| *** otherjon has quit IRC | 00:18 | |
| *** otherjon has joined #openstack-swift | 00:19 | |
| *** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift | 00:27 | |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 00:34 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 00:43 | |
| *** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift | 01:15 | |
| *** mkollaro has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
| *** diegows has quit IRC | 01:59 | |
| *** fifieldt has quit IRC | 02:47 | |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 03:34 | |
| *** leews has joined #openstack-swift | 03:37 | |
| *** sungju has joined #openstack-swift | 03:37 | |
| *** miqui has quit IRC | 03:51 | |
| *** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan | 03:54 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 04:26 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 04:35 | |
| *** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift | 04:37 | |
| *** nthacker_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:40 | |
| nthacker_ | Hi Guys, one of my recent check-in's failed a pep8 test. :P . I wanted to verify the pep8 before I resubmit for review. I dont see a pep8 script that Jenkins uses in the Swift tree - can I assume that the pep8 jenkins runs is full pep8 check or there are some exclusions? | 04:41 |
|---|---|---|
| *** kashyapk has quit IRC | 04:42 | |
| nthacker_ | or can someone tell me how I can see the contents of pep8_check.sh that Jenkins runs | 04:42 |
| *** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift | 04:42 | |
| *** sungju has quit IRC | 04:45 | |
| *** kashyapk has quit IRC | 04:47 | |
| *** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift | 04:52 | |
| *** psharma has joined #openstack-swift | 04:53 | |
| *** kashyapk_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:58 | |
| *** kashyapk has quit IRC | 04:58 | |
| mattoliverau | nthacker_: hey, the pep8 job, used for swift is the a generic job. Its called run-pep8.sh. It's just using tox. You can see a copy of the script at http://is.gd/api.php?longurl=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.openstack.org%2Fcgit%2Fopenstack-infra%2Fconfig%2Ftree%2Fmodules%2Fopenstack_project%2Ffiles%2Fslave_scripts%2Frun-pep8.sh | 05:11 |
| *** nthacker_ has quit IRC | 05:24 | |
| *** sungju has joined #openstack-swift | 05:24 | |
| *** sungju has quit IRC | 05:29 | |
| *** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift | 05:33 | |
| *** sungju has joined #openstack-swift | 05:46 | |
| *** sungju has quit IRC | 05:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | Nirmal Thacker proposed a change to openstack/swift: Fixes a low hanging fruit in container auditor https://review.openstack.org/97148 | 05:54 |
| *** sungju has joined #openstack-swift | 06:03 | |
| *** sungju has quit IRC | 06:09 | |
| *** Midnightmyth has joined #openstack-swift | 06:17 | |
| *** sungju has joined #openstack-swift | 06:19 | |
| *** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift | 06:24 | |
| *** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 06:57 | |
| *** mlipchuk has quit IRC | 07:01 | |
| *** kashyapk_ has quit IRC | 07:10 | |
| *** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift | 07:11 | |
| *** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 07:15 | |
| *** kashyapk has quit IRC | 07:15 | |
| *** jamie_h has joined #openstack-swift | 07:19 | |
| *** fifieldt_ is now known as fifieldt | 07:26 | |
| mattoliverau | Good night all, it has been a very quiet day, maybe I'm the only one here from an Australian like timezone! | 07:33 |
| *** mkollaro has quit IRC | 07:44 | |
| *** nsquare has quit IRC | 07:47 | |
| *** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift | 07:53 | |
| *** jamie_h has quit IRC | 07:58 | |
| *** nacim has joined #openstack-swift | 07:59 | |
| *** jamie_h has joined #openstack-swift | 07:59 | |
| *** mlipchuk has quit IRC | 08:04 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 08:14 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 08:19 | |
| *** jamie_h_ has joined #openstack-swift | 08:19 | |
| *** jamie_h has quit IRC | 08:19 | |
| *** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 08:22 | |
| *** mlipchuk has left #openstack-swift | 08:23 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: setuptools upstream has broken the world. it's a known issue. we're hoping that a solution materializes soon | 08:32 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "setuptools upstream has broken the world. it's a known issue. we're hoping that a solution materializes soon" | 08:32 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 08:33 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 08:40 | |
