Tuesday, 2014-07-29

*** markwash_ has quit IRC01:23
*** mestery_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office03:34
*** mestery has quit IRC03:36
*** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office03:41
*** mestery_ has quit IRC03:46
*** markwash has quit IRC03:47
*** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office03:56
*** mestery_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office03:59
*** mestery has quit IRC04:02
*** mestery_ has quit IRC04:11
*** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office04:21
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office04:25
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z04:59
*** david-lyle has quit IRC05:00
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office05:00
*** david-lyle has quit IRC05:05
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office05:05
*** david-lyle has quit IRC05:12
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office05:12
*** david-lyle has quit IRC05:17
*** jraim has quit IRC06:00
*** jraim__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office06:05
*** jraim__ has quit IRC06:24
*** jraim__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office06:28
ttxmikal_: o/07:59
* ttx wonders if mikal will be around, since there is the Nova sprint08:00
ttxrussellb: I managed to marked all leftover bugs fixreleased09:30
ttxrussellb: protip: remove target milestone first, mark fixreleased (can take up to 5 consecutive tries), then set the target milestone back09:30
ttxfor some reason it helps09:31
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-relmgr-office11:41
eglynnttx: o/11:45
ttxeglynn: o/11:47
ttxSorry was lost in an email rant11:47
eglynnttx: 1:1 time?11:47
eglynnLOL :)11:47
ttxand now I'm interrupted :)11:47
ttxmy rage will cool down!11:47
eglynnk11:47
eglynn... deep breaths ;)11:48
ttx#startmeeting ptl_sync11:48
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 29 11:48:21 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.11:48
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.11:48
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ptl_sync'11:48
ttx#topic Ceilometer11:48
ttxeglynn: how did j2 go ?11:48
eglynncool, d'ya wanna a do a quick juno-2 retrospective first?11:48
eglynnwell, gating for juno-2 was severly restricted by a couple of oslo-messaging bugs causing timeouts in the ceilo units11:48
eglynnwe didn't get the o-m 1.3.1 release until Friday11:49
eglynn(and the test timeouts haven't occurred since)11:49
eglynn\o/ :)11:49
eglynnbut in the end, only two j2 BPs needed last minute bumps to juno-311:49
eglynndedicated-alarm-database was pretty much approved by Monday of last week11:49
ttxOK, you managed to get 7 bps in11:49
eglynn... but the gating Gods decided not to smile upon the many rechecks of dedicated-alarm-database11:50
ttxLooking at j3 now11:50
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/juno-311:50
eglynnyeah so that, that's been fleshed out a bit11:50
ttxYou have 8 blueprints targeted, which sounds pretty realistic, especially with one already completed11:50
ttxdo you expect a lot more to show up ?11:51
eglynnyeah, the whole SAD freeze turned out to be unenforcable11:51
eglynn(with vacations, relocations, job changes etc.)11:51
ttxRemember you can now use "Blocked" if you want to show that a blueprint should be there but didn't have specs approved yet11:51
eglynna-ha, yeah11:51
eglynngood call11:51
eglynnso I've 3 more that I expect to land11:51
ttxthat should allow us to present a more precise roadmap11:51
eglynnI'll add blocked entries in LP for those11:52
ttxeglynn: ok, you can add them to the mix as Blocked11:52
ttxcool11:52
eglynnwill do11:52
ttxotherwise what can I say... merge as early as possible, I expect a busy end of August11:52
eglynnyeap, I'm really banging the drum on feature proposal freeze11:53
ttxyou plan to enforce FPF at the common date ?11:53
eglynn... despite being the worst offender myself in previous cycles for last minute patches ;)11:53
ttxaugust 21 iirc11:53
eglynnthat's the message I've been putting out, yes11:53
ttxok great11:53
ttxeglynn: anything to add to meeting agenda for today?11:53
eglynnI was gonna to raise the per-project functional test suite move11:54
eglynnhowever after discussing with matt, turnout he'll be travelling11:54
eglynnso I think it best to punt that to next week's agenda11:54
ttxyeah, and sdague is at the Nova sprint11:54
ttxok11:55
eglynncool, that settles it so, next week it is11:55
eglynnthat's it from me11:55
