Monday, 2025-11-24

opendevreview신민경 proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add functional tests for image info commands  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/95890810:36
opendevreview신민경 proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add functional tests for image info commands  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/95890812:13
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Implement conflict resolution  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/96817812:28
opendevreview신민경 proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add functional tests for image info commands  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/95890813:10
greatgatsbyGood day.  After upgrading from the python openstack SDK library version 4.7.1 to 4.8.0, it seems that I can no longer do a simple conn.dns.recordsets(all_projects=True, status="PENDING").  This now throws an KeyError for zone_id.  I'm digging through the code now, but I'm hoping there's a workaround so I don't have to iterate over each tenant/zone, as this was way too slow when we first tested it 13:51
greatgatsbythat way.13:51
lutimurahey stephenfin, i'm trying to get https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/958806 in, but, for some reason, the zuul jobs are still failing despite openstacksdk 4.8.0 has already been released (with commit 839e3ccc6). what am i missing here? :(15:00
tkajinamlutimura, I guess you have to revert https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/958872 ?15:37
tkajinamgreatgatsby, if you could report a bug in https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstacksdk with some more details (like traceback) that would be helpful15:40
opendevreviewMerged openstack/os-api-ref master: Remove reference to tag framework  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/96812016:16
opendevreviewcid proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Node.instance_name support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/95510316:17
lutimuratkajinam: oh, you're right! i totally forgot about that one heh16:29
tkajinamlutimura, I guess it's better to bump min version of sdk, too, but I'm not 100% familiar with the existing workflow so will defer it to stephenfin (or other sdk cores)16:30
lutimuratkajinam: do you mean in openstack/requirements? i.e. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/96786316:32
lutimurai'm thinking about reverting the change you mentioned in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/958806 (i guess it has to be done this way...)16:34
tkajinamlutimura, no I mean the line in requirements.txt in python-openstackclient16:36
tkajinamhmm. seems we should do it actually.16:38
tkajinamat least for test code, but I guess it's still useful for functional code16:38
tkajinamlutimura, yeah I agree with doing that revert WITHIN your change16:40
lutimuraack! about requirements.txt, we wait for stephenfin (or other sdk cores) and handle it on a separate change?16:43
tkajinammaybe or within yours if they want to bump it now16:46
tkajinamupdate the change with the required revert now, and hear any feedback16:47
opendevreviewLuan Utimura proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: volume: Add missing backup_id field in tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/95880616:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-openstackclient master: volume: Add missing backup_id field in tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/95880619:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!