| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 00:06 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 00:16 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 00:20 | |
| *** david_lyle_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 00:55 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 01:40 | |
| *** david_lyle_ has quit IRC | 01:44 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 01:54 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 01:54 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 01:56 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 02:01 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 02:56 | |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 02:59 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:57 | |
| *** jgriffith has quit IRC | 04:24 | |
| *** jgriffith has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:29 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 05:28 | |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 05:40 | |
| *** markwash has quit IRC | 06:02 | |
| *** jd__` has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 06:37 | |
| *** mattoliverau has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
| *** jd__ has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
| *** jd__` is now known as jd__ | 06:38 | |
| *** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 06:45 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 07:10 | |
| *** russellb has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:00 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 11:29 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:59 | |
| markmcclain | ttx: ready when you are | 12:59 |
|---|---|---|
| ttx | markmcclain: o/ | 12:59 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:00 |
| ttx | merging still blocked at this point, right | 13:00 |
| markmcclain | yes | 13:01 |
| ttx | you mentioned some progress in working around the kernel issue ? | 13:02 |
| markmcclain | yes so we're working on only running the neutron tests with either metadata or config_drive | 13:02 |
| markmcclain | when key injection is activated the problem gets triggered easily | 13:03 |
| ttx | and that's what triggers the kernel crash ? (sorry, did not follow recent progress on that bug) | 13:04 |
| ttx | thought it was some process kill | 13:04 |
| ttx | in namespaces | 13:04 |
| ttx | (or is that a different issue) | 13:04 |
| markmcclain | the kernel could not handle concurrent nbd and namespace usage | 13:05 |
| markmcclain | it triggered a race inside of the kernel | 13:05 |
| ttx | ah. | 13:05 |
| markmcclain | and nova's key injection was using nbd | 13:05 |
| ttx | yeah, then metadata/config_dirve looks like a saner workaround that hacking kernel patches | 13:06 |
| ttx | than* | 13:06 |
| markmcclain | yeah.. the kernel team also has more data to fix the kernel problem long term | 13:06 |
| ttx | markmcclain: <hen do you hope to have that .. test specialization ready ? | 13:07 |
| ttx | w* | 13:07 |
| markmcclain | we've been making changes, but part of the problem is that devstack gate does not run all of the neutron gate tests | 13:07 |
| markmcclain | so we had to fix a few items first to allow us to get better data from the devstack check | 13:08 |
| ttx | could you use the experimental pipeline to gather results ? | 13:08 |
| markmcclain | that's what we ended up doing | 13:08 |
| ttx | markmcclain: so... progress sometimes this week ? | 13:08 |
| markmcclain | yeah I was really hoping to have it solve Friday, but turning off key injection has been a bit of chase | 13:09 |
| ttx | markmcclain: ok. In other news, ttx.py noticed a dependency issue in i3: | 13:09 |
| ttx | ml2-qos (Medium, scollins, icehouse-3) depends on quantum-qos-api-db (Low, scollins, next) | 13:09 |
| ttx | might just be the other way around ? | 13:10 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-qos | 13:10 |
| markmcclain | ah… I'll go pull the bp out next make both medium | 13:10 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/quantum-qos-api-db | 13:10 |