ttxeglynn: ok, that's all I had11:55
ttxthx!11:55
eglynncool, thanks for your time!11:55
* ttx finishes rant11:55
eglynnLOL :)11:55
SergeyLukjanovttx, hey!12:04
SergeyLukjanovttx, are you ok to talk re sahara?12:04
ttxSergeyLukjanov: yep, rant finished12:04
ttx#topic Sahara12:04
SergeyLukjanov#link https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/juno-312:05
ttxSergeyLukjanov: how did j2 go for you?12:05
SergeyLukjanovj2 was fully completed12:05
SergeyLukjanovand we have good news - sahara-dashboard was merged to horizon12:05
SergeyLukjanovonly some small fixes/features backports on review12:05
SergeyLukjanovso, we're going to close sahara-dashboard repo soon12:06
ttxSergeyLukjanov: this was completed by j2 ?12:06
ttxcool12:07
SergeyLukjanovttx, several days after jw12:07
SergeyLukjanovj2*12:07
ttxok12:07
ttxso... j312:07
ttxhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/edp-move-examples needs an assignee12:07
ttxYou have 11 blueprints targeted, compared to 8 implemented in j3, sounds reasonable12:08
SergeyLukjanovttx, yup, I'm looking for volunteers for it now12:08
ttxdo you expect a lot more to creep in ?12:08
ttx#info looking for a volunteer to implement edp-move-examples12:09
SergeyLukjanovttx, I think one bp re adding Apache Storm plugin will be added to j312:09
ttx#info  sahara-dashboard was merged to horizon12:09
ttxSergeyLukjanov: is it blocked waiting for spec final approval ?12:09
SergeyLukjanovttx, oh, I'm wrong, it's already in j3 :)12:10
ttxok, so the landscape here should be pretty complete ?12:10
SergeyLukjanovttx, I forget that I've approved spec and targeted it to the j3 a week ago12:10
SergeyLukjanovttx, I hope so12:10
SergeyLukjanovttx, I'm not expecting any more huge stuff for j312:11
ttx#info J3 plan supposed to be complete12:11
ttxSergeyLukjanov: do you plan to enforce Feature Proposal Freeze ?12:11
ttxAug 21, feature code needs to be proposed by then12:11
SergeyLukjanovttx, I think it12:12
SergeyLukjanovttx, I think it's not very important for sahara atm12:12
ttxSergeyLukjanov: OK cool. Anything to add to agenda for meeting today?12:12
SergeyLukjanovttx, nope, nothing from my side for meeting this time12:12
ttxSergeyLukjanov: ok thx12:12
SergeyLukjanovttx, thank you!12:13
ttxdhellmann: ready when you are12:13
SergeyLukjanovttx, just added one more bp to the j3 that was approved in specs12:14
dhellmannttx: the toaster just went off, give me a sec to collect breakfast, brb12:14
ttxok that makes 1212:14
ttxdhellmann: ping me when ready, no hurry12:15
*** eglynn is now known as eglynn-commute12:18
dhellmannttx: ready12:18
ttxargh phone call12:19
* dhellmann finishes his breakfast12:19
ttxphone call ended12:20
ttx#topic Oslo12:21
ttxdhellmann: let me know when you're back12:21
dhellmannhere12:21
russellbttx: thanks for fixing the bugs :)12:21
ttxdhellmann: so.. juno-2 was a bit bumpy with new libs12:21
ttxdhellmann: we'll have to adjust the tools so that they workaround more of LP weirdness12:21
ttxdhellmann: unless you think we should go for one tracker per lib12:22
dhellmannyeah, I wasn't too worried about it because I think it only affected oslo.db and I expected a release shortly after12:22
ttxwhich will make this 1:1 a bit uinfun12:22
dhellmannalthough I've asked them to wait until the API change for exceptions is ironed out12:22
dhellmannyeah, I do *not* want that12:22
ttxdhellmann: is your lib tagging sufficiently consistent that we could rely on that in our scripts ?12:23
dhellmannI would almost rather manage the bps by hand12:23
dhellmannI suspect not12:23
dhellmann(the tagging)12:23
dhellmannI could work more on that, though12:23
ttxNot sure it would solve all issues tbh12:24
dhellmannyeah12:24
ttxoslo.messaging gets FixReleased at coimmon milestones as well12:24
dhellmannI'd actually like to be able to use the tool to mark bugs as released when we do cut a library release between milestones12:24
*** eglynn-commute has quit IRC12:24
ttxdhellmann: you probably already can -- just need to have milestones there corresponding to versions rather than integrated openstack release milestones12:24
dhellmannah, ok12:25
ttxThe big problem here is that oslo.messaging for example still has juno-X milestones in12:25
ttxso you don't "release" in LP when you release in pip12:25
dhellmannyeah, and we don't know the alpha milestones for libraries in advance, since we just increment the value by one12:25
dhellmannI would have to create a milestone, move all the tickets into it, then use the tool to mark them as released12:26
