| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 00:48 | |
| *** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 01:31 | |
| openstackgerrit | Ben Swartzlander proposed openstack/releases: Release of python-manilaclient 1.3.0 https://review.openstack.org/223281 | 02:06 |
|---|---|---|
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 02:11 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:12 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 03:19 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
| *** isviridov_away has quit IRC | 03:28 | |
| *** jroll has quit IRC | 03:28 | |
| *** mattoliverau has quit IRC | 03:29 | |
| *** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:29 | |
| *** jroll has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:31 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:32 | |
| *** jroll has quit IRC | 03:41 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa has quit IRC | 03:41 | |
| *** mattoliverau has quit IRC | 03:41 | |
| *** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:42 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:50 | |
| *** jroll has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:04 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:05 | |
| *** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:07 | |
| *** isviridov_away has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:10 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:16 | |
| *** wshao has quit IRC | 04:17 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 04:22 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 04:30 | |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 06:37 | |
| *** TravT_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 06:37 | |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 06:41 | |
| *** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 06:42 | |
| *** TravT_ has quit IRC | 06:43 | |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 06:43 | |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 06:44 | |
| *** TravT_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 06:53 | |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 06:54 | |
| *** wshao has quit IRC | 07:10 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 08:20 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
| ttx | Kiall, flaper87, johnthetubaguy, SergeyLukjanov: ping me if around | 09:01 |
| flaper87 | ttx: I am | 09:02 |
| ttx | Quick check on zaqar status for release | 09:02 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/zaqar/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 09:02 |
| ttx | shows one standing FFE | 09:02 |
| ttx | how close is this ? Is there any other FFE standing ? | 09:03 |
| ttx | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zaqar/+spec/fine-grained-permissions | 09:03 |
| flaper87 | ttx: It's complete, as of yday | 09:04 |
| flaper87 | I need to update the bp | 09:05 |
| * flaper87 does that | 09:05 | |
| ttx | flaper87: cool, so no more FFE in zaqar ? | 09:05 |
| flaper87 | as far as those bugs go, we're reviewing them and it should be all done in time for the rc1 release | 09:05 |
| flaper87 | no more FFEs | 09:05 |
| flaper87 | Zaqar liberty is closed feature wise | 09:05 |
| ttx | ok, the bug list is up-to-date with RC1 blockers ? | 09:05 |
| flaper87 | it is | 09:05 |
| ttx | (at least known ones) | 09:05 |
| ttx | ok, great, looks like you're in great shape | 09:06 |
| flaper87 | I checked it yda | 09:06 |
| flaper87 | w000h00 | 09:06 |
| ttx | flaper87: Thx for the quick update | 09:06 |
| flaper87 | np, my pleasure | 09:06 |
| openstackgerrit | Erno Kuvaja proposed openstack/releases: Release of python-glanceclient 1.1.0 https://review.openstack.org/222716 | 09:09 |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 09:52 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 09:57 | |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 10:44 | |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:34 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release of python-glanceclient 1.1.0 https://review.openstack.org/222716 | 11:54 |
| ttx | gordc: ping me when available | 11:57 |
| ttx | Kiall, johnthetubaguy, SergeyLukjanov: same ^ | 11:57 |
| gordc | ttx: o/ | 11:57 |
| ttx | gordc: Quick check on Ceilo release status | 11:57 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 11:57 |
| ttx | shows that you're done with FFEs, is that correct ? | 11:58 |
| *** bdemers has quit IRC | 11:58 | |
| gordc | ttx: yes. we closed off our remaining FFE items last week so we're just testing/documenting currently. | 11:58 |
| ttx | great! | 11:58 |
| gordc | we're also aiming to tag ceilometerclient 1.5.0 as our liberty cilent | 11:58 |
| ttx | gordc: you only have 2 RC bugs on the list -- are those all the known blockers ? | 11:59 |
| gordc | ttx: the first one is. | 11:59 |
| gordc | i actually haven't been targetting bugs for rc1... | 11:59 |
| ttx | feels like you could go and tag RC1 soon, and unfreeze master | 11:59 |
| gordc | i'll start doing that. | 12:00 |
| ttx | well, you should have all the RC1 blockers on this list, so that we know how far you are | 12:00 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release of python-manilaclient 1.3.0 https://review.openstack.org/223281 | 12:00 |
| gordc | ttx: i'll take a look at existing bugs and tag for rc1 as appropriate | 12:00 |
| ttx | ideally you would tag the RC1 sometimes next week | 12:00 |
| ttx | so that you don't freeze master for too long | 12:01 |
| gordc | kk, i think next week is a doable target for us | 12:01 |
| ttx | cool. The important step is to list the blockers on the RC1 page so that you know how far you are | 12:01 |
| ttx | gordc: thx! | 12:01 |
| gordc | ttx: sure makes sense. | 12:01 |
| ttx | dhellmann: hi! Looking at docs.o.o/releases I was wondering why we had neutronclient cliff starting with folsom and no other libs until icehouse | 12:34 |
| ttx | should we try to map the others ? or remove those ? | 12:34 |
| dhellmann | ttx: yeah, it's a matter of importing their history from git | 12:50 |
| dhellmann | I can make a note to do that | 12:50 |
| dhellmann | there's a tool for it, I just have to run it on all the libs | 12:51 |
| ttx | ok, yeah that would be good, for completeness | 12:51 |
| dhellmann | noted | 12:52 |
| dhellmann | ttx: this looks like a reasonable constraints change for tempest-lib, do you want to approve? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/223523/ | 12:52 |
