tsg_ | notmyname: just checked out the dashboard. looks great .. thanks | 00:08 |
---|---|---|
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 00:15 | |
*** zigo has quit IRC | 00:17 | |
*** zigo has joined #openstack-swift | 00:21 | |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 00:23 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 00:26 | |
*** zigo has quit IRC | 00:35 | |
*** tsg_ has quit IRC | 00:38 | |
*** mwstorer has quit IRC | 00:39 | |
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift | 00:40 | |
*** zz_wasmum is now known as wasmum | 00:42 | |
*** wasmum is now known as zz_wasmum | 00:42 | |
*** zigo has joined #openstack-swift | 00:47 | |
*** ho has joined #openstack-swift | 01:12 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 01:24 | |
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift | 01:55 | |
*** byeager_ has joined #openstack-swift | 01:59 | |
*** byeager_ has quit IRC | 02:01 | |
*** byeager has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
*** byeagerz is now known as byeagerz_away | 02:04 | |
*** nsquare has quit IRC | 02:11 | |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 02:18 | |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 02:23 | |
*** tongli has quit IRC | 02:24 | |
*** bkopilov_ has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan | 02:38 | |
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_ | 02:50 | |
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan | 02:51 | |
*** cm2 has quit IRC | 03:12 | |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:18 | |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 03:24 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 03:38 | |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:38 | |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 03:41 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 03:42 | |
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift | 03:59 | |
*** sileht has quit IRC | 04:06 | |
*** bkopilov_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:08 | |
*** sileht has joined #openstack-swift | 04:09 | |
*** ho has quit IRC | 04:09 | |
*** ho has joined #openstack-swift | 04:09 | |
*** fifieldt has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** occupant has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** lpabon has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** charz has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** ekarlso has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** chmouel has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** gyee_ has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** anderstj has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** alpha_ori has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** byeagerz_away has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** jeblair has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** swat30 has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** pconstantine has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** j_king has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** yuan has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** wer has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** torgomatic has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** hurricanerix has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** jd__ has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** portante has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** briancline has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** pconstantine has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** chmouel has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** gyee_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** anderstj has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** alpha_ori has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** occupant has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** byeagerz_away has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** ekarlso has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** charz has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** jeblair has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** swat30 has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** j_king has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** yuan has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** wer has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** torgomatic has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** hurricanerix has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** jd__ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** portante has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** briancline has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
*** dickson.freenode.net sets mode: +vv torgomatic portante | 04:23 | |
*** goodes has quit IRC | 04:26 | |
*** goodes has joined #openstack-swift | 04:29 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 04:31 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 04:31 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 04:35 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 04:41 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 04:42 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 04:45 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 04:51 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 04:51 | |
*** nsquare has joined #openstack-swift | 04:52 | |
openstackgerrit | Nirmal Thacker proposed a change to openstack/swift: Container Auditor should log a warning if the devices path contains a non-directory. https://review.openstack.org/97148 | 04:56 |