ttxdhellmann: you can have a "next" milestone and rename it when you release, that's what we do with swift12:26
dhellmannah, ok12:26
ttxnext-juno12:26
ttxbut that would not solve the other libs12:26
dhellmannwe would need next-juno-db, next-juno-config, etc.12:27
ttxwell... it would be pretty ugly in the timeline12:27
dhellmannyeah12:27
dhellmannhow's storyboard coming along? :-)12:27
ttxalso not make sense in milestone bug dropdown12:27
ttxIt's awesome, you should try it12:27
dhellmanncan't wait!12:27
ttxalthough projectgroup is not ready yet12:28
ttxwhich is what you want here12:28
ttxdhellmann: what we COULD do though12:28
dhellmannseriously, I'm OK with things being a little manual if it means energy goes into that instead of the "legacy" tool12:28
ttxis to create oslo libs projects in LP AND move them all under an oslo parent project12:28
ttxwe don't use the openstack parent group that much anymore12:29
dhellmannI didn't know we could have nested projects12:29
ttxYou can, it's just one level12:29
ttxand the project group can't contain bugs/BPs12:29
ttxand you need to beg LP admins to get one12:29
dhellmannhow much longer do you realistically think we'll be using lp?12:29
ttxthen you can still see bugs and blueprints at "projectgroup" level12:30
dhellmannis it worth moving all of the bugs and blueprints around?12:30
ttxSo I think infra will migrate to SB for Kilo12:30
ttxthen we'll iron out a number of issues12:30
ttxand during Kilo some adventurous projects will join12:30
* dhellmann tries to decide if he's feeling adventurous12:31
ttxideally so that we can have a strong proposal to move all by L12:31
dhellmannI think I might like to have oslo move early, rather than kludge something together for lp12:31
ttxdhellmann: with more libs being created, it might be worth to implement the oslo projectgroup12:31
ttxin LP12:31
dhellmanncan we convert the existing project, or would we make a new one and leave that one for the incubator?12:32
ttxwe would rename oslo oslo-incubator and ask for an oslo projectgroup12:33
dhellmannok, that makes sense12:33
ttxdhellmann: yeah, I think it's realatively easy, and less weird thean trying to use tag to automate stuff12:33
dhellmannyeah12:33
ttxthat said, we still need to convince that juno-X doesn't make sense for libs.. you would just have the same series (juno) not the same milestones as the integrated release12:34
dhellmannwill spec2bp still work if the blueprints aren't in the oslo project?12:34
ttxI know markmc was pretty attached to having juno-x milestones in oslo.messaging12:34
ttxto share the common rhythm I think12:34
dhellmannyeah, he wants us to act like an integrated project12:35
dhellmannI'm torn on that. I want us to, but I also see some benefits to not.12:35
ttxspec2bp... hmm... trick is all specs fall into solo-specs, so that was working with oslo-the-LP-project quite well12:35
dhellmannyeah12:35
ttxok, let's think about it a bit more12:36
ttxoff-sync12:36
dhellmannwe might need an oslospec2bp that lets me specify the project name12:36
ttxand look at j3 now12:36
ttxyes, some option to force project name12:36
ttxwe'll need it for edge cases anyway12:36
dhellmannwe've had to find some new drivers for a couple of the graduations for j-3, but did have some people volunteer at the last meeting so I think we'll get those back on track12:37
dhellmanntrue12:37
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/juno-312:37
ttxare the "unknown" there "not started", or really "unknown" ?12:37
dhellmannI think those are mostly not started; I'll fix that12:37
dhellmannwe seem to be having more trouble than usual with bp statuses being updated (I thought that happened automatically?)12:38
ttxSo that makes 14 BPs, compared to 6 in j212:38
ttxI think that's doable if most of the ones under review are completed soon12:38
dhellmannyeah12:38
ttxAlso I suspect the graduation ones are not that complex to complete12:39
dhellmannI'm not sure the cross-project testing one is going to make it. I've had some people object to the idea, so I need to talk to jeblair again12:39
dhellmannno, they're not hard, but time consuming because of all of the steps12:39
ttxsometimes keeping two on the list prevents to complete any, while keeping one you can complete it12:39
dhellmannI'm also not counting on anyone adopting those libraries this cycle, so we're going to push right through the rc period with that work12:39
ttxoh, ok12:40
ttxso you may graduate during the RC period, that sounds good12:40
dhellmannI'd like to have the projects thinking about them for k-112:40
