| *** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 08:37 | |
| *** notmyname has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 09:03 | |
| notmyname | wow we have a lot of channels ;-) | 09:03 |
|---|---|---|
| ttx | that one is new. | 09:03 |
| ttx | It's so that 1:1s can be found in the logs. #openstack-dev can be kind of noisy | 09:03 |
| notmyname | this make 12 that I'm in. probably even more for you | 09:03 |
| notmyname | sure | 09:03 |
| ttx | so, let me catch up with the state of things | 09:04 |
| ttx | 1.11.0 is out, we have a tentative 1.12.0 | 09:04 |
| notmyname | (was that a question or are you about to give a summary?) | 09:04 |
| notmyname | what do you mean by tentative 1.12? | 09:04 |
| ttx | wrong word | 09:05 |
| ttx | a "potential" 1.12.0 if that number still makes sense when you want to release | 09:05 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.12.0 | 09:05 |
| notmyname | ah, gotcha | 09:05 |
| notmyname | yes, the next release will be 1.12.0 | 09:05 |
| ttx | you might want to move a fex next-icehouse targets to 1.12.0 to match your current plans | 09:06 |
| ttx | few* | 09:06 |
| ttx | (from https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/next-icehouse) | 09:06 |
| notmyname | actually, I think most of them will stay | 09:06 |
| notmyname | here's what I'm thinking. we've got a significant patch (ie blocking some other work) nearly done. it's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51228/ and part of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/cluster-federation | 09:07 |
| notmyname | when that patch lands, I'll want to think about cutting a 1.12 release | 09:07 |
| notmyname | so as far as timeframes go, that probably means "in the next few weeks" | 09:07 |
| notmyname | as we get that patch in and get the swiftclient blueprint done and potentially a patch that is blocked by patch 51228 | 09:08 |
| ttx | ok | 09:08 |
| notmyname | next week we've got an in-person meeting of several people to specifically work on storage policies. I expect major progress to come from that | 09:09 |
| notmyname | but that's a bigger picture icehouse thing rather than 1.12 | 09:10 |
| ttx | ok, I understand | 09:10 |
| ttx | I'll put a ETA in ~2 weeks for 1.12.0 as a rough indication | 09:10 |
| notmyname | kk | 09:11 |
| notmyname | we're having our first team meeting since before christmas on wednesday at 1900utc | 09:11 |
| notmyname | (it will be 3am for me, ugh) | 09:11 |
| notmyname | but that should help give a better picture for everyone on what's going on | 09:11 |
| ttx | ok, we'll refine next week | 09:11 |
| notmyname | anything from your side? | 09:12 |
| ttx | checking | 09:12 |
| ttx | nope, I'm good | 09:13 |
| notmyname | I won't be at the team meeting (really bad timing for this part of the world) | 09:13 |
| notmyname | this == australia | 09:13 |
| ttx | sure. I don't expect that much discussion today, with everyone just starting over | 09:15 |
| notmyname | ok, good to know | 09:16 |
| ttx | ok, that's all I had. Have a good time at LCA | 09:19 |
| notmyname | thanks :-) | 09:22 |
| *** SergeyLukjanov is now known as _SergeyLukjanov | 09:47 | |
| *** _SergeyLukjanov is now known as SergeyLukjanov | 10:07 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC | 11:44 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:14 | |
| *** dhellmann has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:52 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:00 | |
| markmcclain | ttx: ready? | 13:04 |
| ttx | sorry about that | 13:09 |
| ttx | lunch dragged late | 13:09 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 13:10 |
| ttx | markmcclain: still around ? | 13:10 |
| markmcclain | yep | 13:10 |
| ttx | so... 2 weeks left | 13:10 |
| ttx | A bit concerned with stuff still marked "not started" | 13:11 |
| markmcclain | yeah… same here | 13:11 |
| markmcclain | it is med level, so if it gets pushed back to i-3 we'll be ok | 13:12 |
| ttx | for the >Low that would be l3-metering-api-ext l3-metering-mgnt-ext vif-attribute-for-hairpinning | 13:12 |
| ttx | sure, if it's still not started by next week I think we should move it to i-3 proactively | 13:12 |
