Thursday, 2014-08-28

*** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy08:43
*** lucasagomes has joined #openstack-relmgr-office12:56
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:14
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:19
*** david-lyle has quit IRC14:30
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:30
*** markmcclain has quit IRC14:32
ttxjraim__: around?15:31
redrobotttx he was just over on #openstack-barbican... I'm sure he'll jump on here any minute now15:34
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:35
ttxflaper87: o/15:35
flaper87ttx: o/15:35
ttxinterested in doing zaqar now?15:36
flaper87ttx: yes sir, lets do this15:36
ttx#startmeeting incub_sync15:36
openstackMeeting started Thu Aug 28 15:36:10 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:36
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:36
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'incub_sync'15:36
ttx#topic Zaqar15:36
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/zaqar/+milestone/juno-315:36
ttxnice, Lp rename15:36
flaper87:)15:36
flaper87so, there's been progress w.r.t the blueprints there15:37
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:37
ttxi see you didn't move the "threat model" one yet15:37
flaper87ttx: yup, the reason is that it won't require code so, even if Kurt works on it past the feature freeze, that's fine.15:37
ttxoh, ok15:37
ttx#info threat-model is non-code15:38
flaper87The documentation one is almost done15:38
ttxwould be good to get the essential stuff merged this week if you can15:38
ttxthis week is bad, but next week will be worse </crystalball>15:38
flaper87we approved one patch yday and there's 1 more that will merged today15:39
flaper87Yeah, Prashanth is traveling so Kurt took over his patch15:39
flaper87to get the redis stuff merged asap15:39
flaper87FWIW, the redis patch just had some minor things to address15:40
flaper87so, I'm confident it'll be done today/tomorrow15:40
flaper87and hopefully merged ruing the weekend15:40
ttxHmm... I should create the RC1 milestones everywhere so that things that are non-code can be safely targeted there15:40
flaper87during*15:40
* ttx adds note15:40
flaper87ttx: +1 that'd be useful15:40
ttxok, any question wrt process for next week?15:41
flaper87nope15:41
flaper87I've gone through the process a couple of times with marconi15:41
flaper87it should be clear, I hope.15:41
flaper87:P15:41
ttxheh15:42
ttxYou answered the tricky question RIGHT15:42
ttxok. Talk to you later ;)15:42
flaper87;)15:42
flaper87kk, thanks!15:42
ttxjraim__: still not around?15:42
ttxlucasagomes: want to go now?15:42
lucasagomesttx, hey sure15:43
lucasagomes#link https://launchpad.net/ironic/+milestone/juno-315:43
ttx#topic ironic15:43
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/ironic/+milestone/juno-315:43
ttxtoo fast :)15:43
lucasagomessorry for that heh15:43
lucasagomesstats: 7 Implemented, 6 Needs Code Review, 1 Started (no code upstream yet)15:43
ttxThat looks pretty good15:43
lucasagomescompared with last week, we have 1 more blueprint is marked as "Implemented" .  And 1 more is marked as "Need Code Review" (code was submitted yesterday)15:43
lucasagomesfrom the ones marked as Need Code Review 3 of them are super close to get merged15:43
ttxalthough you'll have to increase the rhythm if you want to match the deadline :)15:44
lucasagomesyeah15:44
ttxdevananda should be back to handle the last line15:44
lucasagomesyeah some cores in Ironic is going to get in a google hangout as well and try to review things together15:44
lucasagomesbut it's looking good right now15:44
ttxlucasagomes: Sounds good! any question, thing i can help with?15:44
lucasagomesttx, I have one question15:45
ttxawesome. i like questions.15:45
lucasagomesone of the bps is not marked as Implemented because in the spec it mentioned that it would add some tempest tests15:45
lucasagomeseverything in Ironic is already merged15:45
lucasagomesbut not the patch in tempest15:45
ttxlucasagomes: ah! yes, a classic limitation of the usage of launchpad blueprints I'm afraid.15:46
lucasagomesIMO, I would mark it as Implemented already... but I don't know if I should15:46
ttxthey can't track tasks across multiple projects15:46
lucasagomesyeah15:46
ttxI think you should mark it implemented15:46
lucasagomesalright15:47
lucasagomeswill do15:47
ttxif you really want to track the tempest work, you carete a blueprint there15:47
ttxcreate*15:47
lucasagomesyeah, I was confused about how to do it15:47
lucasagomesthe tempest test is looking good anyway, has a +2 on it and so on15:47
ttxthere is no good solution unfortunately. This limitation is a major driver for the development of Storyboard, actually15:47
lucasagomesack15:47
lucasagomesthat's fine :)15:47
ttxok, then. Talk to you later! And thanks for stepping up in Deva's absence.15:48
ttxthat was much appreciated15:48
