| *** doxavore has quit IRC | 00:08 | |
| mattoliverau | torgomatic's ec get patch looks good, as others have mentioned there are some nitpics, dlo etc, ive added my own, but i've +2'ed it, so it'll land now and we can keep moving, just take a look at nitpics on the next iteration (dlo fix?) :) | 00:19 |
|---|---|---|
| notmyname | mattoliverau: thanks! | 00:19 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: the power, mwuhahaha | 00:20 |
| *** abhirc has quit IRC | 00:25 | |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: any chance i can be added to https://launchpad.net/~swift-coresec so i can get back to some bug auditing? :) | 00:26 |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: thanks for the reminder. on it | 00:26 |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: what's your LP id? | 00:27 |
| mattoliverau | nps :) I have more EC to review so no hurry | 00:27 |
| notmyname | ah there | 00:27 |
| notmyname | matt-0 | 00:27 |
| mattoliverau | oh yeah.. umm let me double check | 00:27 |
| mattoliverau | yup, thats it | 00:27 |
| mattoliverau | annoying it couldnt give me mattoliverau :( | 00:28 |
| zaitcev | really? | 00:28 |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: done | 00:29 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: ta | 00:29 |
| mattoliverau | zaitcev: yeah.. gerrit gave it to me but not launchpad :( maybe i did something stupid at the time :P | 00:30 |
| *** madhuri_ has quit IRC | 00:34 | |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 00:34 | |
| *** ho has joined #openstack-swift | 00:38 | |
| *** erlon has quit IRC | 00:41 | |
| *** zul has quit IRC | 00:51 | |
| *** zul has joined #openstack-swift | 00:52 | |
| *** cca has quit IRC | 01:01 | |
| ho | good morning guys! | 01:02 |
| *** devlaps has quit IRC | 01:11 | |
| mattoliverau | ho: morning | 01:11 |
| ho | mattoliverau: morning! I will finish to update my recon patch today :) | 01:18 |
| *** david-lyle is now known as david-lyle_afk | 01:19 | |
| mattoliverau | Nice :) | 01:22 |
| peluse | interesting potential xfs fsync optimization: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2014-06/msg00214.html | 01:29 |
| peluse | mattoliverau, hey thanks for looking at the EC stuff! | 01:30 |
| mattoliverau | peluse: no probs! Nice work on it, very impressive! | 01:33 |
| *** bill_az has quit IRC | 01:36 | |
| peluse | mattoliverau, thanks from me and everyone else who has been in the weeds :) Still a ways to go but this is a big week for us I think | 01:37 |
| *** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift | 01:40 | |
| *** zhill has quit IRC | 01:46 | |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 01:46 | |
| *** abhirc has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
| *** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift | 01:49 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 01:55 | |
| notmyname | whoa. bus drive on the way home missed a turn. passengers who were skipped got mad and chased bus. bus driver and passengers got into shouting match. whole bus cleared and had to wait for next one since the first bus driver had called the cops | 02:02 |
| *** abhirc has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
| notmyname | peluse: cool xfs thing | 02:03 |
| klrmn | notmyname: welcome to SF | 02:03 |
| notmyname | klrmn: heh. first time I've seen that sort of thing | 02:03 |
| klrmn | notmyname: i'm experiencing some probe test failures on master….it is hypothetically possible that it's due to some local resource constraint, but if other people can run the probe tests too, that'd be great | 02:04 |
| notmyname | klrmn: I just did with master right before I left the office. no problems | 02:05 |
| klrmn | notmyname: i guess it's time for me to reboot my laptop then | 02:05 |
| notmyname | klrmn: probe tests are really cranky about the storage policy (the first one must be default and must have 4 devices evenly sized) | 02:05 |
| klrmn | notmyname: using clay's saio vagrant box =) | 02:06 |
| notmyname | klrmn: sounds like you need to talk to clayg then ;-) | 02:07 |
| notmyname | *punt* | 02:07 |
| klrmn | notmyname: it's more likely that the VM is having trouble with memory | 02:07 |
| notmyname | ah. | 02:08 |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 02:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Hisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Enable Object Replicator's failure count in recon https://review.openstack.org/138342 | 02:13 |
| *** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift | 02:17 | |
| *** IRTermite1 has joined #openstack-swift | 02:22 | |
| *** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift | 02:24 | |
| *** IRTermite1 has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
| mattoliverau | Lol wow (re:bus) | 02:29 |
| *** ahonda has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
| *** abhirc has quit IRC | 02:34 | |
| *** IRTermite1 has joined #openstack-swift | 02:41 | |
| *** mahatic has quit IRC | 02:50 | |
| *** MasterPiece has quit IRC | 03:11 | |
| *** lcurtis has quit IRC | 03:12 | |
| *** panbalag has quit IRC | 03:14 | |
| *** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift | 03:24 | |
| *** bkopilov has quit IRC | 03:39 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: First pass at EC GET path https://review.openstack.org/154263 | 03:49 |
| *** lcurtis has quit IRC | 04:13 | |
| *** devlaps has joined #openstack-swift | 04:17 | |
| *** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift | 04:24 | |
| *** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 04:28 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 04:44 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 04:48 | |
| *** lcurtis has quit IRC | 04:49 | |
| *** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift | 05:01 | |
| *** zaitcev has quit IRC | 05:08 | |
| *** jrichli_ has quit IRC | 05:09 | |
| *** devlaps has quit IRC | 05:17 | |
| ho | gerrit has been slow down... | 05:24 |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 05:33 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 05:34 | |
| *** kei_yama has quit IRC | 05:57 | |
| *** km_ has joined #openstack-swift | 06:03 | |
| *** km has quit IRC | 06:05 | |
