Saturday, 2015-03-28

mattoliverauclayg: yeah and put them in contraints or something00:09
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift00:16
*** annegentle has quit IRC00:32
claygmattoliverau: yeah...00:35
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC00:35
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift00:35
mattoliverausigh.. looks like due to the gerrit maintenence looks like alot of patches are queued in the check gate and patch 165188 has been paused for over 2 hours not running at all. Guess i'll run tests locally and decide on a score based on that.00:46
patchbotmattoliverau: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165188/00:46
*** tsg_ has quit IRC01:13
claygtorgomatic: this is not a good sign - now I managed to get a segfault :\01:24
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift01:32
*** openstack has joined #openstack-swift01:39
clayganyone know how to get ahold of tsg and kevin?  https://gist.github.com/clayg/2860667dc8a7d3a31e7301:52
claygI can think of lots of reasonable things that might happen if you run that text through a python inturpreture - segfaulting is not one of them01:53
claygalso be useful if someone could confirm...01:53
*** barra204 has joined #openstack-swift01:56
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-swift01:58
claygtorgomatic: didn't you say something about whitespace?  i was able to reduce the reprotest case a little bit...01:59
*** thumpba_ has joined #openstack-swift02:11
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox02:11
*** thumpba has quit IRC02:14
*** thumpba_ has quit IRC02:16
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift02:19
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift02:25
*** annegentle has quit IRC02:50
*** thumpba has quit IRC03:03
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift: Fix AttributeError and logging in ECAppIter  https://review.openstack.org/16854303:11
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift: Add Fragment Index filter support to ssync  https://review.openstack.org/16518803:20
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift: wip: ec reconstructor probe test  https://review.openstack.org/16429103:20
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift: Erasure Code Reconstructor  https://review.openstack.org/13187203:20
claygnotmyname: I believe the word should have been "released"03:40
claygshould we make it an alias now - like opposite ways to spell the same thing --verbose=false and --quiet=true03:41
claygavailable?03:42
*** Akshat has joined #openstack-swift03:42
*** Akshat has quit IRC03:45
mattoliverauclayg: I'll +A patch 164950 then, then you can make a depend patch if you want. Let's merge the sucker.. unless there is another core around who wants to take a look.04:01
patchbotmattoliverau: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164950/04:01
mattoliverauclayg: in my mind, verbose is higher logging level  (INFO and DEBUG), whereas quite would mean less (or none, or maybe just ERROR).. but maybe that's just me.04:03
mattoliverau*quiet04:03
claygyeah that was probably not the best example - there's some syntax in argparse for like store_true and store_false - but you can have them both go into the same thing04:20
claygso like you have a --on or --off and you can even have a default but you can spell it either way04:21
tdasilvamattoliverau, clayg : re 164950 clayg added a comment that he would change the behavior in server.py to return a 503 instead of returning the default policy, do you know if the plan is to do on this patch or a seperate one?04:21
claygmattoliverau: i was just thinking about the "deprecated" option being available as "available" as an alias (just opposite)04:21
claygi thought i just typed git review04:21
mattoliverauclayg: ahh04:21
claygwtf is that other terminal doing04:22
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift: Guard against invalid Policy  https://review.openstack.org/16854804:22
claygtdasilva: ^  opp forgot to type 'yes'04:22
claygi mean i squash them or whatever04:22
claygnotmyname wasn't around to day so I just decided we're not gunna go all crazy merging stuff - we'll merge what's ready04:22
claygi'm going to start the rebase for master work - and i'm sure there's some good code in the feature branch somewhere that we can propose to ec-review or whatever when he gets that setup on Monday04:23
clayghopefully by tuesday or wednesday well have the whole patch chain up04:23
tdasilvaok, cool, sounds good!04:23
claygpaul is going to be disappointed if I don't do any work on the object fixer while he was out04:24
claygbut com'n notmyname  and peluse can't both go away the last two days then come back on Monday - and be like - what it's not done yet!?04:24
mattoliverautrue04:24
tdasilvalol04:24
claygthat being said - if anyone around between now and monday wants to merge aything on the ec review list that's *great*04:25
claygI think there's lots of good stuff that's ready to go on - and there's lots of nits and cleanups that can happen in the review against master04:25
claygwe'll have almost two weeks to nit - and I'll be rebasing the whole time - so it'll be fun to torture me!04:25
mattoliverauclayg: want to sqaush the changes then? 168548 i mean? screw it we'll just merge em both.. found a comment that needs to be updated in a test, but we can leave that for someone to get a free ATC ticket to summit :P04:26
claygmattoliverau: yeah squash, push over, +2 - it's whatever you are feeling brother!04:26
tdasilvaclayg: I thought peluse said he would reward you with scotch for your torture04:26
tdasilvalol04:27
claygyeah that's all ready to go acctually if I can make it through!04:27
tdasilvai think i saw that comment too, little mispelling04:27
claygwhat comment - you guys know i can't spell!04:28
mattoliverauI just meant you mention in a test that no policy will return a 400 and then you assert 503 :P04:29
tdasilvapleanty of nodes04:29
mattoliverautdasilva: lol, i apparently don't read so good :P04:29
claygdamnit - what test!?04:31
mattoliverauI left a comment04:31
claygoh pfhpphththt04:31
clayghey it says "should" not "must"04:31
mattoliverauyeah, sorry, I can push it for ya04:31
mattoliveraulol04:31
mattoliverautrue, +2 then :P04:32