| ttx | it's more, the other one might need to go from next to icehouse-3 | 13:10 |
| ttx | and to medium | 13:11 |
| markmcclain | right.. I just pulled qos-api into I-3 and made it med | 13:11 |
| ttx | markmcclain: otherwise things don't look to bad. Your stuff is in order, and apart from landing, progress looks good | 13:11 |
| markmcclain | yeah…I'll be happy once we can reliably merge just get the backlog cleared | 13:12 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at project meeting later ? | 13:12 |
| markmcclain | also not sure if you saw it, but the kernel bug is affecting stable too | 13:12 |
| ttx | markmcclain: yes, not really surprising | 13:13 |
| markmcclain | otherwise that's all I have | 13:13 |
| ttx | ok, thx! | 13:14 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ready when you are | 13:15 |
| dhellmann | here | 13:16 |
| dhellmann | good morning/afternoon | 13:16 |
| ttx | dhellmann: aloha! | 13:16 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:16 |
| ttx | You have to BPs to triage in there | 13:16 |
| ttx | two* | 13:16 |
| dhellmann | yeah, those snuck in very recently | 13:16 |
| dhellmann | I was just reviewing priorities on a few others with the owners | 13:17 |
| dhellmann | I'll take care of those 2 today | 13:17 |
| dhellmann | can anyone set the milestone on a bp? | 13:17 |
| ttx | dhellmann: yes | 13:17 |
| dhellmann | that explains it | 13:18 |
| ttx | dhellmann: you control only the priority and series goal field | 13:18 |
| * dhellmann hopes storyboard provides email notifications for those sorts of changes on blueprints as well as tickets | 13:18 | |
| ttx | and I have series goal set according to the value of target milestone, for coherence reasons | 13:18 |
| dhellmann | sure | 13:18 |
| dhellmann | I'll contact the owners and see what's what | 13:18 |
| ttx | otherwise progress looks good, wouldn't hurt to start completing stuff | 13:18 |
| dhellmann | heh | 13:18 |
| ttx | congestion control :) | 13:19 |
| dhellmann | we worked out the issues around log translation in our meeting last week, so that just needs review | 13:19 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:19 |
| ttx | same comments | 13:19 |
| dhellmann | that un-owned bug is mark's | 13:20 |
| dhellmann | just got that confirmed via email, and the bug is now updated | 13:20 |
| ttx | Should we add https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272271 to icehouse-3 as well ? | 13:20 |
| dhellmann | yes, done | 13:21 |
| ttx | Saw you added one topic to meeting already. Anything else on your mind ? | 13:21 |
| dhellmann | no, I think that covers it | 13:22 |
| ttx | ok, thanks! | 13:22 |
| dhellmann | thanks! | 13:22 |
| ttx | jd__: ready when you are | 13:29 |
| ttx | no jd__ ? | 13:37 |
| jd__ | sorry, in a call | 13:38 |
| ttx | jd__: available later ? | 13:38 |
| jd__ | ttx: yes | 13:42 |
| ttx | ok ping me | 13:42 |
| jd__ | ttx: ping | 13:45 |
| ttx | ok, let's do this quickly | 13:45 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:45 |
| ttx | You're good on the landing side, but not so many things under review | 13:46 |
| ttx | wanted to review those two "slow progress" | 13:46 |
| jd__ | yeah I need to sync up with sileht but we did made some progress | 13:46 |
| ttx | ok, so still likely to make it, right ? | 13:47 |
| jd__ | at least on the oslo.messaging side, and sileht has a working port | 13:47 |
| jd__ | yes! | 13:47 |
| jd__ | replace-rpc-cast-with-notifications may slip but switch-to-oslo.messaging looks good | 13:47 |
| ttx | yes, that other one does not sound that critical to me | 13:47 |
| ttx | whereas oslo.messaging would be a great win | 13:48 |
| jd__ | yeah, I've changed to 'good progress' based on sileht feedback I got a few minutes ago | 13:48 |
| ttx | ok that's all I had. Anything you want to discuss later ? | 13:48 |
| jd__ | nop | 13:48 |
| ttx | ok, thanks and see you then | 13:49 |
| ttx | jgriffith: ready when you are | 13:49 |
| jgriffith | ttx good morning | 13:50 |
| ttx | jgriffith: hi! | 13:50 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 13:50 |
| ttx | lots of stuff to triage | 13:50 |