*** zaitcev has quit IRC | 04:58 | |
*** ajc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:59 | |
*** psharma has joined #openstack-swift | 04:59 | |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 05:05 | |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Fix pop_queue for move object twice https://review.openstack.org/103731 | 05:05 |
clayg | notmyname: this one is sorta crappy -> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103731/ | 05:07 |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 05:20 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 05:21 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 05:21 | |
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC | 05:37 | |
*** openfly has quit IRC | 05:45 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 05:47 | |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 05:58 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 06:01 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 06:03 | |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 06:11 | |
*** nthacker has joined #openstack-swift | 06:11 | |
*** zigo has quit IRC | 06:13 | |
*** zigo has joined #openstack-swift | 06:14 | |
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift | 06:41 | |
*** kopparam_ has joined #openstack-swift | 06:44 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 06:47 | |
*** nsquare has quit IRC | 06:51 | |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 06:53 | |
*** nsquare has joined #openstack-swift | 06:59 | |
*** nsquare has quit IRC | 07:00 | |
*** nthacker has quit IRC | 07:08 | |
*** kopparam_ has quit IRC | 07:11 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 07:12 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 07:16 | |
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 07:27 | |
*** mkerrin has quit IRC | 07:33 | |
mattoliverau | That's it for me, time to go cook dinner, night all! | 07:36 |
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift | 07:38 | |
*** openfly has joined #openstack-swift | 07:40 | |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 07:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Fix KeyError on Storage Policy Container Sync https://review.openstack.org/102747 | 07:50 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add X-Backend-Timestamp on more object server responses https://review.openstack.org/103776 | 07:50 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Capture 409 Conflict during expect on PUT https://review.openstack.org/103777 | 07:50 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Remove the X-Newest pre-flight request on X-Timestamp https://review.openstack.org/103778 | 07:50 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add support for multiple container-reconciler https://review.openstack.org/103779 | 07:50 |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 07:50 | |
hugokuo | Hola | 07:52 |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 07:58 | |
openstackgerrit | lawrancejing proposed a change to openstack/swift: Fix the section name in CONTRIBUTING.rst https://review.openstack.org/103783 | 07:58 |
*** tsg has quit IRC | 08:03 | |
openstackgerrit | lawrancejing proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Add CONTRIBUTING.rst https://review.openstack.org/103786 | 08:04 |
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 08:09 | |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 08:16 | |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 08:17 | |
*** keisuke_ has joined #openstack-swift | 08:19 | |
*** nacim has quit IRC | 08:20 | |
*** keisuke_ has quit IRC | 08:21 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 08:29 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 08:33 | |
*** ujjain has quit IRC | 08:39 | |
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift | 08:39 | |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 08:58 | |
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift | 09:06 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 09:07 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 09:13 | |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 09:14 | |
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift | 09:19 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 09:24 | |
*** kopparam_ has joined #openstack-swift | 09:25 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 09:25 | |
*** kopparam_ has quit IRC | 09:44 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 09:44 | |
*** joeljwright has quit IRC | 10:11 | |
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 10:12 | |
*** joeljwright has quit IRC | 10:12 | |
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 10:12 | |
*** joeljwright1 has joined #openstack-swift | 10:19 | |
*** joeljwright has quit IRC | 10:22 | |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 10:34 | |
*** joeljwright1 has quit IRC | 10:37 | |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 10:44 | |
*** ho has quit IRC | 10:45 | |
*** km has joined #openstack-swift | 10:45 | |
*** km is now known as Guest86746 | 10:46 | |
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC | 10:47 | |
