| *** jkilpatr has quit IRC | 00:13 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-sdks | 00:45 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 00:55 | |
| *** markvoelker_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 00:57 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 01:01 | |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 01:02 | |
| *** shu-mutou-AWAY is now known as shu-mutou | 01:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/490862 | 01:17 |
|---|---|---|
| *** rajathagasthya has quit IRC | 01:42 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 02:00 | |
| *** gildub has joined #openstack-sdks | 02:14 | |
| *** lifeless has quit IRC | 02:18 | |
| *** lifeless has joined #openstack-sdks | 02:19 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-sdks | 02:35 | |
| *** annp has joined #openstack-sdks | 03:14 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 03:38 | |
| *** Dinesh_Bhor has joined #openstack-sdks | 03:45 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 03:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow PD as Subnetpool during Subnet creations https://review.openstack.org/491664 | 04:14 |
| *** reedip_afk is now known as reedip | 04:17 | |
| *** annp has quit IRC | 04:46 | |
| *** hoangcx has quit IRC | 04:46 | |
| *** annp has joined #openstack-sdks | 04:46 | |
| *** hoangcx has joined #openstack-sdks | 04:46 | |
| *** rajathagasthya has joined #openstack-sdks | 05:16 | |
| *** rajathagasthya has quit IRC | 06:56 | |
| *** markvoelker_ has quit IRC | 07:01 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 07:07 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 07:08 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 07:08 | |
| *** aarefiev has joined #openstack-sdks | 07:10 | |
| *** gtrxcb has quit IRC | 07:11 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-sdks | 07:22 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-sdks | 07:56 | |
| *** ralonsoh_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 07:57 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 07:57 | |
| *** ralonsoh_ is now known as ralonsoh | 08:02 | |
| *** gildub has quit IRC | 08:09 | |
| *** shu-mutou is now known as shu-mutou-AWAY | 09:54 | |
| *** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 10:09 | |
| *** christi3k has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 10:17 | |
| *** christi3k has joined #openstack-sdks | 10:18 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-sdks | 10:47 | |
| *** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-sdks | 10:58 | |
| *** sdague has joined #openstack-sdks | 10:59 | |
| *** gildub has joined #openstack-sdks | 11:24 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-sdks | 11:40 | |
| cdent | thanks for the comments on the extensions thing edleafe . That effort was a bit half-hearted: trying to get myself started but not really having enough brain to really get it together. | 12:09 |
| edleafe | Heh, at least in your case "not enough brain" is a temporary state. | 12:13 |
| openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-wg master: WIP: Explain, simply, why extensions are bad https://review.openstack.org/491611 | 12:16 |
| cdent | I’m no longer sure. This last year has involved a startling decline. | 12:17 |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 12:31 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-sdks | 12:32 | |
| *** sbezverk has joined #openstack-sdks | 12:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Convert network segment functional tests to JSON https://review.openstack.org/491612 | 12:35 |
| *** gildub has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
| *** sbezverk has quit IRC | 13:07 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 13:12 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-sdks | 13:18 | |
| *** cleong has joined #openstack-sdks | 13:38 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-sdks | 14:00 | |
| *** marst has joined #openstack-sdks | 14:05 | |
| *** Guest13936 is now known as med_ | 14:21 | |
| *** med_ has quit IRC | 14:21 | |
| *** med_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 14:21 | |
| *** med_ is now known as medberry | 14:21 | |
| *** medberry is now known as med_ | 14:43 | |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|brb | 14:44 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-client-config master: Update globals safely https://review.openstack.org/491618 | 14:48 |
| *** annegentle has joined #openstack-sdks | 14:56 | |
| *** sbezverk has joined #openstack-sdks | 15:23 | |
| efried | Anyone know how/where to open bugs against service-types-authority? | 15:24 |
| *** sbezverk_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 15:24 | |
| *** marst_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 15:26 | |
| cdent | efried: i suspect we never got around to that | 15:26 |
| *** marst has quit IRC | 15:27 | |
| efried | cdent Since os-service-types is on storyboard, would it be appropriate to create a storyboard... board for it? | 15:27 |
