| kota_ | mattoliverau: new baby will come around there but there is a conference. | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| *** kei_yama has quit IRC | 00:01 | |
| mattoliverau | kota_: nope :( .. That's too close to baby o'clock, and I don't want to be on the opposite side of the world if Bec goes into labour. | 00:01 |
| mattoliverau | ^bristol | 00:01 |
| mattoliverau | I'd have loved to be there, then I'd go visit my brother. Austin maybe.. But the baby will be only be around 6 weeks old, which might be too hard for my wife if I leave, so we'll see | 00:03 |
| kota_ | mattoliverau: gotcha, thanks | 00:04 |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: just got my AUS visa | 00:05 |
| *** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift | 00:06 | |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: now I just need to actually write my talk ;-) | 00:06 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: me too.. I keep procrastinating... I have played with presentty, but 80 charater limit means ascii art diagrams I think will be too small to explain sharding :P | 00:07 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: but I did manage to create an ascii swift logo in the right size :P | 00:07 |
| notmyname | I've always had good intentions of using something like that. but frankly using keynote is a *lot* more productive (for the time put in) and works really well | 00:08 |
| notmyname | cool! | 00:08 |
| notmyname | now I just have to put up with the looks of disdain for taking an apple laptop to LCA ;-) | 00:08 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: yeah, well I've fallen back to using stanard slides for now, now I just need content :) | 00:09 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: lol, yeah, but most people in the audience seems to have macs now.. which is funny to see :) | 00:09 |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 00:10 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 00:11 | |
| *** lcurtis has quit IRC | 00:29 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 00:33 | |
| openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/swift-bench: Remove support for py33/py26 https://review.openstack.org/264486 | 00:35 |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 00:38 | |
| notmyname | lifeless: around? | 00:40 |
| notmyname | I have a question about testrepository | 00:40 |
| notmyname | lifeless: in case you see this later, I'm curious about the comments and reasoning behind patch 260522 | 00:42 |
| patchbot | notmyname: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260522/ - Put py34 first in the env order of tox | 00:42 |
| *** tsg has joined #openstack-swift | 00:42 | |
| *** minwoob has quit IRC | 00:47 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 00:54 | |
| *** blmartin has quit IRC | 00:56 | |
| notmyname | this is very cool https://twitter.com/gsvitak/status/682260151856967681 | 01:02 |
| *** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 01:07 | |
| *** zhill has quit IRC | 01:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Hisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Fix signal handling for daemons with InternalClient https://review.openstack.org/259347 | 01:16 |
| *** badari has quit IRC | 01:19 | |
| mattoliverau | awesome | 01:21 |
| lifeless | notmyname: hi | 01:34 |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 01:35 | |
| lifeless | notmyname: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-July/068979.html | 01:35 |
| *** robefran has quit IRC | 01:42 | |
| *** garthb_ has quit IRC | 01:45 | |
| *** tsg has quit IRC | 01:45 | |
| notmyname | lifeless: ah, ok | 01:50 |
| notmyname | interesting | 01:50 |
| notmyname | lifeless: so what would you recommend? tough it out until testr moves out of venv? go ahead and land patch 260522? something else? | 01:50 |
| patchbot | notmyname: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260522/ - Put py34 first in the env order of tox | 01:50 |
| lifeless | notmyname: putting it first seems harmless, no ? | 01:53 |
| notmyname | maybe? but then again, putting it last seems harmless too ;-) | 01:54 |
| timburke | lifeless: breaks (in a different way) on my mac :( | 01:54 |
| notmyname | lifeless: when your email says "have a discussion about issues" I don't think I know enough about the issues to know what it means | 01:54 |
| lifeless | timburke: oh :( | 01:54 |
| lifeless | timburke: thats frustrating | 01:54 |
| timburke | yup | 01:54 |
| lifeless | notmyname: so that effort is basically stalled, so I don't recommend any option which involves just waiting on it. | 01:55 |
| timburke | but i can reproduce the issue in a trusty VM, so...idk | 01:55 |
| notmyname | ah ok | 01:55 |
| notmyname | in some ways, I don't really care. it's bootstrapping to get tests to run. that part isn't really important to me (compared to you know, actually having running tests). | 01:56 |
| notmyname | timburke: to be fair, I'm not sure running tests on osx is really a "supported" thing ;-) | 01:56 |
| timburke | shit, it i could, i'd require they pass on windows :P | 01:57 |
| notmyname | they do. as long as it's inside a VM running linux ;-) | 01:57 |
| openstackgerrit | Michael Barton proposed openstack/swift: Merge branch 'master' into feature/hummingbird https://review.openstack.org/264517 | 02:17 |
| *** klrmn has quit IRC | 02:17 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 02:26 | |
| *** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift | 02:29 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 02:31 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 02:40 | |
| *** xiangxinyong has joined #openstack-swift | 02:45 | |
| *** chenhuayi has joined #openstack-swift | 02:45 | |
| *** chenhuayi has quit IRC | 02:48 | |
| *** xiangxinyong has quit IRC | 02:50 | |
| *** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift | 02:53 | |
| *** mragupat has joined #openstack-swift | 02:58 | |
| *** haomaiw__ has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 03:01 | |
| *** janonymous has joined #openstack-swift | 03:02 | |
| *** links has joined #openstack-swift | 03:10 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 03:10 | |
| *** links has joined #openstack-swift | 03:12 | |
| *** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 03:15 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 03:37 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 03:37 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 03:41 | |
| *** ChubYann has quit IRC | 03:42 | |
| openstackgerrit | Charles Hsu proposed openstack/swift: Add a note for functional tests with Keystone. https://review.openstack.org/262664 | 03:47 |
| *** venkat has joined #openstack-swift | 03:50 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 03:59 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 04:01 | |
| jrichli | Due to our discussion in the meeting today, I wrote bug 1531698 as a "wishlist" item. I'd be interested in working on this, if other people thought it'd be a good thing. | 04:06 |
| openstack | bug 1531698 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Create an Advanced Features Matrix - docs and tests" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1531698 | 04:06 |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 04:06 | |
