Wednesday, 2019-02-27

*** number80 has quit IRC00:14
*** number80 has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging00:31
*** gyee has quit IRC02:15
*** ykarel has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging04:19
*** ykarel has quit IRC05:54
*** ykarel has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging05:55
*** number80 has quit IRC06:37
*** number80 has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging06:38
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging08:13
*** pcaruana has quit IRC08:28
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging08:42
*** pcaruana has quit IRC08:51
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:57
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging08:58
*** pcaruana|afk| has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging09:01
*** pcaruana has quit IRC09:03
*** jpich has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging09:04
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging09:28
openstackgerritDirk Mueller proposed openstack/rpm-packaging stable/rocky: monasca-tempest-plugin: Fix skipping of tests  https://review.openstack.org/63960909:28
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch09:44
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: update oslo.messaging to v9.4.0  https://review.openstack.org/60931610:09
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel10:23
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch12:36
*** pcaruana|afk| has quit IRC13:09
dirkping toabctl, dirk, apevec, jpena, jruzicka, number80, kaslcrof, ykarel, cmurphy13:37
dirk#startmeeting rpm_packaging13:37
openstackMeeting started Wed Feb 27 13:37:55 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dirk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:37
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:37
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:37
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'rpm_packaging'13:37
dirk#topic roll call13:38
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:38
dirkdo we get a quorum today?13:38
cmurphyo/13:38
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena13:40
toabctlhi13:40
jpenao/13:40
dirkwhoohoo!13:41
dirkeveryone, add your agenda items to13:41
dirk#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-rpm-packaging13:41
dirkok, no agenda items pop up13:45
dirk# PTL election13:45
dirk#topic PTL election13:45
*** openstack changes topic to "PTL election (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:45
dirksmall reminder, the PTL self-election period for Train is upcoming (March 4th-8th)13:45
dirkdoes anyone want to volunteer?13:46
toabctlshould we try to continue with the rotation?13:48
dirkwhat other options do you have in mind?13:48
toabctlif we rotate by company, jpena would be next :) if the company doesn't matter, I could do it next cycle13:48
toabctlplay dice ? :)13:49
jpenawell, I'm 1 against 3, so the other company should have 3 slots before :P13:49
toabctljpena, you need to count the people from this list : https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1007,members :P13:50
jpenawell yeah, I was thinking about active cores13:50
toabctl:)13:50
toabctljpena, so I assume you don't want to do it, right?13:50
jpenaI'd rather pass this time13:51
toabctlok. I can step in then13:51
jpena\o/13:51
dirkwfm13:51
dirkthe only other option I see is to proactively inform the TC that we're not going to participate in this going forward, and not nominate a PTL13:52
cmurphywhy would you want to do that?13:52
toabctlparticipating in having a PTL? or what do you mean, dirk?13:53
dirkno longer being listed as official project13:53
dirke.g. having to follow the openstack foundation rules (PTL election every 6 months etc)13:54
cmurphyare the rules posing such a hardship that it's worthwhile to withdraw from the openstack project?13:55
dirkno, I didn't want to imply that13:56
dirkmy thinking is that there is imho also a certain responsibility in being PTL towards the project (not the on paper-nomination rules) and I'M not sure we're currently committing ourselves towards that responsibility13:57
dirkhowever thats mostly speaking for myself ;)13:57
dirkanyway, I'm fine with toabctl stepping up. thanks!13:57
dirktoabctl: please remember to send an election candidacy then by next week ..13:58
cmurphythe ptl is just supposed to act as a contact point and decision maker, i think it's kind of good to have even if we were an unofficial project13:58
toabctldirk, I try. but feel free to remind me again in the next meeting :)13:58
dirkcmurphy: you're describing the passive role, I meant the active part of the role (participating in the community/cross comunity goals/helping other projects to integrate) ..13:59
dirkI'm happy to discuss this further, can we move it to the open floor part of the meeting?13:59
cmurphysure14:00
dirk#topic project update14:00
*** openstack changes topic to "project update (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"14:00
dirkso for the first time ever I recently got a mail asking whether we as a project would like to give a "project update" talk at the openstack summit in denver14:00
dirksince I'm not sure I will be there (actually more sure I won't) I was wondering if anybody else would like to step up?14:01
jpenaI won't be there either14:01
toabctlsame for me. not there14:01