| cdent | I think that would be fine idea | 15:27 |
| *** sbezverk has quit IRC | 15:28 | |
| efried | cdent Then the question would we where to make note of that. I guess in the sta readme and/or setup.py | 15:28 |
| cdent | you have all the best questions. readme seems good for at least a start | 15:28 |
| *** dtantsur|brb is now known as dtantsur | 15:30 | |
| cdent | efried: I’ve nominated you for core on that repo as it seems unreasonable for you not to be. we’ll see what sdague and mordred say | 15:35 |
| mordred | cdent: ++ | 15:36 |
| efried | cdent Okay, thanks! | 15:36 |
| mordred | cdent, efried: wait ... | 15:36 |
| mordred | service-types-authority is an API-WG repo, so it should do bugs whereever api-wg does bugs | 15:36 |
| * cdent sings wait, I never had a chance | 15:37 | |
| mordred | os-service-types is a lib consuming it that's part of the shade project, so it does bugs where shade does bugs | 15:37 |
| cdent | it’s tc repo, not an api-wg repo, but that would also be fine, there is an openstack-api-wg launchpad presence | 15:37 |
| mordred | that those two places are two different places is a temporary annoyance, but I think we should associated bugs with owning projects | 15:37 |
| mordred | cdent: fair | 15:38 |
| cdent | efried: as a token nearby api-wg person, I hereby authorize you to put bugs in api-wg if you want | 15:39 |
| efried | cdent Wherezat? | 15:39 |
| cdent | https://launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg | 15:39 |
| efried | thx | 15:39 |
| sdague | cdent: ++ | 15:40 |
| efried | cdent mordred btw, the bug I'm going to open is about placement not having an entry. Which started to be addressed by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/462140/ but needs to be driven to closure pretty soon, methinks. | 15:40 |
| efried | https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg/+bug/1709353 | 15:42 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1709353 in openstack-api-wg "placement needs an entry in service-types-authority" [Undecided,New] | 15:42 |
| cdent | yeah. that’s currently blocked on docs migration stuff, I think? There’s a bit of blip with regard to getting the right url, which we wouldn’t have until after the current stack of new docs is merged, which is stalled on feature freeze chaos | 15:42 |
| efried | yarks | 15:42 |
| efried | cdent it's not just https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/placement.html ? | 15:42 |
| cdent | we could just go ahead without the docs ref | 15:42 |
| cdent | no, that’s not the api-ref | 15:42 |
| cdent | we coud use that as a stub for now | 15:43 |
| cdent | I personally think the entry is far more important than whatever the doc link says | 15:43 |
| cdent | we want placement to be consumable | 15:43 |
| cdent | it is and has always been at the service-type placement | 15:43 |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 15:45 | |
| cdent | efried: you should have +2 now, since mordred and sdague were immediately keen | 15:45 |
| efried | cdent Sweet, thank you. | 15:46 |
| cdent | abuse your power with grace! | 15:46 |
| sdague | cdent: there should be an api-ref url for placement, no? | 15:46 |
| efried | cdent sdague Yeah, the one listed in the change set is live, but actually redirects to the user one today. | 15:46 |
| sdague | or is that not being published? | 15:46 |
| efried | https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/placement.html | 15:46 |
| cdent | sdague: there will be eventually but there isn’t yet: we held off on creating the publishing job because the docs migration was in progress | 15:47 |
| sdague | efried: that's not the api-ref | 15:47 |
| efried | bleh, right, developer.o.o? | 15:47 |
| sdague | cdent: ok, so that doesn't really get impacted by docs migration | 15:47 |
| sdague | I'd just do that and land it at developer.openstack.org/api-ref/placement | 15:47 |
| cdent | and we didn’t want to move all the files until after they had all merged | 15:47 |
| sdague | cdent: ok... I guess I'm confused where they are moving to | 15:48 |
| efried | sdague To be clear, land it with a (for now) broken link? | 15:48 |
| cdent | sdague: I’d need to chase some of the conversations with dhellmann and avolkov to really get my memory cear | 15:48 |
| sdague | the api-ref sphinx extension is not guaunteed to not scramble the existing look feel of the main docs | 15:49 |
| sdague | which is why it's in separate repo | 15:50 |
| sdague | and I don't see reasons for that to change | 15:50 |
| sdague | especially as they have a very different target site | 15:50 |
| cdent | part of the issue may have been that having two api-ref-style jobs publishing from the same repo means that the second job needs to have some customizations, and if (I’m not sure if this is even desired?) the placement-api-ref directory was going to move under doc/source we’d wait until after all the pending changes merged before doing that | 15:52 |
| cdent | that was based on the apparently very bad assumption that the pending docs reviews would merge much faster | 15:52 |
