Tuesday, 2014-01-07

*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office08:37
*** notmyname has joined #openstack-relmgr-office09:03
notmynamewow we have a lot of channels ;-)09:03
ttxthat one is new.09:03
ttxIt's so that 1:1s can be found in the logs. #openstack-dev can be kind of noisy09:03
notmynamethis make 12 that I'm in. probably even more for you09:03
notmynamesure09:03
ttxso, let me catch up with the state of things09:04
ttx1.11.0 is out, we have a tentative 1.12.009:04
notmyname(was that a question or are you about to give a summary?)09:04
notmynamewhat do you mean by tentative 1.12?09:04
ttxwrong word09:05
ttxa "potential" 1.12.0 if that number still makes sense when you want to release09:05
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.12.009:05
notmynameah, gotcha09:05
notmynameyes, the next release will be 1.12.009:05
ttxyou might want to move a fex next-icehouse targets to 1.12.0 to match your current plans09:06
ttxfew*09:06
ttx(from https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/next-icehouse)09:06
notmynameactually, I think most of them will stay09:06
notmynamehere's what I'm thinking. we've got a significant patch (ie blocking some other work) nearly done. it's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51228/ and part of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/cluster-federation09:07
notmynamewhen that patch lands, I'll want to think about cutting a 1.12 release09:07
notmynameso as far as timeframes go, that probably means "in the next few weeks"09:07
notmynameas we get that patch in and get the swiftclient blueprint done and potentially a patch that is blocked by patch 5122809:08
ttxok09:08
notmynamenext week we've got an in-person meeting of several people to specifically work on storage policies. I expect major progress to come from that09:09
notmynamebut that's a bigger picture icehouse thing rather than 1.1209:10
ttxok, I understand09:10
ttxI'll put a ETA in ~2 weeks for 1.12.0 as a rough indication09:10
notmynamekk09:11
notmynamewe're having our first team meeting since before christmas on wednesday at 1900utc09:11
notmyname(it will be 3am for me, ugh)09:11
notmynamebut that should help give a better picture for everyone on what's going on09:11
ttxok, we'll refine next week09:11
notmynameanything from your side?09:12
ttxchecking09:12
ttxnope, I'm good09:13
notmynameI won't be at the team meeting (really bad timing for this part of the world)09:13
notmynamethis == australia09:13
ttxsure. I don't expect that much discussion today, with everyone just starting over09:15
notmynameok, good to know09:16
ttxok, that's all I had. Have a good time at LCA09:19
notmynamethanks :-)09:22
*** SergeyLukjanov is now known as _SergeyLukjanov09:47
*** _SergeyLukjanov is now known as SergeyLukjanov10:07
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC11:44
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office12:14
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-relmgr-office12:52
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:00
markmcclainttx: ready?13:04
ttxsorry about that13:09
ttxlunch dragged late13:09
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/icehouse-213:10
ttxmarkmcclain: still around ?13:10
markmcclainyep13:10
ttxso... 2 weeks left13:10
ttxA bit concerned with stuff still marked "not started"13:11
markmcclainyeah… same here13:11
markmcclainit is med level, so if it gets pushed back to i-3 we'll be ok13:12
ttxfor the >Low that would be l3-metering-api-ext  l3-metering-mgnt-ext vif-attribute-for-hairpinning13:12
ttxsure, if it's still not started by next week I think we should move it to i-3 proactively13:12
markmcclainok13:12
ttxotherwise you have 51% done or in review (for the >Low), which looks good13:13
ttxhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/config-plugin-by-name is being proposed to i-2 and not triaged yet13:13
markmcclainyeah that dropped in last Friday and I need to review the proposal because it was completely new for me13:13
