Tuesday, 2015-11-24

homattoliverau: morning!00:01
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: remove pbr from requirements.txt. It's not a run-time dependency  https://review.openstack.org/24526600:03
notmynamewheee00:04
*** sgundur has quit IRC00:07
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift00:10
*** tsg has quit IRC00:10
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC00:16
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift00:16
*** blmartin has quit IRC00:37
ktsuyuzakigood morning, I'm back from business travel week. now starting to catch up recent conversations.00:46
ktsuyuzakioh, my nick has been changed...00:47
*** ktsuyuzaki is now known as kota_00:47
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift00:56
mattoliveraukota_: morning00:58
hokota_: morning!00:59
kota_mattoliverau: ho: morning!01:00
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift01:02
*** NM has quit IRC01:02
*** jerrygb has quit IRC01:09
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift01:10
*** jerrygb has quit IRC01:14
hotdasilva: around?01:33
*** klrmn1 has quit IRC01:54
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift01:57
*** 17SAD4YI2 has joined #openstack-swift02:00
*** Vinsh_ has joined #openstack-swift02:00
*** 17SAD4YI2 has quit IRC02:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift02:01
*** Vinsh has quit IRC02:04
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Unit tests for account/backend.py  https://review.openstack.org/24061302:25
*** david-ly_ has quit IRC02:36
*** Vinsh_ has quit IRC02:42
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift02:44
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift02:56
tsgkota_: ping02:58
kota_tsg: pong02:58
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-swift02:59
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC03:01
*** diazjf has quit IRC03:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift03:01
*** venkat_p has joined #openstack-swift03:02
*** jrichli has quit IRC03:04
janonymousmorning o/03:08
*** jerrygb has quit IRC03:11
*** proteusguy_ has quit IRC03:12
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift03:13
mattoliveraujanonymous: morning03:20
*** Vinsh has joined #openstack-swift03:21
*** Vinsh has quit IRC03:26
*** pcaruana has quit IRC03:27
*** klrmn1 has joined #openstack-swift03:28
*** Vinsh has joined #openstack-swift03:34
hojanonymous: morning!03:38
*** proteusguy has joined #openstack-swift03:49
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift03:57
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC04:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift04:01
*** dimasot has quit IRC04:03
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-swift04:08
janonymouso/ matt ho04:12
notmynamegood evening04:15
*** sgundur has quit IRC04:17
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC04:19
janonymoushi John04:21
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift04:21
honotmyname: hello-04:21
*** trifon has joined #openstack-swift04:23
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC04:24
*** jerrygb has quit IRC04:24
*** klrmn1 has quit IRC04:26
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift04:27
notmynamedid you ever think we should rename functests to funtests?04:27
mattoliverauor nofuntests04:31
notmynameheh04:31
notmynametox, putting the fun in functests04:31
notmynamejenkins, taking the fun out of functests04:32
mattoliveraulol04:32
notmynamepbr, taking the fun out of everything ;-)04:32
mattoliveraubut at least it isn't a runtime dependency anymore ;)04:35
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift04:35
notmynamewell it never was, but now we don't lie about that04:35
mattoliveraulol04:35
*** dimasot has joined #openstack-swift04:39
*** trifon has quit IRC04:47
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has joined #openstack-swift04:50
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC04:52
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift04:54
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC05:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift05:01
*** eranrom has quit IRC05:02
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-swift05:03
mahaticgood morning05:04
*** diazjf1 has joined #openstack-swift05:05
*** diazjf has quit IRC05:08
mattoliveraumahatic: morning05:15
mahaticmattoliverau: hello05:15
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift05:15
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC05:19
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift05:27
*** venkat_p has quit IRC05:33
*** rcernin has quit IRC05:34
*** mahatic has quit IRC05:38
mattoliveraunotmyname: if I set the concurrency of testr to 1 then it seems the func tests on my SAIO works (well hasn't failed yet and it's been going a while). So might a concurrency thing, ie. clean up between tests and how testr actaully splits up the work.05:40
notmynameoh, interesting05:40
mattoliverauso we might be able to set it to concurrency of 1 if we run out of time.05:41
mattoliveraui.e can't get it working concurrently before the deadline05:41
mattoliverauor maybe we need to be sure we are using different container names in different tests in the func tests.. if we aren't already, I haven't looked, just thinking out loud05:43
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift05:43
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift05:49
notmynameyeah, that's a good thought05:49
*** venkat_p has joined #openstack-swift05:51
notmynamethe swift functests aren't the slowest test in the gate, so running with concurrency as 1 won't slow anything down05:52
mattoliverauwe are using uuid.uuid().hex to create container names in func test Envs. but are we reusing account names, we do keep clearing containers, but depends on how it's been called concurrently, I assume it wouldn't be per test in a class. so maybe it's per file.. I think I need to go read some testr docs or even code :)05:53
notmynamemattoliverau: so I glanced at the reverse listings patch, and the only thing that jumped out (totally not a full review) is that you were taking user input and doing math on it05:55
* notmyname goes to find the link05:55
mattoliveraunotmyname: true. we may have a work around for now. Did you want to try using a concurrency or 1?05:55
notmynamemattoliverau: with testr, I'm not sure what I ran with. I don't really care as long as it works ;-)05:56
mattoliveraunotmyname: yeah, I think I know what your talking about, that was Tim's magic cause there were some bounds issue, I need to look back in patch sets.05:56
*** trifon has joined #openstack-swift05:57
notmynamemattoliverau: with the reverse listings patch, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120709/14/swift/container/backend.py in line 593 takes user input conversts to byte, adds 1, then converts to char. which fails if the user input is %ff05:57