| jrichli | in the end, it might turn out looking like most of the answers are obvious, and the docs and tests are already being covered, I don't know. but it might be worth seeing if it covers some things that are missing. | 04:08 |
| *** mragupat has quit IRC | 04:08 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 04:17 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 04:19 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 04:22 | |
| *** km__ has quit IRC | 04:57 | |
| *** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC | 05:00 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 05:01 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:01 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 05:03 | |
| kota_ | mahati: my change on meeting wiki (link to 2016 meeting log) conflicted with your change! you already updated that, thanks! | 05:04 |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 05:08 | |
| openstackgerrit | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/swift: Fix proxy-server's support for chunked transferring in GET object https://review.openstack.org/256201 | 05:09 |
| *** mragupat has joined #openstack-swift | 05:21 | |
| mattoliverau | jrichli: I don't know, you want to put up your hand to add better testing and documentation to advanced features.. That sounds like a horrible idea, when does adding more and better testing improve a project as complex as swift :p (BTW that's sarcasm and who would say no especially when you are already throwing yourself under the bus for it) ;) | 05:23 |
| mattoliverau | </sarcasm> | 05:23 |
| openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Support last modified on listing containers https://review.openstack.org/198634 | 05:24 |
| kota_ | was trying to push "reabase" bottun on gerrit, expecting to follow parent patch... | 05:24 |
| mattoliverau | jrichli: sounds good even if it turns out we have adequate testing.. Then at least we know :) | 05:25 |
| mattoliverau | kota_: gerrit api strikes again | 05:25 |
| * mattoliverau thinks he's had too much coffee at his last meeting and is now in super sarcasm mode | 05:26 | |
| kota_ | lol | 05:27 |
| kota_ | but i don't know how to make sure the branch keep right consistency unless pulling it local :/ | 05:29 |
| kota_ | looks like it worked as i expected | 05:30 |
| kota_ | follow to newest patch of parent and... | 05:31 |
| kota_ | wow, keep +1 for previous patch set. | 05:31 |
| kota_ | i guess, sometimes it would be good but sometimes it would be worse... | 05:31 |
| kota_ | btw, does someone know why stackanalytics halted to keep track to record Swift activities? | 05:34 |
| kota_ | or i might be missing something? | 05:35 |
| kota_ | http://stackalytics.com/?module=swift&metric=commits commits ended at Dec 12... | 05:36 |
| *** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift | 05:37 | |
| kota_ | http://stackalytics.com/?module=swift&metric=marks reviews looks to be recorded till Dec 31... | 05:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: Fixing the deprecated library function. https://review.openstack.org/262722 | 05:38 |
| mahatic | kota_: ah okay :) np | 05:55 |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 05:58 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 06:01 | |
| *** 7JTABHHZB has joined #openstack-swift | 06:01 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 06:18 | |
| *** mragupat has quit IRC | 06:30 | |
| *** PsionTheory has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 06:40 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 06:46 | |
| *** tongli has quit IRC | 06:51 | |
| *** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift | 06:53 | |
| *** aerwin3_ has quit IRC | 06:53 | |
| *** kota_ has quit IRC | 06:53 | |
| *** hurricanerix has quit IRC | 06:54 | |
| *** peluse has quit IRC | 06:54 | |
| *** aerwin3 has joined #openstack-swift | 06:55 | |
| *** kota_ has joined #openstack-swift | 06:56 | |
| *** hurricanerix has joined #openstack-swift | 06:56 | |
| *** peluse has joined #openstack-swift | 06:56 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 06:58 |
| *** tongli has joined #openstack-swift | 06:58 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 06:59 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 07:00 | |
| *** 7JTABHHZB has quit IRC | 07:01 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 07:05 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 07:05 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 07:07 | |
| *** jsuchome has joined #openstack-swift | 07:29 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 07:34 | |
| eranrom | ho_,: Hi | 07:34 |
| *** klrmn has quit IRC | 07:37 | |
| ho_ | eranrom: hello | 07:38 |
| eranrom | I think your patch is much better, as it is more generic. | 07:40 |
| eranrom | Also, I do not think that there is anything to merge from mine. | 07:40 |
| openstackgerrit | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/swift: Fix proxy-server's support for chunked transferring in GET object https://review.openstack.org/256201 | 07:41 |
| ho_ | eranrom: thanks! i will add your name and upload it later. is it ok for you? | 07:41 |
| eranrom | sure, no need to add my name :-) | 07:42 |
| eranrom | ho: but pehaps add: Closes-Bug: #1419901 to the commit message | 07:42 |
| openstack | bug 1419901 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "container-sync checks invalid ClientException" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1419901 - Assigned to Eran Rom (eranr) | 07:42 |
| eranrom | ho: I am struggling with the following problem - you might have an idea. | 07:43 |
| ho_ | eranrom: i will add both. if possible, please test the patch in your env :) | 07:44 |
| eranrom | ho_,:sure will do. | 07:44 |
| eranrom | ho: I wanted to do a regression probe test that will make sure the problem does not come up again. | 07:44 |
| eranrom | ho: I can easily write a probe test that will cause the ClientException to get raised, but I do not know how can I: | 07:46 |
| eranrom | either check the log or loopk at the internal container info | 07:47 |
| eranrom | Do you think I can run swift-container-info from a probe test? | 07:47 |
| eranrom | ho: Anyway I will abondon my patch and test yours in my env. | 07:48 |
| openstackgerrit | Hisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Fix ClientException handling in Container Sync https://review.openstack.org/256306 | 07:55 |
| ho_ | eranrom: sorry for late response. I wanted to use edit func of gerrit and this was a good chance but i did mis-operation 10min before... (i got cold sweat) | 07:58 |
| *** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 07:58 | |
| ho_ | eranrom: i only changed the commit message and looks succeeded. | 07:59 |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 08:01 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 08:01 | |
| *** trifon has joined #openstack-swift | 08:05 | |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 08:06 | |
| ho_ | eranrom: sorry, i have no idea for the probe test. i think unittest is fine for this case (but i usually made a test with saio for my peace) :-) | 08:09 |
| *** arnox has joined #openstack-swift | 08:09 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 08:10 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 08:11 | |