| *** ho__ has joined #openstack-swift | 06:09 | |
| *** ho has quit IRC | 06:09 | |
| mattoliverau | K, I think I might call it a day. night all (though I may be back as wife is going out tonight) | 06:14 |
| ho__ | mattoliverau: good night! | 06:15 |
| *** reed has quit IRC | 06:45 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 07:34 | |
| *** IRTermite1 has quit IRC | 07:34 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 07:48 | |
| *** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift | 07:50 | |
| *** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift | 08:11 | |
| *** Muntaner has joined #openstack-swift | 08:17 | |
| Muntaner | good morning to everyone! | 08:17 |
| Muntaner | I'm having some serious problems with Swift | 08:17 |
| Muntaner | I installed it on my private Openstack Cloud (All-in-one installation) | 08:18 |
| Muntaner | It worked fine, but then we had to change the public IP of the server where Openstack is deployed | 08:18 |
| Muntaner | we got all the components working again (glance, cinder, etc), just swift isn't working | 08:19 |
| Muntaner | seems like all of my swift process are running | 08:19 |
| Muntaner | but swift stat hangs... and via the dashboard horizon I can see the "containers" tab, but when I click on it I have a never ending hang | 08:19 |
| Muntaner | what logs can I look to diagnose my situation? | 08:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-swiftclient: Verify MD5 of uploaded objects. https://review.openstack.org/129254 | 08:22 |
| Muntaner | well, the error that I get after some time is Account HEAD failed: http://192.168.0.62:8080/v1/AUTH_914cd4d8565e4fb8beee37f46a50aa4f 503 Internal Server Error | 08:23 |
| Muntaner | other informations: swift does not respond to any command, f. e. "swift list" | 08:27 |
| *** ho__ has quit IRC | 08:31 | |
| *** ho has joined #openstack-swift | 08:31 | |
| *** km_ has quit IRC | 08:31 | |
| *** cca has joined #openstack-swift | 08:40 | |
| donagh | Muntaner: have you specified where to put logs in /etc/swift/proxy-server.log? | 08:48 |
| donagh | If not, logs would be in /var/log/syslog | 08:49 |
| donagh | You want to look for proxy-server: as first step | 08:49 |
| Muntaner | donagh, I haven't specified that - I have some logs in /var/log/syslog | 08:50 |
| donagh | Actually, can I take you back to first steps: I assume you are using keystone? | 08:50 |
| Muntaner | donagh, yes | 08:51 |
| donagh | Ok. /bin/swift can hand if it can't talk to keystone. Can you do a "nova endpoints" | 08:51 |
| donagh | ? | 08:51 |
| Muntaner | donagh, done, need output? | 08:52 |
| donagh | Not realy. But it works? | 08:52 |
| Muntaner | yep, worked | 08:52 |
| donagh | Next question, doe sendpoint of Swift look ok? | 08:53 |
| Muntaner | donagh, actually I found some errors in /var/log/syslog | 08:53 |
| Muntaner | donagh, yes, looks fine | 08:53 |
| donagh | What are the errors? | 08:53 |
| donagh | Example? | 08:53 |
| *** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 08:54 | |
| Muntaner | gonna paste them | 08:54 |
| donagh | ok | 08:54 |
| Muntaner | donagh, http://paste.ubuntu.com/10385612/ | 08:55 |
| donagh | Ok. A few problems here. | 08:57 |
| Muntaner | actually, 10.0.0.230 is my old ip | 08:57 |
| donagh | 1/ the memcache error says that the proxy-server can't even talk to localhost ... or maybe memcached is not started? | 08:57 |
| Muntaner | 192.168.0.62 is the new one, that I'm using actually | 08:57 |
| cschwede | dencaval: notmyname: i still think the bp (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/sorting-method-storage-policy) needs a DB update because of missing indexes - for example, if you want the container listing sorted by date. of course this increases the DB size… that said, please have a look at the comments on this abandoned patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121278/ | 08:58 |
| Muntaner | donagh, seems like memcached is running | 08:58 |
| donagh | 2/ The "ERROR with Account server" says that proxy-server can't talk to 10.0.0.230 -- againmaybe Swift has not been started on that node? | 08:58 |
| Muntaner | donagh, 10.0.0.230 is the old IP of my server machine | 08:59 |
| Muntaner | naturally, I updated that in conf files | 08:59 |
| donagh | Ah, I read your original as that you changed the endpoint for the system...not the IP addresses of the swift nodes. | 09:00 |
| donagh | So you changed the IP of the swift nodes? Is it node or nodes? | 09:00 |
| *** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 09:00 | |
| Muntaner | donagh, infortunately, we have an all-in-one installation: all the components are in a single server (quite rude, I know) | 09:00 |
| donagh | No problem. However, the ring files containe the IP address of the original node. Actually, in my jon I never mess with ring files | 09:01 |
| Muntaner | donagh, how can I update that? | 09:01 |
| donagh | ...but there is an option in the ring builder to simply change the IP address | 09:01 |
| Muntaner | donagh, totally missed that | 09:02 |
| donagh | If you can't find the syntax for the command, come back here | 09:02 |
| *** km has joined #openstack-swift | 09:03 | |
| donagh | Also, I suggest you put proxy-logging in the pipeline. It needs to go in two places. That way, the logs will contain more information | 09:03 |
| *** dvorkbjel has quit IRC | 09:04 | |
| Muntaner | donagh, fighting with that command syntax - how can I actually change those IPs? | 09:08 |
| donagh | hold on | 09:08 |
| Muntaner | donagh, solved it, seems like I have only the memcached problem now | 09:09 |
| Muntaner | donagh, http://paste.ubuntu.com/10385755/ | 09:09 |
| donagh | Do you have a [memcache] section in /etc/proxy-server.conf? | 09:10 |
| donagh | Sorry [filter:cache] is correct name | 09:11 |
| Muntaner | donagh, yes, with this lone line: use = egg:swift#memcache | 09:11 |
| donagh | You could try adding: | 09:12 |
| donagh | memcached_servers = <new-ip>:11211 | 09:12 |
| donagh | I'm assuming memcached is actually running? | 09:13 |
| Muntaner | yes, service memcached tells me it's running | 09:13 |
| Muntaner | donagh, same errors | 09:13 |
| *** silor has quit IRC | 09:14 | |
| donagh | hold on | 09:14 |
| donagh | In /etc/memcached.conf is -l set t anything (IP it listens on) | 09:15 |