*** openstack has joined #openstack-swift | 10:51 | |
*** cm2 has joined #openstack-swift | 10:57 | |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 11:07 | |
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift | 11:20 | |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 11:22 | |
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift | 11:33 | |
*** andyandy has joined #openstack-swift | 11:36 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/swift: Fix KeyError on Storage Policy Container Sync https://review.openstack.org/102747 | 11:45 |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 11:56 | |
*** mlipchuk has left #openstack-swift | 12:06 | |
*** psharma_ has joined #openstack-swift | 12:08 | |
*** psharma_ has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** psharma_ has joined #openstack-swift | 12:09 | |
*** psharma__ has joined #openstack-swift | 12:10 | |
*** psharma has quit IRC | 12:11 | |
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 12:14 | |
*** psharma_ has quit IRC | 12:14 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 12:16 | |
*** ajc_ has quit IRC | 12:17 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 12:17 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 12:24 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 12:24 | |
*** mitz_ has quit IRC | 12:25 | |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 12:51 | |
*** redbo has joined #openstack-swift | 12:56 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v redbo | 12:56 | |
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC | 12:58 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 12:59 | |
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC | 12:59 | |
*** bkopilov_ has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift | 13:07 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 13:12 |
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 13:17 | |
peluse_ | notmyname: just noticed one that's not on the dashboard that looks ready to go (thing you found): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102052/1 | 13:19 |
*** psharma__ has quit IRC | 13:24 | |
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift | 13:25 | |
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift | 13:28 | |
*** chandan_kumar is now known as chandankumar | 13:30 | |
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 13:41 | |
*** pconstantine has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
acoles | peluse_: i see it on dashboard :) - i think that dashboard url has filters on reviews for which you are owner | 13:50 |
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift | 13:58 | |
*** chandankumar has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
peluse_ | acoles: ahhh, thanks | 13:59 |
*** chandan_kumar is now known as chandan|afk | 14:00 | |
*** chandan|afk is now known as ciypro|afk | 14:00 | |
*** kopparam has quit IRC | 14:04 | |
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift | 14:04 | |
acoles | peluse_: try http://bit.ly/1qfsVgR | 14:06 |
*** chandan_kumar is now known as chandankumar | 14:09 | |
peluse_ | acoles: coolio | 14:10 |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
*** angelastreeter has joined #openstack-swift | 14:14 | |
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 14:14 | |
*** nosnos has quit IRC | 14:18 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/swift: Add SAIO fix for Ubuntu 12.04 https://review.openstack.org/103446 | 14:22 |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:24 | |
*** nacim has quit IRC | 14:24 | |
*** Midnightmyth has joined #openstack-swift | 14:33 | |
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift | 14:35 | |
*** salec has joined #openstack-swift | 14:57 | |
*** mitz_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:57 | |
*** mitz_ has quit IRC | 14:57 | |
salec | hey guys, if I only have a single swift node, is the data still resilient (does swift still make multiple copies of the data)? or does it rely on multiple nodes to make copies? | 14:58 |
ctennis | it will make multiple copies across disks in the same node | 14:58 |
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 15:01 | |
salec | awesome! thanks :) | 15:02 |
*** jasond has joined #openstack-swift | 15:03 | |
jasond | is the AUTH_ part of a tempurl always required or can it be something else? | 15:04 |
*** mitz has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
*** mitz has joined #openstack-swift | 15:12 | |
notmyname | good morning | 15:13 |
notmyname | jasond: something should be there. it's what allows the swift accounts to be segmented into different auth systems. you can change AUTH to something else (the reseller prefix), but you should have something there (and you can't change it on existing accounts) | 15:14 |
jasond | notmyname: just what i was looking for. thanks | 15:15 |
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
tdasilva | salec: your ring will still need to be configured correctly to make multiple copies across disks on the same node.... | 15:26 |
clayg | gholt: hrmm... yeah sorry, i guess the part that makes it so it should be about the same was in the other refernced change -> "You'll want to look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103777/1 first" | 15:27 |