ttxok13:14
ttxalso a few weird dependencies we should talk about13:14
markmcclainyeah most of the IPv6 are parented wrong13:14
ttxdnsmasq-ipv6-slaac depends on neutronclient-support-dnsmasq-mode-keyword (no milestone) and dnsmasq-bind-into-qrouter-namespace (i-3)13:14
markmcclainbecause that should be the master bp13:14
ttxok so dnsmasq-mode-keyword vif-attribute-for-hairpinning and ipv6-provider-nets-slaac should be prerequisites of ipv6-parity rather than the other way around ?13:15
markmcclainright13:15
ttxok, will fix that for you, don't worry about it13:15
markmcclainI'll get that subteam to clean up the dep13:16
ttxnah, will do it13:16
markmcclainok thanks13:16
ttxif you can sort out the dnsmasq ones though that would be great13:16
markmcclainclient is changes to neutronclient, so not sure how we want to do it13:16
markmcclainbecause the proper milestone for it would be the uncreated 3.3.4 milestone13:16
markmcclainI'll sort out dnsmasq13:17
ttxbug list is ambitious but looks good13:17
ttxwill refine it next week13:17
ttxat the meeting today we'll discuss nova-network deprecation13:17
markmcclainyeah.. with nearly everyone gone for the last two weeks13:17
ttxsince that was raised in a thread recently13:18
ttxand now is a good moment to discuss the status13:18
markmcclainok sounds good13:18
ttxanything else you want to see discussed ?13:18
markmcclainnot right now13:18
ttxok, cool13:18
ttxthat's all I had13:18
ttxsorry for being late13:18
ttxdhellmann: around ?13:18
markmcclainno worries13:19
dhellmannhere13:19
ttxawesome13:19
ttxlooking at https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/icehouse-2 and https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/icehouse-213:19
ttxstatus looks coherent13:19
ttxthe not started is being a bit worrisome13:20
dhellmannI just finished updating the bug list for oslo a few minutes ago :-)13:20
ttx improve-config-discovery-for-docs13:20
ttx improve-update-script13:20
dhellmannyeah, that one is on me13:20
dhellmannI should probably just move that to i-313:20
dhellmannthe update script is flavio, and he said to move it if he hasn't started by next week so I'm going to give him that time13:20
ttxif you think it can be proposed this week, you can keep it in13:20
dhellmannok, I moved mine13:21
ttxodiscuss with flavio about the other one13:21
ttxotherwise 55% done/inprogress13:22
ttxerr13:22
ttx55% done/underreview13:22
ttxwhich is good13:22
ttxoslo.messaging looks in good shape13:22
dhellmannI need to scan the bug list and make sure those are up to date13:23
ttxone dep issue in oslo.messaging: trusted-messaging (High, markmc, icehouse-2) depends on key-distribution-server (Medium, jamielennox, icehouse-2)13:23
ttxpriority is mismatched13:23
dhellmannI haven't figured out how to query launchpad for committed bugs without a milestone13:23
ttxthe two bugs in https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/icehouse-2 should have an assignee13:23
ttxotherwise I doubt they will get in in time :)13:23
dhellmannheh, yeah13:23
ttxdhellmann: you'll adjust prio on the mismatch above ?13:24
dhellmannyes13:24
ttxok, that's all I had, then13:24
ttxanything you want to discuss at meeting later ?13:24
dhellmannnot this week13:24
ttxcool. nova-network deprecation should keep us busy anyway ;à13:25
ttx;) even13:25
* ttx grabs coffee before talking to jd13:25
dhellmann:-)13:25
ttxdhellmann: thx!13:25
dhellmannthanks, ttx13:25
*** jd__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:35
jd__knock knock13:35
ttxjd__: hola!13:35
ttxso, 2 weeks left and not much progress so far13:36
jd__holidays, boss13:36
ttxI'm especially concerned with the not started13:36
ttx exclude-low-sample-count  rates-derived-from-cumulative  time-constrained-alarms13:36
jd__I'd need to check with eglynn13:37
jd__our meeting is tomorrow evening13:37
ttxif they are still not started by next week we'll probably have to postpone them13:37
ttxbut overall progress is not really better (only 11% done/under-review)13:37
