| *** david-lyle is now known as david-lyle_afk | 00:28 | |
| *** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu | 01:04 | |
| *** mestery has quit IRC | 05:15 | |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 05:16 | |
| *** eglynn-pto has quit IRC | 08:21 | |
| *** mestery has quit IRC | 08:29 | |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 08:31 | |
| *** eglynn-pto has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 08:46 | |
| *** eglynn-pto has quit IRC | 09:01 | |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, hi, if you have 5 mins, I have a question re backports to stable branch | 11:03 |
|---|---|---|
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: sure | 11:03 |
| ttx | ask away | 11:03 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, thx | 11:03 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, so, I'd like to add several folks to sahara stable maint team, is it on my own, or should I discuss changes to the team with stable branch CPL? | 11:04 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, that's because we'd like to merge fixes for a bunch of critical user-facing bugs in 2014.2.2 | 11:05 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: you suggest a list, we send them a brief email pointing them to the Stable Branch policy, they confirm that they read and understand it, and off they go | 11:06 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, ack, thx | 11:06 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, email with [stable][sahara] tags to -dev will be ok? | 11:07 |
| ttx | yes | 11:07 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, thx | 11:10 |
| *** eglynn-pto has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:01 | |
| *** eglynn-officeafk is now known as eglynn-lunch | 12:15 | |
| *** eglynn-pto has quit IRC | 12:20 | |
| *** eglynn-lunch is now known as eglynn-office | 13:17 | |
| *** eglynn-office is now known as eglynn-officeafk | 13:40 | |
| *** eglynn-pto has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:54 | |
| *** eglynn-pto has quit IRC | 14:03 | |
| *** eglynn-pto has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:19 | |
| *** eglynn-pto is now known as eglynn | 14:59 | |
| *** bswartz has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:59 | |
| ttx | redrobot: ready when you are | 15:59 |
| redrobot | o/ | 15:59 |
| ttx | #startmeeting incub_sync | 15:59 |
| openstack | Meeting started Thu Jan 29 15:59:49 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:59 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:59 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'incub_sync' | 15:59 |
| ttx | #topic Barbican | 15:59 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/kilo-2 | 16:00 |
| ttx | I see one incomplete BP on the docket | 16:00 |
| ttx | certificate-order-api | 16:00 |
| ttx | Is that likely to get completed by the milestone next week ? | 16:00 |
| redrobot | yes, it's very close to being done. I think the last CR is in review right now, so I feel pretty confident it will land | 16:00 |
| ttx | ok, moving to "needs code review" then | 16:01 |
| ttx | We'll tag sometimes between Tue and Thu next week, ideally | 16:01 |
| ttx | Any other thing you'd like to include in the tag ? | 16:01 |
| ttx | and that we should track status of ? | 16:02 |
| ttx | (feature or bugfix) | 16:02 |
| redrobot | I will probably add any fixes that land before next week, but nothing critical that I can think of | 16:02 |
| ttx | ok. Ping me when you're happy, worst case scenario we'll tag during the sync next week | 16:03 |
| redrobot | sounds good | 16:03 |
| ttx | any question on that ? | 16:03 |
| redrobot | Yeah, we accidentally introduced some bad dependencies with a new client release | 16:03 |
| redrobot | as I understand it the client was pinned to <3.0.2 in stable/juno | 16:04 |
| ttx | redrobot: yeah, I saw that thread... not sure I understand the issue exactly | 16:04 |
| ttx | what was the nesw release version ? What did it introduce ? | 16:04 |
| redrobot | I think it was an oslo.something that pulled in an incompatible dependency. | 16:05 |
| redrobot | we have a bot syncing requirements for us, but we didn't have a stable branches job in our gate, so we didn't notice it | 16:05 |
| ttx | I thinkn that's the issue with having stable branches before you have stability :) | 16:05 |
| redrobot | we have the job now, but I'm still not clear on how to backport fixes so that they can be used in juno? | 16:06 |
| redrobot | should I create a stable/juno branch in the client at 3.0.1 (the last juno-compatible release) and then cherrypick for 3.0.1.x releases? | 16:06 |
| ttx | well, in theory we don't do that (stable branches for clients) so that the recent client acvtually workd with the supported release | 16:07 |