| *** fbo has joined #openstack-swift | 08:42 | |
| *** nshaikh has quit IRC | 08:44 | |
| *** roock has joined #openstack-swift | 08:48 | |
| *** foexle has joined #openstack-swift | 08:58 | |
| *** mlipchuk1 has joined #openstack-swift | 09:02 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 09:08 | |
| ppai | is account name unique across swift cluster ? Or does it depend on reseller_prefix ? | 09:20 |
| *** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift | 09:22 | |
| *** sungju has quit IRC | 09:55 | |
| *** nshaikh has quit IRC | 10:01 | |
| *** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift | 10:04 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 10:29 | |
| *** Midnightmyth has quit IRC | 10:33 | |
| *** sungju has joined #openstack-swift | 10:41 | |
| *** sungju has quit IRC | 10:42 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 10:58 | |
| *** mlipchuk1 has quit IRC | 11:05 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 11:16 | |
| *** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_ | 11:19 | |
| *** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan | 11:20 | |
| *** kashyapk has quit IRC | 11:26 | |
| *** diegows has joined #openstack-swift | 11:27 | |
| *** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 11:34 | |
| *** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift | 11:35 | |
| *** Edward-Zhang has joined #openstack-swift | 11:39 | |
| *** nshaikh has quit IRC | 11:52 | |
| *** kashyapk has quit IRC | 12:05 | |
| *** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift | 12:05 | |
| *** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift | 12:06 | |
| *** erlon has joined #openstack-swift | 12:10 | |
| *** matsuhashi has quit IRC | 12:22 | |
| *** mlipchuk has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
| *** Midnightmyth has joined #openstack-swift | 12:32 | |
| *** kashyapk has quit IRC | 12:42 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 12:42 | |
| *** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 12:44 | |
| *** psharma has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
| *** miqui has joined #openstack-swift | 13:03 | |
| *** mlipchuk has quit IRC | 13:04 | |
| *** Midnightmyth has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
| *** samuelmz has joined #openstack-swift | 13:13 | |
| samuelmz | Hi, when using devstack to install OS, it sets iniset operator_roles to 'Member' and 'admin' with 'iniset ${SWIFT_CONFIG_PROXY_SERVER} filter:keystoneauth operator_roles "Member, admin"' at https://github.com/cloudbuilders/devstack/blob/master/lib/swift | 13:16 |
| samuelmz | It may cause an inconsistence in some cases: suppose a cloud admin grants the '_member_' role to a user... then he will not be able to properly use swift | 13:17 |
| samuelmz | For me, having Member and _member_ roles is inconsistent | 13:18 |
| samuelmz | I know it isn't a swift bug, but do you agree with me at this point? | 13:18 |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
| *** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift | 13:20 | |
| *** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 13:21 | |
| *** kashyapk has quit IRC | 13:31 | |
| *** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift | 13:32 | |
| *** kashyapk has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
| *** jamie_h_ has quit IRC | 14:00 | |
| *** jamie_h has joined #openstack-swift | 14:00 | |
| *** mlipchuk has quit IRC | 14:07 | |
| *** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift | 14:10 | |
| *** jamie_h_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:10 | |
| *** jamie_h has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 14:16 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "Storage Policies have been proposed to master. Soft freeze in effect until these patches land | First SP patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96026/ | Last SP patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96049/" | 14:17 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: setuptools issue was fixed in upstream in 3.7.1 and 4.0.1, please, recheck on bug 1325514 | 14:17 | |
| *** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 14:22 | |
| *** Edward-Zhang has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
| *** Midnightmyth has joined #openstack-swift | 14:41 | |
| *** jamie_h_ has quit IRC | 14:52 | |
| *** jamie_h has joined #openstack-swift | 14:53 | |
| *** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 14:53 | |
| *** jamie_h has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
| *** jamie_h has joined #openstack-swift | 15:07 | |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 15:08 | |
| *** physcx has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