jd__I'm afraid of that too13:37
ttxso it would be good to get as much code proposed this week as possible13:38
ttxotherwise there will be a review bottleneck next week13:38
ttxtime to finally digest all the foie gras and be back on track13:38
jd__I'll pass the word13:38
ttx replace-rpc-cast-with-notifications is marked "blocked". Could you elaborate ?13:39
ttxwaiting on oslo.messaging switch ?13:40
jd__it depends on the oslo.messaging one13:40
ttxok13:40
jd__yep13:40
jd__so very likely to be postponed13:40
ttxif we don't need to discuss it to unblock it, then maybe mark it slow progress instead13:40
jd__ack13:40
ttxi use 'blocked' as "need to be discussed at meeting to be unblocked"13:40
jd__fair enough, changed it :)13:41
ttxyour bug list sounds reasonable13:41
ttxanything you want to see discussed at the meeting today ?13:41
jd__nop13:41
ttxok then. Plenty of work to get code proposed, so i won't interfere any more :)13:42
ttxtalk to you at the meeting later13:42
jd__see ya! :)13:42
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:54
jgriffithttx: hello13:54
ttxjgriffith: welcome ! https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-213:54
ttxjgriffith: i fixed a few status (started/notstarted)13:55
ttxwhat's the staus for cinder-backup-recover-api ? still not started ?13:55
ttx(only two weeks left!)13:55
jgriffithttx: that one is started13:56
jgriffithI'll sort out that13:56
ttxok, updating13:56
jgriffithThe last 4 items are new13:56
jgriffithI'll likely remove them13:56
ttxok, don't care that much about Lows13:56
jgriffithahh.. ok13:56
ttxmore concerned about code gettign proposed on the medium and above13:57
jgriffithI'll just deal with tem separte13:57
jgriffithI'll check with Ronen13:57
ttxonly 33% done or under review so far, you need to get code proposed asap to avoid review bottlenecks next week13:57
jgriffithI thought he started but there was some discussion (mostly from me) about the direction13:57
jgriffithYes things aren't moving13:58
jgriffithI'll try and get some motivation or removing things13:58
jgriffithie get other motiviated13:58
ttxok, I see the last 4 you were mentioning13:58
ttxyes, you should triage them13:59
ttxlike, accept them for i-3 or remove them, unless code is ready13:59
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_13:59
jgriffithttx: this is the first I've seen them so remove for now14:00
ttxjgriffith: the prophetstore guys told me they sent you an email about those a few weeks ago14:00
jgriffithttx: they probably did and I forgot14:00
ttxso maybe check if they have code ready, one never knows14:00
jgriffithyep14:01
jgriffithmarking them I3 for now14:01
jgriffithI'll update if they're ready14:01
ttxbug list looks optimistic but otherwsie good. We'll trim it next week14:01
ttxat this point I'd say it's urgent to get more code proposed to avoid a big bottleneck next week14:01
jgriffithttx: well, to be fair we've had a bottle neck all along this time14:02
jgriffithttx: so I'm not sure how much good it will do14:02
jgriffithbut I understand what you're saying14:02
ttxat this point if you wat to land stuff it's good to have about 50% proposed14:02
ttxand you're at 33%. Not too bad, but still needing some extra push14:03
jgriffithttx: we'll work on it and I"ll adjust what I can14:03
ttxany topic you'd like to see discussed at meeting today ?14:03
jgriffith1. gate stability14:03
jgriffithWhere are we at, is it time to think "differently" on how we're doing things14:03
jgriffith2. brick-library14:04
ttxok, adding both to agenda14:04
jgriffithdoesn't necessarily need to be part of TC meeting but I"ll need to talk to you and some other keys folks at some point14:04
jgriffithok14:04
jgriffithsounds good14:04
ttxit's for the release meeting, not the TC one14:05
jgriffithttx: bahh...14:05
ttxthough you can mention them in open discussion at TC meeting too :)14:05
jgriffithttx: then yeah that's actually likely appropriate14:05
ttxadded14:05
ttxsee you there14:05
jgriffithOh!14:05
jgriffithHold on14:05
