*** ho has joined #openstack-swift | 00:02 | |
*** Gue______ has joined #openstack-swift | 00:10 | |
*** thumpba_ has quit IRC | 00:11 | |
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift | 00:23 | |
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift | 00:29 | |
*** zhill has quit IRC | 00:33 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 00:36 | |
*** jkugel has joined #openstack-swift | 00:57 | |
*** mjfork has joined #openstack-swift | 01:04 | |
*** occup4nt is now known as occupant | 01:04 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 01:06 | |
ho | good morning guys! | 01:13 |
---|---|---|
*** mjfork has quit IRC | 01:20 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 01:22 | |
*** kota_ has joined #openstack-swift | 01:22 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 01:24 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 01:29 | |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 01:30 | |
mattoliverau | ho: morning | 01:37 |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
*** sluo_wfh has joined #openstack-swift | 01:39 | |
*** sluo_wfh has quit IRC | 01:40 | |
ho | mattoliverau: morning! what is your local time? 12:30? | 01:40 |
mattoliverau | 11:40 now. Change in time over the weekend :) | 01:40 |
ho | mattoliverau: I see. thanks :-) | 01:43 |
*** km has joined #openstack-swift | 02:03 | |
*** Gue______ has quit IRC | 02:12 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 02:42 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 02:44 | |
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift | 03:31 | |
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 03:47 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 03:50 | |
*** nshaikh has quit IRC | 04:30 | |
ho | when I ran functest for 166576, I sometime met "DiskFileError: Bad fragment index: None: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'None'" error. | 04:33 |
ho | http://paste.openstack.org/show/199094/ | 04:33 |
ho | Did you see it before? | 04:33 |
ho | s/sometime/sometimes/ | 04:35 |
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift | 04:40 | |
*** vinsh has quit IRC | 04:43 | |
kota_ | ho: seems to relate to patch set 167595 | 04:46 |
kota_ | ho: I did not test yet | 04:47 |
ho | kota_: thanks. yeah, I believe it is not related the patch. | 04:47 |
kota_ | ho: have you already setup ec policy? current some functional test pick up a policy randomly. | 04:48 |
kota_ | ho: Bad fragment index: None seems to be caused by a lack of fragment index in the backend request so... | 04:50 |
ho | kota_: yes, I wrote policy_type = erasure_coding in swift.conf. | 04:52 |
ho | kota_: but I didn't care about functest for it. | 04:52 |
ho | s/about functest for it/about it for functest/ sorry... | 04:53 |
kota_ | ho: no worries. | 04:53 |
kota_ | ho: I'm now thinking the reason it would happen... | 04:54 |
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift | 04:56 | |
kota_ | ho: object versioning would hit around copy issue from ec policy to another but I saw the fix at the pach 170003 | 04:57 |
ho | kota_: Did you mention about SWIFT_TEST_POLICY? I checked https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167595/ | 04:58 |
*** Akshat has joined #openstack-swift | 04:58 | |
ho | kota_: thanks I will check the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167595/ | 04:58 |
kota_ | ho: yes, we could to set concrete policy to be tested with 167595 | 04:59 |
ho | kota_: s%https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167595/%17773 | 04:59 |
kota_ | ho: but it didn't be merged yet. | 04:59 |
kota_ | ho: not sure but the copy request might have issues, so if you find something wrong, please feel free to raise that. | 05:00 |
*** nshaikh has left #openstack-swift | 05:00 | |
kota_ | ho: I am going to try to figure out, too. | 05:01 |
ho | kota_: thanks for your help. first, I will specify SWIFT_TEST_POLICY in swift.conf then run functest several times. | 05:02 |
kota_ | perhaps, versions_middleware is still in reviwing? | 05:02 |
kota_ | s/reviwing/reviewing/ | 05:02 |
ho | kota_: yes. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134347/ | 05:04 |
kota_ | ho: thanks, not yet confirmed but maybe you might hit a bug to copy to another policy container (i.e from old version (e.g. replicated) to versioning container (e.g ec) without rerouting controller) | 05:06 |
ho | kota_: thanks :-) | 05:08 |
kota_ | ho: normal copied object has been already fixed at 170003 but object-versioning looks still to use GETorHEAD directly | 05:09 |
kota_ | ho: anyways, SWIFT_TEST_POLICY would trim the issue because if you specified it, whole containers in the functests will be a same policy. | 05:10 |
ho | kta_: I just started the test with SWIFT_TEST_POLICY. I will let you know the test result after I make several trials | 05:12 |
ho | s/kta_/kota_/ really sorry... | 05:13 |