| markmcclain | ok | 13:12 |
| ttx | otherwise you have 51% done or in review (for the >Low), which looks good | 13:13 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/config-plugin-by-name is being proposed to i-2 and not triaged yet | 13:13 |
| markmcclain | yeah that dropped in last Friday and I need to review the proposal because it was completely new for me | 13:13 |
| ttx | ok | 13:14 |
| ttx | also a few weird dependencies we should talk about | 13:14 |
| markmcclain | yeah most of the IPv6 are parented wrong | 13:14 |
| ttx | dnsmasq-ipv6-slaac depends on neutronclient-support-dnsmasq-mode-keyword (no milestone) and dnsmasq-bind-into-qrouter-namespace (i-3) | 13:14 |
| markmcclain | because that should be the master bp | 13:14 |
| ttx | ok so dnsmasq-mode-keyword vif-attribute-for-hairpinning and ipv6-provider-nets-slaac should be prerequisites of ipv6-parity rather than the other way around ? | 13:15 |
| markmcclain | right | 13:15 |
| ttx | ok, will fix that for you, don't worry about it | 13:15 |
| markmcclain | I'll get that subteam to clean up the dep | 13:16 |
| ttx | nah, will do it | 13:16 |
| markmcclain | ok thanks | 13:16 |
| ttx | if you can sort out the dnsmasq ones though that would be great | 13:16 |
| markmcclain | client is changes to neutronclient, so not sure how we want to do it | 13:16 |
| markmcclain | because the proper milestone for it would be the uncreated 3.3.4 milestone | 13:16 |
| markmcclain | I'll sort out dnsmasq | 13:17 |
| ttx | bug list is ambitious but looks good | 13:17 |
| ttx | will refine it next week | 13:17 |
| ttx | at the meeting today we'll discuss nova-network deprecation | 13:17 |
| markmcclain | yeah.. with nearly everyone gone for the last two weeks | 13:17 |
| ttx | since that was raised in a thread recently | 13:18 |
| ttx | and now is a good moment to discuss the status | 13:18 |
| markmcclain | ok sounds good | 13:18 |
| ttx | anything else you want to see discussed ? | 13:18 |
| markmcclain | not right now | 13:18 |
| ttx | ok, cool | 13:18 |
| ttx | that's all I had | 13:18 |
| ttx | sorry for being late | 13:18 |
| ttx | dhellmann: around ? | 13:18 |
| markmcclain | no worries | 13:19 |
| dhellmann | here | 13:19 |
| ttx | awesome | 13:19 |
| ttx | looking at https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/icehouse-2 and https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 13:19 |
| ttx | status looks coherent | 13:19 |
| ttx | the not started is being a bit worrisome | 13:20 |
| dhellmann | I just finished updating the bug list for oslo a few minutes ago :-) | 13:20 |
| ttx | improve-config-discovery-for-docs | 13:20 |
| ttx | improve-update-script | 13:20 |
| dhellmann | yeah, that one is on me | 13:20 |
| dhellmann | I should probably just move that to i-3 | 13:20 |
| dhellmann | the update script is flavio, and he said to move it if he hasn't started by next week so I'm going to give him that time | 13:20 |
| ttx | if you think it can be proposed this week, you can keep it in | 13:20 |
| dhellmann | ok, I moved mine | 13:21 |
| ttx | odiscuss with flavio about the other one | 13:21 |
| ttx | otherwise 55% done/inprogress | 13:22 |
| ttx | err | 13:22 |
| ttx | 55% done/underreview | 13:22 |
| ttx | which is good | 13:22 |
| ttx | oslo.messaging looks in good shape | 13:22 |
| dhellmann | I need to scan the bug list and make sure those are up to date | 13:23 |
| ttx | one dep issue in oslo.messaging: trusted-messaging (High, markmc, icehouse-2) depends on key-distribution-server (Medium, jamielennox, icehouse-2) | 13:23 |
| ttx | priority is mismatched | 13:23 |
| dhellmann | I haven't figured out how to query launchpad for committed bugs without a milestone | 13:23 |
| ttx | the two bugs in https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/icehouse-2 should have an assignee | 13:23 |
| ttx | otherwise I doubt they will get in in time :) | 13:23 |
| dhellmann | heh, yeah | 13:23 |
| ttx | dhellmann: you'll adjust prio on the mismatch above ? | 13:24 |
| dhellmann | yes | 13:24 |
| ttx | ok, that's all I had, then | 13:24 |