jgriffithYou may not14:05
jgriffithproject update webinar... checking time14:05
* ttx HOLDS14:06
jgriffithI should be done in time14:06
ttxok :)14:06
jgriffith15:00 Eastern14:06
jgriffithis the webinar14:06
jgriffithOk.. seeya later today14:06
jgriffiththanks14:06
ttxgoes after the nova-network deprecation discussion anyway14:06
jgriffithhaah14:07
jgriffithwe'll cover it next week :)14:07
ttxshould take a fair amount of time :)14:07
jgriffithindeed14:07
ttxok, thxc14:07
jd__jgriffith: 15:00 the webinar?14:08
jgriffithjd__: 15:00 Eastern yes14:09
jd__I think it's 10:00 Eastern, like in an hour no?14:09
jd__http://openstack.enterthemeeting.com/m/4BC36YZQ14:09
jgriffithjd__: yup14:10
jgriffithjd__: you're correct14:10
jgriffiththank you!14:10
jd__aaahh14:10
jd__you scared me for one sec :)14:10
jgriffithI looked at Thursdays14:10
jd__ah right :)14:10
jgriffith:)14:10
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:01
dolphmo/15:01
ttxhola15:02
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/icehouse-215:02
ttx2 weeks left!15:02
ttxmain concern is the "not started" stuff15:02
ttxesp. service-scoped-tokens15:02
ttxand to a lesser extent saml-id15:03
ttxstill likely to make it in two short weeks ?15:03
dolphmooh, saml-id is in progress15:03
dolphmservice-scoped-tokens will likely slip to j*15:03
ttxok, please update15:03
dolphmi'd like to give it another week or so for consideration in icehouse though15:04
ttxok15:04
ttxsecond concern is not that much code in "needs code review" status yet15:04
ttxso expecting some bottleneck next week15:04
ttxpropose early, review often15:05
dolphmthere's a lot of things in review, but i don't think anything is complete yet15:05
ttxin other news, keystone-manage-token-flush-periodically (Low, icehouse-2) has no assignee15:06
ttxsince someone proposed code I suspect that's false15:06
ttxalthough code appears to be abandoned15:06
dolphmi can assign that one15:06
dolphmalthough i'm not sure it'll land... shardy had some valid questions about the approach15:07
ttxyou can keep it in i2/low as long as it's assigned to someone and has at least /some/chance of getting in15:07
ttxtargeted buglist is very reasonable15:07
ttxthat's all I had15:08
ttxanything on your side ?15:08
dolphmi'm not caught up on bug reports from the holiday break, but i didn't see anything crazy15:08
dolphmi did want to ask about -core changes...15:08
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann15:09
ttxwhat about them?15:09
dolphmis there any sort of community policy / expectation on how changes to -core teams are made?15:09
dolphmi've followed the mailing list proposal approach before, but it's quite slow :P15:09
ttxthe only ultimate rule is: the PTL decides. Some groups want to play nice and use metrics15:10
dolphmi'd like to knock a bunch of changes out during our #openstack-meeting that i've already discussed with the existing -core group15:10
dolphmcool -- that was the impression i was under, but didn't know how official it was15:10
dolphmthat's all from me then!15:10
ttxthere is also an informal rule about polling existing core membership with addition/removal proposals and have lazy consensus around those15:11
ttxbut ultimately the "PTL has final say ovber project matters" rule prevails15:11
ttxanything specific you want to see discussed at meeting today ?15:11
dolphmnope15:11
ttxok, see you there!15:11
dolphmo/15:12
*** russellb has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:16
ttxrussellb: o/15:17
russellbo/15:17
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-215:17
russellbnot much marked implemented :-/15:17
ttxso it looks like your Bp validation exervise turned into a "everything is low" result :)15:17
russellbyes.15:17
russellbdefinitely happy with the team effort on reviewing them15:17
russellbthe "core sponsor" idea has been a complete flop15:17
ttxheh15:18
ttxnot totally surprising15:18
ttxgoodidea but supposes a bit more discipline than we currently have15:18
russellbyeah, seems so15:18