| cdent | but mostly I don’t actually know that much of what’s going on: avolkov had that ball and I lost track of it | 15:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Add placement service https://review.openstack.org/462140 | 15:56 |
| sdague | I think things are going to be really goofy to try to put api-ref under doc/source | 15:59 |
| sdague | and I would generally advise against that | 15:59 |
| sdague | api-guide could probably move | 15:59 |
| cdent | sdague: yeah, I’m really grasping at lose straws of memory here and since I think avolkov may be less around now than he was before, we may be able to just come up with a new correct plan and do whatever. I’m not clear what that should be. | 16:01 |
| sdague | cdent: ok. Well I'm around this week but then gone for 2. So if you want assistance on that bit, getting the publishing patches posted soon would be good | 16:02 |
| cdent | I’m so unanchored that I don’t know where to begin, but can probably resituate myself tomorrow (barring yet more tyre fires in allocations). One concerm was that I thought we didn’t want to publish incomplete docs? | 16:03 |
| sdague | on the api-ref side I kind of thing incomplete is better than none | 16:06 |
| openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/osc-lib feature/osc4: Refactor initialize_app() to allow overriding https://review.openstack.org/491846 | 16:12 |
| cdent | sdague: I found some of the lost context. In https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480991/ dhellmann says to move the placement-api-ref into docs/source | 16:33 |
| cdent | sdague, dhellmann : however I think much of what is said there is confusion over how placement and nova are nearby | 16:34 |
| sdague | yeh | 16:34 |
| sdague | it also doesn't seem to mention developer.openstack.org, as this would implicitely remove that | 16:35 |
| sdague | however the developer experience folks were very very strongly in the camp that it was important that that was a top level construct | 16:36 |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 16:36 | |
| sdague | and, actually, that ends up making the api-ref versioned per release, which is something we very much don't want to do | 16:38 |
| cdent | very good point | 16:38 |
| sdague | I left a post hoc comment in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472275/13 | 16:42 |
| cdent | sdague: cool. I’m going to push up a new gate job, which will make note of some of the conversation here and refer back to the abandoned one | 16:45 |
| *** annegentle has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
| cdent | sdague: i made a new job, because i was nearly all the way done before I found the abandoned one: https://review.openstack.org/491860 | 17:01 |
| cdent | thanks | 17:03 |
| *** annegentle has joined #openstack-sdks | 17:13 | |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 17:17 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| *** sbezverk_ has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 17:37 | |
| mordred | cdent, sdague: I haven't read the whole backscroll yet - but one of the issues is that osme of hte tooling currently expects to be able to find "the project" for a given service-type ... and also expects to be able to find the service-type for a given project (the verficiation that docs are going to the right place) | 17:39 |
| mordred | I had punted on sorting that out in my brain a bit - but if we need to sort it out I can re-prioritize my internal ring-buffer ... | 17:39 |
| cdent | Even if we set aside the problem that placement presents in that model, it seems bad to limit a project to just one service-type? | 17:41 |
| *** sbezverk has joined #openstack-sdks | 17:42 | |
| cdent | it seem we _can_ have multiple types per project but it sounds like the mental model isn’t that? | 17:42 |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 17:44 | |
| *** annegentle has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/osc-lib feature/osc4: Revert "Update UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for feature/osc4" https://review.openstack.org/489664 | 17:48 |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-sdks | 17:52 | |
| *** annegentle has joined #openstack-sdks | 18:09 | |
| *** annegentle has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
| dhellmann | cdent, sdague : I expect the topic of the api ref stuff to come up at the ptg on mon/tue with the docs team. I hope you can participate in that conversation. | 18:27 |
| dhellmann | that move was originally supposed to be part of phase 2 of the migration, so if we decide to skip it it's less work for most everyone | 18:27 |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 18:40 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 18:48 | |
| sdague | dhellmann: sure. I think in some of the docs migration there were missing bits of what's per release and what's master only. And you can't mix those in a single doc tree | 19:02 |
| dhellmann | well, we did acknowledge that, we just didn't necessarily think we "couldn't" mix them | 19:03 |