lucasagomesso yeah, overall things are looking good... I suspect that we are going to get at least 1 more bp implemented this week (apart from the tempest one that I'm marking as implemted right now)15:48
lucasagomesthanks15:48
lucasagomesnp at all15:48
*** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:48
ttxjraim__: ready when you are15:49
*** flaper87 has left #openstack-relmgr-office15:50
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:50
*** david-lyle has quit IRC15:51
jraim__I'm ready if you are still around15:55
jraim__ttx: ^^15:55
jraim__sorry, my bouncer is messed up and not notifying me of mentions right now for some reason15:55
ttx#topic Barbican15:56
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/juno-315:56
ttxThat looks good, any progress recently ?15:57
jraim__Been working with the team to clean up the BPs and retartget things that aren't going to land15:57
jraim__Was at the ops summit too, so we talked a bit with Nova / Neutron about how to handle approved specs that didn't land15:57
jraim__so working through that15:57
ttxStill feeling confident for those 2 missing "high" prio ones ?15:57
jraim__Yes, mostly. If they don't land, it'll be a shame, but the PCKS work is going now and should hopefully land15:58
jraim__the orders resource work is a bunch of CRs15:58
jraim__We're trying to track down all the statuses and see what, if anything, is still left to do15:58
jraim__So most of it has landed, but there might be some things that aren't done yet and might have to wait15:59
ttxok16:00
ttxQuestions on the process for nex week?16:00
ttxWe should have the release tooling up to snuff this time16:00
jraim__So it should just require a tag on our part, yes?16:00
ttxrigth, but i'll push it as part of the release process16:01
ttxreference: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Team/How_To_Release16:01
jraim__redrobot will be the release mgr on our side - so we'll be around for whatever we need16:01
ttx#info redrobot will be release management monkey for Barbican j316:01
ttxjraim__: i'll probably need you to sort the things that didn't make it16:02
ttxbetween deferred and exception-granted ones16:02
jraim__no problem, I'll be around as well16:02
ttxi'll have the RC1 milestones created in LP so that we can track that16:02
ttxjraim__: ok, thx, and talk to you soon16:02
jraim__sounds good. I'm hoping we won't have any, but that is probably in vain16:03
jraim__thanks16:03
ttxI think in my 4-year career this happened only twice16:03
ttxthat all targets were met for a project in a FF milestone16:03
ttx#endmeeting16:04
openstackMeeting ended Thu Aug 28 16:04:01 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:04
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/incub_sync/2014/incub_sync.2014-08-28-15.36.html16:04
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/incub_sync/2014/incub_sync.2014-08-28-15.36.txt16:04
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/incub_sync/2014/incub_sync.2014-08-28-15.36.log.html16:04
*** lucasagomes has left #openstack-relmgr-office16:05
*** jraim__ has quit IRC16:06
*** jraim_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:06
*** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle16:30
dolphmttx: i'm looking to create a feature branch for hierarhical multitenancy in keystone -- do i just follow this except used feature/ instead of proposed/ ? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GerritJenkinsGit#Create_proposed.2F.2A_Branch16:56
dolphmactually it appears i dont have permission to do so on https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/projects/openstack/keystone,branches16:57
*** SlickNik has left #openstack-relmgr-office17:00
*** markmcclain has quit IRC17:17
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:42
ttxdolphm: I can do that for you17:52
ttxdolphm: Was the need for the branch discussed anywhere ? First time I hear of it17:53
ttxdolphm: also you may want to make sure -infra knows about it17:53
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z17:57
*** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu17:59
*** mestery has quit IRC18:08
*** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:08
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk19:21
dolphmttx: it was primarily discussed at our midcycle hackathon - hierarchical is highly impactful and we don't want to ship it with a bunch of bad assumptions / unknown impact19:27
dolphmttx: what does infra need from me?19:27
*** mestery has quit IRC19:35
*** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office19:36
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:01
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_21:17
*** markmcclain has quit IRC22:34
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg22:34
*** david-lyle has quit IRC23:17

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!