| ttx | anything you want to discuss at meeting later ? | 13:24 |
| dhellmann | not this week | 13:24 |
| ttx | cool. nova-network deprecation should keep us busy anyway ;à | 13:25 |
| ttx | ;) even | 13:25 |
| * ttx grabs coffee before talking to jd | 13:25 | |
| dhellmann | :-) | 13:25 |
| ttx | dhellmann: thx! | 13:25 |
| dhellmann | thanks, ttx | 13:25 |
| *** jd__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:35 | |
| jd__ | knock knock | 13:35 |
| ttx | jd__: hola! | 13:35 |
| ttx | so, 2 weeks left and not much progress so far | 13:36 |
| jd__ | holidays, boss | 13:36 |
| ttx | I'm especially concerned with the not started | 13:36 |
| ttx | exclude-low-sample-count rates-derived-from-cumulative time-constrained-alarms | 13:36 |
| jd__ | I'd need to check with eglynn | 13:37 |
| jd__ | our meeting is tomorrow evening | 13:37 |
| ttx | if they are still not started by next week we'll probably have to postpone them | 13:37 |
| ttx | but overall progress is not really better (only 11% done/under-review) | 13:37 |
| jd__ | I'm afraid of that too | 13:37 |
| ttx | so it would be good to get as much code proposed this week as possible | 13:38 |
| ttx | otherwise there will be a review bottleneck next week | 13:38 |
| ttx | time to finally digest all the foie gras and be back on track | 13:38 |
| jd__ | I'll pass the word | 13:38 |
| ttx | replace-rpc-cast-with-notifications is marked "blocked". Could you elaborate ? | 13:39 |
| ttx | waiting on oslo.messaging switch ? | 13:40 |
| jd__ | it depends on the oslo.messaging one | 13:40 |
| ttx | ok | 13:40 |
| jd__ | yep | 13:40 |
| jd__ | so very likely to be postponed | 13:40 |
| ttx | if we don't need to discuss it to unblock it, then maybe mark it slow progress instead | 13:40 |
| jd__ | ack | 13:40 |
| ttx | i use 'blocked' as "need to be discussed at meeting to be unblocked" | 13:40 |
| jd__ | fair enough, changed it :) | 13:41 |
| ttx | your bug list sounds reasonable | 13:41 |
| ttx | anything you want to see discussed at the meeting today ? | 13:41 |
| jd__ | nop | 13:41 |
| ttx | ok then. Plenty of work to get code proposed, so i won't interfere any more :) | 13:42 |
| ttx | talk to you at the meeting later | 13:42 |
| jd__ | see ya! :) | 13:42 |
| *** jgriffith has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:54 | |
| jgriffith | ttx: hello | 13:54 |
| ttx | jgriffith: welcome ! https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 13:54 |
| ttx | jgriffith: i fixed a few status (started/notstarted) | 13:55 |
| ttx | what's the staus for cinder-backup-recover-api ? still not started ? | 13:55 |
| ttx | (only two weeks left!) | 13:55 |
| jgriffith | ttx: that one is started | 13:56 |
| jgriffith | I'll sort out that | 13:56 |
| ttx | ok, updating | 13:56 |
| jgriffith | The last 4 items are new | 13:56 |
| jgriffith | I'll likely remove them | 13:56 |
| ttx | ok, don't care that much about Lows | 13:56 |
| jgriffith | ahh.. ok | 13:56 |
| ttx | more concerned about code gettign proposed on the medium and above | 13:57 |
| jgriffith | I'll just deal with tem separte | 13:57 |
| jgriffith | I'll check with Ronen | 13:57 |
| ttx | only 33% done or under review so far, you need to get code proposed asap to avoid review bottlenecks next week | 13:57 |
| jgriffith | I thought he started but there was some discussion (mostly from me) about the direction | 13:57 |
| jgriffith | Yes things aren't moving | 13:58 |
| jgriffith | I'll try and get some motivation or removing things | 13:58 |
| jgriffith | ie get other motiviated | 13:58 |
| ttx | ok, I see the last 4 you were mentioning | 13:58 |
| ttx | yes, you should triage them | 13:59 |
| ttx | like, accept them for i-3 or remove them, unless code is ready | 13:59 |
| *** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_ | 13:59 | |
| jgriffith | ttx: this is the first I've seen them so remove for now | 14:00 |
| ttx | jgriffith: the prophetstore guys told me they sent you an email about those a few weeks ago | 14:00 |
| jgriffith | ttx: they probably did and I forgot | 14:00 |
| ttx | so maybe check if they have code ready, one never knows | 14:00 |
| jgriffith | yep | 14:01 |