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/juno-312:40
dhellmannthe amqp driver is blocked on having the dependencies packaged for the distros12:40
dhellmanngordon is working on that12:41
ttxbut otherwise it's reasy?12:41
ttx+d12:41
dhellmannwell, I'm not sure "easy" but there is some code up for review12:41
ttxno I meant ready12:41
ttxok12:41
dhellmannah12:42
ttxso both roadmaps are complete, or you expect new specs to make it in j3 ?12:42
ttxIf yes, you can use "Blocked" to add them to the milestone plan until they are accepted12:43
dhellmannok12:43
* ttx converts the existing Blocked onto a "Needs Infrastructure" for clarity12:43
dhellmannI do have 2 new specs that were just proposed12:43
dhellmannah, cool, thanks12:43
dhellmannthere's also the one on switching mysql connection libraries, but that's a bigger cross-project concern still12:44
ttxdhellmann: that page is always a best shot at approximating what we think will be in juno... so if you think it will make it, you can add it as Blocked12:44
dhellmannok, I'll go through and make sure it is up to date today12:44
ttxok that's all I had -- anything to add to meeting agenda for today?12:45
ttx#action ttx to think a bit more how to solve the oslo/libraries/fixrelease/milestones conendrum12:45
dhellmannI don't know if it's meeting worthy, but today is my last day at Dreamhost. I start with HP on Monday, and am taking the rest of the week off.12:46
ttxCool. But then the rumour already reached me12:46
dhellmannI've already started using a new email address on the ML, so it's out there if people need to reach me directly.12:46
dhellmannheh12:46
ttxdhellmann: congrats, i suppose :)12:47
dhellmannthanks :-)12:47
ttxttyl12:47
dhellmannk12:47
*** eglynn-commute has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:04
*** eglynn-commute is now known as eglynn13:05
ttxdolphm: jgriffith doesn't seem to be around, you can go now if you're around14:04
dolphmttx: o/14:04
ttx#topic Keystone14:04
ttxdolphm: how did j2 go for you?14:04
dolphmspecs are still a slow process... which resulted in fewer blueprints and more bumped blueprints than i would have preferred14:05
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/juno-314:05
ttx7 blueprints there, compared to 3 landed in j214:05
dolphmon the upside, we seem to have a broader understanding and agreement on the things we landed much earlier14:05
ttxhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/keystone-to-keystone-federation is marked "unknown" status -- does that mean not started, or really "unknown" ?14:06
dolphmit should be just-barely-started14:06
ttxok will mark it started14:06
ttxdolphm: do you expect more specs to appear on the j3 board ?14:06
dolphmone in particular... i expect hierarchical-multitenancy to land, but it should end up in a feature branch, and not be merged with master until K14:07
ttxdolphm: ok, that should be tracked in "next" milestone then14:08
ttxfuture/next14:08
dolphmokay14:08
ttxdolphm: otherwise the plan is thought to be complete ?14:09
dolphmopenid-connect will be j3 soon14:09
dolphmttx: IIRC, spec2bp was going to have an option to target unmerged specs?14:10
dolphmis that still in review, or am i crazy?14:10
ttxstill in review14:10
ttxI'm a bit behind14:11
ttxfeedback welcome though14:11
ttxhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/108041/14:11
ttxyou can already use the "Blocked" status to show up specs that WILL get approved and make j314:12
dolphmlet me try it now...14:12
ttxthat will make a more comprehensive view14:12
ttxdolphm: do you plan to do a feature proposal freeze?14:12
ttxAug 21?14:12
dolphmyes14:12
ttxok14:13
ttx#info Keystone planning to enforce FPF14:13
ttxdolphm: alrighty then, anything to add to meeting agenda for today?14:14
dolphmlooks like the script worked: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/openid-connect14:14
dolphmnot from me14:14
ttxok14:16
ttxawesomesauce14:16
ttxdolphm: thx!14:16
ttxgriff: around?14:16
griffttx: hi ya14:16
ttx#topic Cinder14:16
ttxSorry for not having noticed your new nick around before14:16
griffnahh... my fault14:17
griffI should've said something14:17
ttxhow was j2 for you?14:17
griffgreat, I left it up to Duncan and Russell :)14:17
griffjust kidding14:17
griffMissed more BP's than I would've liked again14:17
*** dhellmann has quit IRC14:17
griffbut got the ones I was most interested in landed14:17
ttx7 landed14:19
ttx13 in j3 plan14:19
ttxLots under review though14:19
griffYeah14:19
griffmost of those are carried over14:19
ttxso if you get them merged fast that MAY work14:19
