| dims | very insightful article - https://opensource.com/open-organization/17/2/phipps-gaming-the-system | 13:40 |
|---|---|---|
| gothicmindfood | dims: yes! I'm confused about the end recs, though - it seems like he's basically admitting that there's nothing you can do about bad actors in open source | 14:47 |
| gothicmindfood | I wonder often about trust and breaking that trust in a community, in that respect. | 14:48 |
| gothicmindfood | because it seems pretty easy to assume bad actors after a single action, even if that's not the case - and how much can the claim of being transparent actually help repair that trust? | 14:49 |
| persia | One thing I have seen work is when governance bodies call out the bad actor and request a time out (e.g. one cycle). Returnees in such a model mostly seem trustworthy. | 15:57 |
| persia | To avoid claims carrying assumption of guilt, trials are an expensive but workable solution. | 15:59 |
| *** harlowja has joined #openstack-swg | 18:33 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!