notmynamebut I don't know if that's actually possible. to send %ff. I got an error in my one quick test locally trying to do that05:58
mattoliveraunotmyname: as a hack you can add --parallel --concurrency=1 to wrap-testr.sh (might be able to just use concurrency=). Or pass it in as default. or even just run: python setup.py test --testr-args="--subunit --parallel --concurrency=1" | subunit2pyunit06:00
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC06:01
notmynamemattoliverau: push a change over ;-)06:01
*** ppai has quit IRC06:01
mattoliveraunotmyname: or I could do that ;P06:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift06:02
mattoliverauI'll wait to make sure it passes on my SAIO first :)06:02
mattoliverauit should be almost finished06:02
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift06:16
*** diazjf1 has quit IRC06:18
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has quit IRC06:18
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift06:18
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift06:26
*** pcaruana has quit IRC06:28
*** mahatic has quit IRC06:31
openstackgerritCatherine Northcott proposed openstack/swift: Add support for storage policies to have more than one name  https://review.openstack.org/24197806:35
*** dimasot has quit IRC06:35
notmynameZyric1: :-)06:35
*** dimasot has joined #openstack-swift06:36
notmynameZyric1: just glanced over it. what I saw looks good. thanks. I'll take a more detailed look tomorrow06:38
notmynameZyric1: also, I *love* the fact that we'll now have maori in the tests :-)06:39
Zyric1Thanks notmyname! Sorry it took all day, I had some family engagements and helping my brother with his exam studies :)06:39
notmynameno worries.06:40
* notmyname checks out for the night06:41
*** Zyric1 has quit IRC06:42
*** takashi_ has joined #openstack-swift06:48
*** takashi has quit IRC06:50
*** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift06:51
*** takashi_ is now known as takashi06:51
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift06:55
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC07:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift07:01
eranromGreetings, is ho around?07:07
*** venkat_p has quit IRC07:16
*** venkat_p has joined #openstack-swift07:28
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift07:37
*** jerrygb has quit IRC07:42
*** mac_ifie_ has quit IRC07:44
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift07:44
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC08:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift08:02
*** arnox has joined #openstack-swift08:05
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift08:12
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift08:12
*** wuhg has joined #openstack-swift08:13
*** jerrygb has quit IRC08:17
hoeranrom: yeah08:42
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift08:43
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has joined #openstack-swift08:47
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC08:49
*** zaitcev has quit IRC08:50
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift08:59
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC09:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift09:01
*** ppai has quit IRC09:09
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC09:10
*** matt6434 has joined #openstack-swift09:11
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC09:16
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift09:16
hoeranrom: i have to leave here now. i will get in touch with you tomorrow same time :-)09:17
*** ho has quit IRC09:17
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift09:23
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift09:44
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift09:52
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles09:52
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has quit IRC09:55
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has joined #openstack-swift09:57
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC09:59
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC10:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift10:02
*** admin6 has joined #openstack-swift10:03
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift10:05
acolesmahatic: hrou https://review.openstack.org/214438 has a +1 from jrichli, are either of you mid-way through a review? would be great to merge it this week.10:07
* acoles is trying to reduce the crypto patch chain10:07
acolesnotmyname: sorry! (re dashboard)10:09
*** mahatic has quit IRC10:12
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift10:16
mahaticacoles: yes actually, will be done reviewing shortly. thanks for the effort10:17
*** kei_yama has quit IRC10:17
acolesmahatic: great, thank you. no rush - better to do a good review and find all my bugs :)10:17
mahaticacoles: heh, I hope to find bugs too ;)10:19
*** silor has quit IRC10:20
*** Guest31166 has quit IRC10:23
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift10:23
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has quit IRC10:26
*** dimasot has quit IRC10:42
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has joined #openstack-swift10:52
*** matt6434 has quit IRC10:54
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC10:54
*** matt6434 has joined #openstack-swift10:55
openstackgerritvenkatesh proposed openstack/swift: remove unused parameters in the method  https://review.openstack.org/24340110:56
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC11:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift11:01
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift11:03
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC11:05
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has quit IRC11:06
*** rcernin is now known as rcernin|lunch11:13
*** aix has quit IRC11:14
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift11:15
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift11:21
*** ppai has quit IRC11:23
*** venkat_p has quit IRC11:31
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift11:34
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC11:34
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift11:38
*** daemontool has quit IRC11:40
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift11:40
*** ppai has quit IRC11:42
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift11:52
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift11:57
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC12:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift12:02
*** daemontool has quit IRC12:08
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift12:09
*** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift12:14
*** silor has quit IRC12:15
*** silor1 is now known as silor12:15
*** jmccarthy has quit IRC12:19
*** jmccarthy has joined #openstack-swift12:20
*** mahatic has quit IRC12:24
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift12:30