| jgriffith | marking them I3 for now | 14:01 |
| jgriffith | I'll update if they're ready | 14:01 |
| ttx | bug list looks optimistic but otherwsie good. We'll trim it next week | 14:01 |
| ttx | at this point I'd say it's urgent to get more code proposed to avoid a big bottleneck next week | 14:01 |
| jgriffith | ttx: well, to be fair we've had a bottle neck all along this time | 14:02 |
| jgriffith | ttx: so I'm not sure how much good it will do | 14:02 |
| jgriffith | but I understand what you're saying | 14:02 |
| ttx | at this point if you wat to land stuff it's good to have about 50% proposed | 14:02 |
| ttx | and you're at 33%. Not too bad, but still needing some extra push | 14:03 |
| jgriffith | ttx: we'll work on it and I"ll adjust what I can | 14:03 |
| ttx | any topic you'd like to see discussed at meeting today ? | 14:03 |
| jgriffith | 1. gate stability | 14:03 |
| jgriffith | Where are we at, is it time to think "differently" on how we're doing things | 14:03 |
| jgriffith | 2. brick-library | 14:04 |
| ttx | ok, adding both to agenda | 14:04 |
| jgriffith | doesn't necessarily need to be part of TC meeting but I"ll need to talk to you and some other keys folks at some point | 14:04 |
| jgriffith | ok | 14:04 |
| jgriffith | sounds good | 14:04 |
| ttx | it's for the release meeting, not the TC one | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | ttx: bahh... | 14:05 |
| ttx | though you can mention them in open discussion at TC meeting too :) | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | ttx: then yeah that's actually likely appropriate | 14:05 |
| ttx | added | 14:05 |
| ttx | see you there | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | Oh! | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | Hold on | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | You may not | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | project update webinar... checking time | 14:05 |
| * ttx HOLDS | 14:06 | |
| jgriffith | I should be done in time | 14:06 |
| ttx | ok :) | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | 15:00 Eastern | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | is the webinar | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | Ok.. seeya later today | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | thanks | 14:06 |
| ttx | goes after the nova-network deprecation discussion anyway | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | haah | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | we'll cover it next week :) | 14:07 |
| ttx | should take a fair amount of time :) | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | indeed | 14:07 |
| ttx | ok, thxc | 14:07 |
| jd__ | jgriffith: 15:00 the webinar? | 14:08 |
| jgriffith | jd__: 15:00 Eastern yes | 14:09 |
| jd__ | I think it's 10:00 Eastern, like in an hour no? | 14:09 |
| jd__ | http://openstack.enterthemeeting.com/m/4BC36YZQ | 14:09 |
| jgriffith | jd__: yup | 14:10 |
| jgriffith | jd__: you're correct | 14:10 |
| jgriffith | thank you! | 14:10 |
| jd__ | aaahh | 14:10 |
| jd__ | you scared me for one sec :) | 14:10 |
| jgriffith | I looked at Thursdays | 14:10 |
| jd__ | ah right :) | 14:10 |
| jgriffith | :) | 14:10 |
| *** dolphm has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:01 | |
| dolphm | o/ | 15:01 |
| ttx | hola | 15:02 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 15:02 |
| ttx | 2 weeks left! | 15:02 |
| ttx | main concern is the "not started" stuff | 15:02 |
| ttx | esp. service-scoped-tokens | 15:02 |
| ttx | and to a lesser extent saml-id | 15:03 |
| ttx | still likely to make it in two short weeks ? | 15:03 |
| dolphm | ooh, saml-id is in progress | 15:03 |
| dolphm | service-scoped-tokens will likely slip to j* | 15:03 |
| ttx | ok, please update | 15:03 |
| dolphm | i'd like to give it another week or so for consideration in icehouse though | 15:04 |
| ttx | ok | 15:04 |
| ttx | second concern is not that much code in "needs code review" status yet | 15:04 |
| ttx | so expecting some bottleneck next week | 15:04 |
| ttx | propose early, review often | 15:05 |
| dolphm | there's a lot of things in review, but i don't think anything is complete yet | 15:05 |