| ttx | ack done | 12:54 |
| dhellmann | gordc: are you set for ceilometer library releases for liberty? http://docs.openstack.org/releases/releases/liberty.html#library-projects | 12:56 |
| dhellmann | morgan: are you set for keystone library releases for liberty? http://docs.openstack.org/releases/releases/liberty.html#library-projects | 12:56 |
| gordc | dhellmann: we're looking to set ceiloemeterclient 1.5.0 as our min version for liberty https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222386/ | 13:00 |
| gordc | dhellmann: for ceilometermiddleware, we may need a release today/tomorrow | 13:01 |
| dhellmann | ack | 13:01 |
| dhellmann | ttx: a requirements bump for ceilometer client: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222386/2 | 13:05 |
| ttx | ack | 13:10 |
| dhellmann | thingee: do we need a cinder client release to wrap up liberty? http://paste.openstack.org/show/462959/ | 13:10 |
| dhellmann | Kiall: do we need a designate client release to wrap up liberty? http://paste.openstack.org/show/462967 | 13:12 |
| ttx | dhellmann: started to work on Mitaka release schedule, you can see options at https://www.dropbox.com/s/qdh8v3tffdds3mb/Schedule.pdf?dl=0 | 13:17 |
| ttx | Quick comments: ideally we have two full weeks between release week and summit week, that's better for everyone's sanity | 13:17 |
| ttx | Then we have the option to shorten the period between FF and final from 6 weeks to 5 weeks | 13:18 |
| ttx | squares in yellow is where I'm likely to be off | 13:18 |
| ttx | some proposals account for the dead period around Christmas | 13:18 |
| * ttx adds another pption | 13:20 | |
| *** dims_ has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
| dhellmann | morgan: more details for keystone owned libs: http://paste.openstack.org/show/462977/ | 13:22 |
| *** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 13:22 | |
| ttx | dhellmann: options 1/2 only have one empty week between release and summit. options 3/4 place FF on a week I'm likely not to be around. options 5/6 shorten the FF-to-release period by one week. | 13:23 |
| dhellmann | ttx: looking now | 13:24 |
| ttx | If we do our release management simplification right, I think the most painful option would be 1/2 | 13:24 |
| ttx | I'm tempted to reduce FF-to-release. | 13:25 |
| dhellmann | so option 5? | 13:26 |
| dhellmann | 6 might be better, with a longer m2 | 13:26 |
| ttx | options 5/6. I think I prefer 6 since it accounts for the ghost week around christmas) | 13:26 |
| dhellmann | yeah | 13:26 |
| ttx | do you think it's doable to shorten FF-to-release by one week ? (compared to this cycle) | 13:27 |
| ttx | (we still have the same time between FF and summit) | 13:27 |
| dhellmann | I'm likely to be gone around jan 13 for our 20th anniversary trip, though we might take it later in the year, too | 13:27 |
| ttx | OK, let's give it a bit more thought before deciding. Maybe see how the RC1s go this cycle, see how optimistic the shortened one is | 13:29 |
| dhellmann | that seems like a good idea | 13:29 |
| dhellmann | I'd like to figure out a way to eliminate the release period log jam | 13:30 |
| dhellmann | mestery: is neutronclient 3.0.0 the final expected release this cycle? | 13:32 |
| ttx | nikhil_k, redrobot, thingee: ping me when available for a quick release status check | 13:32 |
| ttx | Kiall, johnthetubaguy, SergeyLukjanov: same ^ | 13:33 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: sure | 13:33 |
| mestery | dhellmann: I believe it is, yes, that's why I never pushed a patch. | 13:33 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: looking at https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 13:33 |
| dhellmann | mestery: ok, just making sure, thanks | 13:33 |
| mestery | dhellmann: Thanks for keeping me honest :) | 13:34 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: I see one standing FFE, how close is that one ? | 13:34 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: any other FFE not listed there ? | 13:34 |
| ttx | mestery: we need to sync too, whenever is good for you | 13:34 |
| dhellmann | mestery: it has been a pleasure serving with you this cycle | 13:34 |
| mestery | ttx: Ack! Can you give me about 20 minutes or so? Is that too late or will that work? | 13:35 |
| ttx | mestery: sure, i should be around | 13:35 |
| dhellmann | notmyname: do you need another swiftclient release for liberty? http://paste.openstack.org/show/462993 | 13:35 |
| mestery | dhellmann: Thanks! The same for you and ttx! I hope people tell both of you this, but you do an excellent job at what you do, you really make the life of all PTLs so much easier. :) | 13:35 |
| mestery | ttx: Will ping you soon! | 13:35 |
| ttx | dhellmann: starting to think this channel is popular and has a bit of a weird name. We should probably rename to #openstack-release, but that's painful | 13:35 |
| dhellmann | ttx: but I just got the place decorated to my satisfaction! | 13:36 |
| dhellmann | seriously, a rename may be in order | 13:36 |
| ttx | current name was OK when it was a specialized channel for office hours | 13:37 |
| ttx | but now that it's almost part of the process for all teams, not so much | 13:37 |
| dhellmann | flaper87: do you need a zaqarclient release to wrap up liberty? http://paste.openstack.org/show/462994 | 13:37 |
| dhellmann | ttx: yeah, it would make sense to follow the team naming convention used elsewhere | 13:38 |
| flaper87 | dhellmann: sadly, no. We'll likely cut one in early M, though. | 13:38 |
| dhellmann | flaper87: ack, we'll create the stable branch from 0.1.1 then | 13:38 |
| flaper87 | dhellmann: sounds good | 13:38 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: we are arguing over the last patch | 13:39 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: but it's close and it's the only one ? | 13:39 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: we have a few other possible blockers, but nothing seems important enough to block on right now | 13:39 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: worried we don't really have anyone raising bugs or testing, honestly | 13:40 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: on the bugs side... did you go through the nova bugs list and come up with the blockers there ? | 13:40 |
| johnthetubaguy | using liberty-rc-potential bug tag for the maybe blockers | 13:40 |