dirkafter myself of bitching about not being asked for about two years in  a row not answering is also not good :/14:01
dirkcmurphy?14:02
cmurphyI will be there14:02
cmurphyI have to give several other presentations14:02
cmurphybut I can give this update if someone helps me with the content?14:02
dirkI can probably help with that14:03
cmurphyokay14:04
dirkthanks colleen!14:05
dirklets see if we can sneak in still (I think the official response deadline is already over). I'll followup on this14:05
dirk#topic open floor14:06
*** openstack changes topic to "open floor (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"14:06
dirkdo we have reviews to discuss for today?14:06
toabctlhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/609316/ needs fixing for centos14:06
toabctljpena, ^^ could you have a look? I hope we can get this merged after ~4 month...14:07
jpenaI've been working on it this week. In cnetos, it's failing with some strange error message when building mistral14:08
jpenaI'll give it another look and see if I can find the reason14:09
toabctlthx!14:09
openstackgerritDirk Mueller proposed openstack/rpm-packaging stable/rocky: magnum-tempest-plugin: Fix skipping of tests  https://review.openstack.org/63960914:09
dirkthanks jpena14:09
dirkI think I'll need to do another pass at oslo* updates14:10
dirkwe have Sten branch cut upcoming, it would be good to have master in a sensible shape14:11
dirkits not very closely aligned with what stein is at this point in time14:11
dirkI think we'd have to do some effort on getting all the versions into the right state packaged14:11
dirkcan we distribute the work on this a bit? do we want to do one review per package and getting it into the current version?14:11
toabctl1 review (given that the CI is green) sounds good to me. also distributing the work14:12
cmurphy++14:12
toabctlone more thing - is it possible to add jira to the centos/fedora CI, jpena ? it's needed for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/639076/14:13
toabctlotherwise we would need a workaround for fedora/centos14:14
jpenaI'm on it, but it may take some time14:14
jpenafedora should be easy14:14
toabctlok. thx14:14
dirktoabctl: do you still maintain the packaging status somewhere? I remember it was at https://toabctl.de/openstack/ but that seems to 40314:15
toabctlhttps://toabctl.de/openstack/rpm-packaging-status-stein.html14:16
toabctldirk ^^14:16
dirkthanks!14:16
dirkI'll do oslo.* and maybe some of the *client14:17
dirkmore concretely, the last 5 of *client14:17
toabctlI'll do os-* and the -lib$ stuff14:17
cmurphydo we want to keep track with an etherpad or something?14:19
cmurphyi can do dashboards or clients or services or whatever14:19
toabctlwe could fix https://toabctl.de/openstack/rpm-packaging-status-stein.html which should show opne reviews14:20
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|afk14:20
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: neutron-lib: Update to 1.24.0  https://review.openstack.org/63967814:20
dirkcmurphy: yep, I thought the view from tom above automatically tracks open reviews14:23
dirkit might take some time (an hour or so) to update though14:23
cmurphyhmm14:23
toabctlI think I need to update the tool on the server. I'll have a look14:24
dirkthat said the "reviews" column is empty. so something is broken?14:24
dirkok, thanks14:24
dirkanything else for today? cmurphy want to finish the PTL or not PTL discussion here?14:24
cmurphysure14:25
cmurphyi don't have much else to say14:26
dirkcmurphy: my feeling is that I haven't much participated in pushing the growth of the project as well as participated in community goals like e.g. https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/stein/index.html14:26
dirkwe still don't have most packaging python3 first or python3 compatible14:26
dirkso I think its a fair thought to say that we're not able to keep progress on those (or not even sure if/how upgradechecks would apply to packaging)14:27
dirkwe haven't e.g. established a good plan around how to package the upgradecheck tooling for example14:27
cmurphymost of those community goals don't really apply to packaging and deployment projects14:27
toabctlreviews are fixed in the view (but adding links would be nice  but would need a changeset)14:27
cmurphypython3 goal was about running ci tests with python314:28
dirktoabctl: thanks!14:28
cmurphywhich we actually did accomplish mostly by switching basepython=python3 in tox.ini14:28
cmurphyi don't think the upgrade check really applies to us either14:29
dirkyeah and no14:31
cmurphyif there was something we needed to act on the goal champion would let us know14:31
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: neutron-lib: Update to 1.24.0  https://review.openstack.org/63967814:32
dirkcmurphy: right, my point is being only passive is not a good reason for being in the project.14:33
cmurphyis it a good reason to not be in the project?14:34
cmurphyi think having an openstack-sanctioned place to collaborate on packaging is a good thing for the community14:36
dirkI agree with that, there are projects where being part of the invite list is all that matters14:36
dirkin technical contributions I think saying you're in also gives you responsibility to do something about it14:36
dirkany my personal feeling was taht I'm not doing that14:36
dirknot saying a nother ptl wouldn't be doing that better ;)14:37
