue? | 14:16 |
| elodilles | yepp, validator does not allow that to happen | 14:16 |
| elodilles | and last cycles we did the workaround to mark the Unmaintained/EOL'd series as 'open' temporarily | 14:16 |
| elodilles | but i promised to adapt the code of the validator | 14:16 |
| elodilles | just haven't proposed a solution yet | 14:17 |
| ttx | we can do the workaround again, I guess... | 14:17 |
| elodilles | the problem is that makes it uncomfortable to OSA is that it has to branch OSA-roles first, | 14:17 |
| fungi | what's missing for validation there? | 14:17 |
| elodilles | then do another release of OSA project itself | 14:18 |
| fungi | ah, ordering of repos in the transition i guess | 14:18 |
| elodilles | fungi: not missing, but the validator does not allow to release anything beyond 'stable' | 14:18 |
| fungi | oh it's that they need a tag on unmaintained? | 14:18 |
| fungi | that's definitely a little weird | 14:19 |
| elodilles | fungi: cycle-trailing projects do their releases after everything else got released, this is their request, which completely makes sense, | 14:19 |
| elodilles | and the same applies when we move to Um/EOL | 14:19 |
| elodilles | relmgt granted the exception to them, so that they can prepare their final releases AFTER everything else have branched | 14:20 |
| fungi | maybe i'm misunderstanding. they want to tag releases on unmaintained/2024.1, or they still have stable/2024.1 and want to release on that after the eom deadline? | 14:21 |
| elodilles | but we don't want to keep e.g. 2024.1 Caracal to linger weeks as 'maintained' while it is already unmaintained | 14:21 |
| elodilles | fungi: they still have stable/2024.1 | 14:21 |
| fungi | okay, that makes more sense, thanks | 14:21 |
| elodilles | this is how we did that in the last couple of cycles | 14:21 |
| elodilles | anyway, it's just a heads up, that i'm planning to propose a patch for that, | 14:22 |
| fungi | so the exception would be for releasing past the deadline, not releasing from an unmaintained/* branch | 14:22 |
| elodilles | and if we running out of time, then we have to do the workaround :/ | 14:22 |
| elodilles | fungi: yes: to allow cycle-trailing modelled projects to release in Unmaintained state from their stable branch | 14:23 |
| ttx | ok... anything else? | 14:23 |
| elodilles | ttx: nothing else from me | 14:23 |
| fungi | and policy-wise it seems fine that cycle-trailing projects could have a later deadline for eom transition too, the release tooling just doesn't support that yet | 14:23 |
| elodilles | fungi: exactly | 14:24 |
| ttx | ok then... | 14:24 |
| ttx | have a great weekend! | 14:24 |
| elodilles | same to you o/ | 14:24 |
| fungi | you too! | 14:24 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Nov 14 14:24:34 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-11-14-14.00.html | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-11-14-14.00.txt | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-11-14-14.00.log.html | 14:24 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/releases master: Kayobe 2025.2 Flamingo RC1 and stable branch cut https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/967224 | 16:50 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Add stephenfin as release liaison for sdk deliveries https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/966415 | 16:52 |
| mnasiadka | elodilles: 967224 waiting :) | 17:04 |
| *** tmazur_ is now known as tmazur | 21:27 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!