| ttx | ok | 13:41 |
| ttx | so the list is the current known blockers, even if you may add a couple more | 13:41 |
| johnthetubaguy | not personally been through them all, folks have been through some, and triage folks are looking out for them | 13:41 |
| ttx | and should ask Nova folk to more actively file blockers if they have some they find in testing | 13:41 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: yeah, we have the known ones, but it seems too small | 13:42 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: you seem to be on track for a RC1 next week anyway, little point in freezing master for a lot longer if you have so little things to fix in it | 13:42 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: ok, thx for the update | 13:42 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: the FFE is actually not a FFE, it's a doc task, right | 13:43 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: yeah, that one is a doc only task, and its a developer only doc | 13:43 |
| ttx | ack | 13:44 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: we still have about 80 odd bug fixes waiting for a review, but just rechecking them, but nothing makes we want to hold up the release right now | 13:45 |
| morgan | dhellmann: should be ready for another release of the libs tomorrow. Need to check with people | 14:07 |
| ttx | morgan: would you be availble for a quick release status check ? | 14:08 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: automatically submit constraints updates for new releases https://review.openstack.org/201682 | 14:08 |
| dhellmann | morgan: ok, we're down to the wire so be aggressive about not waiting for stuff if you can | 14:09 |
| morgan | ttx: sure | 14:10 |
| mestery | ttx: I'm back now! | 14:10 |
| ttx | morgan: looking at https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 14:10 |
| morgan | dhellmann: mostly i just woke up | 14:10 |
| * mestery waits for morgan and ttx to finish | 14:10 | |
| morgan | dhellmann: like minutes ago | 14:10 |
| ttx | morgan: I see two BPs there and a few RC1-targeted bugs | 14:10 |
| ttx | are those two BPs for standing FFEs ? | 14:11 |
| dhellmann | morgan: sure, get yourself awake, I just meant we should not delay for FFE | 14:11 |
| morgan | BPs will be punted today / code gating | 14:11 |
| ttx | morgan: and/or are there more FFEs standing for Keystone ? | 14:11 |
| ttx | morgan: ok, I'll let you adjust the list of BPs there accordingly once that is done | 14:11 |
| morgan | FFEs should be decided at our meeting in a few hours | 14:11 |
| ttx | Is the bug list current with known RC1 blockers ? Or do you still have to go through the bug list and target them ? | 14:12 |
| morgan | Bugs should be gating soonish | 14:12 |
| morgan | I need to check for new bugs but I think those are mostly nice to haves and should land | 14:12 |
| morgan | A couple are blockers | 14:13 |
| ttx | ok, so you should be on track for a RC1 sometimes next week | 14:13 |
| morgan | Yeah | 14:13 |
| ttx | cool. Thx for the update! | 14:13 |
| ttx | mestery: you're on | 14:13 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: automatically submit constraints updates for new releases https://review.openstack.org/201682 | 14:13 |
| * mestery buckles in | 14:13 | |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 14:13 |
| morgan | I will also be defering some final rc stuff to the new PTL once election has completed | 14:13 |
| morgan | Fwiw | 14:13 |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 14:13 | |
| ttx | Shows 4 standing FFEs, is that correct ? | 14:13 |
| morgan | Rc2, release and beyond | 14:14 |
| ttx | morgan: ack | 14:14 |
| mestery | ttx: That's correct, we went over them in the neutron meeting yesterday and ended up with those 4. | 14:14 |
| ttx | how far are they ? | 14:14 |
| mestery | LBaaS one just needs a devstack patch, it's basically done | 14:14 |
| mestery | WSIG framework will merge back into master tomorrow | 14:14 |
| mestery | External DNS is one small patch that needs to be re-spun | 14:14 |
| mestery | Flavor frameowkr template is the one which has a handful of patches left | 14:15 |
| mestery | It's the long pole | 14:15 |
| mestery | So | 14:15 |
| mestery | They are all looking awesome :) | 14:15 |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:15 | |
| ttx | Sure, I just fear they distract your team from the long list of RC1-targeted bugs | 14:15 |
| mestery | I think the only one which may is the flavor one | 14:15 |
| mestery | The other 3 are basically ready and just require sheparding a bit | 14:15 |
| ttx | ok | 14:15 |
| ttx | what would be your ETA for the flavor one ? | 14:16 |
| mestery | I'd like to see those patches merged by the end of the week | 14:16 |
| ttx | yeah, that would be good if we want to hit RC1 in a reasonable time | 14:17 |
| ttx | Talking about the targeted bug list, it's a bit long | 14:17 |
| ttx | any chance you could split it between real RC1 blockers, and using a tag for nice-to-haves ? | 14:17 |
| mestery | ttx: I will do that today, yes. | 14:18 |
| ttx | I just don't see how you would complete the current list in the next two weeks | 14:18 |
| mestery | ttx: I agree, I think some things have been slipped in as "wishful thinking" | 14:18 |
| ttx | ok | 14:18 |
| mestery | Agreed | 14:18 |
| mestery | :) | 14:18 |
| ttx | sure and that's fine if they make it | 14:18 |
| mestery | People are optimistic :) | 14:18 |
| ttx | ok, I think I have what I needed | 14:18 |
| ttx | mestery: thx | 14:18 |
| mestery | ttx; Cool! | 14:19 |
| mestery | ttx dhellmann: There is one potential client patch for a 3.0.1 (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219455/) | 14:19 |
| mestery | I'm having folks look at it now. | 14:19 |
| mestery | If it doesn't merge by today, then 3.0.0 is it, otherwise we may want to cut 3.0.1 with that one (and one other patch which merged into the client last week). | 14:19 |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| ttx | Kiall, SergeyLukjanov, nikhil_k, redrobot, thingee: ping me when available for a quick release status check | 14:26 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: hi | 14:30 |
| nikhil_k | just back from a irc meeting, sorry I meant to reply earlier about the timing. | 14:31 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: I have a few bugs and couple of small FFEs in progress. | 14:32 |
| nikhil_k | we are tracking them here: | 14:32 |
