opendevreview | Areg proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Bugfix for paginating for complex paths https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853656 | 13:22 |
---|---|---|
seongsoocho | Hi, Do we have a monthly meeting today after 2 hrs? | 14:14 |
opendevreview | Areg proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Bugfix for paginating for complex paths https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853656 | 14:44 |
diablo_rojo | I do think we should meet briefly today. | 15:08 |
seongsoocho | okay | 15:08 |
frickler | gtema: couple of failures with osc 6, maybe you can also a look? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/853612 | 15:49 |
gtema | ok, will check | 15:53 |
gtema | python-octaviaclient 3.0.0 depends on python-openstackclient>=3.12.0 | 15:54 |
gtema | The user requested (constraint) python-openstackclient===6.0.0 | 15:54 |
gtema | interestingly just 1 hour ago was looking into octaviaclient issues - LOL | 15:55 |
johnsom | gtema Let me know if I can help with any octavia client questions | 15:56 |
gtema | sure. Now need to decode why for pip >=3.12.0 is not good with constraint ===6.0.0 | 15:57 |
diablo_rojo | meeting agenda is here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstacksdk-meeting-agenda | 15:59 |
seongsoocho | Hi o/ , I invited our mentee here to join and watch the meeting. | 16:00 |
zeze | hi | 16:00 |
hoosa | Hi o/ | 16:01 |
diablo_rojo | seongsoocho: excellent! | 16:01 |
YooSoo_LIM | Hi \o/ | 16:01 |
diablo_rojo | gtema: do you want to run the meeting or shall I? | 16:01 |
frickler | actually those failures look unrelated, maybe some pypi hickup | 16:01 |
gtema | feel free to run, since I am again "surprised" by the meeting | 16:02 |
diablo_rojo | #startmeeting sdk_osc | 16:02 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Thu Aug 18 16:02:33 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is diablo_rojo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:02 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:02 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'sdk_osc' | 16:02 |
gtema | I am here, but absolutely not prepared | 16:02 |
diablo_rojo | gtema: no worries at all- I definitely sprung it on you | 16:02 |
diablo_rojo | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstacksdk-meeting-agenda | 16:03 |
diablo_rojo | Ping List: gouthamr: stephenfin amotoki | 16:03 |
gouthamr | heyy! :) | 16:03 |
diablo_rojo | + myself and gtema but we are already here lol | 16:03 |
diablo_rojo | Oh weird. I did a + at the start of that message and my element client turned it into a bullet point. | 16:04 |
stephenfin | o/ | 16:04 |
diablo_rojo | Anywho, feel free to throw things on the agenda and we will get started. | 16:04 |
diablo_rojo | #topic BU Students | 16:04 |
diablo_rojo | So, again we have the opportunity to mentor some students at BU | 16:05 |
diablo_rojo | gtema and I started putting together a project proposal | 16:05 |
diablo_rojo | but would love extra eyes on it before I send it back to the professors (Alan and Orran) | 16:05 |
diablo_rojo | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/BU-2022 | 16:06 |
diablo_rojo | I think I will plan to send it mid next week so if you have comments/edits/feedback please get them in the etherpad by then | 16:06 |
gtema | great | 16:06 |
diablo_rojo | and then we can just use this etherpad for the actual mentorship too | 16:06 |
stephenfin | sounds good | 16:06 |
diablo_rojo | All in one place as much as possible | 16:07 |
diablo_rojo | Anything else on this topic? | 16:07 |
gtema | any info on when they start? | 16:07 |
seongsoocho | I'm really interesting the agenda of mentoship to BU. | 16:07 |
diablo_rojo | It would be early to mid September | 16:07 |
gtema | okay | 16:07 |
diablo_rojo | seongsoocho: for inspiration for you own mentorship? | 16:07 |
diablo_rojo | gtema: and it will end probably mid December | 16:08 |
gtema | ughm, again so short | 16:08 |
diablo_rojo | Yeah it is :/ | 16:08 |
seongsoocho | Yes. It is very simiilar with my own mentorship . the different is I am a mentor too but I have to study this project :-) | 16:08 |
diablo_rojo | At least Violet is sticking around for the foreseeable future and now is up and running. | 16:08 |
gtema | yes, that is good. That change should be merged now | 16:09 |
diablo_rojo | seongsoocho: well you are welcome to attend our meetings with the students once we get started but idk when that will be or what the tz overlap will look like | 16:09 |
diablo_rojo | Shall I move on? | 16:10 |
gtema | yupp, pls | 16:10 |
diablo_rojo | #topic PTG Planning | 16:10 |
seongsoocho | great | 16:10 |
diablo_rojo | The team is signed up as participating | 16:10 |
diablo_rojo | The deadline isnt till the 26th so the full list of all teams wont be final till the 30th, | 16:11 |
gtema | awesome, thanks | 16:11 |
diablo_rojo | but after that maybe we can get on some of the teams agendas to give them status/ invite them to get more involved? | 16:11 |
diablo_rojo | Just a thought I had | 16:11 |