*** alejandrito has joined #openstack-swift12:34
*** rcernin|lunch is now known as rcernin12:36
*** janonymous__ has joined #openstack-swift12:38
*** wolsen has quit IRC12:41
*** ppai has quit IRC12:43
*** dewsday has joined #openstack-swift12:54
*** dewsday has left #openstack-swift12:54
*** MVenesio has joined #openstack-swift12:56
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC13:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift13:01
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Remove _keystone_identity method  https://review.openstack.org/20405013:02
*** silor has quit IRC13:04
*** marcusvrn_ has quit IRC13:05
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC13:11
*** wolsen has joined #openstack-swift13:14
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift13:21
*** daemontool has quit IRC13:22
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC13:23
*** NM has quit IRC13:34
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift13:39
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift13:49
*** daemontool has quit IRC13:56
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift13:57
*** daemontool has quit IRC13:58
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift13:59
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC14:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift14:01
*** rcernin has quit IRC14:03
*** eranrom has quit IRC14:06
hrouHey acoles !  I started taking a peek at that one late last night;  I'll be done by tomr morning my time.14:14
acoleshrou: great thanks!14:14
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift14:23
*** felixcantournet has joined #openstack-swift14:30
*** willsama has joined #openstack-swift14:36
*** tsg has quit IRC14:39
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift14:40
*** Fuz1on has quit IRC14:43
*** goodygum_ is now known as noqa_v_qoovnie14:44
gmmahagood morning14:48
*** minwoob has joined #openstack-swift14:56
*** jerrygb has quit IRC14:56
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift14:57
*** daddyjoseph97 has joined #openstack-swift15:00
jordanPguys, is that on purge that the jenkins job "gate-tempest-dsvm-full" in Swift also run the volume and compute tests ?15:00
jordanP*on purpose15:00
jordanPwhat about running only image and object tests ?15:00
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC15:01
jordanPI can take care of that if you want15:01
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift15:01
*** trifon has quit IRC15:03
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Add more functional tests for reverse listings  https://review.openstack.org/24926215:03
*** breitz has quit IRC15:08
*** breitz has joined #openstack-swift15:08
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Add container and account reverse listings  https://review.openstack.org/12070915:08
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift15:09
*** daddyjoseph97 has quit IRC15:10
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Add more functional tests for reverse listings  https://review.openstack.org/24926215:12
*** jerrygb has quit IRC15:15
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift15:16
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift15:18
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift15:25
gmmahamatt6434: notmyname: found the same last night with functests & concurrency..15:25
*** jerrygb has quit IRC15:33
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift-bench: update hacking in test-requirements  https://review.openstack.org/24334615:38
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC15:49
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift16:02
*** geaaru has quit IRC16:05
*** NM has quit IRC16:07
*** sgundur has left #openstack-swift16:10
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift16:10
notmynamegood morning16:13
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift16:16
pchngmorning !16:16
*** wbhuber_ has joined #openstack-swift16:22
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift16:24
*** wbhuber_ has quit IRC16:26
pelusemorning16:26
*** wbhuber_ has joined #openstack-swift16:27
*** klrmn1 has joined #openstack-swift16:27
notmynameoh yay. reverse listings was approved!16:27
*** wbhuber_ has quit IRC16:31
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Update mailmap  https://review.openstack.org/24931116:31
acolesnotmyname: i'm assuming your script for AUTHORS works on swiftclient too ;) ^^16:32
notmynameacoles: I've got one for that too :-)16:32
*** sgundur has quit IRC16:32
acolesnotmyname: this time i was going to do it myself but then noticed it was alphabetically sorted - thats too hard for a human ;)16:33
notmynameacoles: just looks like 3 missing/incorrect names right now. not counting the hp.com changes16:34
pelusenotmyname: just added a note to the testr patch, it works for me if I add the options "--parallel --concurrency=2".  How many CPUs are in your SAIO VM?16:35
peluse=1 I mean, not 216:35
notmynamepeluse: heresy, I know, to say this to Intel, but my SAIO MV has only 1 vCPU16:36
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift16:36
pelusenotmyname: oh wow, mine is like 4 :)16:36
pelusenotmyname: that probably explains it then16:36
pelusewell, mostly16:37
*** jrichli has left #openstack-swift16:38
notmynameI think we should update the patch to hard code that, if it seems to fix it for people16:38
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift16:40
*** aix has quit IRC16:40
pelusenotmyname: yeah, I'll add another note if you didn't already and also reqeust a comment to not change it until someone figures out how to make it work with >116:41
notmynameyeah16:41
notmynamepeluse: I haven't added anything to it. can you push a patch over it?16:41
peluseyeah sure16:41
notmynamethanks16:42
*** pdardeau has quit IRC16:42
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift16:43
*** daemontool has quit IRC16:43
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: Modify functional tests to use testr  https://review.openstack.org/21420616:44
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift16:44
acolespeluse: notmyname i have only just started looking at the testr change but fwiw swiftclient uses concurrency=116:45
pelusebah, new editor looks like it added whitespace16:45
*** klrmn1 has quit IRC16:47
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift16:48
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: Modify functional tests to use testr  https://review.openstack.org/21420616:48
*** pdardeau has quit IRC16:48
pelusephew :)16:49
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: remove Python 2.6-specific logging workaround  https://review.openstack.org/24532416:49
*** daemontool has quit IRC16:49
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift16:50