griffI'm being pretty picky about new things at this point14:19
griffyeah, my bigger concern is new things coming in14:19
ttxhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-storwize-driver-qos is "unknown" status -- is that really unknown, or just not started?14:20
griffit's really unknown from my view14:20
griffthey submitted the bp but I've had no comittment or updates14:20
ttxok, great!14:20
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:20
ttxjust doublechecking:)14:20
griff:)14:20
griffI'll get updates on "unknowns" at tomorrows Cinder meeting14:21
ttxgriff: do you expect a lot more specs to creep in j3?14:21
griffttx: history says they'll try14:21
griffttx: but I made it clear that this time around I was going to be picky14:21
ttxgriff: but nothing expected from your side ?14:22
ttxonce you agree to consider one (and the spec is not approved yet) you can just add it to j3 as "blocked"14:22
ttxso that it apperas on the plan14:23
griffcool14:23
ttxrather than flies below radar14:23
ttxok, that's all I had for you14:23
ttxanything you'd like to discuss at meeting today?14:23
ttxmikal_: want to quickly steal 10min now?14:24
griffnothing for me thanks :)14:24
ttxgriff: ok then ttyl14:24
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:30
*** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:31
ttxdavid-lyle: o/14:31
david-ly_ttx: o/14:33
ttx#topic Horizon14:33
ttxdavid-lyle: how did j2 go?14:33
*** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle_14:33
david-lyle_got most of Sahara in, the rest went in right after j2 tag14:34
ttxyep, heard the good news14:34
david-lyle_I think 12 bps total merged14:34
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/juno-314:34
ttxSo you have 72 blueprints there14:34
david-lyle_with several more trickling in now14:34
david-lyle_ttx: going to have a fire sale later today, everything must go14:34
ttxincluding 27 that are already up for review14:35
david-lyle_honestly haven't taken an attempt at cleaning that up yet14:35
*** david-lyle has quit IRC14:35
ttxif you only merged those that would already be quite a success14:35
david-lyle_agreed14:35
ttxok, so maybe review it and try to come down to 30-4014:35
ttxanythign above that would just create noise14:36
david-lyle_any that have a status other than started or greater will get cut first14:36
ttxack14:36
david-lyle_yes, too much review load14:36
ttxyou can also adopt an early feature proposal freeze14:36
ttxso that you can easily reject stuff that's not under review yet14:36
ttxthe common one is on Aug 2114:37
david-lyle_that's a good idea14:37
ttxeven with that I don't expect magic though :)14:37
*** zaneb has quit IRC14:37
david-lyle_I think a couple of the need review are stale and may go14:37
ttx70 BPs in 5 weeks means 14/week14:38
david-lyle_is that unreasonable?? ;)14:38
ttxwell, we'll see if we have 14 more implemented next week :)14:38
ttxthat's about half of those that are already "needs code review"14:39
ttx:)14:39
ttxdavid-lyle_: note that we'll have a gap analysis progress review at the TC today, you might consider joining us14:39
david-lyle_more likely I expect 14 more random ones to show up14:39
ttxsince we'll look at Horizon gap plan14:39
ttxif you can't come, don't hesitate to update the plan14:40
ttxto reflect recent (j2) progress14:40
david-lyle_ttx: ok, not much progress, there are 4 items14:41
david-lyle_I'll likely attend14:41
ttxdavid-lyle_: anything you wanted to add to the meeting agenda?14:41
david-lyle_no, I may have to miss part of that meeting due to a conflict14:42
ttxack -- so far nothing is on the agenda anyway14:42
ttxdavid-lyle_: ttyl14:42
david-lyle_ok14:42
ttxmestery: around?14:42
mesteryttx: o/14:42
ttx#topic Neutron14:42
david-lyle_ttx: thanks14:42
ttxmestery: how did j2 go?14:42
mesteryttx: It went well, thanks to russellb's help.14:42
ttxcool!14:42
mesteryttx: We merged 11 BPs I think, not bad overall14:43
*** david-lyle_ is now known as david-lyle14:43
ttxpales in comparison to your 84 BPs in j3 though14:43
mesteryIt's a mountain for sure14:43
ttxso that's about 17 to merge every week14:43
mesteryThat's pretty high14:43
mesteryRealistically, if we land 25-30 I'll be happy.14:44
ttxwith only 23 being ready to review right now14:44
ttxright, the trick is, how to predict which ones won't make it and only contribute noise14:44
mesteryI was going to start pulling things which are in Unknown soon14:44
ttxmestery: you started to make use of the "Blocked" status, does that mean those have specs almost approved?14:45