*** foexle has quit IRC | 15:38 | |
salec | tdasilva: Do the docs for single node installs configure the ring correctly for that? Or is there some other resource I use? | 15:41 |
notmyname | salec: how many drives to do you have in your rings? | 15:42 |
salec | 8 | 15:43 |
notmyname | 3 replicas? | 15:45 |
salec | I don't have it just yet, as I won't pick it up until I'm sure it will suit my needs. But I'm looking to build a simple storage system with 8 3TB drives in it setup as JBOD | 15:46 |
notmyname | salec: ok, so swift will put each piece of data on 3 different drives. if those are all in the same server, then that server will be your failure domain. if you have more than one server, you'll have higher availability since swift will spread the data across multiple servers | 15:47 |
*** nacim has quit IRC | 15:49 | |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
*** chandankumar has quit IRC | 16:02 | |
*** jasond has left #openstack-swift | 16:02 | |
salec | yep :) I'm ok with that. Eventually I'll add a second server for redundancy | 16:09 |
*** angelastreeter has quit IRC | 16:16 | |
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_ | 16:19 | |
*** gyee_ has quit IRC | 16:20 | |
*** mwstorer has joined #openstack-swift | 16:20 | |
*** dANOKELOFF has joined #openstack-swift | 16:25 | |
dANOKELOFF | hi , it's possible with curl command to delete non-empty containers ? | 16:26 |
*** joeljwright has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 16:28 | |
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 16:30 | |
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:31 | |
peluse_ | dANOKELOFF: no, not with one curl cmd. you can use swift client or write your own script to first del the objects though | 16:34 |
*** dANOKELOFF has quit IRC | 16:37 | |
*** kenhui has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
*** lpabon has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift | 16:46 | |
*** andyandy has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
notmyname | paris summit CFP opened today: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2014-July/008218.html | 16:57 |
notmyname | (yes it feels like we just got back from the last one) | 16:58 |
peluse_ | wow | 16:59 |
notmyname | acoles: thanks for sending the keystone v3 email to the ML | 17:00 |
notmyname | hope we get valuable feedback there | 17:00 |
acoles | notmyname: yeah, lets see what comes back | 17:01 |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift | 17:04 | |
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
notmyname | acoles: how about this? http://bit.ly/1iVBigF | 17:21 |
notmyname | I added a "My Patches" section | 17:21 |
*** nsquare has joined #openstack-swift | 17:23 | |
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 17:24 | |
*** ChanServ changes topic to "Currently in Swift 2.0 RC phase -- read all about it at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/038357.html | master is open for dev work | http://bit.ly/1iVBigF" | 17:25 | |
*** ChanServ changes topic to "Currently in Swift 2.0 RC phase -- read all about it at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/038357.html | master is open for dev work | Swift Review Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1iVBigF" | 17:25 | |
*** jamiehannaford has joined #openstack-swift | 17:28 | |
*** salec has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
openstackgerrit | Samuel Merritt proposed a change to openstack/swift: Small cleanup to ring serialization https://review.openstack.org/97615 | 17:39 |
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift | 17:43 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev | 17:43 | |
openstackgerrit | Samuel Merritt proposed a change to openstack/swift: Fix the section name in CONTRIBUTING.rst https://review.openstack.org/103783 | 17:44 |
*** mkollaro has quit IRC | 17:46 | |
acoles | notmyname: nice! | 17:49 |
*** tongli has joined #openstack-swift | 17:56 | |
*** bkopilov_ has joined #openstack-swift | 17:57 | |
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: SimpleClient http proxying https://review.openstack.org/102598 | 18:00 |
*** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 18:13 | |
notmyname | who's editing the priority reviews page? | 18:17 |
notmyname | clayg: is it you? | 18:17 |
torgomatic | I edited it, but I stopped once I was done adding a link | 18:20 |
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 18:20 | |
torgomatic | notmyname: ^^ | 18:20 |
notmyname | torgomatic: you added the performance section? | 18:20 |
torgomatic | notmyname: yup | 18:20 |
notmyname | torgomatic: ok. I rejiggered it a little and added some links there too | 18:21 |
notmyname | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews | 18:21 |
torgomatic | notmyname: ah, cool... maybe put the parallel auditor in there too? | 18:21 |
notmyname | should be relatively updated enough to give people a direction on what to do next, especially with the new gerrit dashboard hotness | 18:21 |
notmyname | torgomatic: ya, that one too | 18:21 |
notmyname | torgomatic: I'll add the link | 18:22 |
torgomatic | thanks | 18:22 |
torgomatic | I'm glad to see you put the zero-copy GET in there... I think that one's useful, but I didn't want to add a new section and then dump my own changes in it :) | 18:22 |
notmyname | I think the "needs approval" and "needs feedback" sections of the dashboard link are going to be really useful for keeping on top of proposed patches | 18:23 |