*** jrichli has quit IRC16:51
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift16:51
*** admin6 has quit IRC16:52
*** pdardeau has quit IRC16:53
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-swift16:53
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Reverse-listings follow-up  https://review.openstack.org/24892416:54
timburkeacoles: ^ added the test case, but to be clear: it's just to guard against our future selves, right? test still passed without needing backend changes16:55
acolestimburke: right. i was fiddling with the marker resetting in the original patch and noticed that i could make that change without any test failing, then same with your patch.16:57
acolestimburke: the pastebin change i mean16:58
timburkecool. just making sure :)16:58
jrichliapologies for the enter/leave messages.  bear with me for a sec17:01
*** jrichli has quit IRC17:01
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift17:08
*** arnox has quit IRC17:08
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift17:10
pchngwelcome back jrichli :)17:10
notmynamejrichli: setting up a bouncer?17:10
jrichliYAY!  notmyname acoles - yes, bouncer setup done!  Thanks to pchng17:11
notmynamenice17:11
*** pdardeau_ has joined #openstack-swift17:11
notmynameare you using znc or did you chose a different one?17:11
jrichliznc17:11
pchngnotmyname: znc17:11
acolesjrichli: i thought you already had one?17:11
timburkei find mine quite handy. thanks for setting it up long ago notmyname!17:11
notmynameacoles: no, previously she was just always online ;-)17:12
jrichliacoles:  I did things the old fashioned way of reading scrollback on the web17:12
acolesof course! :)17:12
hrouI love mine : )17:15
* jrichli is gonna go to lunch now. feel free to send a private message while away ;-)17:16
hroupchng, did you setup znc in softlayer btw ?17:17
*** blmartin has joined #openstack-swift17:18
pchnghrou: Originally I was going to, but I ended up just getting a VM internal to IBM17:18
*** klrmn1 has joined #openstack-swift17:18
pchnghrou: Let me know if you want access :) if you are not already using a bouncer17:18
*** mahatic has quit IRC17:19
hroupchng, haha me too; Its a bit annoying because you need to log into the VPN if not on site :)  FYI I believe wbhuber set it up in softlayer implying there's external access as well : )17:19
*** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-swift17:19
pchngah okay, that's great to have that option. but yeah, having it in softlayer for external access is nicer at times17:20
pchnghrou: And i think the VM they gave me is running a GUI/desktop, so I should probably disable that...17:20
pchng(i think i requested ubuntu server ed. but that might have gotten lost)17:21
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift17:22
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev17:22
*** david-ly_ has quit IRC17:23
*** david-l__ has joined #openstack-swift17:23
*** david-lyle has quit IRC17:23
claygheyoh!17:26
acolesclayg: hi!17:27
*** david-l__ has quit IRC17:30
*** proteusguy has quit IRC17:31
clayghi17:33
*** jmccarthy has quit IRC17:35
*** jmccarthy has joined #openstack-swift17:35
*** jordanP has quit IRC17:38
*** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift17:40
*** sayali has quit IRC17:42
*** proteusguy has joined #openstack-swift17:44
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-swift17:44
*** pdardeau_ has quit IRC17:44
*** jmccarthy has quit IRC17:46
*** pdardeau_ has joined #openstack-swift17:48
*** NM has quit IRC17:48
*** zehicle has quit IRC17:48
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Add container and account reverse listings  https://review.openstack.org/12070917:54
notmynameFYI next week I want to finish up a release for swiftclient (b/c of py26) and consider one for swift17:56
*** pdardeau has quit IRC17:56
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift17:57
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift17:58
*** pdardeau has quit IRC18:00
*** hseipp has quit IRC18:01
claygnotmyname: did ring fixes merge?18:01
*** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift18:01
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift18:01
notmynameclayg: patch 241571? not yet18:02
patchbotnotmyname: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241571/ - Put part-replicas where they go18:02
notmynamebut has one +2 already (still)18:02
*** david-lyle has quit IRC18:03
notmynamedfg_: hurricanerix: glange: did you have a chance to run your rings against that patch?18:03
*** pdardeau has quit IRC18:03
*** jistr has quit IRC18:04
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift18:06
claygnotmyname: hurricanerix told me he was looking at it (yesterday)18:06
notmynamegreat :-)18:06
*** pdardeau has quit IRC18:06
*** jmccarthy has joined #openstack-swift18:06
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-swift18:11
*** wasmum has joined #openstack-swift18:11
claygnotmyname: wow, so we merged reverse listings - that's like a new api feature - that's sorta cool!18:13
claygtimburke: nice work!18:13
notmynameyeah!18:13
claygprobably mattoliver and cschwede too18:13
claygand acoles18:13
clayghigh fives all around18:14
timburkeyeah, i love it! so who wants to go look at patch 234391 and second mattoliverau's +2?18:15
patchbottimburke: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234391/ - Have versioned_writes use reverse listings18:15
notmynamematt, actually :-)18:15
openstackgerritTravis Nguyen proposed openstack/swift: skip object versioning tests when allow_versioned_writes = False  https://review.openstack.org/24935418:25
notmynametimburke: ^18:29
acolesclayg: swift_bytes is a pain :/18:30
acolesclayg: can you think of any reasons why it would be a bad idea to make the object server aware of swift_bytes and update the container server? (right now the object server is blissfully unaware) I am in two minds which way to go with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248219/ but feel like I want to make swift_bytes be a piece of sysmeta on the object server18:32
acolestorgomatic: you may have an opinion too ^^ - I always associate slo with torgomatic :)18:33
timburkeacoles: are we trying to make the container server blissfully unaware instead? if so, i think will cause double-counting in the usage stats18:36
*** sgundur has quit IRC18:38
acolestimburke: no. what i meant was that currently SLO tacks swift_bytes onto content-type and the obj server passes it on to the container server, unaware of the swift_bytes param. But if fast-post is going to update content-type then SLO won't be able to append swift_bytes to POSTed content-type (cos it won't know what the size is during a POST) so I think the object server needs to get involved.18:40
acolestimburke: but yeah the container server always needs to get the value18:41
acolestimburke: and even with post-as-copy its ugly handling the swift_bytes during a POST (thats what I am trying to fix with patch 248219)18:41