| nikhil_k | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-liberty-rc-reviews | 14:33 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: sorry was afk for a minute | 14:35 |
| ttx | I'm trying to crosscheck with https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 14:35 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: do you have a BP for scrub-images-in-parallel ? | 14:36 |
| *** bdemers has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:36 | |
| nikhil_k | ttx: sure | 14:36 |
| ttx | should image-signing-and-verification-support be taregetd to liberty-rc1 too ? | 14:38 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: it's been added to liberty-rc1 page | 14:38 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: not really, it's just waiting on tests | 14:38 |
| nikhil_k | the code is there, some additional tests around libs are being added | 14:38 |
| ttx | ah, ok | 14:39 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: ideally you would have all the feature work out of the way ASAP, so that you can concentrate on bugfixing | 14:39 |
| ttx | Also ideally you would translate that etherpad you have into a set of targeted bugs and BPs, so that we know how close you are from a RC1 tag | 14:40 |
| ttx | it seems mostly in sync but it's hard to tell | 14:41 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: I see, I created the etherpad fot that purpose but I guess it was overused | 14:41 |
| nikhil_k | for* | 14:41 |
| dhellmann | mestery: ack, we can consider a backport, too | 14:42 |
| ttx | the etherpad is often useful to easily list the reviews you're actually waiting on for each of those blockers | 14:42 |
| mestery | dhellmann: I think that's the best approach | 14:42 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: the features that exists -- one of them is just marked feature so document the perf improvement (parallel scrubbing) and because we have config on it | 14:42 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: but keeping the list of blockers (FFEs and bugs) on the Launchpad page helps us making sense of if everything is under control | 14:42 |
| dhellmann | mestery: let's see if it merges today, first | 14:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaitlin Farr proposed openstack/releases: Remove Castellan from deliverables https://review.openstack.org/223624 | 14:43 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: sure, I will cross-check LP with the etherpad. I am not sure if people have added bugs for each of the imp commit so will do that | 14:43 |
| ttx | For example https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217370/ is listed, points to https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1444767 which is not on the RC1 page | 14:44 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1444767 in Glance "scrubber edge cases orphan objects and records" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Hemanth Makkapati (hemanth-makkapati) | 14:44 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: hope that helps | 14:44 |
| ttx | and other changes in the etherpad just don't refer a bug nor a blueprint so they exist only in the etherpad | 14:45 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: people seem to have abused the etherpad, I will remove it | 14:45 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: ack | 14:45 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: so try to list the remaining open FFEs and RC1 blocker bugs on the LP page (you may have to file a few bugs to account for things in the list) | 14:46 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: that was my worry too, thanks. | 14:46 |
| nikhil_k | sure, I will file those bugs | 14:46 |
| ttx | that will help figure out how far you are from the RC1 tag | 14:46 |
| ttx | We'll sync again toward the end of week. | 14:46 |
| nikhil_k | sure, that works | 14:46 |
| nikhil_k | Thanks ttx ! | 14:49 |
| openstackgerrit | Kaitlin Farr proposed openstack/releases: Remove Castellan from deliverables https://review.openstack.org/223624 | 14:59 |
| *** TravT_ is now known as TravT | 15:02 | |
| *** jhesketh has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
| *** jhesketh has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:04 | |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, sorry, I'm here now, IRC client crashed quietly | 15:10 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:13 | |
| SergeyLukjanov | so, we have https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-liberty-ffes to track FFEs | 15:14 |
| SergeyLukjanov | in addition to it we have bunch of bug fixes needed and huge bunch of dock updates in the queue | 15:14 |
| SergeyLukjanov | https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 15:14 |
| SergeyLukjanov | I will cleanup the spare bugs from it next week | 15:14 |
| SergeyLukjanov | so far, it seems like sahara is in a good shape for rc1 on Sept 21-25 week | 15:15 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: sorry was on a call | 15:32 |
| ttx | checking | 15:32 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 15:33 |
| ttx | shows 3 FFEs left, how far are they from landing ? | 15:33 |
| ttx | (at this stage it's a good idea to complete them to be able to focus on bugs and RC1) | 15:34 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: also, any chance you could refine the bug list this week instead ? i'd like to have a clean slate entering next week | 15:34 |
| ttx | david-lyle: ping me when you have 5 minutes for a horizon release status check | 15:35 |
| *** bdemers has quit IRC | 15:37 | |
| *** bdemers has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:45 | |
| *** bdemers has quit IRC | 15:46 | |
| david-lyle | ttx: o/ | 15:55 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 15:55 |
| ttx | david-lyle: this lists 4 open FFEs, is that correspnding to the reality ? | 15:56 |
| ttx | or do you have more or less ? | 15:56 |
| david-lyle | 3 should merge out of those, one is wishlist essentially | 15:56 |
| david-lyle | but does not interfere with stability | 15:57 |
| ttx | david-lyle: how far are they ? We should purge the FFEs asap to concentrate on bugfixes | 15:57 |
| david-lyle | network topology is blocked by someone reporting an issue, others trying to reproduce | 15:57 |
| david-lyle | otherwise ready | 15:57 |
| ttx | ok | 15:57 |