| clayg | creiht: it's expensive to do the double updates in the trigger - plus the total counts in the container don't really help with backwards compat if they don't match the listing | 15:12 |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 15:13 | |
| clayg | creiht: one thing I thought about was doing sp0 stats in the container_stat table - it'd just be some messy sql in the triggers and maybe a little meassy in the policy_stats query | 15:14 |
| creiht | clayg: ahh yeah I guess since the account updates are async performance in't as much of an issue then | 15:17 |
| torgomatic | so if someone upgrades to version w/SP then downgrades again, do their sqlite triggers stay upgraded? | 15:19 |
| clayg | shit, i broke storage policies | 15:19 |
| * torgomatic really doesn't know the answer to that | 15:20 | |
| clayg | creiht: well i just know that single container upload is already a point of contention - creation of lots and lots of container is less worry some | 15:20 |
| torgomatic | I know user-defined functions have to be set up every time you open a DB, which is why I ask | 15:20 |
| creiht | yeha | 15:20 |
| clayg | torgomatic: yeah no the triggers stick around | 15:21 |
| clayg | torgomatic: so new databases would continue to track counts int he policy stat table - and then the get_info query won't know how to find the stats | 15:21 |
| clayg | torgomatic: I think a downgrade script to copy sp0 counts back into container_stat and delete/recreate the old triggers on the object table would work | 15:22 |
| creiht | torgomatic: well my biggest concern is during rolling upgrades | 15:22 |
| creiht | to make sure things work while everything is upgrading | 15:22 |
| notmyname | good morning | 15:25 |
| torgomatic | creiht: indeed | 15:25 |
| clayg | creiht: should be fine during upgrades, maybe if you have replication going while you're upgrading you'll get old servers with new db's rsync'd over | 15:26 |
| clayg | creiht: but the db's will still do the right thing | 15:27 |
| creiht | hrm | 15:27 |
| *** elambert has joined #openstack-swift | 15:28 | |
| creiht | clayg: oh true | 15:28 |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 15:30 | |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 15:31 | |
| *** wasmum has joined #openstack-swift | 15:35 | |
| *** wasmum has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** wasmum has joined #openstack-swift | 15:36 | |
| wasmum | anyone using swift3 with keystone? | 15:37 |
| *** foexle has quit IRC | 15:40 | |
| *** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift | 15:43 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev | 15:43 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 15:53 | |
| redbo | I'm pro new funk | 15:55 |
| *** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_ | 15:57 | |
| *** mlipchuk has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
| *** blinky_ghost has joined #openstack-swift | 16:06 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:07 | |
| blinky_ghost | hi all, I'm trying to setup swift in HA mode through haproxy. When I run the command swift stat to my virtual IP I get this message: Account HEAD failed: http://192.168.151.202:8080:8080/v1/AUTH_0397893622aa4899b7bb59cbdb14fe48 503 Service Unavailable | 16:08 |
| blinky_ghost | If I use my physical IP it runs OK. What I'm missing? thanks | 16:08 |
| notmyname | blinky_ghost: looks like you have 2 ports there (:8080:8080). what's up with that? | 16:09 |
| blinky_ghost | notmyname: yes I know. but If I delete my keystone endpoint and create it through my physical IP, it works fine. I don't understand this. | 16:10 |
| zaitcev | It means the HTTP netloc parsing in HA proxy is more robust than in eventlet and the request is rejected | 16:11 |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 16:11 | |
| zaitcev | probably | 16:11 |
| blinky_ghost | zaitcev: do you have an haproxy conf template for swift? | 16:12 |
| wasmum | blinky_ghost: what does you auth line in your proxy.conf look like? | 16:12 |
| blinky_ghost | wasmum: auth_host = 192.168.151.202 | 16:13 |
| wasmum | blinky_ghost: and that matches your endpoint? | 16:13 |
| blinky_ghost | wasmum: yes, It's my Virtual IP | 16:14 |
| blinky_ghost | | b6fb1e724f284264a8e503573cda71a9 | RegionOne | http://192.168.151.202:8080/v1/AUTH_%(tenant_id)s | http://192.168.151.202:8080/v1/AUTH_%(tenant_id)s | http://192.168.151.202:8080 | 454e9332656b4e98b2bbc5d9029fe875 | | 16:14 |
| blinky_ghost | I have my endpoint created like this. If change the to 192.168.151.1 (the physical ip) of one of my servers it will work ok. | 16:15 |
| wasmum | your vip, listening on port XX forwarding to proxy server 8080? | 16:16 |
| *** nshaikh has quit IRC | 16:16 | |