patchbotacoles: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248219/ - Fix listing of SLO manifest bytes after POST or COPY18:41
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift18:42
torgomaticI generally want things to be as isolated as possible, otherwise I can't hold them all in my head18:44
torgomaticothers with larger brains may have differing opinions18:44
*** jmccarthy has quit IRC18:46
*** jmccarthy has joined #openstack-swift18:47
*** CaioBren_ has joined #openstack-swift18:47
*** CaioBrentano has quit IRC18:51
*** pdardeau has quit IRC18:52
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift18:54
*** pdardeau has quit IRC18:55
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift: Stop staticweb revealing container existence to unauth'd requests  https://review.openstack.org/24886718:56
acolestorgomatic: me too. i keep thinking of that blog you linked about the cost of complexity.18:58
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift19:00
torgomaticacoles: that's the only real reason I have for wanting to keep things out of the object server when possible. if it's necessary, though, I guess we should do it.19:00
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift19:01
*** wuhg has quit IRC19:01
claygacoles: when I was thinking about ith jrichli I had convinced myself that the slo middleware should set some sysmeta on the PUT request - and that the object server should know how to pass that through to the container update (and save in async's)19:01
acolesclayg: yeah thats where my thinking is heading19:02
claygacoles: ideally the object server would just sort of blindly allow middleware to add sysmeta to the object updates - so it wouldn't really be swift_bytes specific from the object server POV - then it's for the middlware and the container server to negotiate where the information lives and what is done with it19:02
claygacoles: i got stumped trying to think of how to do it in rolling upgrade19:02
acolesclayg: of course we have to deal with existing manifests that don't have that sysmeta19:03
claygit seems like maybe the middleware will have to do both for awhile - and only at some point later when it's sure everyone is upgraded it can stop messing with content-type19:03
claygacoles: interesting....19:03
*** pdardeau1 has joined #openstack-swift19:04
*** pdardeau1 has quit IRC19:04
claygacoles: what does the object server do currently?  can I ever see the swift_bytes in the content-type on a GET response for a manifest?19:04
acolesclayg: the obj server has swift_bytes appended to its content_type, but the obj controller strips it off in GET path, so no client doesn't ever see it19:05
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC19:09
jrichliacoles clayg torgomatic: I dont know if this could be in any way related (needing a new solution), but there is another internal param used within the content-type field: "boundary" for sloranges19:10
*** alejandrito has quit IRC19:10
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-swiftclient: Update mailmap  https://review.openstack.org/24931119:10
torgomaticjrichli: is that on 206 responses?19:10
acolesclayg: i think the obj server has to store swift_bytes somehow (either asit does now or in sysmeta) so that when the manifest is copied the swift_bytes can be included in update to the destination container server19:11
jrichlitogomatic: I don't know.  I don't even know if its hidden from the user in the same way.  I just know slorange is causing issues with encryption because of this param, and we need to handle it.  pchng was working it19:11
torgomaticjrichli: okay. that sounds to me like it might be the multi-range GET response stuff from RFC 7233, but I'm not 100% certain of that.19:12
acolestorgomatic: jrichli so on that subject, mahatic and I were looking at this line yesterday https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/common/swob.py#L118719:13
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:13
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:13
acolestorgomatic: and I question the use of the content_type property there - its getter strips off all the params, like charset, but also our crypto-meta :/19:14
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:14
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:14
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:14
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:15
torgomaticacoles: yeah, that sounds like something to fix in the property class there19:15
acolestorgomatic: do you know, is that deliberate? ie is there a reason to not include charset an dother params?19:15
torgomaticacoles: probably because webob did it?19:15
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:15
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:15
acolestorgomatic: the property getter does seem to conform to the webob api - i was thinking that that ine should just fetch the content-type header and not use the property attr19:16
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:16
acoless/ine/line/19:16
torgomaticthere's a couple weird API decisions in swob that are there because they mimic webob19:16
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:16
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:16
torgomaticI know there's one where ranges are (start_byte, end_byte + 1) instead of (start_byte, end_byte) because webob19:16
torgomaticthis is probably another one19:16
acoleslooks that way19:16
*** pdardeau has quit IRC19:16
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:16
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:17
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:17
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:18
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:18
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:18
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:18
acolestorgomatic: ok maybe that could be changed on master19:19
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:19
pchngacoles: Is this the content-type stripping you're referring to? https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/common/swob.py#L40319:19
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:19
torgomaticacoles: yep, http://docs.webob.org/en/1.1/modules/webob.html says that the content_type property strips params19:19
acolespchng: yes19:19
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:20
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift19:20
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:20
acolestorgomatic: yep, and use the charset property if you really want to get that, and if you want other params, well...tough :)19:20
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:20
torgomaticheh, webob doesn't even have a charset property :)19:20
pchngacoles, torgomatic: I was looking into some functests (GETs for SLOs that had ranged manifests) that were filing, possibly because of this stripping.19:20