claygsure thanks - i'm done04:32
clayg... for tonight04:32
tdasilvame too....brain is dead...talk to you guys later04:32
mattoliverauclayg: if you +2 then that last one, I'll merge it once jenkins gets back to us successfully.04:33
mattoliveraunight both of you.. I'll probably head soon, its getting late afternoon on a Saturday.. need to spend time with the wife :)04:33
claygi'll +2 anything on feature/ec - even shit i wrote - you don't even nkow04:34
mattoliverauclayg: lol, thanks. Now go sleep, that's for all the hard work so late into the night!04:35
notmynamehello04:46
notmynameclayg: don't go blame not merging code on me not being here ;-)04:46
mattoliveraunotmyname: hey hey04:46
notmynamemattoliverau: are you in the middle of an archery range?04:46
mattoliverauclayg: he will and he has :P04:46
mattoliveraunotmyname: nope not today, been at my desk :(04:47
notmynamewell, let's go see what's landed today04:47
notmynamenot much04:47
mattoliverauthings seem to be queued up on gerrit too.04:49
notmynameya, looks like a few are in the gate too04:49
mattoliverauthere was some gerrit downtime today for maintenence.. but wonder if that caused the gerrit backlog.04:50
notmynameI'm a little disconcerted by the number of unit test runs04:54
notmynameerr...how many failed04:54
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift05:01
notmynamea lot of ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: ''05:14
notmynamewhich I thought torgomatic had fixed05:14
notmyname(and everything is passing on my saio05:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Extract EC PUT to ECObjController  https://review.openstack.org/16495005:22
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift05:22
mattoliverauSigh.. clayg's 503 change (patch 168548).. and coused some unit tests to fail, fixed all but 1, but that last one is a little more annoying.. solveable but I need to go out for some errands, then dinner (it is approaching saturday evening.. will take a closer look at this later.05:28
patchbotmattoliverau: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168548/05:28
notmynameI am seeing unittest errors locally on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168543/ but not on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/16818505:34
notmynamebut let me rerun with the current patch that just landed05:34
notmynamebah! merge conflicts05:34
notmynametorgomatic: merge conflicts on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168185 that look slightly more complex than I want do deal with at this hour05:37
*** tsg has quit IRC05:42
*** haigang has joined #openstack-swift05:46
*** haigang has quit IRC05:49
*** thumpba has quit IRC06:11
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift06:17
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC06:21
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift08:36
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift08:52
*** tsg has quit IRC09:01
*** welldannit has quit IRC09:27
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away09:56
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC10:37
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-swift10:38
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift11:22
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC11:26
*** silor has quit IRC11:50
*** remix_tj has quit IRC12:21
*** Gu_______ has joined #openstack-swift12:23
*** remix_tj has joined #openstack-swift12:23
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift12:26
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC12:26
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift12:59
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift13:14
*** Gu_______ has quit IRC13:51
*** silor has quit IRC14:56
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift15:16
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift: EC: don't mix different fragment archives  https://review.openstack.org/16818516:07
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift16:21
*** thumpba has quit IRC16:25
torgomaticmy patch generated a bunch of ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: ''; the fix turned out to be cleaning up error-limits in the proxy so they didn't leak between test runs16:40
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift16:40
torgomaticand by that, I mean a tearDown method in my test case that emptied out the error limits16:40
notmynameah16:40
notmynamethanks16:40
torgomaticsure16:40
notmynamerunning tests on it now16:40
torgomatictox run is going now; after that I'll type "git review" and shut my laptop for the day16:41
torgomaticwhat you have will fai16:41
torgomaticnotmyname: ^^16:41
notmynameah ok16:41
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift: EC: don't mix different fragment archives  https://review.openstack.org/16818516:42
torgomaticand with that, I'm off to prepare for my kids' birthday party16:42
notmyname:-)16:43
notmynameheh. I'll miss "test_crazytown"16:43
notmyname(but the new one is better for maintenance)16:44
*** silor has quit IRC17:10
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift17:57
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift19:26
*** thumpba has quit IRC19:31
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox21:20
openstackgerritJanie Richling proposed openstack/swift: WIP - Provides a simple skeleton of middleware for encryption feature.  https://review.openstack.org/15790721:22
*** swat30 has quit IRC21:30
*** peluse has quit IRC21:30
*** swat30 has joined #openstack-swift21:31
*** peluse has joined #openstack-swift21:31
*** jrichli has quit IRC21:32
*** Gues_____ has joined #openstack-swift21:44
*** tsg_ has joined #openstack-swift22:35
*** tsg has quit IRC22:38
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC22:49
*** barra204 has quit IRC22:49
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift: Guard against invalid Policy  https://review.openstack.org/16854822:54
*** barra204 has joined #openstack-swift23:02
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-swift23:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: EC: don't mix different fragment archives  https://review.openstack.org/16818523:25
*** tsg_ has quit IRC23:32

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!