mesteryttx: Actually, that means that there is a -2 on the patches in most cases.14:45
ttxok14:45
ttxyou can use "slow progress" fo that case if you want to distinguish between the two14:46
mesteryttx: Good idea! I think I'll move to using that.14:46
ttxit's like, you want it in but it's not going in the right direction right now14:46
mesteryack14:46
ttxalso lots of BPs have "unknown" status... is that just not started, or really "unknown" ?14:46
mesteryThose are really no started14:47
mesteryI'll move them to that state14:47
mesteryAnd those will be ones to prune in the coming weeks14:47
ttxok, cool14:47
ttxmestery: we'll have post-j2 gap coverage plan progress review at the TC today14:48
ttxyou mighrt want to be present, or at least update your page14:48
mesteryPerfect!14:48
mesteryI think markmcclain and I will be ready for this14:48
ttxmestery: also, just to confirm, you're planning to enforce Feature Proposal Freeze on Aug 21?14:49
mesteryttx: Correct14:49
ttx#info Neutron will have FPF on Aug 2114:49
ttxOK, that's all I had -- anything you want to add to meeting agenda for later today?14:49
mesteryNothing from me at this point, thanks ttx!14:49
ttxmestery: cool. ttyl!14:49
mesteryttx: later!14:50
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg15:01
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs15:09
*** kgriffs has left #openstack-relmgr-office15:10
notmynamettx: ready when you are15:29
ttxnotmyname: o/15:33
ttx#topic Swift15:33
ttxnotmyname: what news?15:33
notmynamettx: last week we release a new swiftlcient15:33
notmynamepython-swiftclient 2.2.015:33
notmynameit has support for storage policies15:33
ttx#info python-swiftclient 2.2.0 was released last week15:33
notmynameand some other nice things15:34
notmynameother than that, we're working on the EC stuff15:34
ttxok, still planning to try a release around the end of the month?15:35
notmynamettx: as in 2 days? or end of august?15:35
ttxarh15:35
* ttx is already in August for some reason15:35
notmyname:-)15:35
notmynameok, end of august seems reasonable :-)15:36
ttxheh, ok15:36
notmynamewhen is the swift gap analysis TC meeting?15:36
ttxplanned next week15:36
ttxas discussed15:36
notmynameok15:37
notmynamejust needed to make sure it was on my calendar :-)15:37
ttxanything you want to discuss at cross-project meeting today?15:37
notmynamenothing specifically. I'm interested-ly following the defcore and in-tree gate testing threads15:38
ttxyes, looks like we are converging towards something more swifty15:38
ttx(on the in-tree gate testing)15:38
ttxdefcore is another beast, but I think you got the discussion going on that15:39
notmynameyes, it seems that way. but actually, I'm just really excited to see some changes that may result in a gate pass rate average above 80%15:39
ttxnotmyname: ack15:40
ttxnotmyname: that's all I had -- talk to you later?15:40
notmynamettx: have a good rest of your day :-)15:40
*** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:03
ttxmarkwash: o/16:04
markwashttx: good morning / evening16:04
ttx#topic Glance16:05
ttxhow was j2 for you?16:05
markwashit rolled by pleasantly enough16:05
ttxa bit un-featureful I see16:05
markwashand then we had our mini summit16:05
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/juno-316:05
markwashI think a few things will land in our specs that will increase the amount of j3 work16:05
ttxmarkwash: feel free to submit them as blueprints with "Blocked" status on the j3 page16:06
ttxthat will allow us to track more precisely16:06
markwashokay, I think the specs will be approved this week in any case16:06
ttxI have a script to push the right statuses in LP16:07
ttxunder review @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108041/16:07
ttxin case you want to play with it16:07
markwashokay, cool16:07
ttxNote that we'll do review gap coverage plan progress in the TC meeting today16:08
markwashah, thanks for the reminder16:08
ttxif you can't be around, make sure the page is updated16:08
markwashI'll be around16:09
markwashbut probably update the page anyway :-)16:09
ttxmarkwash: that's all I had I guess16:09
markwashcool, thanks!16:11
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:11
ttxanytfhing you'd like to talk about at meeting today?16:11
markwashnot at this time16:11
ttxok, ttyl16:13
ttxSlickNik: ready?16:14
SlickNikttx o/16:14
ttx#topic Trove16:14
ttxSlickNik: I take it j2 went well?16:14
SlickNikYes, it did. We got neutron support done and fully merged!16:15
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:15