| jgriffith | ttx:yeah, noticed all the new stuff last night | 13:51 |
| jgriffith | ttx: it's like the mail... keeps showing up at my door | 13:51 |
| ttx | The guys behind nimble-iscsi-volume-driver asked me about status, fwiw | 13:51 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/nimble-iscsi-volume-driver | 13:51 |
| ttx | they pretend to have code almost there | 13:52 |
| ttx | you probably got their emails too | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | same old story, I hear every week | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | emails, phone calls and even an in person meet | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | meat | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | whatever | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | my response is still, great, submit the patch | 13:52 |
| ttx | You can use "Low" liberally for stuff you have no idea about | 13:52 |
| jgriffith | I suppose that's nicer than kicking it out as I had planned :) | 13:53 |
| ttx | so that they submit the patch and you can decide based on that | 13:53 |
| jgriffith | Yep, perfect | 13:53 |
| ttx | You still have room in the high priority if you want to give your current "Low" more importance | 13:53 |
| jgriffith | Yeah, I"ll rebalance some things this morning I think | 13:54 |
| jgriffith | the landscape has changed a bit in the past couple weeks | 13:54 |
| ttx | jgriffith: was wondering about the 2 "not started" ones at the top of the list | 13:54 |
| jgriffith | The oslo one I"m not planning to take | 13:55 |
| jgriffith | given what I've been looking at in Nova | 13:55 |
| jgriffith | unless the logfiles are fixed | 13:55 |
| ttx | if the port to oslo.messaging wasn't started yet it may be better to defer | 13:55 |
| ttx | not exactly the sort of thing you want to land late | 13:55 |
| jgriffith | I agree | 13:56 |
| ttx | or get into a freeze exception with | 13:56 |
| jgriffith | My V6 item... I'll make low | 13:56 |
| jgriffith | it may not be important | 13:56 |
| jgriffith | ttx: it's not a big patch or hard to do, just need some things to settle in core-cinder first | 13:56 |
| ttx | agreed | 13:57 |
| ttx | good to free some time for core reviewers as drivers requests pile up, too | 13:57 |
| ttx | that's why planning your own work to -1 and -2 is better, since so many things are proposed for -3 | 13:57 |
| jgriffith | Yeah... another on-slaught :) | 13:57 |
| ttx | you have to make time for handling those | 13:57 |
| ttx | that's all I had | 13:58 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at meeting later ? anything blocking you ? | 13:58 |
| jgriffith | I think that's it from me on the rlease side | 13:58 |
| jgriffith | Nahh.. nothing blocking | 13:58 |
| ttx | ok, so triage + reprioritize a bit and we should be good | 13:58 |
| ttx | see you then | 13:59 |
| jgriffith | Yeah, I'll have it done by the meeting | 13:59 |
| jgriffith | thanks..cya | 13:59 |
| ttx | nice. gate queue down to 5 at 1400 UTC | 13:59 |
| ttx | pretty rare | 13:59 |
| *** mattoliverau has quit IRC | 14:09 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
| ttx | dolphm: ready when you are | 15:01 |
| dolphm | ttx: o/ | 15:01 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 15:02 |
| ttx | status looks sane and on track | 15:03 |
| ttx | Was work on ephemeral-pki-tokens started ? | 15:03 |
| dolphm | i don't believe so | 15:04 |
| ttx | it's light IIRC though | 15:04 |
| dolphm | correct | 15:04 |
| ttx | the sooner you push it, the better | 15:04 |
| ttx | good to get important things while the queue is empty | 15:04 |
| ttx | ok, you look in pretty good shape | 15:05 |
| ttx | anything you wanted to discuss at meeting ? | 15:05 |
| dolphm | fair enough -- it can probably be in review soon, based on the revocation events patch | 15:05 |
| dolphm | for the meeting, yes | 15:05 |
| dolphm | annegentle requested on the -dev list that we discuss the move to unversioned endpoints in the service catalog | 15:06 |
| dolphm | i'm certainly happy to do so, as i'm not terribly happy with the versioned service types that slipped into havana (computev3, etc) | 15:06 |