| ttx | in other news, keystone-manage-token-flush-periodically (Low, icehouse-2) has no assignee | 15:06 |
| ttx | since someone proposed code I suspect that's false | 15:06 |
| ttx | although code appears to be abandoned | 15:06 |
| dolphm | i can assign that one | 15:06 |
| dolphm | although i'm not sure it'll land... shardy had some valid questions about the approach | 15:07 |
| ttx | you can keep it in i2/low as long as it's assigned to someone and has at least /some/chance of getting in | 15:07 |
| ttx | targeted buglist is very reasonable | 15:07 |
| ttx | that's all I had | 15:08 |
| ttx | anything on your side ? | 15:08 |
| dolphm | i'm not caught up on bug reports from the holiday break, but i didn't see anything crazy | 15:08 |
| dolphm | i did want to ask about -core changes... | 15:08 |
| *** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann | 15:09 | |
| ttx | what about them? | 15:09 |
| dolphm | is there any sort of community policy / expectation on how changes to -core teams are made? | 15:09 |
| dolphm | i've followed the mailing list proposal approach before, but it's quite slow :P | 15:09 |
| ttx | the only ultimate rule is: the PTL decides. Some groups want to play nice and use metrics | 15:10 |
| dolphm | i'd like to knock a bunch of changes out during our #openstack-meeting that i've already discussed with the existing -core group | 15:10 |
| dolphm | cool -- that was the impression i was under, but didn't know how official it was | 15:10 |
| dolphm | that's all from me then! | 15:10 |
| ttx | there is also an informal rule about polling existing core membership with addition/removal proposals and have lazy consensus around those | 15:11 |
| ttx | but ultimately the "PTL has final say ovber project matters" rule prevails | 15:11 |
| ttx | anything specific you want to see discussed at meeting today ? | 15:11 |
| dolphm | nope | 15:11 |
| ttx | ok, see you there! | 15:11 |
| dolphm | o/ | 15:12 |
| *** russellb has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:16 | |
| ttx | russellb: o/ | 15:17 |
| russellb | o/ | 15:17 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 15:17 |
| russellb | not much marked implemented :-/ | 15:17 |
| ttx | so it looks like your Bp validation exervise turned into a "everything is low" result :) | 15:17 |
| russellb | yes. | 15:17 |
| russellb | definitely happy with the team effort on reviewing them | 15:17 |
| russellb | the "core sponsor" idea has been a complete flop | 15:17 |
| ttx | heh | 15:18 |
| ttx | not totally surprising | 15:18 |
| ttx | goodidea but supposes a bit more discipline than we currently have | 15:18 |
| russellb | yeah, seems so | 15:18 |
| ttx | I hope that with proper tooling it might reduce the friction and make it more... relevant | 15:19 |
| russellb | the idea was to try to have a better picture of what we think we have time to review | 15:19 |
| ttx | anyway, just looking at >Low things don't look too bad | 15:19 |
| russellb | so not sure how to fix it ... but like you said, maybe a better tool would help | 15:19 |
| ttx | all started, 49% done or under review | 15:19 |
| russellb | couple more weeks, now that we're past holidays, i expect things to start moving faster | 15:20 |
| ttx | a lot of those Lows have code proposed too | 15:20 |
| ttx | the trick is to get them converted to "implemented" asap so that there is not too many bottlenecks next week | 15:20 |
| russellb | yeah | 15:21 |
| russellb | some of them may be | 15:21 |
| russellb | wish i had a script to check them all | 15:21 |
| russellb | so much clicking | 15:21 |
| ttx | also two critical bugs not targeted to i2: | 15:21 |
| ttx | * https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1254890 | 15:21 |
| ttx | * https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1266711 | 15:21 |
| russellb | 1266711 is in progress | 15:22 |
| russellb | triggered by an infra issue | 15:22 |
| ttx | yep, I would target it to i2 and assign to sahid | 15:22 |
| ttx | the other just needs someone to put their name on it, can be targeted to i2 as well | 15:22 |
| russellb | targeted | 15:23 |