ttxI hope that with proper tooling it might reduce the friction and make it more... relevant15:19
russellbthe idea was to try to have a better picture of what we think we have time to review15:19
ttxanyway, just looking at >Low things don't look too bad15:19
russellbso not sure how to fix it ... but like you said, maybe a better tool would help15:19
ttxall started, 49% done or under review15:19
russellbcouple more weeks, now that we're past holidays, i expect things to start moving faster15:20
ttxa lot of those Lows have code proposed too15:20
ttxthe trick is to get them converted to "implemented" asap so that there is not too many bottlenecks next week15:20
russellbyeah15:21
russellbsome of them may be15:21
russellbwish i had a script to check them all15:21
russellbso much clicking15:21
ttxalso two critical bugs not targeted to i2:15:21
ttx* https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125489015:21
ttx* https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126671115:21
russellb1266711 is in progress15:22
russellbtriggered by an infra issue15:22
ttxyep, I would target it to i2 and assign to sahid15:22
ttxthe other just needs someone to put their name on it, can be targeted to i2 as well15:22
russellbtargeted15:23
ttxyour i2 buglist is pretty massive and could use some trimming -- lots of bugs unassigned too15:23
* ttx removes invalid ones15:23
ttxmaybe review it at next nova meeting15:24
russellbthat sounds like a good idea15:24
russellbmostly gate bugs unassigned ...15:24
russellbnot surprising15:24
russellbhard to get people to take on ownership of those15:24
ttxwhile we are in the "good ideas" department... fifieldt started a thread about nova-netwetwork deprecation.. since we said we would decide by i215:24
russellbwell15:24
ttxso I scheduled that for discussion at meeting today15:24
russellbwhat i said was that we would revisit it *after* i215:25
russellbbasically, giving until i2 for progress to be made, and then revisit it15:25
russellbor that was my plan15:25
ttxoh, ok. Doesn't mean we can't do an intermediary status update15:25
russellbfor sure15:25
ttxput some pressure on :)15:25
russellbi'd love to have a better idea of how things are coming15:25
ttxagreed15:25
russellbi really don't want to un-freeze nova-network ...15:25
russellbbut honestly, it's the right thing if neutron isn't ready15:26
ttxanything else you want to discuss at meeting today ?15:26
russellbthat's the biggest one15:26
ttxok ten. Biggest priority is in converting as many of those "code proposed" BPs into "implemented" early15:27
ttxthen*15:27
ttxand fix the buglist so that it can actually be useful15:27
russellbok, will pass that on to others, hope we can start getting some merged15:27
ttxrussellb: anything else ?15:27
russellbnope15:28
russellbthanks!15:28
ttxrussellb: talk to you later15:28
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:30
ttxdavid-lyle: o/15:30
david-lyleo/15:30
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/icehouse-215:31
ttxQuestion: django-1point6 "needs infrastructure", could you elaborate ?15:31
david-lylettx: looking, I didn't set that status15:32
david-lyleI think that's indicating that django-openstack-auth needs to be released and global requirements updated15:32
ttxdavid-lyle: ok, maybe "slow progress" would also reflect it well, unless you really depend on another's team work15:33
ttxdavid-lyle: you also have a lot of "Not started": are those all short enough to still be completeable in the next two weeks ?15:33
david-lyledo I have publishing ability for django-openstack-auth or do I need to contact the infra team for that15:33
ttxdavid-lyle: let me check15:34
ttxhorizon-ptl has "push tag" on that repo15:34
ttxso you have publishing ability15:34
david-lylettx: I'll start pushing a lot of those to i-3, some are smaller, so I wanted to give them a chance, but I'll go ahead and move them and they can be pulled back in if they make it15:35
ttxerr, except horizon-ptl is still gabriel15:35