| ttx | but then here we don't really have a "supported release" | 16:07 |
| ttx | redrobot: we should discuss that on #openstack-dev and try to get a few others in the discussion | 16:08 |
| redrobot | ttx ok, will do. thanks. | 16:08 |
| ttx | would you be around in 23 min once I'm done with the syncs ? | 16:08 |
| ttx | I'd like to be around to continue that discussion, but I'm stuck | 16:08 |
| redrobot | yeah, I should be. just ping me to get my attention. | 16:08 |
| ttx | ok will do | 16:09 |
| ttx | redrobot: was that your only topic ? | 16:09 |
| redrobot | ttx yep, I'm good. | 16:09 |
| ttx | ok, brb | 16:09 |
| ttx | bswartz: around? | 16:09 |
| bswartz | ttx: yes! | 16:09 |
| ttx | #topic Manila | 16:09 |
| bswartz | although I'm in a cinder meetup with 20 people o_O | 16:10 |
| ttx | #topic https://launchpad.net/manila/+milestone/kilo-2 | 16:10 |
| ttx | err | 16:10 |
| ttx | #topic Manila | 16:10 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/manila/+milestone/kilo-2 | 16:10 |
| ttx | bswartz: act natural | 16:10 |
| bswartz | yes | 16:10 |
| ttx | that page shows 10 more blueprints to complete | 16:10 |
| bswartz | so we reviewed the BPs and nearly all of them are in good shape | 16:10 |
| ttx | are you confident they can all make it ? | 16:11 |
| bswartz | I've made threats to the various developers to get their stuff fixed | 16:11 |
| bswartz | honestly I expect 1 or 2 not to make it but I don't know which | 16:11 |
| bswartz | so I'm giving them all a chance | 16:11 |
| bswartz | it's possible to get them all merged | 16:11 |
| ttx | OK -- as we get closer to the milestone window (Tuesday-Thursday next week), it would be good to to push back to kilo-3 what will miss the window | 16:11 |
| bswartz | the bugs are a different story | 16:11 |
| ttx | yeah, the unassigned ones are unlikely to get fixes in the time we have left | 16:12 |
| bswartz | yeah I gave some of them a deadline to at least rebase and patch jenkins by tomorrow | 16:12 |
| ttx | the ideal would be to keep only the milestone blockers on the page | 16:12 |
| bswartz | anyone than can't do that will get pushed, so we can focus on good reviews | 16:12 |
| ttx | starting Tuesday | 16:12 |
| bswartz | yes | 16:13 |
| ttx | and not be too greedy so that we can actually tag within the window | 16:13 |
| ttx | :) | 16:13 |
| bswartz | well most of the bugs are netapp related and netapp is going to triage them and see if any need to stay in k2 | 16:13 |
| ttx | then a quick ping when all is green and I can tag | 16:13 |
| ttx | ack | 16:13 |
| ttx | but generally, good progress | 16:13 |
| bswartz | I think we're on the same page -- by Tuesday anything nonessential should be pushed out | 16:14 |
| ttx | I'll let you trim down that buglist | 16:14 |
| ttx | any question on the process ? | 16:14 |
| bswartz | when is the ideal time to tag the milestone frm your perspective? | 16:14 |
| bswartz | Wednesday night? Thursday morning | 16:14 |
| bswartz | ? | 16:14 |
| ttx | bswartz: wednesday.. morning for you | 16:15 |
| ttx | afternoon for me | 16:15 |
| bswartz | okay we'll shoot for that and I'll tell you if we're going to be late | 16:15 |
| ttx | Tuesday and Thursday are usually busier | 16:15 |
| ttx | bswartz: cool, that works | 16:15 |
| ttx | that's all I had | 16:15 |
| bswartz | thanks ttx | 16:15 |
| bswartz | same here | 16:15 |
| ttx | cool, have a good week and meetup | 16:16 |
| bswartz | I'll get back to this meetup and cracking the whip on manila devs | 16:16 |
| ttx | flaper87: ready when you are | 16:16 |
| flaper87 | ttx: here | 16:17 |
| ttx | #topic Zaqar | 16:17 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/zaqar/+milestone/kilo-2 | 16:17 |
| ttx | That looks still very much work in progress... | 16:17 |
| flaper87 | yeah, I'm giving some of those a couple of more days before pushing them back to k-3 | 16:18 |
| ttx | Are any of those open BPs actually just waiting on review on code fully posted ? | 16:18 |
| ttx | (i.e. should be Need code review status) | 16:18 |
| flaper87 | I'm confident few of those bps will be fully implemented | 16:18 |
| flaper87 | ah damn, why do I always forget there's a Need core review status? | 16:18 |
| flaper87 | T_T | 16:18 |
| flaper87 | yeah, most of them are up for review | 16:18 |
| flaper87 | there're 2 that need follow-up patches | 16:19 |
| ttx | We use it to represent "all code posted, wtf are the reviewers doing" state | 16:19 |
| ttx | also works for "I gave -1 wtf is the author doing" | 16:19 |
| flaper87 | hahahaha | 16:19 |
| ttx | basically the final stages | 16:19 |
| flaper87 | yeah, that makes sense | 16:19 |
| flaper87 | I'll update those bps | 16:19 |