| donagh | BTW: I assume you restarted it after changing the nodes' IP | 09:15 |
| Muntaner | donagh, yes: -l 192.168.0.62 | 09:15 |
| Muntaner | donagh, naturally | 09:15 |
| Muntaner | restarted all swift services and memcached | 09:16 |
| donagh | So is memcached_servers = 192.168.0.62:11211 | 09:16 |
| Muntaner | yes donagh | 09:16 |
| donagh | in [filter:cache] section? | 09:16 |
| Muntaner | yes donagh, get same errors | 09:18 |
| donagh | THe ECONNREFUSED says 127.0.0.1 -- or is that an older message? | 09:18 |
| Muntaner | donagh, fresh error: Feb 24 10:18:03 openstack proxy-server STDOUT: ERROR:root:Error connecting to memcached: 127.0.0.1:11211#012Traceback (most recent call last):#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/memcached.py", line 208, in _get_conns#012 fp, sock = self._client_cache[server].get()#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/memcached.py", line 123, in get#012 fp, sock = Pool.get(self)#012 File "/usr/ | 09:18 |
| Muntaner | lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/pools.py", line 119, in get#012 created = self.create()#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/memcached.py", line 119, in create#012 sock.connect((host, int(port)))#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/greenio.py", line 194, in connect#012 socket_checkerr(fd)#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/greenio.py", line 46, in socket_checkerr#012 raise s | 09:18 |
| Muntaner | ocket.error(err, errno.errorcode[err])#012error: [Errno 111] ECONNREFUSED (txn: tx4d8fcf52164d4c2fa2970-0054ec41cb) (client_ip: 192.168.0.62) | 09:18 |
| Muntaner | (sorry for pasting there) | 09:19 |
| donagh | did you restart proxy-server since adding memcached_servers= to /etc/proxy-server.conf? | 09:19 |
| Muntaner | donagh, I did a swift-init all restart | 09:20 |
| donagh | Ok. Go to /etc/memcached.conf and set -l to 127.0.0.1, also do same in /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf and restart both swift and memcached | 09:22 |
| donagh | BTW: I presume Swift is working...just maybe slower? | 09:22 |
| donagh | ...the memcache error won't stop swift from working | 09:23 |
| Muntaner | donagh, it's not working actually | 09:24 |
| Muntaner | swift stat returns immediately a Account HEAD failed: http://192.168.0.62:8080/v1/AUTH_914cd4d8565e4fb8beee37f46a50aa4f 400 Bad Request | 09:24 |
| *** aix has quit IRC | 09:25 | |
| donagh | Does swift stat -v | 09:25 |
| donagh | print storage URL and auth token? | 09:25 |
| Muntaner | donagh, brb in 5 minutes - sorry | 09:26 |
| donagh | ie. add -v | 09:26 |
| donagh | dito -- I'm going for coffee | 09:26 |
| Muntaner | donagh, swift stat -v Account HEAD failed: http://192.168.0.62:8080/v1/AUTH_914cd4d8565e4fb8beee37f46a50aa4f 400 Bad Request | 09:31 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 09:36 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 09:36 | |
| *** acoles_away is now known as acoles | 09:36 | |
| acoles | notmyname: ok, noted :) nearly stopped reading when i got to george-cloo... | 09:39 |
| acoles | notmyname: do you have a preference among the varieties? | 09:40 |
| *** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift | 09:44 | |
| donagh | Muntaner: can you run | 09:51 |
| Muntaner | donagh, solved it, thanks :) | 09:51 |
| Muntaner | was a problem with the rings | 09:51 |
| donagh | swift-get-nodes /etc/swift/account.ring.gz /AUTH_914cd4d8565e4fb8beee37f46a50aa4f | 09:51 |
| openstackgerrit | Hisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: WIP: Enable Role-based access control using oslo.policy in Swift https://review.openstack.org/149930 | 09:51 |
| *** aix has joined #openstack-swift | 09:52 | |
| donagh | Good. The purpose of swift-get-nodes was to check that the IP addresses in ring were ok | 09:52 |
| *** cca has quit IRC | 10:05 | |
| *** khivin has joined #openstack-swift | 10:08 | |
| *** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 10:25 | |
| *** aix has quit IRC | 10:30 | |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 10:42 | |
| *** aix has joined #openstack-swift | 10:43 | |
| *** ho has quit IRC | 10:49 | |
| donagh | notmyname: So my "local" offlicense is https://www.google.co.uk/maps/dir/Galway+City,+Ireland/Ashby+Rd,+Woodville,+Swadlincote,+UK/@53.0885464,-7.6486123,7z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x485b96eca4f63c15:0x9f202f408ade89a3!2m2!1d-9.0566819!2d53.270564!1m5!1m1!1s0x4879febbb02caed9:0x81f425b347e82a59!2m2!1d-1.5066527!2d52.7692252?hl=en | 10:54 |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 10:58 | |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 11:01 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 11:02 | |
| acoles | donagh: these guys will ship it to you https://www.thewhiskyexchange.com/search?q=casamigos | 11:05 |
| mattoliverau | No drinking on the job guys.. Unless your working from home ;p | 11:05 |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 11:08 | |
| *** Muntaner has quit IRC | 11:09 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 11:10 | |
| acoles | mattoliverau: sshh ;) | 11:11 |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 11:11 | |
| mattoliverau | acoles: oh this isn't private.. Sorry :p | 11:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: Fix efficient replication handoff delete https://review.openstack.org/157290 | 11:15 |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 11:23 | |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 11:38 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 11:41 | |
| *** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift | 11:41 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 11:56 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 12:00 | |
| *** pconstantine has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
| *** km has quit IRC | 12:16 | |
| *** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift | 12:24 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 12:43 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 12:44 | |
| *** bkopilov has quit IRC | 13:04 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 13:16 | |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 13:18 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 13:20 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 13:30 | |