| ttx | ok adding. Do you have a link to the ML post ? | 15:06 |
| ttx | got it | 15:07 |
| ttx | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/026079.html | 15:08 |
| ttx | added | 15:08 |
| ttx | dolphm: anything else ? | 15:08 |
| dolphm | that's it! | 15:08 |
| ttx | ok, thx! | 15:08 |
| russellb | fwiw, computev3 can be ripped out anytime IMO, it's not supported yet | 15:08 |
| dolphm | russellb: pleeeeease | 15:09 |
| russellb | just need to coordinate it with novaclient probably | 15:09 |
| russellb | but no backwards compat concerns since it's unsupported at this point | 15:09 |
| dolphm | russellb: exactly, and i'm hoping keystoneclient can set the precedent on proper discovery | 15:09 |
| russellb | cool | 15:09 |
| russellb | ttx: on nova, good news is today was blueprint approval deadline, so i can start deferring a ton of stuff :-) | 15:11 |
| ttx | russellb: heh | 15:11 |
| russellb | all day meetings yesterday and today, so haven't had a chance to start deferring, but will asap (tonight and/or tomorrow) | 15:12 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 15:12 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1273556 is critical, should I target to i3 ? | 15:14 |
| russellb | sure, might as ewll | 15:14 |
| russellb | help raise visibility | 15:15 |
| russellb | i'm still not convinced that "mark all bugs that occur in gate as critical" is not insane | 15:15 |
| ttx | fwiw we are looking into expressing "priority" in a smarter way in storyboard | 15:15 |
| ttx | something more personal and multi-dimensional | 15:16 |
| russellb | that'd be great | 15:16 |
| russellb | we're going to have to revisit our plan again for juno | 15:16 |
| ttx | yep | 15:16 |
| russellb | i'm not sure what the plan should be yet ... | 15:16 |
| russellb | couple of ideas | 15:17 |
| ttx | I'll revisit the i3 map once you clean it up | 15:17 |
| ttx | let me know when you're done | 15:17 |
| ttx | doesn't have to be today... sometime this week | 15:17 |
| russellb | 1) go back to more arbitrary prioritization ... and 2) use the nova-core sponsor thing, but add that we won't even let something get prioritized at all or targeted at all until it's sponsored | 15:17 |
| russellb | sure, will get on it asap | 15:17 |
| russellb | so on this, i have another thing i wanted to mention to you | 15:17 |
| russellb | on the whole ... scaling nova leadership area | 15:17 |
| russellb | this cycle, getting more help from nova-drivers in reviewing blueprints was helpful | 15:18 |
| russellb | i think the next thing I (or whoever the nova PTL is) needs is a person that helps manage the roadmap as their primary task | 15:18 |
| russellb | it's too big for me to be able to keep on top of it, and actually do technical leadership too | 15:18 |
| ttx | release management liaison ? | 15:18 |
| russellb | yes | 15:18 |
| ttx | right, like you did for vishy back then | 15:19 |
| ttx | makes sense to me | 15:19 |
| ttx | if you can find your Russell | 15:19 |
| russellb | so i want to try to find someone, but also wanted it on your radar too, because obviously it would impact nova - release interaction | 15:19 |
| russellb | if anyone comes to mind for you, let me know :) | 15:20 |
| russellb | otherwise i'll be searching | 15:20 |
| ttx | heh | 15:20 |
| ttx | !me | 15:20 |
| openstack | ttx: Error: "me" is not a valid command. | 15:20 |
| russellb | right, don't expect it from you | 15:20 |
| ttx | ok, anything you want to discuss at meeting ? | 15:21 |
| ttx | was wondering about the novanet/v3 thing | 15:21 |
| ttx | or is that settled | 15:21 |
| russellb | i'll be in a car heading to an airport at that time, should be able to join from the car though... | 15:21 |
| russellb | i think it's roughly settled | 15:21 |
| ttx | ok then see you there ? | 15:22 |
| russellb | sure | 15:22 |
| russellb | oh, thanks for your velocity blog post | 15:22 |
| russellb | good points in there | 15:22 |
| russellb | didn't think to compare back to grizzly | 15:22 |
| russellb | and hadn't looked at bugs | 15:22 |
