Wednesday, 2014-05-21

*** xmltok_ has quit IRC00:08
*** samchoi has quit IRC00:50
*** bknudson has quit IRC02:24
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks03:43
*** rgbkrk has quit IRC04:11
openstackgerritSam Choi proposed a change to stackforge/openstack-sdk-php: Fixing bug 1302141  https://review.openstack.org/9389204:26
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks05:31
*** rgbkrk has quit IRC05:57
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-sdks08:31
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks10:31
*** rgbkrk has quit IRC10:48
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks12:22
*** mfer has joined #openstack-sdks13:02
*** rgbkrk has quit IRC13:17
jamie_hmfer does truncating work with our stream wrapper? when I open with "w" or "w+" mode, sometimes content is there13:25
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-sdks13:31
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann13:35
mferjamie_h on a call... just a minute13:40
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks14:08
mferjamie_h we'd been using the stream wrapper quite a bit without any writing issues14:15
mferwhat are you seeing?14:15
*** rgbkrk has quit IRC14:15
jamie_hnot too sure yet - it seems that when a remote object is fetched with w or w+, the file is not truncated14:16
mferhrm14:16
jamie_hmight be nothing. I'm trying to get rid of that segfault thing, so am refactoring a few tests14:16
jamie_hI'm using "nope" as the mode, which seems to be best for lots of local tests14:17
mferjamie_h if you discover something please let me know asap. i'm happy to try and figure it out. we'd made a lot of use of the stream wrappers in the past in production systems14:23
jamie_hmfer sure. right now the goal is just to fix the segfault and remove duplication from tests while i'm at it. i'll take a look at the truncating thing after14:24
mferok14:24
mferi see the segfault issue as well14:25
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks14:51
*** TravT has joined #openstack-sdks15:07
jamie_hmfer I've managed to fix it by using setUp and tearDown methods for the resource15:19
jamie_hinstead of passing resources as args to other tests15:19
mferok15:19
mferPHP SDK meeting in 10 minutes in #openstack-meeting-315:20
*** samchoi has joined #openstack-sdks15:22
*** glenc_ has quit IRC15:29
*** glenc has quit IRC15:31
*** glenc- is now known as glenc15:31
*** xmltok_ has joined #openstack-sdks15:33
*** rgbkrk has quit IRC16:28
samchoimfer: jamie_h So from the meeting, we had two primary areas of design discussion. Testing and DSL vs userland code. Do you guy see one as being higher priority than the other?16:33
samchoior would it simply be more efficient/practical to investigate one over the other immediately?16:34
jamie_hsamchoi I think testing first because that's required to implement any other feature16:41
*** stphung has joined #openstack-sdks16:42
stphunghi guys, I was wondering, are the python apis for openstack in a usable state at this time?  I've been having a difficult time with it so just wanted to see where things were16:42
stphungsdks rather*16:43
briancurtinstphung: the new stuff we're working on isn't close to being ready yet, still in the early phases of building it all out16:44
stphungbriancurtin: thanks for the info!16:45
briancurtinstphung: if you're having any specific difficulties with the existing clients, let us know and we'll see how we can improve the situation with this SDK project16:45
stphungbriancurtin: to be clear, are there existing python sdks that are usable..?16:47
terrylhowethey aren't really sdks, but there are clients for each service16:47
terrylhowelike python-novaclient, python-swift-client, ...16:47
briancurtinstphung: within openstack there isn't any all encompassing SDK, but you have things like https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-swiftclient16:47
stphungok that makes sense16:48
briancurtin(sorry if you knew that, i didn't want to assume anything)16:48
stphungno worries :)16:48
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks16:58
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away17:00
*** rgbkrk_ has joined #openstack-sdks17:09
*** rgbkrk has quit IRC17:10
*** stphung has quit IRC17:22
*** rgbkrk_ has quit IRC18:09
terrylhowehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/91889/18:18
terrylhowepython sdk authentication "simplified" at least compared to keystoneclient18:18
briancurtinterrylhowe: thanks! will take a look shortly18:21
mferbriancurtin terrylhowe dtroyer should the openstacksdk and openstackclient have gerritbot notifications in here?18:31
dtroyerwould be fine with me, but as it's a shared room I don't want to swamp it with too many of those notifications.  we can always turn it off it it gets to be too noisy (that would be a good problem to have actually…)18:36
briancurtinmfer: sounds good to me, but i'm not familiar with how to get that to happen18:38
mferbriancurtin dtroyer i can put in the request. i have one in for a couple other projects so i can modify that one fairly easily.18:39
mferthis is why it was on my mind18:39
mferbriancurtin what's the repo name? the one i had isn't listed on git.openstack.org for me18:43
briancurtinmfer: hmm, not actually sure. i only know of https://github.com/stackforge/python-openstacksdk18:45
mferthat's a mirror of http://git.openstack.org/18:45
mferand i thought it was python-openstacksdk but i'd not listed. weird18:46
terrylhowepage 218:46
briancurtinhah. http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/python-openstacksdk/18:47
mferoh, duh.18:47
* mfer goes back to coding... it's safer than thinking18:48
mferfor bot integration... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94683/18:50
*** jamielenz has joined #openstack-sdks18:57
*** jamielennox|away has quit IRC19:00
*** jamielennox|away has joined #openstack-sdks19:00
*** jamielenz has quit IRC19:02
openstackgerritMatt Farina proposed a change to stackforge/golang-client: Adding examples that can optionally be used as acceptance tests.  https://review.openstack.org/9470919:45
mferdtroyer on the go sdk you were interested in https://review.openstack.org/94709 if you have a few minutes19:47
mferthis is the structural style stuff19:47
openstackgerritMatt Farina proposed a change to stackforge/openstack-sdk-php: Adding the support section to composer.json.  https://review.openstack.org/9471620:10
terrylhowedtroyer I think you were looking for a cli thing in the example code: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94707/20:34
*** bknudson has quit IRC21:11
*** mfer has quit IRC21:18
*** jamie_h has quit IRC21:42
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks21:44
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-sdks21:48
*** electrichead has joined #openstack-sdks22:29
*** electrichead is now known as Guest9247722:30
*** sivel has quit IRC22:33
*** notmyname_ has joined #openstack-sdks22:33
*** rgbkrk has quit IRC22:33
*** notmyname has quit IRC22:33
*** notmyname_ is now known as notmyname22:34
*** sivel has joined #openstack-sdks22:34
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks22:36
*** redrobot has quit IRC22:38
*** anteaya has quit IRC22:38
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox22:43
*** rgbkrk has quit IRC22:54
*** rgbkrk has joined #openstack-sdks22:57
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-sdks22:57
Alex_Gaynornot sure why it didn't announce here, but super simple review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94745/23:35
*** xmltok_ has quit IRC23:41
*** xmltok_ has joined #openstack-sdks23:41
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC23:49
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-sdks23:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!