| *** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift | 08:15 | |
| *** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 08:16 | |
| eranrom | ho_: no problem. I will test in my env and update gerrit once done. | 08:22 |
| *** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift | 08:26 | |
| *** silor has quit IRC | 08:27 | |
| *** silor1 is now known as silor | 08:27 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 08:30 | |
| *** yatin has joined #openstack-swift | 08:40 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 08:53 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 08:57 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mahati Chamarthy proposed openstack/swift: Remove content-type encryption/decryption https://review.openstack.org/261292 | 08:58 |
| *** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 08:59 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 09:01 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 09:01 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 09:08 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 09:09 | |
| *** venkat has quit IRC | 09:10 | |
| *** venkat has joined #openstack-swift | 09:13 | |
| *** ejat_ is now known as ejat | 09:23 | |
| *** ejat has quit IRC | 09:23 | |
| *** ejat has joined #openstack-swift | 09:23 | |
| *** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift | 09:32 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 09:35 | |
| *** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 09:41 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 09:45 | |
| *** tongli has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 09:53 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 09:58 | |
| *** bkmz has quit IRC | 10:01 | |
| *** bkmz has joined #openstack-swift | 10:01 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 10:07 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 10:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Hisashi Osanai proposed openstack/swift: Fix ClientException handling in Container Sync https://review.openstack.org/256306 | 10:20 |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 10:41 | |
| *** ho_ has quit IRC | 10:42 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 10:45 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 10:45 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 10:57 | |
| *** yatin has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
| *** acoles_ is now known as acoles | 11:06 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 11:08 | |
| *** jordanP has quit IRC | 11:09 | |
| *** yatin has joined #openstack-swift | 11:10 | |
| acoles | mahatic: are you here? I have a question about your comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211451 | 11:20 |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 11:21 | |
| mahatic | acoles: hello, i'm here | 11:21 |
| ntt | Hi, is there some procedure to move all data from a swift cluster to another? I have one swift cluster (for dev purposes) where swift_hash_path_suffix and prefix are too "easy" and another cluster in production not yet started. Could I move all data between the two? | 11:22 |
| acoles | mahatic: in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211451/19/test/unit/common/middleware/test_decrypter.py | 11:22 |
| acoles | your first comment is correct, my mistake | 11:22 |
| acoles | but the second I cannot see a problem? | 11:22 |
| acoles | the bad iv is only used for value of x-object-sysmeta-crypto-meta-test i.e. only the user meta header | 11:23 |
| acoles | the body iv and crypto_meta is good, i think? | 11:23 |
| mahatic | looking | 11:23 |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 11:24 | |
| mahatic | a min please | 11:24 |
| *** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC | 11:28 | |
| mahatic | acoles: test_get_with_bad_iv_for_object_body - i thinnk a bad iv is not passed on for the body encryption: enc_body = encrypt(body, key, fake_iv()) | 11:28 |
| mahatic | acoles: _test_bad_iv_for_user_metadata and test_get_with_bad_iv_for_object_body are doing the same, aren't they? | 11:29 |
| *** sh__ has joined #openstack-swift | 11:30 | |
| acoles | mahatic: if we passed a bad is to encrypt then it would raise an error. | 11:31 |
| acoles | mahatic: one test simulates a bad iv being returned in the meta for a header, the other has bad iv in crypto meta for the body | 11:31 |
| acoles | in each case we want to verify that a 500 response is returned | 11:32 |
| mahatic | acoles: I thought that was because of this header: 'X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Meta': get_crypto_meta_header(crypto_meta=bad_crypto_meta | 11:32 |
| mahatic | in test_get_with_bad_iv_for_object_body | 11:32 |
| sh__ | Hi All, While doing rebalance I am getting this note:"Dispersion of 33.214188 indicates some parts are not optimally dispersed.You may want to adjust some device weights, increase the overload or review the dispersion report." How to remove it. | 11:32 |
| acoles | but the response messages are different in each case | 11:32 |
| acoles | mahatic: yes, X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Meta': get_crypto_meta_header(crypto_meta=bad_crypto_meta causes the body decrypt to raise error | 11:33 |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 11:33 | |
| acoles | (but not the header decrypt) | 11:33 |
| mahatic | oh right, that makes sense | 11:34 |
| mahatic | no problem then | 11:34 |
| acoles | ok i will fix the other and then merge this | 11:35 |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 11:36 | |
| mahatic | great, thanks | 11:36 |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Modify unit tests to include real crypto https://review.openstack.org/211451 | 11:37 |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 11:39 | |
| acoles | mahatic: done | 11:39 |
| *** yatin has quit IRC | 11:39 | |
| mahatic | yay | 11:41 |
| *** 16WAAH8AU has joined #openstack-swift | 11:41 | |
| *** 16WAAH8AU has quit IRC | 11:53 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 11:54 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 11:56 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 12:00 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
| *** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 12:06 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
| *** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift | 12:13 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 12:17 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 12:22 | |
| *** jmccarthy has joined #openstack-swift | 12:26 | |
| *** tsg has joined #openstack-swift | 12:32 | |
| *** haomaiw__ has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 12:38 | |
| *** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift | 12:41 | |
| *** silor has quit IRC | 12:41 | |
| *** silor1 is now known as silor | 12:41 | |
| *** resker has joined #openstack-swift | 12:50 | |
| *** delattec has joined #openstack-swift | 12:50 | |
| *** janonymous_ has joined #openstack-swift | 12:51 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
| *** cdelatte has quit IRC | 12:52 | |