*** cm2 has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
torgomatic | yeah, I definitely agree there. I have a couple of queries bookmarked for those, but it's nice to get a single page instead of multiple tabs | 18:32 |
*** shri has joined #openstack-swift | 18:33 | |
notmyname | acoles: portante: peluse_: creiht: clayg: torgomatic: I've been talking to some marketing people about doing some press releases around the 2.0 release, and one of their pieces of feedback is that it's better to do it on a monday rather than the thursday before a holiday | 18:34 |
notmyname | so, in their ideal world, the release would be monday am instead of thursday. but either way, they want to do the press releases at the same time as the actual release. so we're in the driver's seat there | 18:35 |
notmyname | what do you think? | 18:35 |
torgomatic | notmyname: you're the one with the ability to tag things, but a couple extra days for testing don't bother me any | 18:36 |
notmyname | torgomatic: actually, I don't have that power. I just tell the right people that the right SHA is ready to go. so, in other words, I just send emails | 18:37 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Document the unnecessary method invoking in FakeRing https://review.openstack.org/103407 | 18:38 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Remove fake _get_part and use the real thing https://review.openstack.org/103962 | 18:38 |
portante | Sounds good to release after the 4th | 18:39 |
portante | notmyname: | 18:39 |
clayg | portante: well there's a couple of bugs I found that I'd like to get into the release if it's reasonable - nothing major | 18:43 |
portante | cool, so in general don't think it hurts us to wait a bit longer | 18:44 |
clayg | notmyname: oh, are we not *allowed* to edit the priority review page? | 18:44 |
notmyname | clayg: you can do whatever you want. just concurrent editing is tricky, and I wanted to make sure I didn't smoosh the other changes. or, if you rather, notmyanme RAGE! SMASH OTHER CONTRIBUTORS! | 18:45 |
clayg | oh my | 18:46 |
clayg | OH, yeah I'm not editing it *currently* - I didn't understand the tense of your question :P | 18:46 |
portante | hulk smash | 18:47 |
notmyname | sorry. and it was all torgomatic's fault anyway :-) | 18:47 |
portante | all these operations | 18:47 |
portante | I wonder what they are actually doing to notmyname ... | 18:47 |
notmyname | clayg: ya, the outstanding 2 patches for 2.0 (one merged one not) are what we gotta figure out about. do we backport those or not? what impact does that have for testing | 18:47 |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 19:01 | |
*** CaioBrentano has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
*** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 19:07 | |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add X-Backend-Timestamp on more object server responses https://review.openstack.org/103776 | 19:10 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Capture 409 Conflict during expect on PUT https://review.openstack.org/103777 | 19:10 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Remove the X-Newest pre-flight request on X-Timestamp https://review.openstack.org/103778 | 19:10 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add support for multiple container-reconciler https://review.openstack.org/103779 | 19:10 |
tdasilva | notmyname: are there any plans on creating a new tag such as rc2 before the official release? | 19:16 |
*** jamiehannaford has quit IRC | 19:21 | |
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 19:25 | |
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 19:27 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/swift: Container Auditor should log a warning if the devices path contains a non-directory. https://review.openstack.org/97148 | 19:27 |
*** CaioBrentano has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC | 19:31 | |
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift | 19:32 | |
*** kenhui has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
notmyname | tdasilva: that's what we gotta figure out this afternoon. in general, though, if nothing comes up that needs to be backported, then there will be another tag at the same sha as 2.0.0.rc1 for the 2.0.0 release | 19:40 |
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 19:47 | |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:55 | |
*** lsell has joined #openstack-swift | 19:58 | |
notmyname | FYI the defcore/tc meeting is starting now in #openstack-meeting | 20:02 |
*** annegent_ is now known as annegentle_ | 20:06 | |
*** annegentle_ is now known as Guest79795 | 20:06 | |
*** Guest79795 is now known as theannegentle | 20:13 | |
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:21 | |
openstackgerrit | gholt proposed a change to openstack/swift: SimpleClient http proxying https://review.openstack.org/102598 | 20:26 |
clayg | ohai | 20:30 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add more tests for SimpleClient http proxy https://review.openstack.org/103994 | 20:38 |
*** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 20:43 | |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
clayg | notmyname: i think either/both 102747 and 103731 are good candidates for backport | 20:46 |