| *** RackerShagz has joined #openstack-swift | 14:05 | |
| *** RackerSh_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:06 | |
| *** RackerShagz has quit IRC | 14:09 | |
| *** navid__ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | Daniel Wakefield proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Reduce memory usage for download/delete and add --no-shuffle option to st_download https://review.openstack.org/130339 | 14:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Daniel Wakefield proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Add changed flag to download. https://review.openstack.org/158701 | 14:21 |
| *** zul has quit IRC | 14:23 | |
| *** zul has joined #openstack-swift | 14:24 | |
| *** nellysmitt has quit IRC | 14:28 | |
| *** nshaikh has left #openstack-swift | 14:29 | |
| *** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift | 14:29 | |
| *** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift | 14:29 | |
| *** navid__ has left #openstack-swift | 14:29 | |
| *** nellysmitt has quit IRC | 14:29 | |
| *** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift | 14:29 | |
| *** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift | 14:29 | |
| *** mahatic has quit IRC | 14:33 | |
| *** dmsimard_away is now known as dmsimard | 14:38 | |
| *** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift | 14:38 | |
| *** abhirc has quit IRC | 14:39 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
| *** IRTermite1 has joined #openstack-swift | 14:50 | |
| *** bsdkurt has joined #openstack-swift | 14:50 | |
| *** bsdkurt has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
| *** kurt2 has joined #openstack-swift | 14:53 | |
| *** nellysmitt has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
| *** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift | 14:56 | |
| *** IRTermite1 has quit IRC | 14:56 | |
| *** Nadeem has joined #openstack-swift | 15:03 | |
| *** kurt2 has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
| *** kurt2 has joined #openstack-swift | 15:07 | |
| *** Manshoon has joined #openstack-swift | 15:12 | |
| *** kurt2 has quit IRC | 15:13 | |
| *** bsdkurt has joined #openstack-swift | 15:15 | |
| *** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift | 15:18 | |
| *** jrichli_ has joined #openstack-swift | 15:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/89250 | 15:22 |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 15:22 |
| *** devlaps has joined #openstack-swift | 15:24 | |
| *** devlaps has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| *** nellysmitt has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
| *** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift | 15:32 | |
| acoles | jrichli_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158735/ <- will enable you to send alternate etag and content-type values to container | 15:43 |
| jrichli_ | acoles: thanks! | 15:44 |
| acoles | using x-backend-update-override-etag | 15:44 |
| acoles | I based it on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158401/2 , which it doesn't need to depend on but it will allow you to more easily pull both patches and rebase on them as and when you need to | 15:45 |
| *** david-lyle_afk is now known as david-lyle | 15:47 | |
| acoles | jrichli_: i *think* those two patches provide the backend support that the crypto middlewares will need | 15:48 |
| acoles | apart from the etag header trailing the PUT body | 15:49 |
| jrichli_ | acoles: sounds good. Does that mean that the CHANGELOG should be modified at this point to mention the changes? | 15:49 |
| acoles | jrichli_: no, not until any of this stuff lands ;) | 15:49 |
| jrichli_ | oh, ok | 15:50 |
| *** zul has quit IRC | 15:50 | |
| acoles | jrichli_: steady on :D | 15:50 |
| *** zul has joined #openstack-swift | 15:50 | |
| *** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift | 15:54 | |
| *** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 15:58 | |
| *** abhirc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 15:58 | |
| *** abhirc has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
| *** vt102 has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| *** reed has joined #openstack-swift | 16:09 | |
| *** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift | 16:10 | |
| notmyname | good morning | 16:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: Add multiple reseller prefixes and composite tokens https://review.openstack.org/137086 | 16:12 |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 16:15 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 16:16 | |
| lcurtis | hello all..is there a real world / practical limit to number of objects per container? | 16:17 |
| lcurtis | or rule of thumb for not to exceed? | 16:17 |
| ctennis | if you aren't using SSDs for your container/account dbs, then in the order of "millions" | 16:19 |
| notmyname | the "limit" is one of how many puts per second you can sustain | 16:20 |
| lcurtis | okay...fair enough | 16:20 |
| *** NM has joined #openstack-swift | 16:21 | |
| lcurtis | are there general benchmarks for ssd's versus spinning disks | 16:21 |
| lcurtis | theoretical max vs requests per second? | 16:21 |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 16:22 |
| donagh | acoles: clayg: thanks for your work in reviewing the composite token stuff. I'm aware that it involved a lot of work setting up DevStack etc. | 16:23 |
| acoles | donagh: its merged - nice work | 16:23 |
| donagh | whew | 16:24 |
| *** NM1 has joined #openstack-swift | 16:25 | |
| jrichli_ | good mornign | 16:25 |
| *** NM has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
| *** dencaval has joined #openstack-swift | 16:25 | |
| ctennis | lcurtis: it changes all of the time and is very dependent on overall setup fo the cluster. SSDs are orders of magnitude faster though,so you can have tens of millions of objects in a container before the container becomes the bottleneck. | 16:32 |
| lcurtis | ctennis thank you | 16:32 |
| ctennis | lcurtis: keep in mind I'm only talking about using the ssd to store the container information, not the object data itself. you can get away with a very small amount of SSDs in a cluster and still keep all of your object data on spinning media. | 16:39 |