gtema | yeah, why not | 16:12 |
diablo_rojo | Also, would be good to get any/all of the students we have together to talk about their work and meet each other + the community | 16:12 |
diablo_rojo | try to build up the connection to keep them around past the semester end | 16:12 |
gtema | yeah, that would be really cool | 16:12 |
gtema | sadly last years they were not active enough to participate on PTG | 16:12 |
diablo_rojo | I will have a think on that a bit more... but any ideas are obviously welcome :) | 16:12 |
diablo_rojo | gtema: I think there was one like.. a year + ago that we had NDSU students and BU students | 16:13 |
diablo_rojo | Either way- everyone should register as its free: https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com/ | 16:13 |
gtema | yeah, maybe one. But definitely majority was even with a reminder not participating | 16:13 |
diablo_rojo | gtema: yeah, would be good to stress the importance | 16:14 |
gtema | :) | 16:14 |
diablo_rojo | maybe make that our 'check in ' meeting for the week | 16:14 |
diablo_rojo | or what have you- kinda push them to come | 16:14 |
gtema | yupp, why not | 16:14 |
gtema | the only thing - they should not have courses at this time, otherwise they have excuse | 16:14 |
diablo_rojo | Once I have the final list of teams, I will get them loaded into the PTGbot and the etherpad will get generated and then we can build our agenda- we can start early but I dont think we are in a rush and need to start it now? | 16:15 |
diablo_rojo | gtema: +2 | 16:15 |
gtema | yeah, no hurry now | 16:15 |
diablo_rojo | Anything else on the PTG topic? | 16:15 |
gtema | we anyway do not even know how many of the students will we have | 16:15 |
gtema | nothing from my side | 16:15 |
diablo_rojo | gtema: also true | 16:16 |
diablo_rojo | Okay next topic then | 16:16 |
diablo_rojo | #topic Last Interface Change before R1.0 | 16:16 |
diablo_rojo | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853052 | 16:16 |
gtema | yeah, I feel burden with waiting of the R1.0 and decided to pack the last change into the queue | 16:16 |
diablo_rojo | I think this topic was yours gtema ? | 16:16 |
gtema | yeah, mine | 16:16 |
gtema | this change is unifying listing filtering | 16:16 |
diablo_rojo | Ah okay. | 16:16 |
gtema | before in proxy layer we had only service-side filters | 16:17 |
diablo_rojo | ooOOOooo | 16:17 |
gtema | and on the cloud layer only client filters | 16:17 |
gtema | since we discourage usage of cloud layer I have created this change | 16:17 |
gtema | that is actually taking all possible filters in a single parameter | 16:17 |
diablo_rojo | I am all for unifying of functionality | 16:17 |
gtema | and applies server side what possible and rest on the fetched results | 16:18 |
diablo_rojo | Makes sense to me. | 16:18 |
gtema | I consider this type of change also as partially "breaking", even in reality it is not. But it introduces quite some behavior change | 16:18 |
diablo_rojo | Yeah that can be scary if you're familiar with the old functionality | 16:19 |
gtema | exactly | 16:19 |
diablo_rojo | seongsoocho: maybe you and your mentees can review the patch when you get some time? | 16:19 |
gtema | my idea is that once this lands we can really discuss making R1.0.0 finally | 16:19 |
diablo_rojo | gtema: is that something we want to note in the docs? | 16:19 |
zeze | wow | 16:20 |
seongsoocho | diablo_rojo: maybe , I and we will try it :-) | 16:20 |
gtema | haven't I? | 16:20 |
gtema | oh no, you are right | 16:20 |
gtema | that is why we need reviews | 16:20 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Bah, my computer up and died. | 16:21 |
gtema | ok, will update it once I have my hands in SDK area next time | 16:21 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Sounds good gtema | 16:22 |
gtema | but today is neither friday, nor 13. And still things misbehave | 16:22 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Yeah. Just black screen. No warning. | 16:22 |
diablo_rojo_phone | So now I'm on my phone but idk how the meeting commands will work. | 16:22 |
gtema | cool. In my TZ I would treat it as a sign to stop for today ;-) | 16:22 |
gtema | #topic manila patches status | 16:23 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Lol I wish. | 16:23 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Okay uhh.. next topic? | 16:23 |
gtema | I was wondering really what is the status with those batch of changes we had that are bit abandoned now | 16:24 |
diablo_rojo_phone | gouthamr: ^? | 16:24 |
gouthamr | ashrodri went around and refreshed a bunch of them recently | 16:24 |
* gouthamr finds links | 16:24 | |
gtema | (next topic - I thought you might have difficulties to type specific stuff from mobile) | 16:24 |
gouthamr | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:openstacksdk-manila-support | 16:25 |
gtema | I hate typing from mobile - this is a fight agains auto-correct | 16:25 |
gouthamr | looks like we need to do them again | 16:25 |
gouthamr | thanks for checking on this though; i'll rebase and try to see if we can un-WIP some of these | 16:25 |