| *** cutforth has joined #openstack-swift | 16:18 | |
| blinky_ghost | wasmum: listening on the same port 8080, 192.168.151.202:8080 -> 192.168.151.1:8080 | 16:18 |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 16:18 | |
| wasmum | if your vip is sending the traffic to 8080 you do not have to specify that in the url. just as +notmyname pointed out. You have dual ports specified in the url | 16:19 |
| wasmum | remove the port setting in your endpoint and give that a try | 16:20 |
| blinky_ghost | wasmum: It's working now :) It was a problem in haproxy conf. I was using http protocol | 16:20 |
| wasmum | cool | 16:20 |
| blinky_ghost | thank you all :) | 16:20 |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 16:21 | |
| *** byeager_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:22 | |
| *** jamie_h has quit IRC | 16:22 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 16:24 | |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
| blinky_ghost | Another question :) I have 4 nodes with 2 disks each in RAID-1, where I will create a 200gb partition, and will use swift as glance backend. My question is what values should I use swift-ring-builder account.builder command? thanks :) | 16:29 |
| openstackgerrit | Samuel Merritt proposed a change to openstack/swift: Remove unused variable https://review.openstack.org/97287 | 16:29 |
| notmyname | blinky_ghost: http://rackerlabs.github.io/swift-ppc/ might be helpful for you | 16:32 |
| wasmum | blinky_ghost: partition power = drives @ max cluster X 100, then take the closest number 2 to the power of x x = closest number to the drives X 100 and then x also = the partition power | 16:33 |
| wasmum | it's really impossibl to explain without a graphic | 16:33 |
| wasmum | see the suggestion from +notmyname | 16:33 |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
| blinky_ghost | wasmum: I want 4 replicas = 4 servers, 1 min drive = 1 partition from one server, 4 max drives = 4 total partitions from all the servers. Is my understanding correct? :) | 16:35 |
| *** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-swift | 16:36 | |
| wasmum | bloinky_ghost: swift-ring-builder container.builder create 9 4 4 | 16:40 |
| wasmum | gives you the part power of 9 4 replicas 4 zones? | 16:40 |
| *** kenhui has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
| blinky_ghost | wasmum: thanks :) | 16:42 |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:43 | |
| *** byeager_ has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
| zaitcev | oh just always use 18 unless you run 1GB RAM nodes or something | 16:51 |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 16:51 | |
| zaitcev | I see no downside in oversized arrays except RAM | 16:51 |
| zaitcev | your replication is going to be softer, not as chunky... 100k partitions for everyone | 16:52 |
| wasmum | blinky_ghost, update, should look somethin g like this "swift-ring-builder <builder_file> create <part_power> <replicas> <min_part_hours>" or swift-ring-builder container.builder create 9 4 1. You do not want a <min_part_hours> set at 4 for that cluster | 16:53 |
| blinky_ghost | wasmum: 18 4 1 ? | 16:53 |
| zaitcev | modern nodes are aways so crazy fat because of all XFS caches they have to carry to support 60 drives, 18-bit ring is like what | 16:54 |
| blinky_ghost | zaitcev: I will only use this for glance backend it will not have a big I/O | 16:55 |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
| zaitcev | I'm just saying | 17:00 |
| zaitcev | [root@rhev-a24c-01 ~]# swift-ring-builder /etc/swift/object.builder | 17:00 |
| zaitcev | 262144 partitions, 3.000000 replicas, 1 regions, 3 zones, 9 devices, 0.00 balance | 17:00 |
| zaitcev | that's 18 bits, right? | 17:00 |
| zaitcev | so | 17:01 |
| zaitcev | [root@rhev-a24c-01 ~]# ls -l /etc/swift/object.builder | 17:01 |
| zaitcev | -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1836523 May 14 2013 /etc/swift/object.builder | 17:01 |
| zaitcev | Say, couple of megs for one ring (per process, of course) | 17:02 |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 17:09 | |
| *** mkollaro has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
| *** shri has joined #openstack-swift | 17:15 | |
| *** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift | 17:17 | |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 17:22 | |
| *** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 17:25 | |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
| *** nsquare has joined #openstack-swift | 17:27 | |
| blinky_ghost | I've setup replication using rsync and now I'm getting this error: http://pastebin.com/3jXBwR5k any hint? | 17:28 |
| *** fbo is now known as fbo_away | 17:28 | |
| *** kenhui has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