| ttx | your i2 buglist is pretty massive and could use some trimming -- lots of bugs unassigned too | 15:23 |
| * ttx removes invalid ones | 15:23 | |
| ttx | maybe review it at next nova meeting | 15:24 |
| russellb | that sounds like a good idea | 15:24 |
| russellb | mostly gate bugs unassigned ... | 15:24 |
| russellb | not surprising | 15:24 |
| russellb | hard to get people to take on ownership of those | 15:24 |
| ttx | while we are in the "good ideas" department... fifieldt started a thread about nova-netwetwork deprecation.. since we said we would decide by i2 | 15:24 |
| russellb | well | 15:24 |
| ttx | so I scheduled that for discussion at meeting today | 15:24 |
| russellb | what i said was that we would revisit it *after* i2 | 15:25 |
| russellb | basically, giving until i2 for progress to be made, and then revisit it | 15:25 |
| russellb | or that was my plan | 15:25 |
| ttx | oh, ok. Doesn't mean we can't do an intermediary status update | 15:25 |
| russellb | for sure | 15:25 |
| ttx | put some pressure on :) | 15:25 |
| russellb | i'd love to have a better idea of how things are coming | 15:25 |
| ttx | agreed | 15:25 |
| russellb | i really don't want to un-freeze nova-network ... | 15:25 |
| russellb | but honestly, it's the right thing if neutron isn't ready | 15:26 |
| ttx | anything else you want to discuss at meeting today ? | 15:26 |
| russellb | that's the biggest one | 15:26 |
| ttx | ok ten. Biggest priority is in converting as many of those "code proposed" BPs into "implemented" early | 15:27 |
| ttx | then* | 15:27 |
| ttx | and fix the buglist so that it can actually be useful | 15:27 |
| russellb | ok, will pass that on to others, hope we can start getting some merged | 15:27 |
| ttx | russellb: anything else ? | 15:27 |
| russellb | nope | 15:28 |
| russellb | thanks! | 15:28 |
| ttx | russellb: talk to you later | 15:28 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:30 | |
| ttx | david-lyle: o/ | 15:30 |
| david-lyle | o/ | 15:30 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 15:31 |
| ttx | Question: django-1point6 "needs infrastructure", could you elaborate ? | 15:31 |
| david-lyle | ttx: looking, I didn't set that status | 15:32 |
| david-lyle | I think that's indicating that django-openstack-auth needs to be released and global requirements updated | 15:32 |
| ttx | david-lyle: ok, maybe "slow progress" would also reflect it well, unless you really depend on another's team work | 15:33 |
| ttx | david-lyle: you also have a lot of "Not started": are those all short enough to still be completeable in the next two weeks ? | 15:33 |
| david-lyle | do I have publishing ability for django-openstack-auth or do I need to contact the infra team for that | 15:33 |
| ttx | david-lyle: let me check | 15:34 |
| ttx | horizon-ptl has "push tag" on that repo | 15:34 |
| ttx | so you have publishing ability | 15:34 |
| david-lyle | ttx: I'll start pushing a lot of those to i-3, some are smaller, so I wanted to give them a chance, but I'll go ahead and move them and they can be pulled back in if they make it | 15:35 |
| ttx | err, except horizon-ptl is still gabriel | 15:35 |
| ttx | Ask infra to fix https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/146,members first | 15:35 |
| david-lyle | ttx: ack | 15:35 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/auto-login-after-password-changed needs to be triaged | 15:36 |
| ttx | (a priority set or BP should be removed) | 15:37 |
| david-lyle | ack, I think that one should go away | 15:37 |
| david-lyle | I'll take care of that | 15:38 |
| ttx | ceilometer-api-enhancements still depends on statistics-order-by-and-limit-for-grouped-query ? | 15:38 |
| david-lyle | argh, right | 15:38 |
| ttx | will let you fix it :) | 15:39 |
| ttx | finally you have a number of unassigned targeted bugs | 15:39 |
| ttx | I think if they are not assigned by next week we should postpone them | 15:40 |
| david-lyle | ttx: ok | 15:40 |
| ttx | that's all I had.. anything you want to see discussed at meeting today ? | 15:40 |
| david-lyle | no, I think we're set | 15:41 |
| ttx | ok then, see you at meeting later today | 15:41 |