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:20
torgomaticoh no, wait, it's in 1.219:21
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:21
torgomaticor 1.1 and I can't read. ANYWAY19:21
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:21
acolesheh, yeah its there19:21
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:21
pchngacoles, torgomatic: essentially it looks like the content-type should have had "multipart/byteranges; boundary=<something>" but only "multipart/byteranges" was showing up19:22
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:22
acolespchng: failing on master?19:22
torgomaticpoint being that _prepare_for_ranges could use self.headers['Content-Type'] and remove any boundary that's in there, then put that in each part's header19:22
torgomatic(assuming I'm understanding the bug)19:22
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:22
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:22
pchngacoles: No, on feature/crypto. I think after a merge from master, maybe last week? Details in trello here: https://trello.com/c/rPjrIefY/61-fix-functests-failures-in-slo-ranged-gets19:23
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:23
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:23
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:23
jrichlipchng acoles: slorange and crypto combo has always failed those tests19:24
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:24
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:24
openstackgerritJohn Dickinson proposed openstack/swift: Add support for storage policies to have more than one name  https://review.openstack.org/24197819:24
acolestorgomatic: yep. actually i hadn't considered that the source content-type might have a boundary19:24
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:24
acolespchng: oic19:24
claygacoles: so is this week a holiday for you guys?19:25
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:25
pchngjrichli: I think you said in trello that after the merge, these two more were failing, the ones specifically related to GETs for SLO that had ranged manifests. But yes I think the other SLO ones were failing before that19:25
claygacoles: do you have any other fall holiday between halloween and christmas?19:25
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:25
jrichlipchng: oh, really?  I'll take your word for it :-)19:25
acolesclayg: nope. we have nothing to give thanks for, we were left behind !)19:25
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:26
acolesclayg: and nope, in fact halloween isn't so big here either19:26
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:26
jrichliacoles: what about the cake you get at work all the time?19:26
acolesoh yeah19:26
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:26
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:27
acolesclayg: thanks for working on that staticweb thing btw. looks like i missed something there.19:27
claygacoles: well luckily for you and me both cschwede has his eyes open19:27
acolespchng: hmmm, could be related. my take away is "read the docstring before using the content_type property on swob.Response"19:28
claygthis is the worst procrastination ever - I want to start reviewing concurrent-gets - but I keep finding other reviews that'll be like "quick" so I wanna knock those out first :'(19:29
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:29
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:29
acolesi know what you mean, had to overcome that today to get stuck into reverse listings19:30
pchngacoles: thanks, that will help with my investigation - still learning about SLO/DLO, etc.19:30
acolesclayg: but after doing a 'longer' review i rewarded myself with changing a mailmap file :)19:31
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:32
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:32
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:33
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:33
timburkeand thank you for the longer review acoles!19:33
claygtimburke: acoles is the best19:33
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:33
acolestimburke: i felt i was getting out of practice ;)19:33
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:34
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:34
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:34
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:35
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:35
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:35
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:36
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:36
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:36
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:37
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:37
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:37
acolesgood night, or in honour of patch 120709 i should say "night good"19:38
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:38
patchbotacoles: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120709/ - Add container and account reverse listings19:38
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:38
jrichliacoles : cute.  good night!  :-)19:38
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:38
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:39
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:39
acolesnotmyname: have a great thanksgiving (and anyone else who is heading off soon)19:39
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:39
notmynamethanks19:39
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:40
*** acoles is now known as acoles_19:40
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:40
notmynamezehicle: you're spamming the channel with join/part messages19:40
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:40
claygnotmyname: filter that noise!19:40
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:41
*** zehicle has quit IRC19:41
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o notmyname19:41
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-swift19:41
*** zehicle was kicked by notmyname (zehicle)19:41
*** jmccarthy has quit IRC19:41
notmynameclayg: done. seems to have worked19:45
*** notmyname sets mode: -o notmyname19:45
claygnotmyname: oh i just ment on your client - but that's coo19:50
claygmy favorite part of reviewing concurrent-gets is the meta-hacking on dfg's slowdown20:00
*** CaioBren_ has quit IRC20:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Reverse-listings follow-up  https://review.openstack.org/24892420:03
*** sgundur has left #openstack-swift20:04
*** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift20:05
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift20:06
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift20:08