| russellb | other big nova project thing is review bandwidth (not that new) ... need to revisit nova-core i think, some current folks not as active | 15:23 |
| russellb | we need to pick up review bandwidth | 15:23 |
| russellb | anyway, just random thoughts i guess | 15:23 |
| russellb | things affecting quality / velocity of roadmap :) | 15:24 |
| ttx | yeah, i wanted to look at reviews as well | 15:24 |
| russellb | i've done a lot of review stats, but i've never done historical analysis | 15:26 |
| russellb | last 90 days versus a 90 day period a while ago, for example | 15:26 |
| russellb | always more to analyze ... | 15:26 |
| ttx | lyle: around? | 15:34 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:34 | |
| ttx | david-lyle: howdy | 15:34 |
| david-lyle | hello | 15:34 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 15:35 |
| ttx | looks sane to me | 15:35 |
| ttx | django-angular-integration needs an assignee or be removed | 15:35 |
| david-lyle | yes, will likely remove | 15:36 |
| ttx | separate-horizon-from-dashboard (Medium, mrunge, icehouse-3) depends on remove-javascript-bundling (Undefined, mrunge, No milestone) -- maybe add it to icehouse-3 ? | 15:36 |
| ttx | otherwise progress looks good | 15:36 |
| david-lyle | I think both may be early juno, the javascript split was a late addition | 15:37 |
| david-lyle | lots of work | 15:37 |
| david-lyle | I think we're on target otherwise | 15:37 |
| ttx | yep | 15:37 |
| ttx | anything blocking you ? Anything you'd like to discuss at meeting ? | 15:38 |
| david-lyle | no, I think we're good. With the gate back in order, we just need to land some patches | 15:38 |
| ttx | ack | 15:39 |
| ttx | see you there | 15:39 |
| david-lyle | sounds good | 15:39 |
| notmyname | ttx: ready when you are | 16:20 |
| ttx | notmyname: o/ | 16:31 |
| notmyname | hello | 16:31 |
| notmyname | I don't think I have a lot to report. 1.12 is out, progress is being made towards some changes in swiftclient | 16:31 |
| notmyname | good progress is being made on storage policies for icehouse | 16:31 |
| notmyname | still undetermined if we'll have 1 or 2 releases before icehouse | 16:32 |
| ttx | yep | 16:32 |
| ttx | looks like I haven't created milestone 1.13.0 yet. Want me to ? | 16:32 |
| notmyname | yes, please | 16:32 |
| ttx | done. you can move next-icehouse stuff to it: https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.13.0 | 16:33 |
| notmyname | ok, will do | 16:33 |
| ttx | any topic for meeting later ? | 16:33 |
| notmyname | things currently keeping me up at night include the depth of the review queue and effective ways to tackle that | 16:33 |
| notmyname | I don't htink that's a project-wide meeting topic, so I don't have anything for the meeting today | 16:34 |
| ttx | notmyname: the swift review queue ? | 16:34 |
| * ttx checks | 16:34 | |
| notmyname | ya. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/-status:workinprogress+AND+status:open+AND+(project:openstack/swift-bench+OR+project:openstack/object-api+OR+project:openstack/swift+OR+project:openstack/python-swiftclient),n,z | 16:34 |
| ttx | impressive indeed | 16:35 |
| notmyname | I don't know how that compares in other projects (but I'm not trying to compare) | 16:35 |
| notmyname | I simply want it to be shorter | 16:35 |
| ttx | looking at your reviewer stats | 16:36 |
| ttx | http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/swift-reviewers-60.txt | 16:36 |
| notmyname | ya, I've been looking there too. anyway, just what I've been thinking on lately | 16:37 |
| ttx | your core group seems to match review activity | 16:37 |
| notmyname | yes | 16:37 |
| ttx | cschwede / rahmu could be considered added if you think you could use more bandwidth | 16:37 |
| ttx | (no idea how good they are in reviews though) | 16:37 |
| ttx | ok well... see you at meeting later | 16:38 |
| notmyname | I'm not looking to add new people, necessarily. I'd prefer something more structural. but I don't have too many ideas now. | 16:38 |
| notmyname | ok. later | 16:38 |
| *** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:41 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:42 | |