| david-lyle | the Sahara BP should be ready, just trying to get through review | 15:58 |
| ttx | On the bugs side, would be great to refine the list to true RC1 blockers, and move nice-to-haves to some tag | 15:58 |
| david-lyle | and Database clustering is a 1700 line review needing more time to review | 15:58 |
| ttx | because I don't think all those bugs will be fixed before the end of times | 15:58 |
| david-lyle | ttx: will pare doen the list | 15:58 |
| david-lyle | *down | 15:58 |
| ttx | david-lyle: ok, general goal being to tag the RC1 next week, but I usually cut some slack for Horizon since it sits on top of features that just appeared | 15:59 |
| ttx | would still like all FFEs purged by end of week though | 15:59 |
| david-lyle | ttx: understood. will move them forward | 16:00 |
| ttx | so we would drop that wishlist one if it happens to not be completed | 16:00 |
| ttx | so we'll sync again around end of week | 16:01 |
| ttx | david-lyle: thx! | 16:01 |
| david-lyle | sure, will do, I wanted to give it some slack | 16:01 |
| david-lyle | but hasn't materialized yet | 16:01 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov, Kiall, redrobot: around? | 16:02 |
| david-lyle | thanks ttx | 16:02 |
| *** bdemers has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:06 | |
| redrobot | ttx o/ | 16:10 |
| *** bdemers_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:11 | |
| *** bdemers has quit IRC | 16:12 | |
| *** bdemers_ is now known as bdemers | 16:12 | |
| ttx | redrobot: o/ | 16:17 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 16:18 |
| ttx | redrobot: that page lists one standing FFE, how close is it from being merged ? | 16:19 |
| redrobot | ttx waiting on one more patch | 16:20 |
| redrobot | ttx I'm guessing 1-2 days | 16:20 |
| ttx | ok | 16:20 |
| ttx | redrobot: you don't have any RC1 blocker bug listed on that page -- does that mean you're bug-free ? | 16:20 |
| ttx | or taht you haven't parsed the bug reports for any blocker you'd like to fix before RC1 | 16:20 |
| redrobot | ttx no, it means we've done a bad job of triaging | 16:20 |
| ttx | redrobot: any chance that can happen early this week ? We'd like to reach RC1 stage next week, and it's difficult if you don't know what the blockers are | 16:21 |
| redrobot | ttx yes, I can definitely make that a priority | 16:21 |
| ttx | redrobot: cool, we'll talk again near the end of the week for a new status check | 16:22 |
| redrobot | ttx sounds good | 16:22 |
| ttx | redrobot: I hope the FFEs will be in by then and the bug list curated, so that we can draft an ETA for RC1 | 16:22 |
| ttx | redrobot: thx! | 16:22 |
| * ttx takes a 3-hour dinner break | 16:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/releases: python-ceilometerclient 1.1.1 - stable/kilo https://review.openstack.org/223684 | 16:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Remove Castellan from deliverables https://review.openstack.org/223624 | 16:33 |
| dhellmann | ttx: when you're back, this should update constraints for the libs we have already: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/223596/ | 16:38 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, okay, I'll review bugs by the end of this week | 16:54 |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
| *** TravT_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:58 | |
| vipul | dhellmann: hello, so here's the issue i'm having with registering python-cueclient | 17:00 |
| vipul | http://paste.openstack.org/show/463232/ | 17:00 |
| vipul | Do i need to update the ownership info in setup.cfg? | 17:03 |
| dhellmann | vipul: looking | 17:13 |
| *** bswartz has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:15 | |
| bswartz | ttx: I'm here now | 17:15 |
| dhellmann | vipul: I see the same error. I'm asking in infra to see if dstufft can help us | 17:15 |
| vipul | dhellmann: ok thanks for looking | 17:16 |
| dhellmann | vipul: is there any chance someone else has already registered that name? | 17:20 |
| dhellmann | vipul: I have registered projects in the past few days, including today, so I think there's something special with the name | 17:20 |
| vipul | dhellmann: shouldn't it show up in the search? I don't recall if it's been registered by anyone | 17:21 |
| dhellmann | vipul: I would expect to find it by search, too, but maybe not if there is no version provided, yet? I don't know how that works. | 17:21 |
| dhellmann | vipul: what do you see if you navigate to https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cueclient | 17:22 |
| dhellmann | I just registered that name | 17:22 |
| vipul | Package Index Owner: doughellmann -- seems like that worked | 17:22 |
| dhellmann | ok, so there may be something wrong with an existing record, or it may be something else | 17:23 |
| dhellmann | I suggest reporting the issue through the pypi bug reporting system to see if someone there can help | 17:23 |
| vipul | Ok will go that route too.. | 17:23 |
| vipul | dhellmann: anything else i need to do to get a release out? | 17:23 |
| vipul | submit a patch to openstack/releases? | 17:23 |
| jroll | dhellmann: when you have a moment, do you mind creating an "Ironic 4.2.0" milestone in launchpad so I can target bugs to it? | 17:24 |
| dhellmann | vipul: for an unmanaged project you'll push a tag yourself when this is working | 17:24 |
| dhellmann | jroll: sure, do you not have permission to do that? | 17:24 |
| jroll | (or teach me to fish) | 17:24 |
| vipul | dhellmann: ok sounds good | 17:24 |
| jroll | dhellmann: I'm looking at https://launchpad.net/ironic/+milestones and don't see a button for it | 17:24 |
| dhellmann | jroll: is that liberty? | 17:24 |
| jroll | I'm part of ironic-drivers | 17:24 |
| jroll | yes | 17:24 |
| jroll | will be stable/liberty | 17:24 |
| dhellmann | ok, to create a milestone you do it from the series page: https://launchpad.net/ironic/liberty | 17:25 |
| jroll | aha! | 17:25 |
| jroll | thanks | 17:25 |
| dhellmann | jroll: I would expect the next liberty release to be 4.1.x | 17:25 |
| dhellmann | 4.2 implies new features | 17:25 |
| jroll | dhellmann: pretty sure there will be a g-r update in there, which you told me warrants a minor bump | 17:26 |
| jroll | also, there are new features in there | 17:26 |
| dhellmann | jroll: stable branches shouldn't get requirements updates | 17:27 |
| jroll | dhellmann: I mean a requirements update between 4.1.0 and 4.2.0 (which will be stable/liberty) | 17:27 |