| *** resker has quit IRC | 12:52 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 12:58 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 13:01 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 13:02 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 13:07 | |
| *** eranrom has quit IRC | 13:08 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
| *** bkmz has quit IRC | 13:16 | |
| *** bkmz has joined #openstack-swift | 13:16 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 13:16 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
| *** urth has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
| *** urth has joined #openstack-swift | 13:20 | |
| *** kei_yama has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 13:23 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 13:46 | |
| *** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 13:47 | |
| *** sh__ has left #openstack-swift | 13:53 | |
| *** wanghua has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
| *** silor has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 14:00 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 14:01 | |
| *** 5EXAAOC18 has joined #openstack-swift | 14:01 | |
| *** robefran has joined #openstack-swift | 14:02 | |
| *** janonymous_ has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
| *** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift | 14:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | Peter Lisák proposed openstack/swift: Change schedule priority of daemon/server in config https://review.openstack.org/238799 | 14:04 |
| *** delatte has joined #openstack-swift | 14:05 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 14:05 | |
| *** delattec has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 14:11 | |
| *** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 14:14 | |
| *** janonymous_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:16 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 14:21 | |
| *** tsg has quit IRC | 14:22 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mahati Chamarthy proposed openstack/swift: Decrypt multipart mime doc https://review.openstack.org/248377 | 14:25 |
| openstackgerrit | Mahati Chamarthy proposed openstack/swift: Have versioned_writes use reverse listings https://review.openstack.org/264790 | 14:25 |
| openstackgerrit | Mahati Chamarthy proposed openstack/swift: Log error if a local device not identified in replicator https://review.openstack.org/264791 | 14:25 |
| openstackgerrit | Mahati Chamarthy proposed openstack/swift: Add functional test for multi-range GET requests. https://review.openstack.org/264792 | 14:25 |
| mahatic | uh oh | 14:27 |
| *** daemontool_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:33 | |
| acoles | mahatic: problem? | 14:34 |
| *** daemontool has quit IRC | 14:34 | |
| mahatic | acoles: yeah :( 211451 needed this 251606. So i rebased | 14:37 |
| mahatic | basically this is the chain: | 14:37 |
| mahatic | 251606 -> 211451 -> 261292 | 14:38 |
| mahatic | now I want to add 248377 to the end of the chain. Problem is 248377 has latest master changes (with MultiRangeGet tests) and 251606 (first one in chain) is older than that | 14:39 |
| *** blmartin has joined #openstack-swift | 14:40 | |
| mahatic | did it make any sense? :) | 14:40 |
| acoles | no ;) | 14:40 |
| acoles | so was 248377 based on master? | 14:41 |
| *** venkat has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
| acoles | no that doesnt make sense, sorry | 14:41 |
| mahatic | acoles: heh. okay, patch 248377 needs to be rebased onto patch 261292. But first has latest code than the latter | 14:41 |
| patchbot | mahatic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248377/ - Decrypt multipart mime doc | 14:41 |
| patchbot | mahatic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/261292/ - Remove content-type encryption/decryption | 14:41 |
| mahatic | acoles: 248377 is based on latest master merge you had done | 14:42 |
| *** badari has joined #openstack-swift | 14:42 | |
| *** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 14:43 | |
| *** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift | 14:45 | |
| mahatic | if I am starting afresh (let's say for some new work, new patch), would I pull the code from feature/crypto and go on from there? (this would generate a commit in git log as Merge "feature/crypto" into <current-branch>" | 14:45 |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 14:45 | |
| *** minwoob has joined #openstack-swift | 14:46 | |
| acoles | mahatic: ok i am confused how you ended up where you are | 14:46 |
| acoles | yes you woul dpull feature/crypto | 14:46 |
| acoles | while you are on feature/crypto branch | 14:47 |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
| acoles | then git checkout -b new-branch | 14:48 |
| acoles | make your changes, and git commit -a | 14:48 |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 14:48 | |
| acoles | you don't get an auto-generated merge commit message | 14:49 |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 14:50 | |
| *** dslevin_ has quit IRC | 14:50 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
| mahatic | acoles: sorry, I ended up there because of multiple different rebasing | 14:51 |
| *** lpabon has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
| acoles | mahatic: looks like you are not based on the latest version of 211451 | 14:51 |
| mahatic | acoles: i only have a remotes/origin/feature/crypto | 14:51 |
| mahatic | acoles: 211451 doesn't have multirangeGET tests from master. (because of old code) | 14:52 |
| acoles | mahatic: ah, 211451 didn't get rebased on latest feature/crypto | 14:54 |
| mahatic | acoles: yup | 14:54 |
| *** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 14:55 | |
| acoles | mahatic: so maybe your patch was based on feature/crypto, you rebased onto the 211451 and as a result re-played head of feature/crypto onto 211451 | 14:56 |
| acoles | mahatic: bbiab, need to fetch my cake before it disappears :D | 14:57 |
| *** Vinsh has quit IRC | 14:57 | |
| *** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift | 14:57 | |
| mahatic | acoles: yes, indeed | 14:57 |
| mahatic | acoles: :D enjoy! | 14:57 |
| *** doxavore has joined #openstack-swift | 14:59 | |
| *** 5EXAAOC18 has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 15:01 | |
| acoles | mahatic: it was all gone :( | 15:01 |
| mahatic | acoles: aw! too bad | 15:02 |
| acoles | mahatic: when you rebase do you use the -i option, cos then you will see exactly what is going to happen | 15:03 |
| *** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift | 15:04 | |
| mahatic | acoles: I do. and I knew this was the chain. But since the others were merged, I didn't think they would be chained like that | 15:04 |
| acoles | yeah it can get confuding | 15:04 |
| acoles | confusing* | 15:04 |
| acoles | you'll need to abandon those gerrit reviews you created ^^ for the patches already on feature/crypto | 15:05 |
| *** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
| acoles | and then you have two options: | 15:06 |
| mahatic | yeah, but I'd probably have to wait until patch 261292 goes into feature/crypto as well | 15:06 |
| patchbot | mahatic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/261292/ - Remove content-type encryption/decryption | 15:06 |