kota_ | ho: no problem :P | 05:13 |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 05:36 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 05:42 | |
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift | 05:47 | |
*** zhill has quit IRC | 05:47 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 06:05 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 06:07 | |
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift | 06:14 | |
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 06:15 | |
*** Bsony has quit IRC | 06:22 | |
cschwede | Good Morning! | 06:43 |
ho | kota_: I executed the functest after SWIFT_TEST_POLICY set in os.env. I could not see the problem anymore (0/5 times). | 06:46 |
ho | cschwede: good morning! | 06:46 |
*** silor has quit IRC | 06:47 | |
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 06:47 | |
cschwede | ho: hello! | 06:48 |
ho | kota_: btw I saw same traceback in both logs, proxy-server and object-server. from log size point of view, i think we don't need to have it in proxy-server. what do you think? (maybe useful for trouble shooting?) | 06:49 |
kota_ | ho: sorry I'm back just now and sounds good not to appear the problem and then... | 07:06 |
*** Bsony has joined #openstack-swift | 07:07 | |
kota_ | ho: about traceback, if we have really duplicated traceback, yes we can suppress it, imo. | 07:08 |
kota_ | ho: however I have to look at the reason deeply before making agree. | 07:09 |
kota_ | ho: the reason -> why we dump the duplicated log to proxy and object-sever | 07:10 |
kota_ | anyways, good morning cschwede :) | 07:10 |
cschwede | hello kota_ ! | 07:12 |
ho | kota_: thanks! after ec merge finish I will refactor it if there is no reason. | 07:14 |
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 07:14 | |
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 07:16 | |
*** Bsony has quit IRC | 07:18 | |
cschwede | notmyname: small question on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ec_merge_plan - the second reviewer who is adding a +2 also adds a +A? Or the third reviewer? Or later? | 07:19 |
mattoliverau | cschwede: morning, I think the second.. But could be wrong, but either case it can't merge until the -2 is unplugged so should be OK | 07:20 |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 07:21 | |
cschwede | mattoliverau: Good Evening! Yes, I agree - but then I thought better ask one more time… | 07:22 |
mattoliverau | lol | 07:22 |
cschwede | Anyways, I can +A my +2 later on as well | 07:22 |
mattoliverau | true :) | 07:22 |
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift | 07:34 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 07:34 | |
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift | 07:48 | |
*** jistr has quit IRC | 07:50 | |
*** km_ has joined #openstack-swift | 07:54 | |
*** km has quit IRC | 07:56 | |
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 08:09 | |
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 08:11 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 08:50 | |
*** kota_ has quit IRC | 08:54 | |
*** nshaikh has quit IRC | 08:59 | |
*** Akshat has quit IRC | 09:11 | |
*** km_ has quit IRC | 09:13 | |
*** jordanP has quit IRC | 09:20 | |
*** Akshat has joined #openstack-swift | 09:30 | |
*** Akshat has quit IRC | 09:32 | |
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift | 09:39 | |
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 09:44 | |
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift | 09:45 | |
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift | 09:52 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 10:06 | |
*** jistr has quit IRC | 10:30 | |
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-swift | 10:45 | |
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 10:51 | |
*** jistr is now known as jistr|biab | 10:52 | |
*** ujjain has quit IRC | 10:56 | |
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift | 10:56 | |
*** kei_yama has quit IRC | 11:06 | |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 11:26 | |
*** AbyssOne__ has quit IRC | 11:27 | |
*** tab___ has joined #openstack-swift | 11:28 | |
*** Akshat has joined #openstack-swift | 11:29 | |
*** AbyssOne has joined #openstack-swift | 11:31 | |
*** ujjain has quit IRC | 11:33 | |
*** jkugel has quit IRC | 11:36 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 11:42 | |
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift | 11:44 | |
*** dencaval has joined #openstack-swift | 11:46 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 11:49 | |
*** jistr|biab is now known as jistr | 11:49 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 11:51 | |
*** ho has quit IRC | 11:52 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 12:06 |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 12:19 | |
*** Akshat has quit IRC | 12:25 | |
*** Akshat has joined #openstack-swift | 12:26 | |
*** jkugel has joined #openstack-swift | 12:39 | |
*** jkugel1 has joined #openstack-swift | 12:40 | |
*** jkugel has quit IRC | 12:43 | |
openstackgerrit | Kamil Rykowski proposed openstack/swift: Replaced setting run_pause with standard interval https://review.openstack.org/171170 | 12:53 |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 12:55 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 12:58 | |