| ttx | markwash: o/ | 16:45 |
| markwash | ttx hi there | 16:46 |
| *** SergeyLukjanov is now known as SergeyLukjanov_a | 16:46 | |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 16:46 |
| ttx | one untriaged blueprint | 16:47 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/replace-mox-with-mock | 16:47 |
| ttx | + 2 unassigned ones: | 16:47 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/expose-owner-in-v2 | 16:47 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/expose-owner-in-v2 | 16:47 |
| ttx | err | 16:47 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/expose-owner-in-v2 | 16:47 |
| ttx | damn copy paste | 16:47 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/community-level-v2-image-sharing | 16:47 |
| markwash | I just assigned expose-owner-in-v2 to flwang since he already has a review up for it | 16:48 |
| * ttx marks it started then | 16:48 | |
| markwash | I will ask rosmaita for an owner for "community-level-…" when we meet for bp triage here in a few minutes | 16:49 |
| markwash | and the untriaged one. . I'm still thinking about it :-) | 16:49 |
| ttx | ok | 16:49 |
| markwash | I thought we had a plan for mox packages for python 3, no? | 16:50 |
| ttx | I thought so yes | 16:50 |
| markwash | not that I'm a fan of mox | 16:50 |
| markwash | hmm | 16:50 |
| markwash | oh well | 16:50 |
| ttx | mox3 or mock | 16:51 |
| ttx | As far as progress goes, this is slightly behind... | 16:51 |
| *** hub_cap has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:51 | |
| ttx | would be good to have more stuff ready for review, and more stuff completed | 16:51 |
| markwash | yes | 16:51 |
| ttx | but you're not too far behind either | 16:51 |
| markwash | we will kick some more stuff out as well | 16:51 |
| markwash | today | 16:52 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272136 is "critical", should I add it to the i3 list ? | 16:52 |
| markwash | maybe we should make it "high" instead | 16:52 |
| ttx | ok, making high | 16:53 |
| ttx | that's all I had. Anything you want to discuss at meeting later ? | 16:53 |
| markwash | possibly | 16:53 |
| hub_cap | ttx: s/making/getting ? | 16:53 |
| markwash | I have a quick question for you | 16:53 |
| markwash | at the Glance summit we discussed the general murano / heat artifact repository idea | 16:53 |
| markwash | and in general thought it was the right direction | 16:54 |
| markwash | I'm just a little bit worried that this is a scope expansion for the Images program | 16:54 |
| markwash | which would mean we'd need some cross project or TC interaction perhaps? | 16:54 |
| markwash | who do we need to talk to? or just go for it? | 16:54 |
| markwash | I think the images program currently lacks a mission statement, it could be a discussion around adding one | 16:55 |
| ttx | markwash: you will definitely need to have some TC discussion about it | 16:55 |
| ttx | markwash: that said, raising it at cross-project meeting first might be a good idea | 16:55 |
| ttx | make sure the others are comfortable with that scope expansion before you start pushing it | 16:56 |
| markwash | hows the agenda for today? | 16:56 |
| ttx | so I would add it for meeting today to judge the temperature, then start a thread on -dev about expanded scope and mission statement | 16:56 |
| markwash | all right, let's give that a shot | 16:57 |
| ttx | then it could appear on the TC radar as a governance repo change | 16:57 |
| ttx | adding to today's agenda | 16:57 |
| markwash | I'll try to prepare a few lines to present it adequately | 16:59 |
| ttx | hub_cap: o/ | 17:02 |
| hub_cap | howdy ttx | 17:02 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 17:02 |
| hub_cap | so just so u know, ive put another bp into i3 | 17:02 |
| hub_cap | its a sub-feature of configuration mgmt | 17:03 |
| ttx | 2 non-prioritized BPs in there | 17:03 |
| hub_cap | aka, a shift in the wa i wanted some data represented | 17:03 |
| hub_cap | yup ill fix them now | 17:03 |
| ttx | ok | 17:03 |
| hub_cap | k | 17:04 |