*** CaioBrentano has quit IRC20:09
*** changbl has quit IRC20:11
hurricanerixnotmyname yeah, i am playing around with it this week. (and by this week, i mean today and tomorrow)  :)20:19
notmyname:-)20:19
*** haypo has joined #openstack-swift20:20
haypotsg: hi. any progress on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247936/ "Add liberasurecode to CI slaves for Swift/PyECLib" (and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244287/ "Bump PyECLib requirement to >=1.0.7")?20:21
tsghaypo: the latest status is on the review pages20:22
tsghaypo: we are waiting on the F22 and F23 packages to appear in updates20:22
tsghaypo: the rest is all taken care of20:22
tsghaypo: zaitcev has this pending - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3889c3fcba20:23
tsghaypo: may be you can help with testing and add to karma.  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3889c3fcba and https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1ab5c917e2 both20:23
zaitcevtsg, haypo: no idea how a request to pending could be pending for so long20:23
zaitcever. request to testing20:24
zaitcevso while this is going on, I am unable to build pyeclib20:24
tsgzaitcev: can you please file an issue so Kevin also sees the error20:25
haypozaitcev: sorry, what is pending?20:25
zaitcevhaypo: Once the build system has produced the build, e.g. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=701091, a magic process occurs that copies the resulting RPMs into the master of mirrors and updates repo (a number of gigantic XML files *.xml.gz). Then dnf/yum are able to see that package even exists, and whem mirrors fetch it they can download.20:29
zaitcevA certain ticket is filed to initiate the magic. Buld system files automatically for (none)->testing, while I have to file testing->stable. While the magic hasn't completed, the ticket is "pending".20:30
zaitcevShould usually take a few minutes, but it's 21 hours now.20:30
*** changbl has joined #openstack-swift20:31
haypozaitcev: oh20:32
zaitcevInfra says about my build "it's in the current push that I started 3 hours ago"20:33
zaitcevTime for coffee it appears20:33
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Have versioned_writes use reverse listings  https://review.openstack.org/23439120:41
*** eranrom has quit IRC20:44
haypozaitcev, tsg : i tested liberasurecode 1.1 package: it works, PyEClib  tests pass with the package. but i failed to post a comment on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3889c3fcba20:45
zaitcevYeah, it's locked while the aforementioned magic is active.20:45
hayponevermind, i succeeded to vote +120:46
zaitcevhaypo: oooooh20:46
haypozaitcev: i see four +1 votes on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3889c3fcba but the Karma is at 2?20:47
*** zhill has quit IRC20:48
haypoPatch Set 5:20:48
haypo(oops)20:48
haypotsg: i also pinged Clark Boylan on #openstack-infra :)20:49
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift20:49
*** matt6434 is now known as mattoliverau20:52
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v mattoliverau20:52
tsghaypo: I talked to clarkb there yesterday - we are holding off until the package is available in F22 (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1ab5c917e2)20:54
tsgzaitcev: might need you help with the F22 update as well20:54
zaitcevtsg: oh god20:54
tsgzaitcev: the devstack folks need it20:54
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift20:54
haypozaitcev: we all rely on you20:54
tsgzaitcev: :) sorry, doesn't have to be an update - we can simply push the existing 1.0.9 pkg to F22 - see the activity on the F22 ticket20:55
janonymous__Hi , a quick question do we need to mention upgraded tox version for py3 changes in tox file: http://paste.openstack.org/show/479917/  also?20:56
haypozaitcev: ah, tsg told me that i have to log in to vote. otherwise, my vote doesn't count20:57
haypozaitcev: would a +1 vote change something?20:57
zaitcevit changes the move to stable so you don't need to wait for 3 days in testing20:58
*** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift21:00
*** tsg has quit IRC21:07
haypozaitcev: i got an error from https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/liberasurecode/ before and now i got an error when i try to create a fedora account :-/21:07
*** tim_ has joined #openstack-swift21:09
*** zhill has quit IRC21:10
openstackgerritJanie Richling proposed openstack/swift: WIP - Support for http footers - Replication and EC  https://review.openstack.org/23739321:10
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift21:11
janonymous__*Away21:12
*** janonymous__ has quit IRC21:12
haypozaitcev, tsg : ooook, i succeded to vote +1 and increase the karma to +3: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3889c3fcba21:14
zaitcevtsg wanted https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1ab5c917e2 I think21:15
tsghaypo: yes, if you follow the same steps on F22 and update https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1ab5c917e2 that will be great21:15
haypotsg: i don't have Fedora 2221:16
zaitcevSo Haikel submitted liberasurecode-1.0.9.fc22 to stable.21:16
zaitcev7 hours ag21:16
*** djc has joined #openstack-swift21:17
djchow do you find out what the partition power of a swift cluster is? Is there a config file that contains that information.21:18
tsgzaitcev: I see it now - thanks.  Is the package expected to land in stable by tonight?21:18
zaitcevtsg: I would expect so.21:19
zaitcevdjc: run  swift-ring-build xxxxx.builder  without any other arguments21:19
haypozaitcev, tsg : why not 1.1 for fc22?21:19
tsgzaitcev: ok .. I will let the infra guys know so patch 238926 can go in21:19
patchbottsg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238926/ - EC: Use ec_type=liberasurecode_rs_vand in unit tests21:19
tsghaypo: we simply need "a version" available on F22 for now21:20
tsghaypo: update is the next step21:20
haypotsg: ah21:20
*** minwoob has quit IRC21:25
*** badari has joined #openstack-swift21:26
*** blmartin has quit IRC21:26
*** djc has quit IRC21:28
haypohey, i'm looking for reviews on my python3 patches. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237039/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237005/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237019/ already got +2 from samuel merritt who looks to be a good reviewer since he usually complains on most of my changes :-D21:28
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift21:28
hayposee https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Victor+Stinner%22+status:open+project:openstack/swift,n,z for all my pending swift patches for py321:29
notmynamelifeless: were you looking for me for something?21:31
haypozaitcev: ^^21:32
zaitcevhaypo: I must focus on fast-post21:33
haypozaitcev: what is fast-post?21:33
zaitcevhaypo: I think it's this https://review.openstack.org/13538021:34