gtema | at least rebase would be the beginning | 16:25 |
diablo_rojo_phone | gtema: yeah less fast and less access to links :) Thank you. | 16:25 |
gtema | welcome diablo_rojo_phone | 16:26 |
gtema | wrt changes: once I looked last time on them there were unaddressed review comments or so and no activity at all | 16:26 |
gtema | if we can land at least some of them I would be happy to include them in R1 | 16:27 |
gtema | otherwise we would need to leave them for later. I do not want to see this much of work simply abandoned | 16:28 |
gouthamr | great! i rechecked a couple and added my +2 back | 16:28 |
gtema | cool, thks | 16:28 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Yay progress! | 16:28 |
gtema | once we land at least some of those I will take care of moving them to master branch | 16:28 |
gouthamr | great thanks gtema! | 16:28 |
gtema | wlcm | 16:28 |
diablo_rojo_phone | I think that was the last topic? | 16:29 |
gtema | yupp, the last | 16:29 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Sweet. | 16:29 |
gtema | I have one more topic, but without neutron folks support we can not do much | 16:29 |
diablo_rojo_phone | slaweq: around? | 16:30 |
diablo_rojo_phone | I don't see Lajos in this channel. | 16:30 |
gtema | I added it to agenda anyway. The question is that we have added some of the vpnaas functionality, but we can't test it since I can't understand how to activate it in devstack | 16:31 |
gtema | I did everything like vpnaas code does but tests are still skipped | 16:32 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Ahh that is indeed an issue. | 16:32 |
diablo_rojo_phone | I don't know how to set that stuff up in devstack either | 16:32 |
gtema | yeah, that is the point. I was asking slaweq about that, he promised to have a look, but most likely no time | 16:33 |
diablo_rojo_phone | That happens. | 16:33 |
gtema | right, this is life | 16:33 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Indeed | 16:34 |
gtema | that's all folks (c) | 16:34 |
gtema | or is it (r) - no clue | 16:34 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Yep that's it | 16:35 |
diablo_rojo_phone | #endmeeting | 16:36 |
diablo_rojo_phone | Except I have no authority. | 16:36 |
gtema | #agreed :) | 16:36 |
diablo_rojo_phone | On this nick apparently | 16:36 |
seongsoocho | diablo_rojo: gtema I have an one question to you. There seem to be a lot of old and already resolved issues registered in the storyboard. We want to find these and close the issue, but rather than closing it at will, we want to have you review it. How to do it efficiently? | 16:36 |
gtema | #endmeeting | 16:36 |
frickler | wait until the hour is up, then anyone can end the meeting | 16:37 |
gtema | hmm. My problem is that I can't use storyboard effectively, I just become mad after 10 seconds of starting with it | 16:37 |
diablo_rojo_phone | frickler: ahh got it. Thank you. | 16:37 |
seongsoocho | gtema: Yes.. The storyboard is really slow. | 16:38 |
gtema | seongsoocho, maybe you comment inside the issues whether you think it can be closed. At least I will receive email (if spamfilter will not catch it first) | 16:38 |
gtema | and with that at least I will have a chance to comment or really close it | 16:39 |
seongsoocho | Okay. I'll comment if I think I can close it. | 16:39 |
gtema | thanks | 16:39 |
seongsoocho | thanks | 16:39 |
slaweq | gtema: hi, sorry, I forgot about it | 16:40 |
slaweq | Do you have patch woth that job so I can check it? | 16:40 |
gtema | slaweq: no worries, it will not run away | 16:40 |
gtema | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/846618 | 16:40 |
slaweq | I'm not at my desk now but I will take a look later tonight or tomorrow morning | 16:40 |
diablo_rojo | I'm back! | 16:41 |
diablo_rojo | #endmeeting | 16:41 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Thu Aug 18 16:41:16 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:41 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2022/sdk_osc.2022-08-18-16.02.html | 16:41 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2022/sdk_osc.2022-08-18-16.02.txt | 16:41 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2022/sdk_osc.2022-08-18-16.02.log.html | 16:41 |
diablo_rojo | I guess I could have kept it going since slaweq is here now | 16:41 |
* diablo_rojo facepalms | 16:41 | |
gtema | awesome, thanks. In the change I just repeated how vpnaas code sets up jobs, but tests are still skipped, so I do not know whether the it is not activated, or whether tests are having wrong skip | 16:41 |
gtema | he is not on desk, therefore no problems of not logging it | 16:42 |
gtema | s/on/at/ | 16:42 |
*** rcastillo|rover_ is now known as rcastillo|rover | 19:16 | |
opendevreview | hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703 | 20:36 |
opendevreview | hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703 | 20:56 |
opendevreview | hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703 | 20:57 |
*** rcastillo|rover is now known as rcastillo | 23:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!