| dhellmann | huge amounts of the docs don't change from cycle to cycle; this is just one area | 19:03 |
| sdague | but it means you'd have a published pike tree linking to pike version docs that should only have a master existing | 19:04 |
| dhellmann | why "should only"? | 19:04 |
| sdague | because some docs only are supposed to exist on master | 19:04 |
| sdague | like api-ref | 19:05 |
| sdague | by design | 19:05 |
| dhellmann | you're arguing with a tautology | 19:05 |
| dhellmann | what's special about api docs that makes it invalid to publish from branches? | 19:05 |
| sdague | because there should only ever be one copy and it should cover all released api | 19:05 |
| cdent | a microversioned api just exists as a whole | 19:05 |
| cdent | there is no pike, ocata, newton | 19:06 |
| sdague | and if there is more than one copy then you need to backport fixes or have multiple clocks saying different things | 19:06 |
| dhellmann | ok | 19:06 |
| dhellmann | I don't see the big deal in saying "there may be newer docs than this, check your API version" but it's not a big deal to me -- not combining those builds means less work next cycle | 19:06 |
| dhellmann | I'm optimizing for the fact that our doc contributor base is decimated; you have other priorities. | 19:07 |
| sdague | dhellmann: the reason for that was optimizing for small contributor bases | 19:07 |
| sdague | because it removes the need to backport corrections on docs | 19:07 |
| sdague | as there is a single source of truth, and only one publish point | 19:08 |
| dhellmann | I guess I don't agree with the premise that there's any reason to backport doc fixes that are not related to code fixes. | 19:08 |
| dhellmann | but I see your point | 19:08 |
| sdague | dhellmann: because the docs aren't 100% accurate | 19:08 |
| dhellmann | yes, well, welcome to this universe | 19:08 |
| dhellmann | I don't actually care about the api docs myself, so as I said, I'm happy to leave all of that alone. | 19:08 |
| sdague | ok | 19:08 |
| dhellmann | that is, I don't care so much about integrating them that I actually want to have the argument | 19:09 |
| cdent | I think, at least for microversioned systems and for people who are talking to multiple different cloud where they don’t necessarily know the version of the cloud, the main isssue is the multiple clocks. We dont want that in api-ref docs. The bit about backports is less relevant. | 19:11 |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 19:44 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-sdks | 20:12 | |
| *** jkilpatr has quit IRC | 20:16 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: WIP: Adapter.get_conf_options(deprecated_opts) https://review.openstack.org/490895 | 20:24 |
| *** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-sdks | 20:37 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-sdks | 20:37 | |
| *** marst_ has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
| *** sbezverk has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
| *** cleong has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
| *** marst has joined #openstack-sdks | 20:55 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Adapter.get_conf_options(deprecated_opts) https://review.openstack.org/490895 | 20:57 |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 21:01 | |
| *** sbezverk has joined #openstack-sdks | 21:22 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Protect against missing interface attribute https://review.openstack.org/488568 | 21:32 |
| *** annegentle has joined #openstack-sdks | 21:32 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 21:37 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Protect against missing interface attribute https://review.openstack.org/488568 | 21:48 |
| openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Adapter.get_conf_options(deprecated_opts) https://review.openstack.org/490895 | 21:48 |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 22:04 | |
| *** markvoelker_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 22:05 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 22:09 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 22:36 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
| *** markvoel_ has joined #openstack-sdks | 22:37 | |
| *** markvoelker_ has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** sbezverk has left #openstack-sdks | 22:41 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
| openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: WIP: Return the endpoint_override from EndpointData https://review.openstack.org/491947 | 22:43 |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 23:01 | |
| *** markvoel_ has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
| *** marst has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 23:18 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-sdks | 23:18 | |
| *** sdague has quit IRC | 23:22 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
| *** gildub has joined #openstack-sdks | 23:55 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!