Monday, 2014-02-17

*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift00:23
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC00:33
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift00:34
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC00:38
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC00:48
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift01:04
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift01:05
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift01:11
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC02:18
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift02:26
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift02:35
*** hndak has joined #openstack-swift02:50
*** hndak has quit IRC02:51
*** byeager has quit IRC02:55
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC03:32
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift03:33
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift03:35
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC03:38
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC03:48
*** jokke_ has quit IRC04:17
*** jokke_ has joined #openstack-swift04:17
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift04:32
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift04:37
*** jokke_ has quit IRC04:40
*** jokke_ has joined #openstack-swift04:40
*** byeager has quit IRC04:42
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift05:02
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift05:03
openstackgerritAmala Basha proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: swift_client needs to close http connection  https://review.openstack.org/5513205:16
notmynameportante: you'd probably find this interesting: https://github.com/notmyname/logflow (note, it's very much "pre-alpha" state ;-)05:34
koolhead17https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/11409/quarantined-items/ << decommission the old devices with the data on . Some pointers needed05:36
notmynamekoolhead17: check the quarantined data (although it may be unreadable) with swift-object-info. then do a HEAD on the cluster for that object to see if it's good (it's extremely likely that it is). then delete the quarantined data with no worries05:43
koolhead17notmyname: thanks will respond accordingly05:44
*** basha has joined #openstack-swift05:44
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift05:54
notmynamekoolhead17: heh. I didn't think you'd just copy/paste my answer ;-)06:00
notmynamemaybe next time I'll phrase it better06:01
*** Anju_ has joined #openstack-swift06:03
*** kelvin has joined #openstack-swift06:04
kelvinhow can I check swift3 working or not06:04
kelvin?06:04
notmynamekelvin: that is a very open-ended question06:04
notmynamekelvin: can you use something like boto (ie a "normal" S3 client utility) and see if it works?06:05
notmynameagainst your swift cluster06:05
kelvinboto ?06:05
kelvinnotmyname : does swift 100% compatible witha amazon06:05
openstackgerritYuan Zhou proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Allow to specify storage policy when uploading objects  https://review.openstack.org/7392006:06
notmynamekelvin: no. swift has it's own API. swift3 is a translation layer, but it doesn't support all of S3's features06:06
kelvincould we to some other features in swift306:07
kelvin?06:07
kelvin could we add  some other features in swift306:07
notmynameI'm sure you could. AFAIK, fujita is pretty good about accepting changes into the swift3 repo06:08
notmyname(https://github.com/fujita/swift3)06:08
kelvinnotmyname:  If I am not using amazon sevices06:08
kelvinstill could check the swift3 response  in swift ?06:08
notmynameI'm not sure what you mean06:08
kelvinnotmyname:  I want to check that how swift3 is working06:09
kelvinby code analysis  I came to know that its is changing the headers only06:09
notmynameok06:11
*** ppai has quit IRC06:12
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift06:15
*** nosnos has quit IRC06:42
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift06:52
koolhead17notmyname: sigh.. i just did the same & mentioned via notmyname @ IRC :)07:10
Anjucan any body tell  return self.app(env, start_response)07:15
Anjuwhat is this for ?07:15
*** basha has quit IRC07:20
*** madhuri has quit IRC07:41
*** saurabh_ has quit IRC07:44
*** kelvin has quit IRC07:50
*** saurabh_ has joined #openstack-swift08:00
*** saurabh_ has joined #openstack-swift08:00
*** Anju has quit IRC08:01
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift08:03
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift08:10
*** saurabh_ has quit IRC08:20
*** basha has joined #openstack-swift08:22
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift08:24
*** saurabh_ has joined #openstack-swift08:24
*** Anju has joined #openstack-swift08:24
Anjuwhat is QUERY_STRING08:24
*** saurabh_ has quit IRC08:31
*** saju_m has quit IRC08:31
*** saurabh_ has joined #openstack-swift08:34
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift08:37
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift08:47
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift08:58
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC09:02
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift09:03
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC09:10
*** anticw_ has quit IRC09:12
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo09:17
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift09:20
*** mmcardle has quit IRC09:21
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift09:22
*** anticw has joined #openstack-swift09:24
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC09:54
hugokuohola09:56
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift10:02
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC10:17
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift10:17
*** joeljwright has quit IRC10:18
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC10:22
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Add tests for bin/swift  https://review.openstack.org/7371010:22
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift10:28
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift10:36