| portante | creiht: did you ever get that 3D logo thing printed? | 17:32 |
| *** mkollaro has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
| creiht | portante: not yet | 17:32 |
| creiht | need to do some work on it | 17:32 |
| *** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 17:33 | |
| *** Thurloat has joined #openstack-swift | 17:35 | |
| *** kenhui has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | Peter Portante proposed a change to openstack/swift: Handle func tests of swift cluster that hide /info https://review.openstack.org/97297 | 17:38 |
| *** sandywalsh_ has quit IRC | 17:39 | |
| *** pberis1 has quit IRC | 17:46 | |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 17:53 | |
| zaitcev | pconstantine_: I'm stuck with shit IRC but I caught your Q and will look | 17:58 |
| *** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-swift | 17:58 | |
| pconstantine_ | zaitcev: cool! I'll go home for now, will ping you tomorrow. | 17:59 |
| zaitcev | is this what you mentioned on IRC /query before | 18:00 |
| zaitcev | oh | 18:01 |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 18:01 | |
| *** zul has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
| *** zul has joined #openstack-swift | 18:13 | |
| blinky_ghost | can anybody explain me this error: ERROR syncing /srv/node/device1/accounts/153235/fd9/95a4c310f283c6953cd3b5b043292fd9/95a4c310f283c6953cd3b5b043292fd9.db {'replication_port': 6000, 'zone': 1, 'weight': 100.0, 'ip': '192.168.151.4', 'region': 1, 'port': 6000, 'replication_ip': '192.168.151.4', 'meta': '', 'device': 'device1', 'id': 4}: #012Traceback (most recent call last):#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/swift/common/db_replica | 18:16 |
| blinky_ghost | tor.py", line 474, in _replicate_object#012 | 18:16 |
| *** swat30 has joined #openstack-swift | 18:18 | |
| zaitcev | check if rsyncd is up and a/c/o section names match (e.g. no "test_vm=yes" that produces object6000 | 18:18 |
| zaitcev | sorry can't look closer right now but looks like that mismatch | 18:18 |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 18:26 | |
| *** shri1 has joined #openstack-swift | 18:30 | |
| *** shri1 has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
| *** shri has quit IRC | 18:34 | |
| redbo | pink starburst are best starburst | 18:44 |
| blinky_ghost | zaitcev: what do you mean "section names match"? | 18:44 |
| *** fbo_away is now known as fbo | 18:44 | |
| zaitcev | I like yellow | 18:44 |
| redbo | gross | 18:44 |
| notmyname | red FTW | 18:45 |
| zaitcev | blinky: just look into /var/log/rsyncd.log | 18:46 |
| Alex_Gaynor | Swift is now a programming language from Apple. | 18:46 |
| dmsimard | Oh no | 18:46 |
| dmsimard | Why did they do that | 18:46 |
| *** openstackstatus has quit IRC | 18:50 | |
| zaitcev | http://thenextweb.com/apple/2014/06/02/apple-announces-swift-new-programming-language-ios/ | 18:50 |
| redbo | probably the same reason we ignored everything else already called swift when we named this | 18:50 |
| *** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-swift | 18:52 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus | 18:52 | |
| *** pberis has joined #openstack-swift | 18:53 | |
| *** NM has joined #openstack-swift | 18:54 | |
| redbo | well.. to be fair we didn't think it was an original name. but we expected it to be internal forever. | 18:55 |
| creiht | evidently there was another scientific programming language called swift | 18:55 |
| *** elambert has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
| Thurloat | another quantum -> neutron renaming in order? | 18:57 |
| zaitcev | I expect we wait for Apple to file C&D with Foundation | 19:01 |
| zaitcev | Do nothing until then | 19:01 |
| notmyname | please do not talk about it online | 19:02 |
| pandemicsyn | so when we gonna switch Swift to use Swift | 19:02 |
| dmsimard | lol ^ | 19:03 |
| *** caio has joined #openstack-swift | 19:04 | |
| *** caio is now known as Guest31437 | 19:04 | |
| *** Guest31437 has quit IRC | 19:05 | |
| creiht | interesting that they link to the other swift scripting language at the bottom of the page | 19:07 |
| *** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 19:10 | |
| *** openfly has joined #openstack-swift | 19:14 | |
| *** tsg has joined #openstack-swift | 19:39 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
| *** nsquare has quit IRC | 19:43 | |
| *** pberis has quit IRC | 19:45 | |
| redbo | clayg: https://github.com/redbo/bertin/blob/master/pickle.go | 19:58 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 19:58 | |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 19:59 | |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 19:59 | |