| hub_cap | at this point, the big ones are getting c*, mongo, and config mgmt in | 17:04 |
| * ttx refreshes | 17:04 | |
| hub_cap | and xml removal | 17:04 |
| hub_cap | so if the others slip, im fine w/ that | 17:04 |
| hub_cap | we might need a FFE For config mgmt, and possibly some mgmt api stuff | 17:05 |
| hub_cap | but we can cross that bridge when we get closer to our cutoff | 17:05 |
| ttx | ok | 17:05 |
| ttx | progress looks good, although you could "complete" more things | 17:06 |
| hub_cap | i still feel confident everything will merge tho | 17:06 |
| hub_cap | yea | 17:06 |
| hub_cap | the break nuked our productivity | 17:06 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252897 is critical | 17:06 |
| hub_cap | so those are still in progress | 17:06 |
| ttx | should it appear on the i3 list ? | 17:06 |
| * hub_cap checks | 17:06 | |
| hub_cap | fixed | 17:06 |
| ttx | it's on the "trove next" list | 17:06 |
| hub_cap | its a nebulous bug that had one "Case" fixed | 17:06 |
| hub_cap | so i put it to wishlist | 17:07 |
| ttx | maybe downgrade to "high" ? | 17:07 |
| ttx | otherwise I'll keep forgetting about it :) | 17:07 |
| hub_cap | k, its not something ive seen in a long while | 17:07 |
| hub_cap | i almost suspect it just needs to be cleaned up at this point | 17:07 |
| ttx | and ask again and again | 17:07 |
| hub_cap | hahaha | 17:07 |
| ttx | ok, anything you'd like to see discussed later ? | 17:08 |
| hub_cap | ok fixef again | 17:08 |
| hub_cap | not at present.. just still trying to find a good way to do blueprints that make our developers effective heh | 17:08 |
| hub_cap | any progress on the replacement? | 17:08 |
| ttx | slow progress. | 17:09 |
| ttx | but should go faster once the basics are nailed | 17:09 |
| ttx | we have CD now | 17:09 |
| hub_cap | hell yea | 17:09 |
| hub_cap | prolly still lookin at a full cycle before we can adopt ya? | 17:10 |
| hub_cap | even early adopters ;) | 17:10 |
| ttx | yeah. infra is expected to start dogfooding soon | 17:10 |
| ttx | hope to have a good story to sell by next summit | 17:10 |
| hub_cap | great! id love to help out w/ early adoption | 17:11 |
| ttx | famous last words | 17:11 |
| hub_cap | im _sure_ the trove team will be happy w/ it :) | 17:11 |
| hub_cap | dude can it be worse than bps?? | 17:11 |
| hub_cap | ;) | 17:11 |
| hub_cap | look, give me 3 textboxes, 2 "search/tag" fields | 17:12 |
| ttx | well. ATL it doesn't have AUTHENTICATION. | 17:12 |
| hub_cap | and u have bluepritnts LOL | 17:12 |
| ttx | ATM* | 17:12 |
| ttx | so it's pretty bare :P | 17:12 |
| hub_cap | oh ill wait till auth ;) | 17:12 |
| hub_cap | but great to know its comin along | 17:12 |
| ttx | ok, ttyl | 17:13 |
| hub_cap | cu | 17:13 |
| *** hub_cap has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:14 | |
| *** SergeyLukjanov_a is now known as SergeyLukjanov | 18:05 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 18:40 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:00 | |
| *** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:06 | |
| *** zaneb has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:30 | |
| zaneb | ttx: o/ I am proxy-stevebaker for the week | 19:30 |
| ttx | zaneb: o/ | 19:34 |
| * ttx refreshes | 19:35 | |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-3 | 19:35 |
| zaneb | so I was just discussing some of the autoscaling ones today with radix | 19:36 |
| ttx | Two blueprints without a priority | 19:36 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/i18n-messages | 19:36 |
| zaneb | and it looks like a few of those need to get bumped | 19:36 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/send-notification-autoscaling | 19:36 |
| ttx | one of them being marked already implemented | 19:36 |
| ttx | should I just give a low prio to the last one so that it doesn't send anymore alerts ? | 19:37 |
| zaneb | let's call that one high-priority then ;) | 19:37 |
| ttx | hah | 19:37 |
| ttx | I'll make it "medium" sounds fair enough | 19:37 |
| zaneb | split the difference :D | 19:37 |
| ttx | Is the other one (i18) something wanted or not ? | 19:38 |
| ttx | i18n | 19:38 |