| lcurtis | ctennis - got it..thats along lines of what I am thinking | 16:39 |
| ctennis | a cheaper method may be to still use spinning disks for account/container info, but just keep them dedicated to just those functions vs. also keeping object data on them, which will keep as much IO available as possible. | 16:40 |
| *** Nadeem has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
| lcurtis | has swift published any numbers or tests? | 16:41 |
| ctennis | I don't think so | 16:42 |
| lcurtis | we are currently thinking of ssds for just account / container boxes | 16:42 |
| lcurtis | nodes that is | 16:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Add tests for uploads deleting DLO segments https://review.openstack.org/153177 | 16:57 |
| peluse | lcurtis, there are lots of benchmakring articles, presentations, etc., available for swift just by googling. not saying I endorse any of them or that any one of them has a golden set of numbers, however... | 16:59 |
| peluse | lcurtis, this one is a little old but I think has decent general concepts/thoughts http://www.zmanda.com/blogs/?tag=swift-benchmark | 16:59 |
| *** doxavore has joined #openstack-swift | 17:02 | |
| *** BaconIsKing has joined #openstack-swift | 17:02 | |
| lcurtis | peluse thank you..sometimes there are some well known ones in the community that might be overlooked. | 17:03 |
| peluse | for sure... | 17:06 |
| *** annegent_ has quit IRC | 17:06 | |
| notmyname | lcurtis: basically, "ssds are orders of magnitude faster" is the common wisdom of the community. anything else is very dependent on your hardware and usage pattern | 17:09 |
| *** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 17:10 | |
| lcurtis | notmyname -- got it | 17:13 |
| lcurtis | thanks as always for your help | 17:13 |
| peluse | esepcially Intel SSDs :) | 17:13 |
| lcurtis | yes! | 17:13 |
| * peluse couldn't resist... | 17:13 | |
| notmyname | whew. rode to work on my bike for the first time in about 8 months (since my accident) | 17:15 |
| notmyname | my legs aren't used to that! ;-) | 17:15 |
| lcurtis | are there performance benefits to using multiple accounts in same way as multiple containers? | 17:16 |
| *** rledisez has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
| mahatic | notmyname, hello | 17:16 |
| notmyname | mahatic: good morning! | 17:16 |
| mahatic | notmyname, good morning to you! | 17:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Fix failing tox -e py26 tests https://review.openstack.org/158784 | 17:17 |
| mahatic | notmyname, I have a question: the --validate-servers all option, should I just include it and let it work accordingly (as it now takes default object, and if container/account it works accordingly) | 17:17 |
| *** nellysmitt has quit IRC | 17:17 | |
| *** jistr has quit IRC | 17:18 | |
| *** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift | 17:18 | |
| *** erlon has joined #openstack-swift | 17:19 | |
| peluse | notmyname, glad you made it in safely :) | 17:19 |
| notmyname | mahatic: yes, that sounds right. | 17:19 |
| notmyname | peluse: so is my wife! | 17:19 |
| hugokuo | bonjour notmyname | 17:20 |
| notmyname | mahatic: with the all option, the operator gets every report about whatever hosts were chosen. eg tell me everything about every server. or tell me everything about this particular zone. etc | 17:21 |
| mahatic | notmyname, yeah, I figured :D | 17:21 |
| hugokuo | A quick question for anyone who knows about the answer. If there's a blueprint of python-swiftclient added to LP, could anyone just take it and implement it directly ? | 17:23 |
| notmyname | hugokuo: sure. also, you could do it if there isn't a blueprint too :-) | 17:23 |
| hugokuo | notmyname: got it. We may try to implement https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-swiftclient/+spec/swiftclient-download-pseudo-folder-to-specific-target | 17:24 |
| notmyname | hugokuo: great! | 17:24 |
| mahatic | it was easy, I looked into the code and some manpage on the internet ;) | 17:24 |
| notmyname | hugokuo: and by "we" you mean charz? ;-) | 17:24 |
| hugokuo | notmyname: oh yes | 17:25 |
| notmyname | hugokuo: lol | 17:25 |
| *** bill_az has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
| charz | LoL | 17:25 |
| hugokuo | cool beans | 17:25 |
| notmyname | acoles: big news yesterday what with the top-level reorg. do you expect it to affect you at all? | 17:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Mahati proposed openstack/swift: Ring checker in swift-recon https://review.openstack.org/153617 | 17:27 |
| *** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift | 17:30 | |
| openstackgerrit | David Goetz proposed openstack/swift: swift-ring-builder remove doesn't print message (tabbing error) https://review.openstack.org/158789 | 17:33 |
| acoles | notmyname: no, i don't expect any disruption | 17:34 |
| *** annegent_ has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
| *** omame has quit IRC | 17:40 | |
| *** omame has joined #openstack-swift | 17:43 | |
| notmyname | FYI swiftstack announced a ceo change today. press release happened, but I think we'll have a blog post later today | 17:44 |
| notmyname | joe is definitely still around and very involved. | 17:44 |
| btorch | so what happened to swift-ring-builder ? did something change and messed it up ? | 17:44 |
| notmyname | http://www.enterprisetech.com/2015/02/24/swiftstack-appoints-new-ceo/ | 17:44 |
| notmyname | btorch: what do you mean? | 17:44 |
| omame | notmyname: you got a promotion? | 17:45 |
| klrmn | clayg: is there something that needs to be done to a vagrant saio after halting and re-uping it in order to get it to work again, or do i need to destroy and rebuild? | 17:45 |
| notmyname | omame: lol | 17:45 |
| omame | don't forget to update /about | 17:46 |
| notmyname | omame: being done now | 17:46 |
| btorch | notmyname: issues removing a zone/device where it has been set as drained .. nothing is removing the device(s) | 17:46 |
| btorch | rebalance doesn't work, obviously there is nothing to rebalanace since there are no parts to shuffle around | 17:47 |