ttxAsk infra to fix https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/146,members first15:35
david-lylettx: ack15:35
ttxhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/auto-login-after-password-changed needs to be triaged15:36
ttx(a priority set or BP should be removed)15:37
david-lyleack, I think that one should go away15:37
david-lyleI'll take care of that15:38
ttxceilometer-api-enhancements still depends on statistics-order-by-and-limit-for-grouped-query ?15:38
david-lyleargh, right15:38
ttxwill let you fix it :)15:39
ttxfinally you have a number of unassigned targeted bugs15:39
ttxI think if they are not assigned by next week we should postpone them15:40
david-lylettx: ok15:40
ttxthat's all I had.. anything you want to see discussed at meeting today ?15:40
david-lyleno, I think we're set15:41
ttxok then, see you at meeting later today15:41
david-lylesee you then15:41
*** SergeyLukjanov is now known as _SergeyLukjanov16:10
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:34
*** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:41
ttxmarkwash: o/16:46
markwashttx: good evening16:46
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-216:47
ttxerr16:47
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/icehouse-216:47
markwashit looks a little unreasonable right now16:47
ttxstatus looks mostly in sync16:47
markwashyes16:48
ttxvmware-datastore-storage-backend needs to be triaged16:48
ttx(priority set or moved out of milestone)16:48
markwashk sure thing16:48
ttxwhat worries me the most would be the "not started" stuff16:48
ttxesp. new-download-workflow16:48
ttxany chance that can still get completed over the next two weeks ?16:49
markwashthat one is my most likely candidate to get bumped to I-316:49
markwashthe other not-started is actually not up to date, it was just approved and has a patch up for review16:49
markwashI think16:49
ttxmarkwash: ok, we'll see next week, if it's still not started, we'll defer it16:50
markwashI"ll bring it up at the weekly meeting16:50
ttxotherwise it's generally late but not too bad16:50
ttxbug list looks curated enough16:50
ttxideally you'd get as much in this week as you can, as I expect next week to be a bit busy16:51
markwashyeah, I guess the gate may become a blocker again16:51
ttxthat's all I had... anything you want to see discussed at meeting later today ?16:51
markwashno I think I'm good16:51
markwashmentioning bug triage, though16:51
markwashare there any metrics about tracking how well we're doing with that? I feel like I've not done well with it in the past16:52
markwashjust #new?16:52
ttxhmm16:52
ttxI may have a webnumbr somewhere for Glance16:52
ttxhttp://webnumbr.com/open-glance-bugs16:53
ttxdunno if that really helps though ;)16:53
markwashheh no worries16:54
markwashthat's all from me, I guess I"ll see you at the meeting16:54
ttxok then, ttyl16:54
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC16:59
*** markmcclain has quit IRC17:02
*** hub_cap has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:03
hub_caphey sorry i missed this msg17:03
ttxhola17:04
ttxjust a sec*17:04
hub_capyessir17:04
ttxok17:05
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/icehouse-217:06
hub_capheyp17:07
ttxhub_cap: is entrypoints-for-binscripts implemented now that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54225/ merged ?17:07
hub_capnosir, this is the actual review for that17:07
hub_caphttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/64310/17:07
ttxok, cool17:07
hub_capthat was a dep that someone kinda randomly worked on17:07
hub_capand i finished it hehe17:07
ttxyou have two "not started" left17:07
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:07
ttxare those likely to get completed over the next two weeks ?17:08
hub_capya those are very low17:08
hub_capi think the oslo.msging shoudl be doable17:08
hub_capthe other is a whole api thing that will require moree discussion then i think dan realizes hehe17:08
ttxthere is a dep priority mismatch too:17:08