| mahatic | since that is dependent on 211451 | 15:07 |
| acoles | 1. wait for 211451 to merge (~1 hour perhaps) when it will be at HEAD of feature/crypto, then we'll rebase 261292 on HEAD and you can rebase your patch on that | 15:08 |
| mahatic | or I'l just wait until 211451 merges | 15:08 |
| mahatic | yup | 15:08 |
| acoles | yeah, that! | 15:08 |
| mahatic | :) | 15:08 |
| acoles | do you want to hear option 2? cos its going to take me longer to type :) | 15:08 |
| mahatic | :D let me type my option 2 | 15:09 |
| *** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 15:09 | |
| acoles | option 1 sounds good... | 15:09 |
| acoles | ;) | 15:09 |
| *** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 15:10 | |
| mahatic | i can wait until 211451 merges and, take a back of up 26192, create a new branch off feature/crypto. Copy my back up code, commit with same change id | 15:10 |
| mahatic | heh, but that would be more work | 15:10 |
| acoles | mahatic: more work that git can do for you | 15:11 |
| mahatic | acoles: right | 15:11 |
| mahatic | acoles: option 1! :D | 15:11 |
| mahatic | what's your option 2? ;) (curious) | 15:12 |
| *** mragupat has joined #openstack-swift | 15:12 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 15:12 | |
| *** eranrom has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
| *** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift | 15:13 | |
| acoles | mahatic: my option 2 is you take your local checkout of 211451 and rebase it onto feature/crypto (so get it to the same state that zuul will when it merges) then rebase the the other patches onto that. it just allows you to move forwards immediately. | 15:13 |
| acoles | mahatic: but you may end up pushing a new version of 211451 while its in the zuul queue and idk if that will cause it to get dropped from queue | 15:14 |
| mahatic | right! | 15:14 |
| acoles | mahatic: so ... option 1 == easy life | 15:15 |
| mahatic | acoles: I can wait up, gtg anyway | 15:15 |
| mahatic | yup | 15:15 |
| acoles | mahatic: zuul says you have 1hr8m to wait | 15:16 |
| mahatic | acoles: ah, maybe i'll check back after my dinner. | 15:16 |
| mahatic | acoles: thank you! | 15:17 |
| *** diogogmt has quit IRC | 15:22 | |
| doxavore | is there a threshold that replication times should be kept under? we tweaked the # of replicators and rsync max connections down in order to reduce request latency, which is fairly important to us (not that it's low/fast, but that we don't regularly have timeouts). our replication cycle time seems to be hanging around 12h now. | 15:22 |
| *** robefran has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 15:29 | |
| jrichli | mattoliverau: Thanks for the response. And no worries, I enjoy your sarcasm :-) I had just logged-off before seeing your message. | 15:30 |
| *** breitz has quit IRC | 15:30 | |
| *** breitz has joined #openstack-swift | 15:30 | |
| jrichli | acoles: sorry you missed your cake :-( I will bring some sweets to the hackathon to make up for it | 15:34 |
| janonymous_ | Haha, cake war :P | 15:35 |
| *** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift | 15:38 | |
| openstackgerrit | Peter Lisák proposed openstack/swift: Change schedule priority of daemon/server in config https://review.openstack.org/238799 | 15:39 |
| *** garthb has joined #openstack-swift | 15:40 | |
| jrichli | janonymous_: acoles gets cake at work something like everyday (well, not today)! I am wondering if we will be able to sample this cake when we are there ... | 15:41 |
| janonymous_ | cool :) | 15:42 |
| acoles | jrichli: thursday is the official cake day in HPE Cloud. but then there are the unofficial days... | 15:44 |
| janonymous_ | you guys are in ibm ryt.. | 15:45 |
| jrichli | janonymous_: i'm at ibm. acoles at HPE. | 15:47 |
| janonymous_ | Ohh i see ,sry didn't knew :) | 15:47 |
| jrichli | no worries! | 15:48 |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 15:50 | |
| *** tongli has joined #openstack-swift | 15:51 | |
| janonymous_ | jrichli: is the keymaster work is in progress or done ? | 15:51 |
| jrichli | janonymous_: keymaster v1 is done (with a caveat). But if you recall, that is using derived keys from one secret that is stored in a config file. | 15:53 |
| jrichli | janonymous_: the caveat is that we are currently working off a fixed key due to issues in other functionality. Once we have COPY as middleware, it will be easy to switch back to multiple keys. | 15:54 |
| janonymous_ | jrichli: can i get some links for reference, i was reading about these. | 15:54 |
| jrichli | all I have are etherpads ... but I can get that | 15:55 |
| janonymous_ | jrichli: no problem, i would go through that, also i attended the summit sessions, i remember the basic flow though | 15:56 |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:01 | |
| *** silor has quit IRC | 16:02 | |
| jrichli | janonymous_: there are 3 etherpads, all designed for a slightly different reason | 16:03 |
| jrichli | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Swift_SmartKeyMaster | 16:03 |
| jrichli | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swift_production_keymaster_issues | 16:03 |
| jrichli | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swifjt-keymaster-with-castellan | 16:03 |
| jrichli | and they haven't been updated since the summit, or recently afterwards | 16:04 |
| *** fthiagogv has joined #openstack-swift | 16:04 | |
| *** fthiagogv has left #openstack-swift | 16:05 | |
| janonymous_ | Thanks! | 16:05 |
| *** fthiagogv has joined #openstack-swift | 16:05 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| *** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 16:05 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 16:07 | |
| portante | notmyname: hello | 16:09 |
| portante | curious if swift is using oslo logging at all? I am guessing not | 16:09 |
| portante | and is there any pressure to move off of using rsyslog | 16:10 |
| *** eranrom has quit IRC | 16:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Bill Huber proposed openstack/swift: Re-format the SLO manifest file on new multipart-manifest GET call https://review.openstack.org/263902 | 16:13 |
| wbhuber | dfg: ^^ the patch now includes func tests. feel free to review at your earliest convenience. | 16:13 |
| *** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 16:19 | |
| *** diogogmt_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:22 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 16:22 | |
| dfg | wbhuber: cool thx | 16:23 |
| *** diogogmt has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
| *** diogogmt_ is now known as diogogmt | 16:24 | |
| *** robefran has joined #openstack-swift | 16:24 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 16:25 | |
| *** lpabon has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
| *** blmartin has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
| *** garthb has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
| *** blmartin has joined #openstack-swift | 16:41 | |
| peluse | portante: yo! | 16:42 |
| peluse | portante: I know the answer to your first question is no, notmyname will have to answer the one on pressure... | 16:42 |
| portante | peluse: hi | 16:42 |
| portante | thanks | 16:43 |