| btorch | write_ring also doesn't make any changes , device(s) are still kept in builder file | 17:47 |
| notmyname | btorch: to clarify so I can test locally...you have a zero-weight device and you can't remove it? | 17:48 |
| btorch | it seems to work on newly build rings | 17:48 |
| btorch | do you have a 5y old ring laying around :) ? | 17:48 |
| omame | existing ring -> set weight to 0 -> rebalance -> remove host -> rebalance -> got rejected | 17:49 |
| btorch | it only got removed from object ring but because there was another device that was actually removed and ring actually needed rebalancing | 17:50 |
| btorch | btw it used to not too long ago | 17:52 |
| btorch | used to work | 17:52 |
| notmyname | omame: what's the "got rejected"? couldn't rebalance? | 17:55 |
| btorch | No partitions could be reassigned. | 17:55 |
| notmyname | ok | 17:56 |
| btorch | Either none need to be or none can be due to min_part_hours [1]. | 17:56 |
| btorch | ring hasn't been modified for several days so not a min_part_hours issue | 17:57 |
| notmyname | btorch: what version of swift are you using? | 18:00 |
| btorch | haha | 18:01 |
| btorch | :) | 18:01 |
| *** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 18:01 | |
| btorch | notmyname: ver 2.2.1-1 | 18:02 |
| notmyname | btorch: `curl https://storage101.dfw1.clouddrive.com/info | python -m json.tool` says 2.1.0 | 18:02 |
| notmyname | :-) | 18:02 |
| btorch | yeah I forgot about damn recon :( | 18:03 |
| notmyname | recon? or /info | 18:03 |
| btorch | either way | 18:03 |
| notmyname | hugokuo: charz: on the community QA cluster, when we get that back online, how possible would it be to add the py26 unit tests? | 18:11 |
| notmyname | torgomatic: acoles: ^^ idea | 18:11 |
| *** devlaps has joined #openstack-swift | 18:11 | |
| torgomatic | notmyname: sounds like a good idea to me | 18:12 |
| openstackgerrit | Samuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift: Clean up a couple deprecation warnings https://review.openstack.org/158806 | 18:12 |
| *** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift | 18:12 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev | 18:12 | |
| notmyname | torgomatic: did you see the question btorch has? can't remove empty weight devices from the ring | 18:13 |
| charz | notmyname: That's not a problem, I can add it :) | 18:14 |
| notmyname | charz: thanks | 18:14 |
| torgomatic | notmyname: yeah, and it doesn't happen with newer rings I guess? | 18:14 |
| notmyname | torgomatic: btorch said it doesn't but it might, actually. I'm looking at master right now | 18:14 |
| torgomatic | I know it doesn't print the message, but dfg just fixed that | 18:15 |
| acoles | notmyname: good idea. think i added you as reviewer on this one as an fyi https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158671/ | 18:16 |
| notmyname | torgomatic: btorch: ah. it does remove. or more specifically, you have to rebalance after removing to actually remove it. but that works on current master | 18:16 |
| btorch | yeah we gonna try the new --force flag in a bit to see if it works | 18:17 |
| notmyname | btorch: when's the last time you did a rebalance on that ring before now? ie what version of swift were you running the last time the builder file was written to disk? | 18:17 |
| notmyname | btorch: ie I can build a ring like that and then try the removal to attemp a repro | 18:17 |
| btorch | last year was last rebalance and prior was the version you got from dfw url | 18:18 |
| notmyname | ok. so probably 2.0.0 | 18:18 |
| btorch | it was around 2014-07-17 | 18:19 |
| btorch | let me check what version it was back then but yeah likely 2.0.0 | 18:19 |
| btorch | notmyname: yeah 2.0.0 | 18:20 |
| notmyname | ok, now I have a 2.0.0 era ring | 18:21 |
| *** vt102 has joined #openstack-swift | 18:21 | |
| *** annegent_ has quit IRC | 18:22 | |
| *** doxavore has quit IRC | 18:22 | |
| *** doxavore has joined #openstack-swift | 18:23 | |
| notmyname | btorch: ok, going through that I had to do a pretend_min_part_hours_passed but after that it was removed | 18:23 |
| notmyname | with the 2.1.0 code | 18:24 |
| doxavore | does swift's proxy-server use 499 only in cases where the client disconnects, or are there other possible reasons? | 18:25 |
| notmyname | doxavore: that should be the only reason | 18:25 |
| acoles | torgomatic: yes i will move https://review.openstack.org/158735 to master and tweak the header name | 18:26 |
| torgomatic | acoles: thanks! | 18:26 |
| notmyname | this is what I did: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9a7198db76d4612d23b8 | 18:28 |
| *** jordanP has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
| zaitcev | I am curious why we chose 499 when 408 looks like exact that error, only standard | 18:29 |
| zaitcev | Not that it matters really, but I'm curious. | 18:29 |
| *** aix has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
| notmyname | zaitcev: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.5.7 says that's for the server receiving stuff from the client. the 499 is when the client goes away on a response and we need to log *something* in the log line | 18:31 |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 18:31 | |
| notmyname | we may could separate the 2. maybe we do 499 for both kinds of timeouts. but could log a 408 if the client doesn't send data fast enough. I'm not sure if that would break anything for log parsing | 18:32 |
| notmyname | acoles: thanks for the functests job patch. lgtm | 18:34 |
| notmyname | I mentioned it in -infra both so they'd notice and also in case there were other jobs that had a 'sudo' added that may need to be audited | 18:39 |
| *** mahatic has quit IRC | 18:40 | |
| acoles | notmyname: i suspect the job was temporariy broken between the change to 'tox -e func' and the later adding of 'sudo' ;) | 18:48 |
| acoles | torgomatic: if i cherry pick that override patch onto master and leave the same change id, will gerrit maintain the same review but do the 'right thing' wrt moving it to master? | 18:51 |
| acoles | or should i generate a new change id? | 18:52 |
| *** zul has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
| torgomatic | acoles: I think so, but I've never trie dit | 18:52 |
| torgomatic | *tried it | 18:52 |