| david-lyle | see you then | 15:41 |
| *** SergeyLukjanov is now known as _SergeyLukjanov | 16:10 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:34 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:41 | |
| ttx | markwash: o/ | 16:46 |
| markwash | ttx: good evening | 16:46 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 16:47 |
| ttx | err | 16:47 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 16:47 |
| markwash | it looks a little unreasonable right now | 16:47 |
| ttx | status looks mostly in sync | 16:47 |
| markwash | yes | 16:48 |
| ttx | vmware-datastore-storage-backend needs to be triaged | 16:48 |
| ttx | (priority set or moved out of milestone) | 16:48 |
| markwash | k sure thing | 16:48 |
| ttx | what worries me the most would be the "not started" stuff | 16:48 |
| ttx | esp. new-download-workflow | 16:48 |
| ttx | any chance that can still get completed over the next two weeks ? | 16:49 |
| markwash | that one is my most likely candidate to get bumped to I-3 | 16:49 |
| markwash | the other not-started is actually not up to date, it was just approved and has a patch up for review | 16:49 |
| markwash | I think | 16:49 |
| ttx | markwash: ok, we'll see next week, if it's still not started, we'll defer it | 16:50 |
| markwash | I"ll bring it up at the weekly meeting | 16:50 |
| ttx | otherwise it's generally late but not too bad | 16:50 |
| ttx | bug list looks curated enough | 16:50 |
| ttx | ideally you'd get as much in this week as you can, as I expect next week to be a bit busy | 16:51 |
| markwash | yeah, I guess the gate may become a blocker again | 16:51 |
| ttx | that's all I had... anything you want to see discussed at meeting later today ? | 16:51 |
| markwash | no I think I'm good | 16:51 |
| markwash | mentioning bug triage, though | 16:51 |
| markwash | are there any metrics about tracking how well we're doing with that? I feel like I've not done well with it in the past | 16:52 |
| markwash | just #new? | 16:52 |
| ttx | hmm | 16:52 |
| ttx | I may have a webnumbr somewhere for Glance | 16:52 |
| ttx | http://webnumbr.com/open-glance-bugs | 16:53 |
| ttx | dunno if that really helps though ;) | 16:53 |
| markwash | heh no worries | 16:54 |
| markwash | that's all from me, I guess I"ll see you at the meeting | 16:54 |
| ttx | ok then, ttyl | 16:54 |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC | 16:59 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
| *** hub_cap has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:03 | |
| hub_cap | hey sorry i missed this msg | 17:03 |
| ttx | hola | 17:04 |
| ttx | just a sec* | 17:04 |
| hub_cap | yessir | 17:04 |
| ttx | ok | 17:05 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 17:06 |
| hub_cap | heyp | 17:07 |
| ttx | hub_cap: is entrypoints-for-binscripts implemented now that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54225/ merged ? | 17:07 |
| hub_cap | nosir, this is the actual review for that | 17:07 |
| hub_cap | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64310/ | 17:07 |
| ttx | ok, cool | 17:07 |
| hub_cap | that was a dep that someone kinda randomly worked on | 17:07 |
| hub_cap | and i finished it hehe | 17:07 |
| ttx | you have two "not started" left | 17:07 |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:07 | |
| ttx | are those likely to get completed over the next two weeks ? | 17:08 |
| hub_cap | ya those are very low | 17:08 |
| hub_cap | i think the oslo.msging shoudl be doable | 17:08 |
| hub_cap | the other is a whole api thing that will require moree discussion then i think dan realizes hehe | 17:08 |
| ttx | there is a dep priority mismatch too: | 17:08 |
| ttx | configuration-management (High, cp16net, icehouse-2) depends on move-manager-to-datastore-version (Medium, cp16net, icehouse-2) | 17:08 |
| ttx | one of them should probably match the other | 17:09 |
| hub_cap | HA | 17:09 |
| hub_cap | ill lower config mgmt | 17:09 |
| hub_cap | done | 17:09 |
| ttx | otherwise I think you are good, but i'd advise to convert some of those "under review" to "implemenetd" soon enough | 17:09 |
| ttx | next week shall be a nightmare :) | 17:09 |
