Tuesday, 2022-05-24

opendevreviewJiri Podivin proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM testing override behavior  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84310606:50
opendevreviewJiri Podivin proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM testing override behavior  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84310606:52
opendevreviewJiri Podivin proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM testing override behavior  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84310607:29
opendevreviewJiri Podivin proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM testing override behavior  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84311007:34
opendevreviewJiri Podivin proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM testing override behavior  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84310607:36
opendevreviewJiri Podivin proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM testing override behavior  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84310607:59
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Replace Python 3.6 by Python 3.9  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/84311508:06
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Bump minimum python version to 3.8  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/84311508:09
tkajinamstephenfin, may I ask you thoughts on this ? ^^^ this is currently blocking keystoneauth gate08:12
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Bump minimum python version to 3.8  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/84311508:14
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updated pip constraints for release candidates of OpenStackSDK's first major release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84296608:30
opendevreviewJakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack stable/1.0.0: Updated pip constraints for release candidates of OpenStackSDK's first major release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84294608:34
opendevreviewJakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack stable/1.0.0: Updated pip constraints for release candidates of OpenStackSDK's first major release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84294608:37
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Migrate osc-tox-py3N-tips to Python 3.9  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/84311508:47
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cliff master: Migrate Python 3.6/7 jobs to Python 3.8  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/84312308:51
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cliff master: Migrate Python 3.6/7 jobs to Python 3.8  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/84312308:53
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Migrate osc-tox-py3N-tips to Python 3.8  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/84311509:02
opendevreviewArx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update endpoint to new proxy layer  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84064009:43
dtantsurgtema: hey! can we please revert marking tenant_id as deprecated in neutron? it's all over devstack, somehow also ending up in stdout and breaking our tooling09:46
dtantsurI don't think we should deprecate something we use so actively09:46
gtemaand if we ensure your change on fixing logging lands properly?09:47
opendevreviewArx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update port info  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/83308309:47
dtantsurgtema: so far I'm not 100% convinced it fixes the situation09:48
dtantsuranother option is to make devstack stop using tenant_id. which is arguably the correct option.09:48
dtantsuralthough.. it seems like something is using this tenant_id? can it be openstacksdk itself?09:50
gtemacan you show me some logs pls, Actually we have not dropped tenant_id, but just marked it deprecated09:50
gtemaI actually also wanted to stop throwing log entry on using deprecating parameter - it is way too much09:50
dtantsurgtema: scroll down to the bottom: https://258182c531e48106d788-8f200da8737017c5e7926809f5fe1643.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/843112/1/check/metalsmith-integration-glance-centos8-uefi/09eeb13/job-output.txt09:51
dtantsurthere is an openstacksdk warning that is messing with the JSON output of my tool09:51
gtemaok, will look once current meeting ends09:52
dtantsurthx!09:55
opendevreviewDr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix python-dev reference in bindep  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/84312409:59
gtemadtantsur: is there a chance you can try whether https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/816790 helps?10:46
dtantsurgtema: will try after the painful meeting I'm in..10:47
gtema:)10:47
gtemaa typical Tuesday10:47
dtantsurI'll probably need some booze after it, dunno10:47
dtantsurgtema: I wonder if line 180 should be changed too10:48
gtemayeah, may be10:48
priteauHello. We've started to see failures uploading images to Glance through Ansible following the release of openstacksdk 0.99.0. It seems to be fixed with ansible-collections-openstack from master, but not with the latest release 1.8.0.10:57
priteau400 Bad Request\n\nProvided object does not match schema 'image': 'False' is not of type 'boolean'  Failed validating 'type' in schema['properties']['protected']:     {'description': 'If true, image will not be deletable.',      'type': 'boolean'}  On instance['protected']:     'False'\n\n10:58
priteauIs a new collection release planned?10:58
fricklerpriteau: iiuc you need to cap openstacksdk<0.99 currently. new collection is being worked on, but not ready yet10:58
gtemayou should be asking this in another room #openstack-ansible-sig10:58
gtemayes, there is a new collection version, but the work there is not complete10:59
priteauSorry, just noticed this is the wrong channel for htis10:59
frickleroh, I didn't know about that channel either11:00
opendevreviewArx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update catalog service for the new sdk  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/83935212:08
opendevreviewArx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update endpoint to new proxy layer  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84064012:18
frickleros-client-config also needs a py38 fix https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/caa6cdd3f37449178759671730329503 guess that's what we get for slacking so long12:22
gtemathe whole thing depresses. So many things broke at once12:23
frickleryeah, maybe not the best timing with the sdk release. otoh fixing it all in one go isn't that bad, either12:27
gtemaI wouldnt say sdk release was bad timing. I mean so much things broke due to oslo.log + py36/37 drop12:27
gtemaand neither SDK nor OSC have real problems with py3612:28
gtemaand we "should" stay backward compatible12:28
opendevreviewDr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Fix zuul jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-client-config/+/84313612:30
frickler^^ not sure if it is a good idea to do all these changes at once, will see what zuul says12:31
opendevreviewJakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Raise minimum OpenStack SDK version to 0.99.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/83969112:37
opendevreviewJakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack stable/1.0.0: Lowered maximum OpenStack SDK version to 0.98.999  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/83969312:48
fricklermore regressions :( https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/31e084f8cb20412a89c62681da712b04 https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/4f7468d7526b4b53a08c4d0aaf00eea813:04
opendevreviewDr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Fix zuul jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-client-config/+/84313613:34
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack stable/1.0.0: Updated pip constraints for release candidates of OpenStackSDK's first major release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/84294613:50
opendevreviewJan Horstmann proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Return details in baremetal_node_info when iterating over all machines  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/83977615:22
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Raise minimum OpenStack SDK version to 0.99.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/83969117:55
fricklergtema: stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-client-config/+/843136 to hopefully unbreak sdk gate. I hope you agree with skipping shade jobs and deferring fixing those until the major issues are resolved18:36
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack stable/1.0.0: Lowered maximum OpenStack SDK version to 0.98.999  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/83969318:42
eanderssonis the openstacksdk >0.99 meant to be part of Zed?18:55
fricklereandersson: I think so, at least the release has been made under the zed tree in the releases repo19:01
jm1frickler: whuat? 😱 i thought its going to be part of zed+1? then we have to speed up porting ansible openstack collection.. somehow..19:04
fricklerjm1: well the authoritative answer will have to come from gtema, but I don't see how we could still release an older version again for zed19:10
eanderssonI bumped senlin requirements to only use >=0.99 for zed19:20
eanderssonbut realized that it might cause issues if not all projects support 0.9919:20
eanderssonhttps://github.com/openstack/senlin/blob/master/requirements.txt#L1319:20
jm1frickler: ack, maybe a release with zed would bring some new attention to aoc 🙈19:23
stephenfinfrickler: done19:29
opendevreviewMerged openstack/os-client-config master: Fix zuul jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-client-config/+/84313621:16

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!