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift10:47
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC11:37
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift11:46
*** dmorita has quit IRC11:58
*** bvandenh has quit IRC12:01
*** Trixboxer has joined #openstack-swift12:04
*** basha has quit IRC12:06
*** mkollaro1 has joined #openstack-swift12:52
*** mkollaro has quit IRC12:52
*** nshaikh has left #openstack-swift12:52
*** portante has quit IRC12:55
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift12:57
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift12:58
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC13:02
*** nosnos has quit IRC13:08
*** portante has joined #openstack-swift13:15
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v portante13:15
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift13:17
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift13:19
*** mkollaro1 has quit IRC13:21
*** mmcardle has quit IRC13:31
openstackgerritZhang Jinnan proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Replace assertEqual(None, *) with assertIsNone in tests  https://review.openstack.org/7403913:43
openstackgerritZhang Jinnan proposed a change to openstack/swift: Use assertIsNone or assertIsNotNone in tests  https://review.openstack.org/7404113:46
tristanCIn order to tests 1/ ssl cert verification and 2/ stored files are not corrupted, I think we need 'functionnal test'. Or maybe I could create a socket and try those features against 127.0.0.1. Would this be accepted in swiftclient unit-tests ?13:59
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift14:04
*** mkollaro has quit IRC14:05
*** saju_m has quit IRC14:15
*** mkerrin has quit IRC14:30
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift14:34
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift15:03
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC15:07
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift15:07
*** rustlebee is now known as russellb15:08
*** pberis has quit IRC15:11
*** bada has quit IRC15:13
*** dmsimard has joined #openstack-swift15:14
luisbgmorning :)15:14
*** bada has joined #openstack-swift15:15
*** bada_ has joined #openstack-swift15:18
*** bada has quit IRC15:20
notmynamegood morning, world15:24
*** basha has joined #openstack-swift15:25
tristanC'morning!15:25
*** zackf has joined #openstack-swift15:26
luisbgnotmyname,  tristanC, :)15:28
notmyname*may not be applicable in your area15:28
notmynametoday is a company holiday for me, so I'll only be around intermittently today15:28
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-swift15:32
luisbgnotmyname, family day, right?15:32
notmynamethat's the plan :-)15:33
luisbgI am in Quebec, so doesn't apply :( I should move to Toronto or the US15:33
portantenotmyname: I don't have the day off, so if you need anything let me know15:33
*** ppai has quit IRC15:33
notmynameportante: did you see my graphviz stuff last night?15:33
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift15:34
notmynameportante: it's not really a call to action per-se. just an interesting visualization, IMO15:35
notmynameportante: also (as a result of building that), I filed 2 logging bugs against swift last night15:36
*** basha has quit IRC15:36
*** nshaikh has left #openstack-swift15:36
*** basha has joined #openstack-swift15:45
notmynameportante: as far as reviews go, peluse's and torgomatic's on the feature/ec branch are top15:48
* notmyname is out15:51
*** basha has quit IRC15:52
*** bantone has left #openstack-swift15:53
*** jergerber has quit IRC15:57
creihtnotmyname: any thoughts on the pbr patch?16:01
creihthttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/73738/16:01
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-swift16:05
*** pberis has joined #openstack-swift16:05
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away16:15
*** bvandenh has quit IRC16:23
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo16:24
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift16:29
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC16:29
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift16:30
*** byeager has quit IRC16:32
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift16:35
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift16:42
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC16:55
*** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift17:00
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC17:08
*** zackf1 has joined #openstack-swift17:19
*** zackf has quit IRC17:19
*** portante has quit IRC17:21
*** portante has joined #openstack-swift17:21
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v portante17:21
*** nacim has quit IRC17:22
notmyname(drive by comment) creiht: no I haven't taken a look yet17:30
*** zackf1 is now known as zackf17:41
*** gvernik has quit IRC17:49
*** mmcardle has quit IRC17:57
luisbgis there a way I can run the Jenkins test suite without pushing the commit to gerrit's review system?18:01
luisbga dev test suite run before I am ready to push the commit for review18:02
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away18:03
*** shri has joined #openstack-swift18:06
*** byeager has quit IRC18:20
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift18:21
*** byeager has quit IRC18:22
pconstantineanybody knows why this one is still not fixed? https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/121728818:27
pconstantineI mean fix it by ditching pbr, of course18:28
gholtpconstantine: Maybe like this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73738/18:35
portantenotmyname: I just looked at the graphviz stuff for those operations, pretty cool18:36
portantevery useful, and will help with the DiskFile talk, should it be accepted18:37
pconstantinegholt: thanks God!18:38
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift18:38
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift18:43
gholtSo I guess now when anybody comments on anything Jenkins kicks in.18:50
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC18:53
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift18:54