cmurphymaybe it's something to bring up to the tc for advice14:38
dirkI am not sure I can follow ? ;)14:42
dirkanyway, I'll talk to you about it outside the meeting14:42
dirkanything else?14:42
dirkwould like to close the meeting for today14:42
cmurphynot from me14:42
dirk#endmeeting14:42
*** openstack changes topic to "https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-rpm-packaging - Regular IRC Meeting Wednesdays 1:00 PM UTC in openstack-rpm-packaging"14:42
openstackMeeting ended Wed Feb 27 14:42:55 2019 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:42
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rpm_packaging/2019/rpm_packaging.2019-02-27-13.37.html14:42
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rpm_packaging/2019/rpm_packaging.2019-02-27-13.37.txt14:42
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rpm_packaging/2019/rpm_packaging.2019-02-27-13.37.log.html14:43
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging14:49
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging14:57
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-resource-classes: Update to 0.2.0  https://review.openstack.org/63968815:01
*** jpena is now known as jpena|brb15:02
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-traits: Update to 0.11.0  https://review.openstack.org/63968915:03
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: Remove explict sed for doc build warnings  https://review.openstack.org/50721015:04
*** ykarel|afk is now known as ykarel15:06
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-brick: Update to 2.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/63969115:06
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-service-types: Update to 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/63969215:08
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-vif: Update to 1.15.0  https://review.openstack.org/63969615:11
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-win: Update to 4.2.0  https://review.openstack.org/63970115:13
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: oslo.db: Update to 4.44.0  https://review.openstack.org/63970615:27
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: openstackdocstheme: Update to 1.29.1  https://review.openstack.org/62493515:30
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: oslo.policy: Update to 2.1.0  https://review.openstack.org/63970815:34
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: pbr: Update to 5.1.2  https://review.openstack.org/63971015:35
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: oslo.utils: Update to 3.40.2  https://review.openstack.org/63971215:39
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: pycadf: Update to 2.9.0  https://review.openstack.org/63971415:41
*** jpena|brb is now known as jpena15:45
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away16:03
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel16:04
openstackgerritJavier Peña proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: oslo.utils: Update to 3.40.2  https://review.openstack.org/63971216:09
jpenatoabctl: I think I know why mistral is failing to build in https://review.openstack.org/609316. We're building an old version (7.0.0.0b1), and it fails when we use the cachetools from the current upper-constraints (3.1.0, which is what we have in the RDO CentOS CI). We have an older version in Fedora (2.something), which works fine16:39
jpenais there any reason why we're not moving to 8.0.0.0b1?16:40
*** ykarel_ has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging16:43
*** ykarel has quit IRC16:46
*** pcaruana has quit IRC16:57
*** gyee has joined #openstack-rpm-packaging16:59
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel|away16:59
*** gkadam has quit IRC17:18
*** jpich has quit IRC17:30
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rpm-packaging stable/rocky: magnum-tempest-plugin: Fix skipping of tests  https://review.openstack.org/63960917:43
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC17:51
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-win: Update to 4.2.0  https://review.openstack.org/63970118:07
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-vif: Update to 1.15.0  https://review.openstack.org/63969618:09
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-service-types: Update to 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/63969218:09
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-brick: Update to 2.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/63969118:09
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-traits: Update to 0.11.0  https://review.openstack.org/63968918:09
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rpm-packaging master: os-resource-classes: Update to 0.2.0  https://review.openstack.org/63968818:09
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off18:11
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: openstackdocstheme: Update to 1.29.1  https://review.openstack.org/62493518:25
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: mistral: Update to 7.0.4  https://review.openstack.org/63977218:47
openstackgerritThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rpm-packaging master: nova: Add missing Requires/BuildRequires  https://review.openstack.org/63977318:49

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!