| dhellmann | jroll: and for the rare cases where we do need that, when we have messed up their requirements, we call those bug fixes and increment the patch level | 17:27 |
| dhellmann | oh, I see, you don't have a 4.2 tag yet, so yeah, that would be ok | 17:27 |
| jroll | yeah :) | 17:28 |
| jroll | cool thanks | 17:28 |
| dhellmann | I thought you meant this would be the next release in the stable series, but it's the *first* release in the stable series, my mistake | 17:28 |
| dhellmann | vipul: did you spot the "support" link near the top of https://pypi.python.org/pypi for reporting the problem? it took me a while to find it, and I knew it was there, so I wanted to make sure you'd found it | 17:29 |
| jroll | heh, correct | 17:29 |
| vipul | dhellmann: I was able to find their Jira, and filed https://bitbucket.org/pypa/pypi/issues/340/unable-to-register-a-package-403-python | 17:32 |
| vipul | dhellmann: i suppose i should also use their support link | 17:32 |
| dhellmann | vipul: you probably only need one or the other, I'm not sure which is actually better | 17:33 |
| *** TravT_ is now known as TravT | 17:34 | |
| bswartz | dhellmann: where is it documented what happens when we do the g-r freeze? | 17:42 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: I'm not sure what you mean? | 17:43 |
| bswartz | the g-r freeze just means that, for the rest of liberty, we cannot increase the minimum version of anything, right? | 17:44 |
| bswartz | or does it mean we set maximum versions too? | 17:44 |
| dhellmann | we're trying to avoid capping this cycle | 17:45 |
| dhellmann | so we would rather not raise the minimums or change the constraints used in the gate, except for things we ourselves are releasing | 17:45 |
| bswartz | I'm trying to understand how we deal with bugs found in the client -- do we fix them, then make a new release, then rely on the fact that the latest release is used and g-r is irrelevant? | 17:46 |
| dhellmann | ah, ok | 17:47 |
| dhellmann | after you have a stable branch for the client, you can backport fixes to that and we can update the version used in the stable/liberty constraints list | 17:47 |
| dhellmann | that's just like what we did last cycle, except that we're not introducing upper-bounds caps on the requirements lists to help with upgrades | 17:47 |
| bswartz | in that case what does the g-r freeze achieve? just a freeze on "other" things from outside openstack? | 17:48 |
| dhellmann | outside dependencies are a big part of it, yes | 17:48 |
| bswartz | ok | 17:49 |
| bswartz | we're trying to figure out what cutoff dates exist for manila client work, if any | 17:49 |
| bswartz | also manila-ui project, which is technically a library too | 17:50 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: ok. You should be in feature freeze already, and you should be planning a release this week to serve as the basis of the stable branch. | 17:52 |
| bswartz | dhellmann: so the release serves as the branching point for the stable branch? | 17:54 |
| bswartz | dhellmann: because in that case we need to make another release later this week | 17:55 |
| dhellmann | bswartz: that's right | 17:55 |
| openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/releases: python-ceilometerclient 1.1.1 - stable/kilo https://review.openstack.org/223684 | 18:04 |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: cliff 1.15.0 https://review.openstack.org/223730 | 18:05 |
| *** bdemers has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:12 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:40 | |
| *** TravT_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:41 | |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| *** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:50 | |
| ttx | bswartz: around now | 19:12 |
| bswartz | ttx: hey I saw you note but I had to run | 19:12 |
| ttx | bswartz: is now a good time ? | 19:12 |
| bswartz | sure | 19:13 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/manila/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 19:13 |
| ttx | shows that you're done with FFEs, is that correct ? | 19:13 |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:15 | |
| *** TravT_ has quit IRC | 19:17 | |
| ttx | bswartz: ? | 19:19 |
| bswartz | arg sorry | 19:20 |
| bswartz | yes we wrapped up FFEs 8 days ago | 19:20 |
| bswartz | we're been working on bugs ever since | 19:20 |
| ttx | bswartz: same page lists 8 targeted bugs - is that the complete list of release-critical blockers ? | 19:20 |
| bswartz | yes | 19:20 |
| bswartz | there are no others that we're aware of | 19:21 |
| ttx | bswartz: ok, looks like if you burn them down fast enough you should be on track for RC1 next week | 19:21 |
| ttx | bswartz: thx for the quick update! | 19:21 |
| bswartz | some of these might even get pushed out or marked invalid after they're investigated | 19:21 |
| bswartz | yeah we're driving towards an early RC1 because our L3 milestone was incomplete due to the technical FFEs | 19:22 |
| bswartz | I want to get RC1 into testers hands this week if at all possible | 19:22 |
| ttx | SlickNik: around for a quick release status update ? | 19:22 |
| bswartz | the main thing that plagues us is neutron bugs that we can't work around | 19:23 |
| bswartz | that's a story for another time though | 19:23 |
| ttx | bswartz: I'm fine with this week, end of week so that we have time to cut the libs branches first | 19:23 |
| ttx | and to merge requirements updates | 19:24 |
| ttx | stevebaker: ping me when you are available for a quick release status update | 19:24 |
| ttx | Kiall, thingee: same ^ | 19:24 |
| SlickNik | ttx: here now | 19:29 |
| ttx | SlickNik: https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 19:30 |
| ttx | that shows that you're done with all FFEs, is that correct ? | 19:30 |
| SlickNik | ttx: yes, that is correct. | 19:30 |
| SlickNik | We're working purely on bugfixes now. | 19:30 |
| ttx | Also shows 25 targeted bugs, and I suspect some of those are not release-critical... Any chance you could narrow down to true blockers, and use for example a tag to mark nice-to-haves ? | 19:31 |
| ttx | That way we could focus and maybe reach RC1 state sometimes next week | 19:31 |
| SlickNik | ttx: yes, these are not all release blockers — I will triage them later today to give us a better sense of what's definitely needed for rc1 | 19:32 |