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift | 13:00 | |
*** krykowski has joined #openstack-swift | 13:01 | |
*** Akshat has quit IRC | 13:05 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 13:06 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 13:07 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 13:07 | |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 13:09 | |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
openstackgerrit | Kamil Rykowski proposed openstack/swift: Replaced setting run_pause with standard interval https://review.openstack.org/171170 | 13:26 |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 13:51 | |
*** skret has joined #openstack-swift | 14:10 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 14:16 | |
*** petertr7 has joined #openstack-swift | 14:23 | |
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift | 14:28 | |
*** panbalag has left #openstack-swift | 14:28 | |
*** tsg_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:33 | |
*** erlon has joined #openstack-swift | 14:34 | |
*** devlaps has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift | 14:41 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 14:47 | |
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift | 14:49 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 14:58 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 15:01 | |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 15:06 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift | 15:08 | |
*** panbalag has left #openstack-swift | 15:15 | |
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift | 15:15 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 15:17 | |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
*** tsg_ has quit IRC | 15:20 | |
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift | 15:28 | |
panbalag | Hi, does anyone know how to retrieve the metadata keys stored on an account, container or object? | 15:29 |
glange | HEAD requests and look at the headers returned? | 15:30 |
joeljwright | the metadata keys are returned in the headers of a HEAD request, they start 'x-object-meta-', 'x-container-meta-' and 'x-account-meta-' I think | 15:32 |
glange | swift has extensive documentation :) | 15:33 |
*** foexle has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
panbalag | glange, yeah...I tried posting the metadata "-H 'X-Object-Meta-subject1:science' -H 'X-Object-Meta-subject2:literature'..but they dont seem to come up in the HEAD information.. | 15:37 |
panbalag | glange, my bad..i posted object meta data on a container... (a mistake a copy paste previous command :) | 15:39 |
panbalag | glange, it works now | 15:39 |
glange | cool | 15:39 |
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-swift | 15:40 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 15:54 | |
*** bkopilov has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
panbalag | who should we ask for if we need a new one? | 16:04 |
panbalag | sorry wrong window | 16:04 |
*** panbalag has left #openstack-swift | 16:04 | |
*** krykowski has quit IRC | 16:06 | |
*** tsg_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:07 | |
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift | 16:14 | |
*** welldannit has joined #openstack-swift | 16:14 | |
*** aerwin has joined #openstack-swift | 16:18 | |
notmyname | good morning | 16:23 |
*** jistr has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
peluse | morning | 16:33 |
peluse | anyone wishing to help the EC errort: a good place to start is the user docs as they attempt (need eyes please!) to explain everyting :) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169990/ | 16:36 |
glange | errort? that's a bad typo :) | 16:38 |
*** devlaps has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
*** thumpba has joined #openstack-swift | 16:44 | |
peluse | yeah, that's why I need doc reviewers :) | 16:47 |
peluse | but in my defense, the f and the r keys are pretty damned close togather... | 16:47 |
*** thumpba_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:47 | |
tdasilva | or togetha as they say around here | 16:49 |
*** thumpba has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
peluse | tdasilva, hey thanks for the last doc push man - good stuff! | 16:51 |
tdasilva | peluse: I hope it was helpful... | 16:51 |
peluse | tdasilva, for sure - so seeing it all together did they make good sense? | 16:51 |
tdasilva | but yeah, I agree we still need more eyes on it... | 16:51 |
tdasilva | peluse: I think overall it is pretty good. There were some areas that I wanted to make bigger changes, but wasn't sure if they were correct, maybe I'll add comments or questions | 16:52 |