| *** nsquare has joined #openstack-swift | 20:03 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 20:10 | |
| chmouel | tricky :) | 20:12 |
| chmouel | or clever | 20:12 |
| chmouel | i heard that go is spawning a new thread everytime there is a concurrent access for C wrapped functions | 20:12 |
| *** esmute has joined #openstack-swift | 20:13 | |
| *** Thurloat has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
| *** thurloat_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:14 | |
| *** swat30 has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
| *** thurloat_ is now known as thurloat | 20:14 | |
| *** swat30 has joined #openstack-swift | 20:15 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 20:15 | |
| blinky_ghost | zaitcev: it's working now, my mistake creating the rings. I have it working with glance, but If I shutdown 2 swift servers, glance stops working. I have a total of 4 swift servers. Is this expected? | 20:18 |
| notmyname | blinky_ghost: how many replicas are you using? | 20:18 |
| blinky_ghost | notmyname: 4 | 20:18 |
| notmyname | 4 replicas will require 3 successful responses for quorum. therefore 2 servers down will cause problems | 20:19 |
| zaitcev | blinky_ghost: zones not on servers 1:1 I suspect, but dunno need to see details to answer, sorry | 20:19 |
| zaitcev | what, really? I thought quorum was 2 | 20:19 |
| blinky_ghost | notmyname: I created like this: swift-ring-builder account.builder create 18 4 1 | 20:19 |
| notmyname | zaitcev: quorum is replicas DIV 2 + 1 | 20:20 |
| portante | clayg: https://gist.github.com/portante/a393d072615c0862481a | 20:21 |
| portante | the above is a simple patch to get functional test skips to note why they are skipped | 20:22 |
| *** wasmum has quit IRC | 20:22 | |
| blinky_ghost | notmyname: I would like some sort of HA, if all 3 nodes go down swift would still be working on the remaining node. Is this possible? | 20:23 |
| zaitcev | Right, I even reviewed it whenwe went to integer, but I fogot, sorry. I thought we needed 2 out of 4 for regions... | 20:23 |
| ctennis | blinky_ghost: you would still be able to read data, just not write data | 20:24 |
| torgomatic | clayg tried to do that at one point but got shot down; I don't remember why | 20:24 |
| blinky_ghost | ctennis: Humm, I'll test it out | 20:25 |
| ctennis | also blinky_ghost, you'd be better off getting rid of raid1 and using 8 disks for swift | 20:25 |
| ctennis | instead of pairs of 4 | 20:25 |
| *** shri has joined #openstack-swift | 20:28 | |
| blinky_ghost | ctennis: Yes, but this is only for saving some glance images and I have the swift running with other openstack services. If it still reads data it's acceptable to me. thanks i'll do some more tests. | 20:30 |
| *** blinky_ghost has quit IRC | 20:30 | |
| zaitcev | Just use R=3 and then it's classic unambiguous case and only uses 3x disk space vs 4x | 20:31 |
| zaitcev | unless you have 2 datacenters on 2 continents | 20:32 |
| zaitcev | IMHO | 20:32 |
| *** miqui has quit IRC | 20:39 | |
| *** CaioBrentano has quit IRC | 20:41 | |
| *** physcx has joined #openstack-swift | 20:43 | |
| torgomatic | clayg: http://paste.openstack.org/show/aOpZEtt9IlmsayzUxb4V/ | 20:50 |
| torgomatic | look at the beautiful view ^ | 20:51 |
| *** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 20:53 | |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
| *** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 20:56 | |
| *** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 20:59 | |
| *** byeager_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:59 | |
| *** byeager has quit IRC | 21:02 | |
| *** shri1 has joined #openstack-swift | 21:05 | |
| *** shri1 has quit IRC | 21:05 | |
| openstackgerrit | Peter Portante proposed a change to openstack/swift: Handle func tests of swift cluster that hide /info https://review.openstack.org/97297 | 21:06 |
| *** shri has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| *** kenhui has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
| *** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 21:14 | |
| *** Midnightmyth has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
| *** kenhui1 has joined #openstack-swift | 21:25 | |
| *** kenhui has quit IRC | 21:25 | |
| creiht | zaitcev: http://imimotorsports.com/rentals.php | 21:46 |
| *** miqui has joined #openstack-swift | 21:48 | |
| notmyname | pandemicsyn: swift on swift in swift? and if we implement TCP over avian carrier, we can use swifts for that too | 21:48 |
| *** byeager_ has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
| creiht | in swift truck containers | 21:48 |
| notmyname | of course :-) | 21:48 |
| notmyname | followed by suzuki swift cars | 21:48 |
| *** sileht has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