| torgomatic | so we're about to learn something about Gerrit either way :) | 18:52 |
| *** zul has joined #openstack-swift | 18:52 | |
| notmyname | acoles: I think it does the right thing. IIRC from doing backports. not sure though | 18:53 |
| notmyname | maybe with backports I did a new change id | 18:53 |
| *** zul has quit IRC | 18:53 | |
| *** zul has joined #openstack-swift | 18:53 | |
| acoles | torgomatic: ok here goes | 18:54 |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Enable override of container update headers https://review.openstack.org/158821 | 18:54 |
| notmyname | acoles: torgomatic: fun! (not really) https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I7d846ed54ff173d08c66c6d5b0ecf7dff27f5a87,n,z | 18:55 |
| acoles | notmyname: torgomatic : oh :( | 18:56 |
| acoles | all good things come in two's ?!? | 18:56 |
| notmyname | looks like gerrit has (change_id, branch) tuples for the master key | 18:56 |
| acoles | i'll abandon and try again | 18:56 |
| notmyname | acoles: I think you can leave the one on master | 18:56 |
| acoles | notmyname: yes, true | 18:56 |
| acoles | notmyname: torgomatic: ok i abandoned the one on feature/crypto | 19:00 |
| acoles | jrichli_: ^^ context for the abandon | 19:00 |
| clayg | acoles: thanks for pretending we still support py2.6 with me! | 19:03 |
| *** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:03 | |
| *** bill_az has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
| acoles | clayg: you could open another linkedin group for those who do ;) | 19:04 |
| *** acoles is now known as acoles_away | 19:09 | |
| jrichli_ | acoles_away: thanks | 19:15 |
| *** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 19:17 | |
| clayg | mattoliverau: I think confirmed/low should be enough to push it out of our bird-doggin' list; but you're right with something like that it's really hard to say when it's closed - https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1365084 | 19:20 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1365084 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Spelling mistakes corrected in comments." [Low,Confirmed] | 19:20 |
| clayg | instead of won't fix - they need "will try" | 19:20 |
| clayg | redbo: what do you think about invalidate vs. deleting tombstones in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134855/ | 19:21 |
| *** annegent_ has quit IRC | 19:23 | |
| *** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:26 | |
| *** devlaps has quit IRC | 19:33 | |
| *** RackerSh_ has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
| notmyname | peluse: clayg: torgomatic: acoles_away: I added https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158821/ to the EC priority reviews section so it can be tracked | 19:47 |
| torgomatic | notmyname: sounds good | 19:48 |
| torgomatic | I'm looking at that one now, but I'm possibly embarking on a yak shave getting probetests to pass on master so I have a baseline for probetests on that change | 19:48 |
| notmyname | torgomatic: probe tests passed on master for me yesterday | 19:49 |
| torgomatic | notmyname: same here; not sure what's up with this machine | 19:49 |
| notmyname | a "validate that the config is what probetests expect" tool would be nice | 19:50 |
| notmyname | also, a pony | 19:50 |
| *** annegent_ has quit IRC | 19:54 | |
| zaitcev | The fix for Neutron that my gate job needs to proceed (158162) had hit several gate bugs, each of which... | 19:56 |
| zaitcev | This is like some Kessler syndrome in miniature | 19:57 |
| *** RackerShagz has joined #openstack-swift | 20:01 | |
| *** dencaval has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
| *** sandywalsh_ is now known as sandywalsh | 20:04 | |
| *** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:04 | |
| *** zhill has joined #openstack-swift | 20:04 | |
| *** BaconIsKing has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
| *** RackerShagz has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
| *** RackerShagz has joined #openstack-swift | 20:07 | |
| klrmn | clayg: is there something that needs to be done to a vagrant saio after halting and re-uping it in order to get it to work again, or do i need to destroy and rebuild? | 20:15 |
| clayg | if you've changed your localconf - you need to vagrant provision to get the chef bits in the vm up to snuff - if you just need to make the vm be like it was at chef time you can rebuildswift | 20:16 |
| clayg | rebuildswift is just a script in the vagrant users path | 20:16 |
| clayg | if you need to just erase data on the vm and clear out swift but not undo any local conf edits - then resetswift will work | 20:16 |
| clayg | if you just changed branches you need to reinstallswift | 20:16 |
| clayg | if you want to be angel you could type up something like that in the README and push it to swiftstack/vagrant-swift-all-in-one | 20:17 |
| klrmn | clayg: i can be an angel on that. i wonder how i managed to get anything to work the past 2 weeks not knowing that | 20:24 |
| *** nellysmitt has quit IRC | 20:26 | |
| *** lcurtis has quit IRC | 20:26 | |
| *** silor has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
| klrmn | clayg: do any of the commands imply the other commands? | 20:32 |
| clayg | yeah rebuildswift > resetswift > reinstallswift IIRC | 20:38 |
| klrmn | clayg: so resetswift does reinstallswift? | 20:38 |
| clayg | i'm looking at the scripts in ./bin now and I'm not sure - it doesn't seem to call it directly | 20:39 |
| klrmn | clayg: it looks like swift proxy won't work on a VM thats been halted and restarted…it can't bind to 0.0.0.0:8080 | 20:40 |
| clayg | klrmn: that's weird | 20:41 |
| clayg | anyway, no it doesn't look like resetswift will reinstall the swift branch | 20:41 |
| klrmn | clayg: i've seen problems with interfaces not working right w/o provisioning before | 20:41 |
| clayg | ... interesting | 20:42 |
| klrmn | clayg: i've also gotten a bunch of errors about solo.rb and reload.json | 20:43 |
| openstackgerrit | Ian Cordasco proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Release connection after consuming the content https://review.openstack.org/149043 | 20:43 |
| klrmn | clayg: and dna.json | 20:43 |
| clayg | i've never seen any errors reference those file | 20:43 |