*** CaioBrentano has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
*** kenhui has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift | 20:56 | |
*** mkollaro has quit IRC | 20:58 | |
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
*** kenhui has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 21:10 | |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/swift: Fix SLO test with old simplejson https://review.openstack.org/99805 | 21:11 |
openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add more tests for SimpleClient http proxy https://review.openstack.org/103994 | 21:20 |
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 21:31 | |
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 21:35 | |
*** piousbox has joined #openstack-swift | 21:37 | |
piousbox | meow | 21:38 |
piousbox | Hi people. If I have an OpenStack and a Swift, how do I make OpenStack aware of my Swift? | 21:38 |
piousbox | I installed OpenStack with Mirantis Fuel. | 21:38 |
*** Midnightmyth has quit IRC | 21:43 | |
peluse_ | notmyname: agree on post holiday thing, also feel free to have your people contact my people to arrange for other PR activies around 2.0 :) | 21:52 |
peluse_ | portante: what's the status on SP support for in process func tests? | 21:53 |
mattoliverau | Morning | 21:58 |
*** theannegentle has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
notmyname | peluse_: do you have a contact email you can pm me? I'm already talking with lsell from the foundation about it | 22:05 |
notmyname | lsell: <-- laruen, does marketing for openstack foundation | 22:05 |
*** piousbox has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
peluse_ | notmyname: yup, will send it over email | 22:16 |
notmyname | peluse_: thanks | 22:16 |
notmyname | peluse_: clayg: creiht: portante: acoles: torgomatic: new plan! | 22:18 |
torgomatic | screw object storage, we're doing function storage? | 22:19 |
notmyname | it's monads all the way down! | 22:19 |
notmyname | backport https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102747/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103731/ to the RC, cut an RC2, continue testing and release 2.0 on monday | 22:19 |
peluse_ | torgomatic: function storage eh? Lets fire up a Trello board and get started then! | 22:20 |
zaitcev | (car cdr) | 22:21 |
notmyname | any concerns with that plan? | 22:21 |
notmyname | also, please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103731/ since it hasn't landed on master yet | 22:21 |
notmyname | can't backport something not on master | 22:21 |
peluse_ | notmyname: no issues here, still doing my rolling upgrade and suffering from totally unrelated issues (slowing me down). Will keep you posted | 22:22 |
notmyname | creiht: dfg: gholt: glange: redbo: if there's anything that you have found in your testing at RAX, especially anything where a patch would invalidate existing testing, please speak up | 22:23 |
notmyname | the current 2 proposed backport patches do not appear to invalidate most QA testing that would be done. one is container sync and the other is the reconciler (an edge case in the edge case) | 22:24 |
notmyname | lsell: here? | 22:33 |
*** markd has joined #openstack-swift | 22:34 | |
markd | Hey there, I am trying to install swift on ubuntu 14.04 (icehouse). Using the guide here: http://docs.openstack.org/icehouse/install-guide/install/apt/content/ch_swift.html | 22:36 |
markd | When I go to run the ring builder I keep getting: sudo swift-ring-builder account.builder 18 1 1Ring Builder file does not exist: account.builder | 22:36 |
markd | does anyone know what is causing this? I have duplicated it now 3 times... sorta starting to go crazy... touching the file causes a python stack trace. | 22:37 |
zaitcev | don't sudo it and run the whole thing in a directory in your ~ | 22:41 |
zaitcev | then you can strace | 22:42 |
markd | ah geez, figured it out. I was forgetting the create command! ARGGGGG! Somehow, just posting here helps! :-) | 22:42 |
zaitcev | heh | 22:42 |
openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/swift: Add test for swift-recon --auditor https://review.openstack.org/100058 | 22:44 |
peluse_ | notmyname: check your email real quick if you haven't re:press release stuff | 22:44 |
notmyname | peluse_: got it. I'm adding him to the existing thread of marketing people | 22:44 |
peluse_ | cool | 22:44 |
clayg | shouldn't it be like swift-ring-builder account.builder create 18 1 1 | 22:50 |
clayg | markd: and how many devices do you have in this cluster with a part power of *18* (spoiler alert - anything less than 60 is probably wrong answer) | 22:51 |
notmyname | clayg: to be fair to markd, don't all the examples have 18? | 22:52 |
notmyname | markd: http://rackerlabs.github.io/swift-ppc/ | 22:52 |
clayg | meh, that ones has basically the same "go huge it's awesome!" mentality of every other crystal ball based recommendation i've seen | 22:53 |
markd | clayg, I am just setting it up to test internal support for swift in our product. Going to run the swift tests. We set it up with 18 1 1, as internally to our product we write 3 times, so no need for 18 3 1. | 22:53 |
markd | and yes all the examples have 18. Have yet to research what should it be for a real deployment. | 22:54 |
notmyname | markd: seems that clayg doesn't like it, but that part power calculator gives decent recommendations IMO. basically you want around 100 partition per drive when you have all the drives deployed (ie max possible size of your cluster | 22:55 |