| SlickNik | ttx: that sounds like a good plan — I'll use a tag for "nice-to-haves" | 19:32 |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/releases: ceilometermiddleware 0.3.0 https://review.openstack.org/223778 | 19:33 |
| SlickNik | And I see a couple that I don't think are blockers at all that I think we should be able to safely punt to Mitaka. | 19:33 |
| ttx | SlickNik: yeah, some teams use "liberty-rc-potential" | 19:33 |
| ttx | SlickNik: ok, I'll be talking to you later in the week to see progress on the bug burning front | 19:34 |
| ttx | thx! | 19:34 |
| bswartz | I thought "liberty-rc-potential" was for after RC1 was tagged -- to flag things for RC2 | 19:34 |
| SlickNik | ttx: sounds good. Thank you! | 19:34 |
| ttx | bswartz: it's a bit of a moving target | 19:34 |
| bswartz | because we *always* have an RC1, but later RCs are optional | 19:35 |
| ttx | it has been used to mark nice-to-haves pre-RC1 as well | 19:35 |
| ttx | but tags are cheap I agree so we can use another one pre-rc1 | 19:35 |
| bswartz | I thought we just used the targeting system for RC1 since we know we have to create the milestone | 19:36 |
| bswartz | we avoid creating milestones for rc2, etc until they are deemed necessary | 19:36 |
| bswartz | thus the tags help in the latter case | 19:36 |
| ttx | bswartz: true | 19:36 |
| ttx | maybe "liberty-nice-to-have" | 19:37 |
| bswartz | =D | 19:37 |
| ttx | to not conflate with true release blockers | 19:37 |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 19:54 | |
| *** wshao has quit IRC | 20:08 | |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:17 | |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 20:17 | |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:24 | |
| thingee | ttx: pong, multi-tasking at the moment. polling for blockers and preparing for cross project meeting | 20:34 |
| thingee | ttx: current have a couple of blockers https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1495764 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1495758 | 20:38 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1495764 in Cinder "Capability Filter doesn't work when create volume using no-admin user" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Xing Yang (xing-yang) | 20:38 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1495758 in Cinder "Create Consistency Group with non-admin user failed" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Xing Yang (xing-yang) | 20:38 |
| thingee | ttx: they're in progress | 20:38 |
| *** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:57 | |
| ttx | thingee: ok, just keep the list updated with blockers (and use another tag for nice-to-haves) and we should be alright. | 21:02 |
| thingee | ttx: ack | 21:03 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: ceilometermiddleware 0.3.0 https://review.openstack.org/223778 | 21:13 |
| ttx | stevebaker: have 5 min to sync on Heat release status ? | 21:14 |
| stevebaker | ttx: yes | 21:14 |
| ttx | stevebaker: https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/liberty-rc1 | 21:15 |
| ttx | shows 2 standing FFEs -- is that accurate or is there more ? | 21:15 |
| ttx | If accurate, how far are they from completion ? | 21:15 |
| stevebaker | ttx: there is indeed only 2. I would still like them in but they are both at medium risk of not being ready | 21:17 |
| ttx | stevebaker: I'm mostly concerned about how much of a diversion they are (and how untested the feature will be) | 21:17 |
| ttx | You have a lot of RC1-targeted bugs, are they all release blockers ? | 21:18 |
| ttx | If not, maybe refine the list to only list true blockers and move the rest to some nice-to-have tag | 21:18 |
| ttx | that will look less scary | 21:18 |
| ttx | stevebaker: what deadline did you have in mind for those last 2 FFEs ? | 21:19 |
| stevebaker | ttx: nested-validation just extends the existing returned validation data, so is low risk. rich-network-prop adds attributes to OS::Nova::Server - it is being reworked now to not change behaviour for template using existing attributes, so that lowers the risk | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: git history import cleanups https://review.openstack.org/223818 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: history build cleanup https://review.openstack.org/223819 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import barbican client history https://review.openstack.org/223820 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import ceilometerclient history https://review.openstack.org/223821 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import cinderclient history https://review.openstack.org/223822 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import designateclient history https://review.openstack.org/223823 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import glanceclient history https://review.openstack.org/223824 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import heatclient history https://review.openstack.org/223825 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import ironicclient history https://review.openstack.org/223826 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import ironic-inspector-client history https://review.openstack.org/223827 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import keystoneclient history https://review.openstack.org/223828 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import manilaclient history https://review.openstack.org/223829 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import novaclient history https://review.openstack.org/223830 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import openstackclient history https://review.openstack.org/223831 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import saharaclient history https://review.openstack.org/223832 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import swiftclient history https://review.openstack.org/223833 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import troveclient history https://review.openstack.org/223834 | 21:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import zaqarclient history https://review.openstack.org/223835 | 21:20 |
| stevebaker | ttx: I'm hoping they'll be ready to land this week. | 21:20 |
| stevebaker | ttx: as for bugs, I'll do a prune to blockers only. | 21:21 |
| ttx | stevebaker: i'm fine with giving them until the end of the week, if your release-critical bug list is not 30-bugs deep. Otherwise I don't see how we can produce a RC1 before December :) | 21:21 |