| *** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 21:55 | |
| *** kenhui1 has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
| *** sileht has joined #openstack-swift | 21:59 | |
| *** sileht has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
| *** sileht has joined #openstack-swift | 22:06 | |
| *** fbo is now known as fbo_away | 22:10 | |
| *** kenhui has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
| *** tsg has quit IRC | 22:20 | |
| anticw | i see the container/account replicators timing out with the default conn_timeout=0.5s - but the load on the systems isn't that high | 22:37 |
| anticw | i wonder if we're not exceeding the socket backlog? | 22:37 |
| *** NM has quit IRC | 22:38 | |
| anticw | swift/common/wsgi.py defaults to 4096 - i can't imagine that's being over-run though | 22:39 |
| portante | clayg: https://gist.github.com/portante/a393d072615c0862481a | 22:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Pete Zaitcev proposed a change to openstack/swift: isolate representation from content in GET request https://review.openstack.org/97363 | 22:57 |
| openstackgerrit | Pete Zaitcev proposed a change to openstack/swift: isolate object update logic from container PUT https://review.openstack.org/97364 | 22:58 |
| mattoliverau | Good morning all | 23:01 |
| *** cutforth has quit IRC | 23:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Update container storage_policy_index when auditing https://review.openstack.org/96352 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add functional tests for Storage Policy https://review.openstack.org/96042 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Fixes probe tests with non-zero default storage policy https://review.openstack.org/96353 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Update swift-container-info to be storage policy aware https://review.openstack.org/96043 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Merge container storage_policy_index https://review.openstack.org/96040 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy Support to Accounts https://review.openstack.org/96041 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy Support to list_endpoints https://review.openstack.org/96046 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy Support to Container Sync https://review.openstack.org/96047 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Enqueue misplaced objects during container replication https://review.openstack.org/96044 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add LRUCache to common.utils https://review.openstack.org/96045 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy Support to ssync https://review.openstack.org/96034 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Put X-Timestamp in object 404 responses https://review.openstack.org/96035 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy Support to the Auditor https://review.openstack.org/96032 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add storage policy support for the Replicator https://review.openstack.org/96033 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add container-reconciler daemon https://review.openstack.org/96038 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add reconciler probetest outline https://review.openstack.org/96039 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Extend interface on InternalClient https://review.openstack.org/96036 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Extend direct_client https://review.openstack.org/96037 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy Support https://review.openstack.org/96027 | 23:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy support to Containers https://review.openstack.org/96029 | 23:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Update FakeRing and FakeLogger https://review.openstack.org/96028 | 23:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy support to Object Updates https://review.openstack.org/96031 | 23:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy support to Object Server https://review.openstack.org/96030 | 23:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy support to the Account Reaper https://review.openstack.org/96049 | 23:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add Storage Policy Support to Recon Middleware https://review.openstack.org/96048 | 23:21 |
| clayg | portante: oh crap i forgot your fuctest updates | 23:21 |
| mattoliverau | clayg: looks like you've been busy :) | 23:37 |
| *** CaioBrentano has quit IRC | 23:52 | |
| *** diegows has quit IRC | 23:54 | |
| *** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift | 23:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!