| opendevreview | SongSuheon proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement heat 'stack resource signal' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/894203 | 04:54 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM: Testing subnet disable_gateway_ip https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/894254 | 06:12 |
| opendevreview | SongSuheon proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement heat 'stack resource signal' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/894203 | 07:08 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM: Testing subnet disable_gateway_ip https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/894254 | 07:13 |
| ralonsoh | stephenfin, hi! This is about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/892771?tab=change-view-tab-header-zuul-results-summary | 09:00 |
| ralonsoh | when I use the patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/892792 in the SDK venv, the tests pass | 09:01 |
| ralonsoh | I don't know how to make the OSC unit tests pass without merging the OSC patch first. But that requires the SDK patch first! | 09:02 |
| frickler | gtema: what became of moving back to LP, is it that just nobody has done the needful to actually execute it? or is there some blocker? | 09:04 |
| gtema | frickler - I do not consider this a blocker, but for me LP is not really better then SB | 09:05 |
| ralonsoh | stephenfin, I see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/885132, for example, and looks very similar. But in this case the UTs are passing | 09:05 |
| frickler | gtema: hmm. for me, I can track bugs on LP efficiently and work on them. SB I just ignore | 09:08 |
| gtema | it is clearly different (and faster), but UX is still too unfriendly for a regular user/reporter. For me it is same as bugzilla | 09:10 |
| gtema | you have lots of capabilities, but the UX is from 20 years ago | 09:10 |
| frickler | well, I'm also from > 20 years ago, so I guess that's a good match :D | 09:11 |
| gtema | I am too, but it feels ugly to me. I know there are better things and I don't want to go back to ugly (it's not retro ;-) | 09:13 |
| opendevreview | Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "hardware_offload_type" attribute to "port" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/892771 | 09:13 |
| gtema | honestly I also doubt right now something would really change just by changing bug reporter | 09:13 |
| gtema | when I have no time to look at issues I do not care much it is SB or LP or GH | 09:14 |
| frickler | gtema: well the only remaining argument I could bring then is that users are more likely to have experience in LP from interacting with other openstack projects. but I agree maybe that difference is small enough currently to not care, so we can postpone the discussion until when there are more contributors again (one can still dream?) | 09:17 |
| gtema | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/894285 | 09:18 |
| frickler | oh no, I already nagged you enough :D | 09:18 |
| gtema | we were discussing this last PTG, I just somehow was not convinced too much to actually do the step | 09:18 |
| gtema | do you remember if tracker on LP appears after this change gets merged? Currently https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstacksdk returns 404 | 09:19 |
| gtema | hm, but there is empty https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstacksdk | 09:20 |
| frickler | I just checked, seems there is https://launchpad.net/python-openstacksdk instead | 09:20 |
| frickler | yes. it needs to be set up manually, no automation for that | 09:20 |
| frickler | "This is a proposed OpenStack project" that's really old | 09:21 |
| gtema | right, maintainers list is too ancient also | 09:21 |
| frickler | but it seems it is getting referenced by the ubuntu packaging | 09:21 |
| gtema | correct | 09:22 |
| gtema | thus most likely not really for us now | 09:22 |
| frickler | so let's try to reuse that I'd say. I'll see whether we can get access | 09:22 |
| gtema | ok | 09:24 |
| opendevreview | SongSuheon proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement heat 'stack resource signal' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/894203 | 10:07 |
| opendevreview | SongSuheon proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement heat 'stack resource signal' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/894203 | 10:10 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/keystoneauth stable/2023.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/894328 | 14:53 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/keystoneauth stable/2023.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/894329 | 14:53 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Update master for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/894330 | 14:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!