clayg | notmyname: the max *possible* size of my cluster!? let me see, once I add another region on the moon I might be a billion devices! why does this thing only go to 32!? | 22:56 |
markd | notmyname, thanks that's good info. I will pass it on to the developer. | 22:56 |
notmyname | clayg: what else would you use? or is that in your patch to make the part power adjustable? ;-) | 22:57 |
clayg | don't mind the terrible code/math - the answer is what matters -> https://gist.github.com/clayg/2fb0b467d71a8afd3670 | 22:57 |
notmyname | lol @ number-of-devices-you-have-in-the-real-hardware-you-are-going-to-deploy | 22:58 |
clayg | notmyname: just pick something sane for the hardware you are deploying that will scale a good two orders of magnitude and come crying to me in a couple of years if you acctually hit the balancing issues of pikcing "too low" a part power | 22:58 |
clayg | I've seen pleanty of clusters that went too high | 22:58 |
* clayg is waiting on vms to build and making noise :P | 22:59 | |
notmyname | ah, now your comment above makes sense. not how many drives in the cluster; how many drives per server in the cluster. 60/server leads to a part power of 18. got it | 23:00 |
* notmyname now gets closer to understanding clayg | 23:00 | |
clayg | oh and also, that thing doesn't only go to 32 - so that's funny for me | 23:00 |
clayg | pandemicsyn2: is the source for the ppc out there somewhere? does the "min drives" number even get used? | 23:01 |
notmyname | clayg: ya, min drives changes the output numbers. doesn't change the calculation AFAICT | 23:01 |
clayg | pandemicsyn2: oh i see it, where it shows me the rediculously high parts per drive number - shouldn't that be in red above ~20K or something? | 23:02 |
notmyname | clayg: I only get more than a part power of 32 after I get up to 9000000 drives per server (going up by powers of ten each time) | 23:02 |
notmyname | 9 million drives!!!! | 23:02 |
notmyname | per server! | 23:02 |
notmyname | clayg: what kind of fancy kinetic thing are you working on!?!? | 23:03 |
*** tdasilva has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
clayg | no no no - one *billion* | 23:03 |
notmyname | "yes, I'd like 3 servers please. 1 billion drives each" | 23:03 |
* notmyname suspects swift might have a few problems in a mbillion drive cluster | 23:04 | |
torgomatic | just type "ls /srv/node" and then give up; it won't finish before you do | 23:05 |
notmyname | lol | 23:05 |
zaitcev | I have to disagree with Clay | 23:06 |
zaitcev | Despite all this experience - you never know how big your cluster is going to grow. | 23:07 |
zaitcev | So, adding one little pause parameter into replicator is much better than tearing your hair once your balancing gets lumpy later. | 23:07 |
clayg | zaitcev: meh, it's not just the replicator cycle types - your object servers are trying to cache that directory structure too - so you have to have a bunch of ram to support that many parts in each device | 23:09 |
zaitcev | dude please | 23:12 |
zaitcev | [root@rhev-a24c-01 ~]# free | 23:12 |
zaitcev | total used free shared buffers cached | 23:12 |
zaitcev | Mem: 66028884 2644260 63384624 0 170532 1613764 | 23:12 |
zaitcev | oh, wait | 23:12 |
zaitcev | taht was proxy, i don't paco | 23:13 |
*** mwstorer has quit IRC | 23:13 | |
zaitcev | Mem: 66028880 14008108 52020772 0 204736 630900 | 23:13 |
zaitcev | [root@rhev-a24c-02 ~]# grep dent /proc/slabinfo | 23:14 |
zaitcev | dentry 60603648 60603880 192 20 1 : tunables 120 60 8 : slabdata 3030194 3030194 79 | 23:14 |
zaitcev | Granted this cluster is essentially empty | 23:14 |
notmyname | fill it up 90% with small objects, then walk the drive and just inodes will fill the page cache | 23:16 |
clayg | zaitcev: or don't it's fine, part power 18 ftw! | 23:23 |
clayg | so did markd get his trusty issue squared away? | 23:24 |
markd | clayg, yes I did, thanks! | 23:25 |
clayg | markd: oh... well good! | 23:25 |
notmyname | anyone else looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103731/1 | 23:36 |
notmyname | ? | 23:36 |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 23:37 |
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
clayg | notmyname: i suppose someone should tell me to write a unittest for it, but none of the eixting tests were really setup to exercise that problem in any meaningful way besdies the probetest... | 23:37 |
notmyname | clayg: thing I'm wrapping my head around right now is why get_to_final_state() matters for the reconciler | 23:38 |
notmyname | clayg: is it just to make sure the listing is all up to date? (that makes sense to me) | 23:39 |
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 23:41 | |
clayg | notmyname: well objects are enqueued in the replicator - i could have just run those | 23:42 |
clayg | so like the reconciler runs and it throws out some writes, then you cycle replication to see if anything new shows up to be reconciled | 23:42 |
notmyname | ya, ok. makes sense. I think I grok it now | 23:42 |
clayg | meh, it had me scratching my head for awhile | 23:43 |
clayg | i have a subsequent change I need to do to fix up the log formatting | 23:43 |
notmyname | well it's really easy to figure out when I read how you solved it. :-) | 23:43 |
clayg | there's a few places that do '%f' % Timestamp() and you don't see all the important bits | 23:43 |
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!