peluse | tdasilva, ok cool. now go review the code patches :) | 16:53 |
tdasilva | haha...half-way through 169989 | 16:53 |
peluse | sweet | 16:53 |
*** aix has quit IRC | 16:55 | |
*** jordanP has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
peluse | glange, any chance of enticing you to into looking at this stuff too? Would be awesome to get your thoughts on any/all of it! | 16:58 |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
*** tsg_ has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
*** lpabon has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
*** geaaru has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 17:27 | |
notmyname | swift version history https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/version_map | 17:30 |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 17:31 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
*** jkugel1 has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
*** mjfork has joined #openstack-swift | 17:45 | |
portante | notmyname: nice | 18:00 |
notmyname | I was asked to put some dates on it, so I'll do that next | 18:00 |
notmyname | also, it's portante!! | 18:00 |
portante | just a swift wannabe | 18:00 |
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 18:01 | |
*** jkugel has joined #openstack-swift | 18:05 | |
*** tongli has joined #openstack-swift | 18:08 | |
cschwede | notmyname: nice mapping (the version history). but then it doesn’t accord to https://launchpad.net/swift/kilo ? | 18:18 |
notmyname | cschwede: how do you mean? | 18:18 |
notmyname | the dates? | 18:19 |
cschwede | notmyname: no, 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 are marked as kilo series: https://launchpad.net/swift/kilo/2.2.2 https://launchpad.net/swift/kilo/2.2.1 | 18:19 |
notmyname | oh right. so you'd say that on my table, the openstack releases are the /end/ of that series | 18:20 |
notmyname | 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 are only tracked as "kilo" for openstack purposes. ie they happened during the openstack kilo dev cycle calendar time | 18:21 |
cschwede | that’s how i understood this until this morning, when a colleague told me that 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 are marked as kilo | 18:21 |
notmyname | how is that different? | 18:22 |
notmyname | so, yeah, to talk abotu what's in the kilo release, we talk about anything that has happened since juno. which includes 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 | 18:23 |
*** khivin has joined #openstack-swift | 18:24 | |
cschwede | yes, i agree on this. but i think 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 are kind of bugfix for the juno release, ie „are juno“. of course they are also included in kilo | 18:24 |
cschwede | anyways, i think the map is much better than the launchpad view | 18:25 |
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift | 18:27 | |
*** sweeper has left #openstack-swift | 18:27 | |
notmyname | cschwede: heh, ok :-) | 18:30 |
notmyname | well definitely feel free to update it to be more clear, if needed | 18:31 |
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift | 18:37 | |
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-swift | 18:42 | |
*** dencaval has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 18:56 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 18:57 | |
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 19:07 | |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:12 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 19:13 | |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 19:17 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 19:18 | |
*** mahatic has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 19:22 | |
tdasilva | peluse: around? | 19:33 |
peluse | yup | 19:33 |
tdasilva | there were some new comments on the doc which I could take a stab at fixing, but wanted to check with you first | 19:33 |
tdasilva | not sure if you are already working on it | 19:33 |
tdasilva | or clayg ?? | 19:33 |
peluse | nope, feel free my friend | 19:34 |
tdasilva | cool..one more thing...are the docs supposed to also be limited to 80 chars per line? | 19:34 |
tdasilva | I was wondering that yesterday and noticed that jrichli noticed the same issue towards the end of the ec doc... | 19:35 |
peluse | that's a good question, I dont know but have been doping so except for bullteted lists which seem to piss off RST | 19:35 |
klrmn | peluse: bulleted lists are okay with wrapping too, so long as the first letter of each line lines up | 19:37 |
klrmn | (at least that's how it's been working with SwiftStack's .rst files) | 19:37 |
peluse | klrmn, ahh, cool. thanks! | 19:38 |
klrmn | peluse: happy to have a ready answer for a swift-related problem =) | 19:38 |