*** NM has quit IRC21:37
*** tim_ has quit IRC21:38
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift21:40
*** blmartin has joined #openstack-swift21:42
*** wbhuber_ has joined #openstack-swift21:42
*** blmartin has quit IRC21:43
*** wbhuber_ has quit IRC21:55
lifelessnotmyname: I wanted to cc you on a cross project spec I've got21:55
lifelessnotmyname: about actually testing backwards compat of clients (and libraries, but for you, clients are the key)21:55
notmynameok, thanks. I saw it21:56
notmyname(saw that it exists)21:56
notmynamelifeless: I too have problems searching for people in gerrit. often the person doesn't show up and I have to search my email hoping I can find an email address21:57
mattoliverauMorning21:58
*** haypo has left #openstack-swift22:00
*** MVenesio has quit IRC22:04
*** zhill has quit IRC22:04
*** felixcantournet has quit IRC22:05
claygsigh - and things were going so well :'(22:05
*** zhill has joined #openstack-swift22:05
claygmattoliverau: I'm seeing a 404 at the end of a GET again?22:05
claygmattoliverau: I would have swore you fixed that in some previous rev22:05
mattoliverauYeah, that sounds familiar22:07
claygmattoliverau: like if your concurrency == replica count shouldn't it be inflight < concurrency?  otherwise you can have replica count requests in flight and then still only wait concurrency_timeout instead of node_timeout22:09
clayglike if inflight == replicas - I think you wait node timeout22:10
clayg(don't trust me on any of this - i'm just thinking outload)22:10
claygI mean you an trust me on the 404's - i'm seeing the 404's and maybe they're justified or not - maybe i'm doing something stupid - maybe it's a bug - who knows!22:10
claygi'll just try chaing the <= to < (what could go wrong)22:10
mattoliverauLol22:11
mattoliverauYou could be right, this conversation seems familiar. I need to go stare at the code again22:13
claygwell... it got slower :'(22:13
claygI think pile.waitall(timeout) is waiting up to the timeout and if two happen to finish it's fine with that - it's not like - well idk22:14
claygcrap22:14
*** jerrygb has quit IRC22:14
claygok, yeah waitall definately waits up to timeout22:14
mattoliverauThe other major change in that patchset is we now wait conn_timeout by default rather then node timeout. But if your using 0 concurrency_timeout then your bypassing that22:15
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift22:15
claygmattoliverau: yeah make everyone faster by default - seems good to me - if it works like a boss22:16
claygmattoliverau: i'm not sure I buy the concurrent_requests t/f always use replica_count thing22:16
mattoliverauLol, yeah if22:16
mattoliverauWe could t/f/#22:17
claygoh no - now I made it faster22:26
claygmattoliverau: it was dfg that thought it was a potential for mis-config yeah?22:27
claygmattoliverau: like I'm not really exactly sure what someone would expect if they configured concurrency for 4 on a three replica ring - i guess it'd dig for the handoff sooner - which could be what you want if you're running hummingbird and PUT's get 503's to handoffs more often because of device limit checks22:28
claygthe real problem is just that it's not configurable per-policy/ring unless you just make it t/f and turn it into replica22:29
lifelessnotmyname: I found out today - it is case sensitive22:29
lifelessnotmyname: "john d" -> you are not there. "John D" -> you are there.22:29
notmynamewe should probably agree between hummingbird and python object servers that a response to "hey I'm still up just dealing with other stuff" probably should be something other than 503/50722:29
notmynamelifeless: interesting22:29
claygI think the crazy handoff node count has mathy stuff like "replica / 2" in the dsl22:29
claygnotmyname: everyone says that (I said that) but it's so trivial to fix it's not even worth discussing - it's like what color to paint the bikeshead22:30
notmynameclayg: blue! no, yellow!22:31
claygnotmyname: when something like that gets implemented in python I'm not going to +2 it w/o a decent error code and a test22:31
claygthen if you can run that test on hummingbird it's like 10 seconds to get it passing - yay!22:32
notmynameclayg: yeah, I get your point, but that doesn't mean actually changing it (ie code/tests) shouldn't happen. since we're spread all over, it's not jsut like "hey redbo do you hate code 4xx for this?"22:32
notmynameI just think we need to spend 5 minutes talking about it, and that's about it22:32
claygnotmyname: let's do it in the review22:32
notmyname:-)22:33
claygmattoliverau: neway - I think i'm cool to just go with a boolean for now where truthy means replica - we can probably expand on that later if needed without breaking backwards compat - so I'm good with that I htink22:34
zaitcevtsg: "hguemar's liberasurecode-1.0.9-3.fc22 bodhi update completed push to stable"22:36
tsgzaitcev: awesome! thanks for the note.  I will let -infra folks know so we can get the package into CI22:37
*** travisn has quit IRC22:38
tsgzaitcev, should the F22 package appear in "updates" for "updates-testing"?22:40
*** zhill has quit IRC22:41
*** sjmc7 has joined #openstack-swift22:42
openstackgerritTravis Nguyen proposed openstack/swift: skip object versioning tests when allow_versioned_writes = False  https://review.openstack.org/24935422:51
notmynameyou know what would be cool? reverse listings in swiftclient22:51
mattoliverauclayg: it could be a good parameter to add at the policy level one day22:54
*** wuhg has joined #openstack-swift22:57
*** rohit_ has joined #openstack-swift22:58
openstackgerritSteve McLellan proposed openstack/swift: WIP Oslo.messaging middleware  https://review.openstack.org/24947123:01
*** sgundur has quit IRC23:02
*** NM has quit IRC23:04
*** km has joined #openstack-swift23:09
*** km is now known as Guest5920823:09
*** diazjf has quit IRC23:11
*** TravT has joined #openstack-swift23:27
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:29
*** mac_ified has joined #openstack-swift23:29
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8925023:31
*** willsama has quit IRC23:31
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873623:32
*** ho has joined #openstack-swift23:34
claygman, swift-bench is failing to pip install because of some TypeError: must be type, not classobj in setuptools :'(23:37
claygnotmyname: i said that in the review23:37
claygnotmyname: well in the review of the reverse listings23:37
notmyname:-)23:37
claygnotmyname: it doesn't have --limit either23:38
notmynameyeah, I mostly said it to write it down somewhere23:38
claygor --path23:38
claygnotmyname: and now it's in irc logs forever!23:38
notmynametimburke has been griping about that for a while23:38
notmynamewho cares about --path ;-)23:38
claygnotmyname: fair23:38
timburkeclayg: what, | sort -r isn't good enough for you? :P23:41
* notmyname steps away for a bit23:41
*** rcernin has quit IRC23:42
mattoliveraulol23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!