| dfg | wbhuber: what dod you mean about the "This also covers the need for a copy mechanism when it does a GET | 16:43 |
| dfg | and a PUT." in the commit message? | 16:43 |
| dfg | what did | 16:43 |
| dfg | are you talking about the user sending a GET and a PUT, not using COPY ? | 16:44 |
| wbhuber | dfg: what i meant was that instead of doing put, get and modify the manifest manually before we copy it to another location. this new format should skip the last two steps (with a copy). | 16:46 |
| wbhuber | dfg: i'll go clarify that up in the commit message. perhaps take that out for clarity. | 16:46 |
| dfg | wbhuber: no i was just checking. its because of the kinda weird COPY and ?multipart-manifest=get doing a COPY of the manifest file. if you do a COPY with ?multipart-manifest=get-raw then it just concatenates the segments like if you sent no query string | 16:48 |
| dfg | which is fine i guess | 16:48 |
| dfg | i mean- i can't think of an alternative | 16:50 |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 16:52 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 16:55 | |
| wbhuber | hm.. let me try fiddle with the message a bit. | 16:55 |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 16:57 | |
| *** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:59 | |
| *** jordanP has quit IRC | 16:59 | |
| *** mragupat has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
| *** mragupat has joined #openstack-swift | 17:00 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** 77CAAHQRX has joined #openstack-swift | 17:01 | |
| *** mragupat has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
| *** mragupat has joined #openstack-swift | 17:02 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
| *** daemontool_ has quit IRC | 17:06 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 17:10 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 17:11 | |
| *** mragupat_ has joined #openstack-swift | 17:19 | |
| *** mragupat has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
| *** garthb has joined #openstack-swift | 17:24 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jonathan Hinson proposed openstack/swift: WIP Conditional GETs Fix https://review.openstack.org/257603 | 17:33 |
| *** chsc has joined #openstack-swift | 17:33 | |
| notmyname | good morning | 17:37 |
| notmyname | portante: what peluse said. swift doesn't use oslo.logging. there's only occasional mild pressure to use it. but mostly people are fine with "well it would be ok with me if swift were to have configurable logging so I can make it look like oslo.logging fields" | 17:39 |
| notmyname | portante: however, very few, if any, of those conversations are with people who actually use swift. it's mostly from people who are pushing a "you should do what everyone else is doing" idea (as opposed to "it's broken and the new way fixes it") | 17:41 |
| *** rledisez has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
| *** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-swift | 17:45 | |
| *** jistr has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
| *** CaioBrentano has quit IRC | 17:47 | |
| *** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 17:47 | |
| *** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift | 17:48 | |
| *** hseipp has quit IRC | 17:48 | |
| *** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift | 17:48 | |
| *** cschwede has quit IRC | 17:50 | |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 17:52 | |
| *** yarkot has joined #openstack-swift | 17:53 | |
| *** arnox has quit IRC | 17:53 | |
| *** can8dnSix has joined #openstack-swift | 17:56 | |
| *** can8dnSix has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
| *** 77CAAHQRX has quit IRC | 18:01 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 18:01 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 18:06 | |
| *** vinsh has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
| *** itlinux_ has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
| *** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift | 18:07 | |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 18:08 | |
| *** CaioBrentano has quit IRC | 18:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Prompt for missing password https://review.openstack.org/189387 | 18:09 |
| *** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 18:10 | |
| *** proteusguy_ has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
| *** hseipp has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
| *** tongli_ has joined #openstack-swift | 18:11 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 18:11 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 18:12 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 18:13 | |
| *** fthiagogv has quit IRC | 18:14 | |
| *** tongli has quit IRC | 18:14 | |
| *** garthb_ has joined #openstack-swift | 18:14 | |
| *** ndk has quit IRC | 18:14 | |
| *** garthb has quit IRC | 18:15 | |
| *** fthiagogv has joined #openstack-swift | 18:17 | |
| *** tsg has joined #openstack-swift | 18:20 | |
| *** proteusguy_ has joined #openstack-swift | 18:23 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 18:28 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 18:28 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 18:30 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 18:33 | |
| *** ndk has joined #openstack-swift | 18:35 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 18:35 | |
| *** jsuchome has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
| *** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift | 18:40 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev | 18:40 | |
| acoles | mahatic: patch 211451 hasn't merged yet, assuming it does I can help with rebasing the dependent patches tomorrow if you don't mind waiting for a.m. in my timezone | 18:40 |
| patchbot | acoles: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211451/ - Modify unit tests to include real crypto | 18:40 |
| *** acoles is now known as acoles_ | 18:41 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| *** tongli has joined #openstack-swift | 18:51 | |
| *** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift | 18:52 | |
| *** tongli has quit IRC | 18:53 | |
| *** tongli_ has quit IRC | 18:53 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 18:54 | |
| openstackgerrit | Paul Dardeau proposed openstack/swift: Remove limit of 64K devices by providing 4 bytes per device id when needed. https://review.openstack.org/264922 | 18:55 |
| *** jordanP has quit IRC | 18:55 | |
| notmyname | pdardeau: cool | 18:56 |
| openstackgerrit | Peter Lisák proposed openstack/swift: Change schedule priority of daemon/server in config https://review.openstack.org/238799 | 18:56 |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 18:56 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
| *** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift | 18:58 | |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 18:58 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 18:58 | |
| *** dmorita_ has joined #openstack-swift | 18:59 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
| pdardeau | notmyname: thx | 19:02 |
| notmyname | I'll take a look a little later. glad to see it up | 19:02 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: Modify unit tests to include real crypto https://review.openstack.org/211451 | 19:05 |
