*** ChanServ changes topic to "#openstack-sdks" | 00:02 | |
*** wchrisj_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 00:22 | |
*** wchrisj_ has left #openstack-sdks | 00:27 | |
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-sdks | 01:28 | |
*** bknudson has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 02:47 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 03:05 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 03:14 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 03:22 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 03:28 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 03:47 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 03:52 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 04:06 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 04:10 | |
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 04:27 | |
*** wchrisj has quit IRC | 04:43 | |
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 04:45 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 05:10 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 05:17 | |
*** HenryG_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 05:54 | |
*** HenryG has quit IRC | 05:57 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 06:23 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 06:29 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 06:40 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 06:45 | |
*** al_ex has joined #openstack-sdks | 06:55 | |
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 09:40 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 10:29 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 10:34 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 11:49 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 11:53 | |
*** HenryG_ has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
*** mfer has joined #openstack-sdks | 12:58 | |
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-sdks | 13:08 | |
*** wchrisj has joined #openstack-sdks | 13:34 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 13:36 | |
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-sdks | 13:40 | |
wchrisj | elight So we are meeting in 65 mins? | 13:54 |
---|---|---|
elight | wchrisj: Yes. I’ve had it on my calendar | 14:12 |
wchrisj | Sorry - miscommuniction on this end - just making sure we were clear. | 14:12 |
*** al_ex has quit IRC | 14:16 | |
*** al_ex has joined #openstack-sdks | 14:17 | |
*** al_ex has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
*** mhagedorn has joined #openstack-sdks | 15:00 | |
mhagedorn | elight, wchrisj OSC Hangout https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/ctsrpo0l6l82aci88hsj6bed1es?authuser=0&hl=en | 15:01 |
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-sdks | 15:13 | |
mfer | PHP SDK meeting in #openstack-meeting-3 in 2 minutes | 15:28 |
elight | wchrisj mhagedorn krames: https://github.com/fog/fog-openstack-core/issues/25 | 16:26 |
elight | wchrisj mhagedorn: identity map pattern: http://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/identityMap.html | 16:26 |
krames | thanks! | 16:27 |
krames | lgtm | 16:27 |
mfer | in 2 minutes i'll end the meeting. leaving it open until then | 16:28 |
mfer | #endmeeting | 16:30 |
ycombinator | mfer, wrong channel :) | 16:31 |
ycombinator | glenc ended it in the other one | 16:31 |
mfer | i saw that | 16:31 |
mfer | and i noticed glen did it | 16:31 |
mfer | before i could pipe up another meeting started | 16:31 |
mfer | thanks glenc | 16:31 |
mfer | jamie_h does your json schema setup work for arrays being imported as well as json files? | 16:32 |
jamie_h | mfer right now it handles strings (either file paths or json_decoded data) or file resources | 16:33 |
jamie_h | https://github.com/jamiehannaford/json-schema/blob/master/src/JsonSchema/Parser.php#L25-36 | 16:33 |
jamie_h | for remote schemas, we could use a stream wrapper or something | 16:33 |
mfer | jamie_h for opcode caching is would be nice if we could represent json as a php data structure. we'd save on a constant parsing step | 16:34 |
jamie_h | mfer sure, definitely something to think about | 16:34 |
jamie_h | Can we discuss at a later date? I'm on vacation in a Prague cafe right now, and the wifi is not great :P | 16:34 |
mfer | jamie_h sorry. thanks for coming. hit me up when you get back. thanks again and have fun! | 16:35 |
samchoi | jamie_h: what are you doing here then! | 16:35 |
samchoi | jamie_h: I certainly wouldn't get on irc during vacation :) | 16:35 |
jamie_h | samchoi ha! I'm asking myself the same question | 16:35 |
jamie_h | Catch everyone later | 16:35 |
samchoi | later | 16:36 |
ycombinator | later | 16:36 |
ycombinator | mfer: like bugs, is it possible to know which blueprints are actively being worked on? | 16:37 |
mfer | ycombinator blueprints have assigned names and states | 16:38 |
mfer | some of those states are set by a bug and tied to reviews if marked int he commit messages | 16:38 |
mfer | s/bug/bot | 16:38 |
ycombinator | ok | 16:39 |
mfer | if i say in a commit message a blueprint or bug is implements/fixed or partially so the bot will update the blueprint/bug | 16:39 |
mfer | ycombinator for example, see https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-sdk-php/+spec/guzzle-transport | 16:39 |
mfer | in the whiteboard the gerrit urls were added by the bot | 16:40 |
ycombinator | so in the meetings, when we go over bugs and blueprints, do we only consider blueprints in "started" state? | 16:40 |
wchrisj | elight krames mhagedorn - merge complete | 16:40 |
ycombinator | I'm asking because I'm working on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-sdk-php/+spec/sphinx-docs but I don't know how to get it into started state | 16:40 |
mfer | ycombinator i think it depends on what were talking about. if we're talking about things that need to be discussed before work starts then that will happen. | 16:41 |
mfer | ycombinator if you're logged in you can choose the edit icon nest to implementation | 16:41 |