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC18:58
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift18:59
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift19:03
*** nacim has quit IRC19:09
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/swift: Allow log disable in account/container server  https://review.openstack.org/7412819:10
portantegholt: cranky, bugger, huh?19:20
portantecreiht, gholt: what kind of resources need to be dedicated to object expiration in rackspace's deployment? one object expirer per proxy server, 1 on a separate node per swift cluster?19:22
portantecan you talk about that? it is okay if you cannot19:22
gholtOh, I think that's probably fine to talk about. It varies quite a bit and just one active customer using the feature can really skew things.19:23
gholtWe currently run one process per region.19:23
portantecool, thanks19:23
gholtIf something goes wrong, on our "worst" region we'll have to run an extra process or three to get caught back up in a reasonable period.19:24
portanteso in our SAIO we just stand one up as a matter course, but no reason that needs to be one per proxy-server node19:24
gholtAnd they run on a box separate from the cluster, but shared with some other log processing jobs.19:24
portantek19:24
gholtNo, no need for that many expirers19:25
portantegreat, thanks19:25
gholtOh, there's the setting, one process, 100 concurrency19:25
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift19:26
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev19:26
portantegholt, thanks19:28
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/swift: Allow log disable in account/container server  https://review.openstack.org/7412819:38
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC19:45
*** byeager_ has joined #openstack-swift19:45
*** byeager has quit IRC19:45
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift19:46
*** byeager_ has quit IRC19:46
*** byeager has quit IRC19:47
koolhead17https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/10291/why-nova-and-swift-polling-is-separated-from-rest-of-the-modules-and-fed-to-agent/19:50
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift19:52
*** byeager has quit IRC19:53
*** Trixboxer has quit IRC20:28
*** mjseger has joined #openstack-swift20:32
*** dmsimard1 has joined #openstack-swift20:35
*** dmsimard has quit IRC20:35
creihtis it just me, or are the gates re-running after every comment in gerrit?20:40
*** bada_ has quit IRC20:41
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: Small efficiency improvement for SLO range GET  https://review.openstack.org/7316120:44
clarkbcreiht: sort of20:45
clarkbcreiht: the idea is that tests are rerun if the existing results are stale (more than 72 hours old)20:45
clarkbthe intention is that actively reviewed changes should have up to date test results20:46
clarkbso that yo udon't have surprises when code is approved and gated20:46
creihtahh20:46
creihtok20:46
*** shri1 has joined #openstack-swift20:51
zaitcevnice20:51
*** shri1 has quit IRC20:51
*** shri has quit IRC20:54
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo20:56
*** tdasilva has left #openstack-swift20:56
*** kris_h has joined #openstack-swift20:57
portanteclarkb: we can still say it is creiht, right? ;)21:10
portantecreiht: or maybe say that it is because portante might be *thinking* about doing gerrit reviews again ... (sorry, not meant to be a threat ;)21:11
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift21:11
*** byeager has quit IRC21:11
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift21:21
*** 21WACDP1E has joined #openstack-swift21:25
portantefolks, does anybody deploy swift in production using Ext4 file systesms?21:27
*** byeager has quit IRC21:30
*** koolhead17 has quit IRC21:33
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-swift21:33
*** lpabon has quit IRC21:38
glangeFAT32 here21:39
dfgtorgomatic: did gholt's comment make sense to you? because i thought it was horribly written :)21:39
*** 21WACDP1E has quit IRC21:53
*** joeljwright has quit IRC21:53
wkellyportante: there are some ext4 users in private cloud at rackspace.22:01
wkellysmall deployments, but production22:02
*** dmsimard1 is now known as dmsimard22:06
wkellyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/72157/ seems to have stalled a little bit.  Any chance a core reviewer could take a look?22:08
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift22:11
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift22:12
*** joeljwright1 has joined #openstack-swift22:12
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away22:13
*** shri has joined #openstack-swift22:15
*** joeljwright has quit IRC22:16
*** joeljwright1 has quit IRC22:16
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift22:24
*** joeljwright has quit IRC22:29
bsdkurton a production cluster what is a typical number of workers for the object-server?22:35
ctennishere's some overview details on worker settings bsdkurt: https://swiftstack.com/docs/admin/cluster_management/ss_tuning.html#worker-settings22:39
bsdkurtctennis: thansk!22:41
*** dmsimard has quit IRC22:57
portantewkelly: thanks23:21
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift23:25
*** byeager has quit IRC23:26
*** joeljwright1 has joined #openstack-swift23:27
*** joeljwright has quit IRC23:29
*** joeljwright1 has quit IRC23:32
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift23:36
*** jergerber has quit IRC23:37
*** fifieldt has quit IRC23:44
dfgnotmyname: how do you topics for the next swift meeting?23:45
dfgnotmyname: how do you submit topics for the next swift meeting?23:45
portantedfg: there is a wiki page folks can add them to23:46
portantelet me see if I can find the link23:46
glangehttp://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWIFT23:47
portantehttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift23:49
dfgdammit glange23:49
dfgthx portante23:49
portantewelcome23:50
portantedfg: also, it turns out that clicking on the meeting time link on the swift wiki (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift) also gets you there23:52
dfgcool thx23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!