*** vinsh has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift | 19:42 | |
*** silor has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
*** jistr has quit IRC | 19:55 | |
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:59 | |
*** tsg has quit IRC | 20:01 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 20:02 | |
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift | 20:05 | |
*** lpabon has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift | 20:24 | |
*** tongli has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
*** tsg_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:29 | |
*** tsg has quit IRC | 20:30 | |
*** tgohad has joined #openstack-swift | 20:31 | |
*** tsg_ has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** yuan has quit IRC | 20:35 | |
*** aerwin has quit IRC | 20:57 | |
*** fifieldt has quit IRC | 21:08 | |
*** annegent_ has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
tdasilva | peluse, torgomatic, clayg: why did we choose "2" success messages from storage node for the .durable file? why not 1 or 3 or quorum? | 21:15 |
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift | 21:21 | |
torgomatic | tdasilva: I'm not sure. It matches how many replicas have to be successfully stored in a 3-replica case, but that's just a guess. | 21:21 |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 21:25 | |
*** jrichli_ has joined #openstack-swift | 21:26 | |
*** jrichli has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 21:28 | |
*** jrichli_ has quit IRC | 21:31 | |
peluse | we chose 2 because we figured that was the minimum amout to know it would get propogated | 21:32 |
peluse | > than that would mean potentially more latency and we figured it wasn't neccessary | 21:32 |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 21:37 | |
peluse | tdasilva, if you're updating the doc patch right now go ahead and mark it WIP just so anyone else thinking of pushing over knows that an active update is happening so they should wait | 21:39 |
tdasilva | peluse: just added a comment there, I think since it is not my patch I can't mark -1 for Workflow | 21:42 |
tdasilva | peluse: just trying to figure out what changes are needed in overview_policies.rst, I think we should at least mention EC there | 21:44 |
peluse | tdasilva, OK cool. Sounds good, when I wrote that one we purposely left EC out since it didn't exist yet but yeah it would be good to add mention of it now :) | 21:47 |
peluse | in fact, I used to have a bullet point in the opening paragraph of Storage Policies "* Different Durability Characteristics" that would be good to add now | 21:52 |
*** mjfork has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
tdasilva | where can I find it? | 21:52 |
peluse | oh, its long gone I'm sure, you'll have to make some shit up :) | 21:53 |
peluse | but let me look... | 21:53 |
peluse | and then maybe a small blub in the 'configuring policies' section that has a link to how to configure for EC | 21:53 |
tdasilva | just noticed we removed feature/sp and only kept feature/sp-review :( | 21:54 |
peluse | ahh crap, the diskFile routing stuff should probably be mentioned in the under the hood section as well | 21:54 |
tdasilva | yeah, we also don't talk a lot about the changes for PUT in the proxy | 21:55 |
peluse | yeah in both cases we dont' want a ton of detail but mentioning there are provisions for organzing the code in various modules based on policy is probably a good thing to do | 21:57 |
* peluse has to run off to meetings for a bit... | 21:58 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 21:59 |
tdasilva | peluse: found this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85824 | 22:01 |
*** skret has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
briancline | question... I know container sync was getting some love at some point a few months ago - has that still marched onwards or is it on hold at the moment? | 22:05 |
*** remix_tj has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
*** remix_tj has joined #openstack-swift | 22:11 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
*** jkugel has quit IRC | 22:13 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 22:13 | |
notmyname | FWIW, my PTL email for the upcoming elections http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-April/060870.html | 22:16 |
notmyname | briancline: some. let me look in the logs | 22:17 |
notmyname | briancline: well, ok. no a lot ;-) | 22:19 |
notmyname | *not | 22:19 |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 22:30 | |
mattoliverau | Morning | 22:37 |
tdasilva | mattoliverau: morning :) | 22:42 |
notmyname | yo | 22:43 |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
*** joeljwright has quit IRC | 22:48 | |
briancline | thanks - no biggie, just crossed my mind | 23:15 |
*** petertr7 has quit IRC | 23:31 | |
*** ho has joined #openstack-swift | 23:44 | |
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift | 23:44 | |
*** annegentle has quit IRC | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!