elight | wchrisj: Ok. Time to face the music and rebase my branches... | 16:41 |
mfer | that will let you set state | 16:41 |
ycombinator | ah, implementation | 16:41 |
ycombinator | thanks | 16:41 |
mfer | ycombinator blueprints are not obvious. | 16:41 |
mfer | i'm not even sure how i stumbled on soem of this | 16:42 |
ycombinator | heh | 16:42 |
mfer | on the bright side, there is a long term plan to replace launchpad for this stuff | 16:43 |
mfer | it's under active development | 16:43 |
mfer | so, things will hopefully get better | 16:43 |
ycombinator | I have some questions about the user guide - what's the best place to discuss them? put them on a wiki page? send email to openstack-dev with [php sdk] tag? or here? | 16:43 |
mfer | ycombinator two things. if you send stuff to the list i'd suggest the project name [openstack-sdk-php]. | 16:44 |
mfer | ycombinator you can do either or. i'll be around here all afternoon. if you have questions i can likely try to respond in short order here. | 16:44 |
mfer | it's up to you | 16:44 |
ycombinator | okay, thanks | 16:45 |
mfer | ycombinator i'll be around and can chat until 5pm ET today. | 16:46 |
*** etoews_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 16:46 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
elight | this rebase ow ow ow | 17:08 |
*** etoews_ has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 17:20 | |
elight | wchrisj mhagedorn krames: we should standardize on yard (http://rubydoc.info/gems/yard) docs for our code comments | 17:32 |
krames | havent we already? | 17:32 |
*** samchoi has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
krames | maybe I am thinking of fog itself | 17:33 |
elight | krames: Not inside openstackcore | 17:33 |
wchrisj | elight krames Find by me | 17:34 |
wchrisj | Fine | 17:34 |
krames | gotcha | 17:34 |
elight | ironically, written by one of our counterparts, I believe, at AWS: Loren Segal. | 17:35 |
elight | Long before he was at Amazon ;-) | 17:35 |
elight | wchrisj mhagedorn krames: Ready for review and merge unless there are more concerns: https://github.com/fog/fog-openstack-core/pull/22 | 17:56 |
*** krames has quit IRC | 17:57 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 18:17 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 18:22 | |
wchrisj | elight pr#22 merged | 18:29 |
elight | Ah! Hahaha. | 18:30 |
elight | And here I was just starting to look at base_provider_path | 18:30 |
elight | Ok so THAT will be a new PR then. That’s fine, actually. | 18:30 |
elight | wchrisj: we need to get better about cleaning up branches post-PR | 18:32 |
wchrisj | yeahhh | 18:32 |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 18:33 | |
*** krames has joined #openstack-sdks | 18:33 | |
elight | wchrisj mhagedorn krames: Do we really *care* about validating services in ServiceDiscovery? If the service can’t be required, is that not enough? | 18:34 |
elight | Just so long as failures to require result in a useful error message, I think | 18:35 |
elight | That’d probably be adequate | 18:35 |
elight | And it’s less work all around | 18:35 |
wchrisj | elight - As a matter of habit, we should be deleting a branch after merge, no? | 18:36 |
elight | wchrisj: +1 | 18:36 |
*** jamie_h has quit IRC | 18:37 | |
wchrisj | elight krames - branches cleaned up | 18:39 |
*** samchoi has joined #openstack-sdks | 18:40 | |
elight | wchrisj: ServiceDiscovery.register_provder('openstackcommon', 'fog/openstackcommon/services') | 18:40 |
elight | wchrisj: And for any other provider under OSC as well | 18:40 |
elight | So Rackspace or HP | 18:40 |
elight | Hmm… I’m not even sure we need the first arg | 18:41 |
elight | really may only need that path... | 18:41 |
elight | Which would mean we could do it once so in the core.rb for each provider. | 18:41 |
elight | And the ServiceDiscovery could just use that. ‘identity’, ‘storage’ et al just drives which file name to look for. | 18:42 |
elight | and the presence or absence of such becomes our “validation” as well. Failure to require is a useful error message. | 18:42 |
elight | My head hurts. I haven’t taken enough breaks today… >.< | 18:43 |
wchrisj | lol | 18:43 |
wchrisj | you've been doing some good work tho ;-) | 18:50 |
wchrisj | elight ^^ | 18:50 |
elight | <3 now let me get a screenshot of that to send to mgmt.... | 18:50 |
elight | ;-) | 18:51 |
wchrisj | haha | 19:00 |
*** mhagedorn_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 19:07 | |
*** mhagedorn has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
*** mhagedorn_ is now known as mhagedorn | 19:09 | |
*** bknudson has quit IRC | 19:28 | |
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-sdks | 19:29 | |
dtroyer | terrylhowe: would you mind if I fixed up some of the formatting in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76742/ ? I've been doing those as the code is touched for other reasons, and since I've left it for so long already… | 19:33 |
terrylhowe | Sounds good dtroyer | 19:36 |
terrylhowe | that one always reminds me wouldn't it be nice if find was a method of resource | 19:37 |
dtroyer | I see things like this as a breakdown in the resource-first model. What kind of resource do you have to find of all you really have is a filter of some sort? | 19:39 |
dtroyer | terrylhowe: ok, double check me on that review | 20:00 |
terrylhowe | Looks good dtroyer | 20:03 |
dtroyer | cool, thanks for letting me do that. I'll sleep better tonight. ;) | 20:04 |
terrylhowe | :) | 20:04 |
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 20:52 | |
*** mfer has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
*** krames has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
*** mhagedorn has left #openstack-sdks | 21:29 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 22:19 | |
*** etoews has joined #openstack-sdks | 22:21 | |
*** bknudson has quit IRC | 22:27 | |
*** etoews has quit IRC | 23:02 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!