| klrmn | clayg: https://gist.github.com/klrmn/74412a7b1a28cc5f87cd | 20:44 |
| clayg | klrmn: I don't think you should be running any of those scripts as sudo - probably something got the wrong permissions | 20:46 |
| clayg | that bind error looks like some of the servers aren't fully shutdown - you can swift-init all stop; pkill -f swift and make sure ps -ef | grep swift is empty | 20:46 |
| klrmn | clayg: the output when i did it w/o sudo is now in a comment on the gist | 20:47 |
| clayg | ok, yeah you probably just need to run vagrant provision from your host to get the chef bits filled back in on /tmp (they would have been removed on the reboot) | 20:48 |
| *** marzif_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:49 | |
| marzif_ | Hi all, I have a question about python-swiftclient: why with class Connection(object) from client.py is not possible to set a proxy? | 20:51 |
| clayg | idk, i sorta remember httplib doesn't honor the env vars by default unless you do some magic - but I thought requests would? | 20:52 |
| *** Manshoon_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:53 | |
| *** BaconIsKing has joined #openstack-swift | 20:54 | |
| marzif_ | clayg, thanks, yes requests does, but when I've tried it didn't work, probably I was using a swiftclient version, with requests deps that still didn't supported that? | 20:55 |
| marzif_ | I don't know... so in theory if I use let's say the last version of python-swiftclient with env var set for proxy it should work? | 20:55 |
| *** Manshoon has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
| marzif_ | yes requests honor HTTP_PROXY and HTTPS_PROXY (capital)... | 20:56 |
| clayg | i don't believe I've tested it either way | 20:57 |
| *** RackerShagz has quit IRC | 20:57 | |
| *** RackerSh_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:58 | |
| marzif_ | ok. thanks a lot for your response :) | 20:58 |
| clayg | if you have the latest version (or installed from source) and it doesn't work - you could open a bug - I think it'd be nice if it did - dunno if it'd be hard to fix whatever the issue is | 20:58 |
| *** BaconIsKing has quit IRC | 20:59 | |
| marzif_ | agreed | 21:00 |
| marzif_ | my doubt was because from class HTTPConnection(object): you can explicitly set proxy=, while with Connection not.... btw tomorrow I'll try with env HTTP(S)_PROXY | 21:03 |
| *** annegent_ has quit IRC | 21:04 | |
| clayg | oic, i thought you were using the env vars - maybe there's a way to make the kwargs - you could open a bug for that too even if the env vars work | 21:05 |
| *** Manshoon has joined #openstack-swift | 21:05 | |
| *** Manshoon_ has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
| marzif_ | clayg, https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-swiftclient/+bug/1425283 | 21:10 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1425283 in python-swiftclient "proxy argument needed in client.Connection " [Undecided,New] | 21:10 |
| *** RackerSh_ has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
| marzif_ | clayg, from https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient/blob/master/swiftclient/client.py#L1218 http_connection is a redefined method inside Connection, but it doesn't allow to take proxy= as arg | 21:13 |
| marzif_ | I'm not sure but probably adding proxy= there and in __init__ of Connection may solve the issue, tomorrow I can test it and let you know if you want | 21:14 |
| clayg | yeah just update the bug if you find a patch that works for you | 21:14 |
| clayg | thanks! | 21:14 |
| marzif_ | ok :) | 21:15 |
| *** Manshoon has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
| *** Manshoon has joined #openstack-swift | 21:20 | |
| *** sandywalsh has quit IRC | 21:22 | |
| *** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-swift | 21:23 | |
| *** Manshoon has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
| *** marzif_ has quit IRC | 21:32 | |
| klrmn | clayg: i decided the VM was hosed and rebuilt it. even tho my localrc had 3 policies in it, the VM only has the default policy | 21:34 |
| klrmn | clayg: ah, maybe because i designated one as an EC policy but am not on the EC branch... | 21:35 |
| clayg | klrmn: i think it would have tried to setup the ec policy and swift's checks on swift.conf would have complained | 21:36 |
| clayg | if your localrc is different from you get on your node you need a vagrant provision to stuff the chef bits into the vm | 21:36 |
| *** RackerShagz has joined #openstack-swift | 21:36 | |
| *** RackerShagz has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
| *** NM1 has quit IRC | 21:42 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: swift-ring-builder remove doesn't print message (tabbing error) https://review.openstack.org/158789 | 21:44 |
| mattoliverau | Morning | 21:50 |
| tdasilva | mattoliverau: hello | 22:05 |
| *** delattec has joined #openstack-swift | 22:08 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 22:09 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 22:17 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 22:26 | |
| *** erlon has quit IRC | 22:31 | |
| klrmn | clayg: it helps if i remember to source localrc | 22:32 |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 22:34 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 22:37 | |
| clayg | oh yeah that | 22:43 |
| clayg | w | 22:43 |
| *** jrichli_ has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
| torgomatic | looks like f578a35100f5dcd0046c79e810441633d28f55ff broke some probe tests | 23:14 |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 23:19 | |
| *** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift | 23:21 | |
| *** joeljwright has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 23:27 | |
| klrmn | clayg: #$%^&* so, because i had to re-do the VM, i've lost my branch and all it's commits | 23:40 |
| clayg | klrmn: wat? the code should all be on the host? | 23:42 |
| klrmn | ~/Swift/vagrant-swift-all-in-one$ git branch | 23:42 |
| klrmn | * master | 23:42 |
| klrmn | oh! duh | 23:42 |
| klrmn | clayg: you're right. i'm clearly kinda slow today | 23:43 |
| *** ahonda has joined #openstack-swift | 23:45 | |
| *** chlong_ has joined #openstack-swift | 23:50 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!