| hub_cap | o ya | 17:10 |
| ttx | your targeted bug list looks good | 17:10 |
| hub_cap | its amazing how 2 wks of no one doing reviews stacks up on ya | 17:10 |
| ttx | heh | 17:10 |
| hub_cap | :P | 17:10 |
| ttx | couting one extra week in the milstone just doesn't do it justice | 17:10 |
| ttx | counting* | 17:10 |
| ttx | ok, that's all I had | 17:11 |
| ttx | anything you want to discuss at the meeting later ? | 17:11 |
| ttx | hub_cap: ? | 17:13 |
| hub_cap | sorry dued | 17:14 |
| hub_cap | baby.... got a bit distracted | 17:14 |
| hub_cap | naw im likely gonna be out | 17:14 |
| hub_cap | i think slicknik will be in my stead | 17:14 |
| ttx | oh right | 17:14 |
| ttx | ok, no pb | 17:14 |
| hub_cap | family+airport=me as cheafuer | 17:14 |
| hub_cap | *chauffeur | 17:15 |
| ttx | ok, then talk to you next week :) | 17:15 |
| hub_cap | thx dude. cu nxt wk | 17:16 |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:59 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:29 | |
| *** dkuffner has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:40 | |
| *** dkuffner has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:40 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:56 | |
| *** zzelle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:01 | |
| *** stevebaker has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:01 | |
| ttx | stevebaker: hola | 22:01 |
| stevebaker | hi | 22:01 |
| ttx | I multi-invited you since you miss notifications :) | 22:01 |
| stevebaker | I should be getting them now ;) | 22:02 |
| ttx | let's see.... https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-2 | 22:02 |
| ttx | wow, that's a large map | 22:02 |
| ttx | stevebaker: I suspect request-scoping-policy was not completed by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63185/ | 22:03 |
| stevebaker | hmm, I don't think I can justify leaving software-config Essential | 22:03 |
| ttx | drop to high while you still can :) | 22:04 |
| ttx | stevebaker: should I consider the two "unknown" status to actually mean "not started" | 22:04 |
| stevebaker | fixing | 22:04 |
| ttx | add-parameter-label-to-template needs a priority set (or be booted off the milestone) | 22:05 |
| ttx | parameter-nested-schema needs an assignee ((or be booted off the milestone) | 22:05 |
| ttx | that's all for status updates.. let's check progress | 22:06 |
| ttx | So you have loads of "not started" -- are they still likely to get completed in the next two weeks ? | 22:06 |
| stevebaker | in many cases not. I'll go through them at tomorrow's meeting | 22:07 |
| stevebaker | I'll also raise parameter-nested-schema tomorrow | 22:07 |
| ttx | ok. We'll obviously drop the not started by next week, unless they are REALLY trivial | 22:08 |
| stevebaker | man, xmas it troublesome for release cadence | 22:08 |
| ttx | always is | 22:08 |
| ttx | a few releases ago the milestone was on january 6 or something | 22:08 |
| ttx | hilarity ensues | 22:08 |
| stevebaker | i suspect we'll be having a lot of big features landing in i-3 | 22:09 |
| ttx | ok, defer early so that people don't expect too much of icehouse-2 | 22:09 |
| stevebaker | ok | 22:09 |
| ttx | your buglist is pretty massive too | 22:10 |
| stevebaker | yeah, lots in-progress though | 22:10 |
| ttx | witha few unassigned | 22:10 |
| ttx | we'll trim it next week too | 22:10 |
| stevebaker | yep | 22:10 |
| ttx | so yes, defer te unrealistic not started, and get stuff merged and code proposed :) | 22:11 |
| ttx | That's about all I had | 22:11 |
| ttx | anything you wanted to mention ? | 22:11 |
| stevebaker | ah, a question | 22:11 |
| ttx | go for it | 22:12 |
| stevebaker | I have my state of heat webinar in 2 days and failed to find out how to extract the number of havana bugs fixed | 22:12 |
| ttx | hhhm | 22:12 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/heat/havana/2013.2 should list them all | 22:12 |
| ttx | 282 | 22:13 |
| stevebaker | cool thanks | 22:13 |
| ttx | ok, talk to you later ! | 22:13 |
| ttx | thx | 22:13 |
| stevebaker | chur | 22:14 |
| *** zzelle has quit IRC | 23:47 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!