SlickNikThat's one beast down. :)16:15
ttxYou have 3 times as many blueprint targeted to j3 though16:15
ttxfeeling lucky?16:15
SlickNikNope, I just need to clean it up. I was using it as a sort of catch all.16:15
ttxok, the sooner the better, otherwise the noise will create a distraction16:16
ttxSlickNik: note that we'll be doing the post-j2 review of progress on your gap coverage plan today at the TC16:16
SlickNikI was hoping that someone will pick up some of the lower pri ones, but since they're not started yet - I will need to move them out.16:16
ttxyou migth want to update that page, and/or join us16:16
SlickNikttx: I'm out on the road today, so I might not be able to join. I'll make sure that the wiki is up-to-date with the info. (I'll try my best to join as well).16:17
ttxok16:17
ttxThat's all I had. i suppose you won't be at the cross-project meeting then?16:17
ttxSlickNik: ^16:18
SlickNikttx: Yes, I probably won't make that either. Have family visiting and will likely be driving from Portland to Seattle.16:19
ttxok16:19
ttxwell, talk to you later, then16:19
SlickNikThanks ttx! Talk to you later!16:19
ttxmikal_: I suspect we are skipping our 1:1 for this week? Ping now before I close the day16:20
*** sdague has left #openstack-relmgr-office16:21
*** sdague has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:22
*** eglynn has quit IRC17:01
*** david-lyle has quit IRC17:33
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:33
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:34
*** david-lyle has quit IRC17:35
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:36
*** markwash_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:37
*** markwash has quit IRC17:39
*** markwash_ is now known as markwash17:39
*** david-lyle has quit IRC17:44
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:44
*** david-lyle has quit IRC17:49
*** eglynn has quit IRC18:05
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:07
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:12
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:16
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:17
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:21
*** markwash has quit IRC18:26
russellbttx: any juno-2 issues come up during your 1-1s today that i can help follow up on?18:41
*** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:50
*** markwash_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:54
*** markwash has quit IRC18:55
*** markwash_ is now known as markwash18:55
*** david-lyle has quit IRC18:57
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:57
*** david-lyle has quit IRC18:59
*** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:59
*** markwash has quit IRC19:01
*** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle19:05
ttxrussellb: nope, I think we are ok now19:13
russellbk19:13
*** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office19:24
*** markwash has quit IRC19:31
*** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office19:32
*** markwash has quit IRC19:32
*** markwash has joined #openstack-relmgr-office19:33
*** SlickNik has left #openstack-relmgr-office19:56
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC19:59
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:00
*** mikal_ is now known as mikal20:01
*** david-lyle has quit IRC20:22
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:22
*** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:22
*** david-lyle has quit IRC20:27
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:27
*** david-lyle has quit IRC20:28
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:29
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:05
ttx#endmeeting21:06
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 29 21:06:14 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:06
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-07-29-11.48.html21:06
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-07-29-11.48.txt21:06
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-07-29-11.48.log.html21:06
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:06
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:10
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:11
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:15
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:34
*** stevebaker is now known as steveburt21:41
*** steveburt is now known as stevebaker21:41
*** dhellman_ has quit IRC21:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!