| flaper87 | ttx: question: Is it "legal" to remove the "Incubated" lable from zaqar in the docs page? | 16:20 |
| ttx | We use Good progress / Slo progress more to represent "I'm in the middle of a 12-patch long patchseries" | 16:20 |
| flaper87 | (and everywhere it's being used) | 16:20 |
| ttx | flaper87: it's consistent with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145740/14/reference/projects.yaml | 16:21 |
| ttx | scroll down to line 355 | 16:21 |
| flaper87 | w00000t | 16:21 |
| flaper87 | :D | 16:21 |
| ttx | but that's not approved yet | 16:21 |
| * flaper87 will throw a zaqar party at FOSDEM | 16:21 | |
| ttx | I think that's the sense of history though | 16:22 |
| flaper87 | yeah, I'll wait for that patch to land then | 16:22 |
| ttx | direction of history | 16:22 |
| ttx | probably better | 16:22 |
| ttx | That's the change where we erase "incubation" from the collective history | 16:22 |
| flaper87 | ok, other than that. I've no further questions | 16:22 |
| flaper87 | nice, looking forward to the beginning of the tagging craziness | 16:23 |
| ttx | alright, update your status, ping me when you have a "won't get much more in anyway" SHA | 16:23 |
| flaper87 | will do | 16:23 |
| ttx | ideally between Tue and Thu next week | 16:23 |
| ttx | great, thx | 16:23 |
| ttx | flaper87: oh, and push back bugs as well, not just BPs | 16:24 |
| ttx | Kiall: ready when you are | 16:24 |
| Kiall | ttx: heya | 16:26 |
| ttx | #topic Designate | 16:26 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/designate/+milestone/kilo-2 | 16:26 |
| ttx | 2 open BPs | 16:26 |
| ttx | how likely is taht to be completed by the milestoen window next week ? | 16:26 |
| Kiall | Yes, Agent has merged - there's a followup commit pending before complete | 16:26 |
| Kiall | and the 2nd one has code waiting to me to submit | 16:26 |
| Kiall | so - likely to close both out. | 16:27 |
| ttx | so still on track | 16:27 |
| ttx | On the bugs side, you might want to trim the list to milestone blockers | 16:27 |
| Kiall | Yes - many of the still open bugs will likely get pushed to k3 | 16:27 |
| ttx | and push back most unassigned ones unless you can get someone on them now | 16:27 |
| ttx | Then when you're happy and that page is all green, you can send me a SHA | 16:27 |
| ttx | hopefully between Tue and Thu | 16:28 |
| Kiall | Yea, I asked people to push anything that won't land in our meeting last night, nothings changed yet though ;) | 16:28 |
| ttx | same old process | 16:28 |
| Kiall | Sounds good | 16:28 |
| ttx | yeah, cats! | 16:28 |
| Kiall | :D | 16:28 |
| ttx | ok, that's about all I had, you look in good shape | 16:28 |
| ttx | any question on your side ? | 16:29 |
| Kiall | can't help myself.. | 16:29 |
| Kiall | _,,/| | 16:29 |
| Kiall | \o o' | 16:29 |
| Kiall | =_~_= | 16:29 |
| Kiall | / \ (\ | 16:29 |
| Kiall | (////_)// | 16:29 |
| Kiall | ~~~ | 16:29 |
| Kiall | Nope, same old process as you said :) | 16:29 |
| ttx | that's a single cat. It's when there are thousands that it gets tricky. | 16:29 |
| Kiall | I'll do the bug list myself tonight if nobody else get's to it first | 16:29 |
| ttx | alright | 16:29 |
| ttx | have a good end of week | 16:29 |
| Kiall | Same to you.. | 16:29 |
| ttx | I'll try to be at Graham's presentation at FOSDEM | 16:29 |
| Kiall | I'm technically presenting at that too ;) | 16:30 |
| ttx | technically ? Or really ? | 16:30 |
| Kiall | But - It's so short, I might leave it to Graham | 16:30 |
| ttx | ok, but you'll be around? | 16:30 |
| Kiall | Yes - I fly out friday :) | 16:30 |
| ttx | ok, see you there then! | 16:30 |
| Kiall | I'll keep and eye out for you :) | 16:30 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 16:30 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Thu Jan 29 16:30:57 2015 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:31 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/incub_sync/2015/incub_sync.2015-01-29-15.59.html | 16:31 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/incub_sync/2015/incub_sync.2015-01-29-15.59.txt | 16:31 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/incub_sync/2015/incub_sync.2015-01-29-15.59.log.html | 16:31 |
| *** david-lyle_afk is now known as david-lyle | 16:49 | |
| *** bswartz has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
| *** ff has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:11 | |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
| *** eglynn has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:50 | |
| *** mikal_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:55 | |
| *** mikal has quit IRC | 19:56 | |
| *** ff has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:20 | |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!