| *** wmn-tech has joined #openstack-swift | 19:07 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 19:07 | |
| *** klamath has joined #openstack-swift | 19:08 | |
| klamath | howdy yall, wondering if swift-drive-audit controls the drive.recon file located in /var/cache/swift or whatever you configured the recon dir to be. | 19:08 |
| *** dslevin_ has quit IRC | 19:10 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 19:11 | |
| wmn-tech | Hi guys I am running a small cluster with 3 nodes having 4 hdd each. I have uploaded some files to the cluster now I am getting high cpu load on one node which is created by some swift process I can see hard disks working on iotop The problem is I am unable to kill any swift processes How can I kill them | 19:12 |
| *** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:13 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 19:14 | |
| *** robefran has quit IRC | 19:18 | |
| *** robefran has joined #openstack-swift | 19:19 | |
| *** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 19:20 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alan Erwin proposed openstack/swift: Refactoring the expiring objects feature https://review.openstack.org/252085 | 19:22 |
| *** rsFF has joined #openstack-swift | 19:23 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 19:25 | |
| *** itlinux_ has quit IRC | 19:28 | |
| *** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:28 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 19:28 | |
| *** badari_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:29 | |
| *** Guest38743 has quit IRC | 19:29 | |
| *** klrmn1 has joined #openstack-swift | 19:30 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
| *** garthb__ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:31 | |
| *** yarkot has quit IRC | 19:31 | |
| *** yarkot has joined #openstack-swift | 19:31 | |
| *** tsg_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:31 | |
| *** redbo_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:33 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 19:33 | |
| *** wasmum- has joined #openstack-swift | 19:35 | |
| *** powerbsd has joined #openstack-swift | 19:35 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
| *** torgomatic_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:36 | |
| *** stevemar_znc has joined #openstack-swift | 19:37 | |
| *** janonymous_ has quit IRC | 19:37 | |
| *** philipw_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:37 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 19:38 | |
| *** alpha_ori_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:38 | |
| *** tsg has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** garthb_ has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** klrmn has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** badari has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** albertom has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** briancurtin has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** sileht has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** alpha_ori has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** swifterdarrell has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** redbo has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** torgomatic has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** wasmum has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** philipw has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** stevemar has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** alpha_ori_ is now known as alpha_ori | 19:38 | |
| *** powerbsd is now known as albertom | 19:38 | |
| *** stevemar_znc is now known as stevemar | 19:40 | |
| *** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift | 19:40 | |
| *** swifterdarrell has joined #openstack-swift | 19:40 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v swifterdarrell | 19:40 | |
| *** sileht has joined #openstack-swift | 19:41 | |
| *** briancurtin has joined #openstack-swift | 19:45 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
| vinsh | Where can I read/learn about the "daemonize = on" setting for swift services? | 19:56 |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 19:57 | |
| vinsh | The source code I guess :) | 19:57 |
| vinsh | "Whether or not to run replication as a daemon" What are the ups/downs to that? | 19:57 |
| wmn-tech | vinsh: Hay dude do you have any proper fine tuning manual for this thing so far I am unable to find a proper explained doc if you can provide some links its very helpful :) | 20:00 |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 20:01 | |
| *** zhill has joined #openstack-swift | 20:01 | |
| vinsh | Well.. | 20:02 |
| vinsh | http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/deployment_guide.html ? | 20:02 |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 20:02 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 20:03 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 20:03 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 20:04 | |
| wmn-tech | vinsh: Using the same :( | 20:05 |
| vinsh | wmn-tech: Start reading then :) -> http://www.amazon.com/OpenStack-Swift-Administering-Developing-Storage/dp/1491900822 | 20:07 |
| wmn-tech | vinsh: ahah cool bro we are on same track https://books.google.co.in/books?id=ALHXBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA165&lpg=PA165&dq=openstack+swift+8+core+server&source=bl&ots=74MGu6WUbK&sig=izgxEsr7du3ZNeZ3eEISs04dWvA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiOn_6ZuJjKAhVIBo4KHX_KA0QQ6AEITDAI#v=onepage&q=openstack%20swift%208%20core%20server&f=false | 20:07 |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 20:08 | |
| glange | https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/common/daemon.py | 20:08 |
| glange | "daemonize = on" seems to make the service run just once | 20:09 |
| vinsh | Had that up.. but i'm not getting the "why" for setting it on or off | 20:09 |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 20:09 | |
| glange | which seems to be the opposite of what you would think it would mean | 20:09 |
| glange | you could run it via cron if you do the run_once | 20:09 |
| glange | or you could have it run forever on its own if you don't do the run_once | 20:10 |
| glange | I think that is the difference | 20:10 |
| *** minwoob has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
| portante | notmyname: great, that is what I had remembered from before, glad to see no one has bowed to that! | 20:10 |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 20:10 | |
| wmn-tech | glange: disable_fallocate Can you please tell me the use | 20:10 |
| vinsh | I wonder if it would use "interval" to run at the interval with daemonize | 20:10 |
| Zyric | Good Morning | 20:11 |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
| *** dhellmann has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
| vinsh | glange: Seems like on is default for reconstructor (in the config example atleast). | 20:12 |
| vinsh | I'll play around with it and see how it behaves. Thanks :) | 20:12 |
| *** changbl has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