ttxconfiguration-management (High, cp16net, icehouse-2) depends on move-manager-to-datastore-version (Medium, cp16net, icehouse-2)17:08
ttxone of them should probably match the other17:09
hub_capHA17:09
hub_capill lower config mgmt17:09
hub_capdone17:09
ttxotherwise I think you are good, but i'd advise to convert some of those "under review" to "implemenetd" soon enough17:09
ttxnext week shall be a nightmare :)17:09
hub_capo ya17:10
ttxyour targeted bug list looks good17:10
hub_capits amazing how 2 wks of no one doing reviews stacks up on ya17:10
ttxheh17:10
hub_cap:P17:10
ttxcouting one extra week in the milstone just doesn't do it justice17:10
ttxcounting*17:10
ttxok, that's all I had17:11
ttxanything you want to discuss at the meeting later ?17:11
ttxhub_cap: ?17:13
hub_capsorry dued17:14
hub_capbaby.... got a bit distracted17:14
hub_capnaw im likely gonna be out17:14
hub_capi think slicknik will be in my stead17:14
ttxoh right17:14
ttxok, no pb17:14
hub_capfamily+airport=me as cheafuer17:14
hub_cap*chauffeur17:15
ttxok, then talk to you next week :)17:15
hub_capthx dude. cu nxt wk17:16
*** markwash has quit IRC17:32
*** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:59
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:29
*** dkuffner has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:40
*** dkuffner has left #openstack-relmgr-office18:40
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC20:56
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:56
*** zzelle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office22:01
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-relmgr-office22:01
ttxstevebaker: hola22:01
stevebakerhi22:01
ttxI multi-invited you since you miss notifications :)22:01
stevebakerI should be getting them now ;)22:02
ttxlet's see.... https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-222:02
ttxwow, that's a large map22:02
ttxstevebaker: I suspect request-scoping-policy was not completed by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63185/22:03
stevebakerhmm, I don't think I can justify leaving software-config Essential22:03
ttxdrop to high while you still can :)22:04
ttxstevebaker: should I consider the two "unknown" status to actually mean "not started"22:04
stevebakerfixing22:04
ttxadd-parameter-label-to-template needs a priority set (or be booted off the milestone)22:05
ttxparameter-nested-schema needs an assignee ((or be booted off the milestone)22:05
ttxthat's all for status updates.. let's check progress22:06
ttxSo you have loads of "not started" -- are they still likely to get completed in the next two weeks ?22:06
stevebakerin many cases not. I'll go through them at tomorrow's meeting22:07
stevebakerI'll also raise parameter-nested-schema tomorrow22:07
ttxok. We'll obviously drop the not started by next week, unless they are REALLY trivial22:08
stevebakerman, xmas it troublesome for release cadence22:08
ttxalways is22:08
ttxa few releases ago the milestone was on january 6 or something22:08
ttxhilarity ensues22:08
stevebakeri suspect we'll be having a lot of big features landing in i-322:09
ttxok, defer early so that people don't expect too much of icehouse-222:09
stevebakerok22:09
ttxyour buglist is pretty massive too22:10
stevebakeryeah, lots in-progress though22:10
ttxwitha few unassigned22:10
ttxwe'll trim it next week too22:10
stevebakeryep22:10
ttxso yes, defer te unrealistic not started, and get stuff merged and code proposed :)22:11
ttxThat's about all I had22:11
ttxanything you wanted to mention ?22:11
stevebakerah, a question22:11
ttxgo for it22:12
stevebakerI have my state of heat webinar in 2 days and failed to find out how to extract the number of havana bugs fixed22:12
ttxhhhm22:12
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/heat/havana/2013.2 should list them all22:12
ttx28222:13
stevebakercool thanks22:13
ttxok, talk to you later !22:13
ttxthx22:13
stevebakerchur22:14
*** zzelle has quit IRC23:47

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!