| zaneb | yes, I think it is | 19:38 |
| ttx | ok, let's make it low and see | 19:38 |
| zaneb | and I know that's an area that Liang focuses on | 19:38 |
| ttx | so yeah.. there are 3 without assignee, including one autoscaling one | 19:39 |
| ttx | was that what you wanted to discuss ? | 19:39 |
| zaneb | no, but I definitely don't see that one happening in icehouse | 19:40 |
| ttx | so.. radix's "high" ones ? | 19:40 |
| zaneb | we're short on time even for the ones that do have assignees | 19:40 |
| zaneb | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/as-engine should be bumped to Juno | 19:41 |
| ttx | agreed -- you should start deferring | 19:41 |
| ttx | zaneb: want me to do it ? | 19:41 |
| zaneb | I just moved that one to 'next' | 19:41 |
| ttx | ack | 19:41 |
| zaneb | ditto for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/autoscaling-api | 19:42 |
| ttx | zaneb: we don't need to go through them right now. But I agree you need to trim the plan down significantly at this point | 19:42 |
| zaneb | ok, cool | 19:42 |
| ttx | as soon as you're reasonably sure it won't make it, move to next | 19:42 |
| ttx | that will allow to focus review resources on stuff that might make it | 19:43 |
| zaneb | sure, will do | 19:43 |
| ttx | rather than chasing red herrings | 19:43 |
| ttx | I'd suggest to defer those without assignees too | 19:43 |
| ttx | I noticed a few dep issues | 19:43 |
| ttx | update-failure-recovery (High, zaneb, icehouse-3) depends on resource-template-api (Undefined, No assignee, No milestone) and retry-failed-update (Low, clint-fewbar, icehouse-3) | 19:44 |
| zaneb | I just bumped update-failure-recover to next | 19:44 |
| ttx | ah | 19:44 |
| * ttx refreshes again | 19:44 | |
| ttx | ok, looks better now | 19:45 |
| zaneb | I'll assign myself to resource-template-api | 19:45 |
| ttx | x-auth-trust depends on an untargeted keystone blueprint (trusts-chained-delegation) | 19:45 |
| zaneb | and set low priority | 19:45 |
| ttx | want us to raise that one at the meeting ? | 19:46 |
| zaneb | yes, that's probably a good idea | 19:46 |
| ttx | ok, added | 19:46 |
| zaneb | I just ping shardy for an update | 19:47 |
| ttx | right -- no need to discuss it if he plans to drop it | 19:47 |
| zaneb | hopefully I can say something intelligent about it at the meeting ;) | 19:47 |
| ttx | ok, I think that's all I had | 19:48 |
| ttx | anytyhing else you wanted to discuss at meeting ? | 19:48 |
| ttx | anything blocking you ? | 19:48 |
| zaneb | not that I know of :) | 19:48 |
| ttx | OK then. Go and aggressively defer. | 19:48 |
| ttx | See you later :) | 19:48 |
| ttx | oh. wait | 19:48 |
| ttx | zaneb: was wondering if https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/hot-select wasn't completed with the merging of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67562/ | 19:49 |
| zaneb | yep, looks like it is done | 19:50 |
| ttx | zaneb: ok, you can set it to implemented then | 19:50 |
| ttx | that is all | 19:50 |
| zaneb | will do, thanks :) | 19:50 |
| dolphm | ttx: what's the scoop on hudson not linking bp & bugs to code reviews anymore? | 19:59 |
| ttx | no idea | 19:59 |
| zaneb | dolphm: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64738/ | 20:06 |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:45 | |
| *** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:17 | |
| dolphm | regarding our 1v1 this morning and annegentle's request to discuss versioned endpoints in today's meeting; there's a second thread on list that has been very active today, and frankly i'm not caught up on it yet | 21:18 |
| dolphm | i'm guessing it addresses/discusses what anne was looking for | 21:19 |
| dolphm | ttx: ^ | 21:20 |
| ttx | ack | 21:25 |
| ttx | zaneb: question in #openstack-meeting | 21:51 |
| ttx | on that keystone/heat dep | 21:51 |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 22:26 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:33 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 23:25 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:54 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!