| *** dmorita_ has quit IRC | 20:16 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 20:17 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 20:20 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 20:21 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 20:23 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 20:25 | |
| *** tsg__ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:35 | |
| *** tsg_ has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 20:42 | |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 20:47 | |
| *** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 20:48 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 20:48 | |
| *** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 20:51 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 20:52 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 20:53 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Make write-only container access consistent https://review.openstack.org/264961 | 20:56 |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
| *** changbl has joined #openstack-swift | 21:01 | |
| *** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 21:04 | |
| *** petertr7_away is now known as petertr7 | 21:05 | |
| *** changbl has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 21:10 | |
| *** lpabon has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 21:14 | |
| *** trifon has quit IRC | 21:16 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
| *** trifon has joined #openstack-swift | 21:29 | |
| *** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift | 21:32 | |
| *** blmartin has quit IRC | 21:32 | |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 21:36 | |
| mattoliverau | Morning | 21:37 |
| *** tsg__ has quit IRC | 21:39 | |
| *** tsg__ has joined #openstack-swift | 21:40 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
| *** trifon has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
| *** wasmum- has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
| *** klrmn1 has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
| *** eranrom has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
| *** peluse has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
| *** trifon has joined #openstack-swift | 21:51 | |
| *** wasmum- has joined #openstack-swift | 21:51 | |
| *** klrmn1 has joined #openstack-swift | 21:51 | |
| *** eranrom has joined #openstack-swift | 21:51 | |
| *** peluse has joined #openstack-swift | 21:51 | |
| onovy | mattoliverau: morning, thanks a lot for you review | 21:54 |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 21:57 | |
| notmyname | acoles_: peluse: torgomatic_: any confirmation on this would be appreciated https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1532008 | 22:01 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1532008 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "EC policy doesn't fallocate objects" [Undecided,New] | 22:01 |
| notmyname | and i don't know what the right math is to find the right on-disk size of an EC fragment given the client object size, the EC algo, and the segment size | 22:01 |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 22:14 | |
| *** robefran has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 22:16 | |
| torgomatic_ | notmyname: I think you just discovered why EC doesn't fallocate :p | 22:18 |
| notmyname | it's possible to do, right? | 22:18 |
| torgomatic_ | notmyname: probably? if pyeclib can answer the question "how big is the fragment for a segment of size N", then it's possible | 22:19 |
| notmyname | also, if we can calculate range offsets, we can find the total length | 22:20 |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 22:22 | |
| *** tsg_ has joined #openstack-swift | 22:22 | |
| *** petertr7 is now known as petertr7_away | 22:22 | |
| *** tsg__ has quit IRC | 22:25 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 22:27 | |
| torgomatic_ | that's probably true | 22:28 |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-swift | 22:28 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 22:31 | |
| notmyname | but to back up, did I just rediscover something already known? cause it looks like it was supposed to do the right thing, but it's not | 22:31 |
| notmyname | ie instead of just not doing it at all | 22:32 |
| *** blmartin has joined #openstack-swift | 22:32 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 22:36 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 22:36 | |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
| timburke | notmyname: torgomatic_: from get_segment_info, we should get segment_size, last_segment_size, fragment_size, last_fragment_size and num_segments. from there, i think the backend-obj-content-length should be fragment_size * (num_segments - 1) + last_fragment_size, right? | 22:43 |
| torgomatic_ | timburke: sounds reasonable | 22:44 |
| *** chsc has quit IRC | 22:44 | |
| *** zhill has quit IRC | 22:46 | |
| *** zhill has joined #openstack-swift | 22:49 | |
| notmyname | I just discovered that there is a swift irc network | 22:51 |
| notmyname | http://www.swiftirc.net | 22:51 |
| *** km_ has joined #openstack-swift | 22:56 | |
| mattoliverau | onovy: no worries, I'll keep my eye on it :) | 22:56 |
| *** bkmz_ has joined #openstack-swift | 23:03 | |
| *** trifon has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** klamath has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** bkmz has quit IRC | 23:07 | |
| *** robefran has joined #openstack-swift | 23:08 | |
| *** zhill has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
| *** mragupat_ has quit IRC | 23:20 | |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: redbo_: could you take a look at patch 258704? | 23:25 |
| patchbot | notmyname: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258704/ - Fix IPv6 handling in MemcacheConnPool. | 23:25 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: I'll do my best to get to it today | 23:27 |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: thanks | 23:27 |
| *** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift | 23:34 | |
| *** kei_yama has quit IRC | 23:36 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Autovivify X-Versions-Location container https://review.openstack.org/265015 | 23:41 |
| *** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift | 23:42 | |
| clayg | timur: re patch 258704 | 23:51 |
| patchbot | clayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258704/ - Fix IPv6 handling in MemcacheConnPool. | 23:51 |
| clayg | timur: is the [ip:v6:address] thing like common for configs that use ipv6 addresses - or did you just have to make it up to avoid 1.2.3.4:<port> looking like ipv6 because of the ':' ??? | 23:52 |
| * clayg realizes this might have all very well been in the commit message | 23:53 | |
| clayg | "oprtional" | 23:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Fix versioned_writes functional test skipping https://review.openstack.org/265017 | 23:53 |
| clayg | timur: oh, i guess there's this -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_address#Literal_IPv6_addresses_in_network_resource_identifiers | 23:55 |
| *** garthb__ has quit IRC | 23:57 | |
| *** garthb__ has joined #openstack-swift | 23:57 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!