| stevebaker | ttx: there is a bug which may result in a sql schema change. How do we handle that during FFE? | 21:22 |
| ttx | In theory that requires an exception too | 21:22 |
| ttx | the sooner it gets in the sooner we can catch any weird regression due to the schema change | 21:23 |
| ttx | so I would prioritize fixing that one up | 21:23 |
| stevebaker | sure thing | 21:23 |
| stevebaker | ttx: can we talk heatclient too? | 21:24 |
| ttx | Ok, we'll talk again at the end of the week. Let's get those last 2 FFEs in by then and distill that bug list down to true blockers. | 21:24 |
| ttx | stevebaker: sure | 21:24 |
| stevebaker | there are still a couple of changes which need to land. https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-heatclient/+milestone/0.8.0 | 21:25 |
| openstack | stevebaker: Error: malone bug 0 not found | 21:25 |
| ttx | heh fun | 21:25 |
| stevebaker | ttx: what is the story with when stable branching happens for heatclient? | 21:25 |
| ttx | so we create a release branch. We can still issue point releases on that branch | 21:26 |
| ttx | so bugfixes that only increment .Z are ok to backport | 21:26 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: cliff 1.15.0 https://review.openstack.org/223730 | 21:26 |
| stevebaker | right, but we're still landing the client side changes for liberty features | 21:26 |
| ttx | the idea is taht we need a tagged release to branch from | 21:27 |
| ttx | stevebaker: this is starting to be a bit late for that. The RC1 needs to icnlude the requirements for the lib, so the lib has to be available first | 21:27 |
| stevebaker | sure | 21:28 |
| ttx | which is why the deadline for python-*client release branch was ... 1 week ago now | 21:28 |
| ttx | we are still cutting the last ones | 21:28 |
| ttx | but that means it becomes pretty urgent to push features in if you still have some | 21:29 |
| ttx | and cut a version we can make the liberty branch from | 21:29 |
| ttx | stevebaker: how far are you on those ? | 21:30 |
| stevebaker | the features are all at the cli layer, so at least the lib is stable | 21:30 |
| stevebaker | I think they are close. 24-48 hours? | 21:30 |
| ttx | I guess as long as we can cut the stable branches this week we should be good, release-wise | 21:30 |
| stevebaker | ok, thanks | 21:31 |
| ttx | means we can't tag RC1s on projects consuming heatclient before next week, but there aren't that many | 21:31 |
| ttx | stevebaker: ok, ttyl! | 21:33 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: can you take a peek at this change to update the constraints for some of our current libs? https://review.openstack.org/223596 | 21:33 |
| stevebaker | ttx: \o | 21:33 |
| lifeless | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221157/ failed, we need to poke at that | 21:35 |
| lifeless | +A'd 596 | 21:35 |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: python-ceilometerclient 1.1.1 - stable/kilo https://review.openstack.org/223684 | 21:47 |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 21:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import ceilometerclient history https://review.openstack.org/223821 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import barbican client history https://review.openstack.org/223820 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import designateclient history https://review.openstack.org/223823 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import cinderclient history https://review.openstack.org/223822 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: history build cleanup https://review.openstack.org/223819 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: git history import cleanups https://review.openstack.org/223818 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import keystoneclient history https://review.openstack.org/223828 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import manilaclient history https://review.openstack.org/223829 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import novaclient history https://review.openstack.org/223830 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import openstackclient history https://review.openstack.org/223831 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import glanceclient history https://review.openstack.org/223824 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import heatclient history https://review.openstack.org/223825 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import ironicclient history https://review.openstack.org/223826 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import ironic-inspector-client history https://review.openstack.org/223827 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: remove cruft from the import script https://review.openstack.org/223836 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import saharaclient history https://review.openstack.org/223832 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import swiftclient history https://review.openstack.org/223833 | 21:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: Import troveclient history https://review.openstack.org/223834 | 21:52 |
| lifeless | dhellmann: I think you should just +A all those :) | 21:52 |
| dhellmann | ttx: every time we do a release, it introduces a merge conflict in that series ^^ so maybe we should merge it and then fix any errors? | 21:52 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: ++ | 21:52 |
| ttx | dhellmann: yes, fasttrack it | 21:53 |
| dhellmann | lifeless: otoh, I like the slightly-off-phase beeping from both of my irc clients noticing the series of patches at the same time :-) | 21:53 |
| dhellmann | ttx: ack, doing that now | 21:53 |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 22:16 | |
| *** TravT has quit IRC | 22:25 | |
| *** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: git history import cleanups https://review.openstack.org/223818 | 22:35 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: history build cleanup https://review.openstack.org/223819 | 22:35 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Import barbican client history https://review.openstack.org/223820 | 22:35 |
| *** wshao has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:16 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 23:17 | |
| *** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!