*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 00:04 | |
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 00:04 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 00:08 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 00:08 | |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 00:23 | |
*** Suyi has quit IRC | 00:25 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 00:26 | |
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 00:27 | |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift | 00:27 | |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 00:33 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 00:34 | |
*** lyrrad has quit IRC | 00:34 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 00:34 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 00:35 | |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 00:36 | |
*** duobei has joined #openstack-swift | 01:03 | |
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift | 01:05 | |
*** NM has quit IRC | 01:06 | |
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift | 01:12 | |
*** _JZ_ has quit IRC | 01:13 | |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Allow concurrent bulk deletes https://review.openstack.org/311817 | 01:14 |
---|---|---|
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 01:14 | |
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 01:30 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 01:31 | |
*** saltsa has quit IRC | 01:35 | |
*** saltsa has joined #openstack-swift | 01:37 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
*** bill_az has quit IRC | 01:41 | |
*** duobei has quit IRC | 01:49 | |
*** duobei has joined #openstack-swift | 01:56 | |
openstackgerrit | Matthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift: disable_fallocate also disables fallocate_reserve https://review.openstack.org/317158 | 01:57 |
*** StraubTW has joined #openstack-swift | 02:01 | |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 02:09 | |
*** StraubTW has quit IRC | 02:10 | |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 02:18 | |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 02:26 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-swift | 02:35 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 02:36 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 02:44 | |
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC | 02:52 | |
*** adu has joined #openstack-swift | 03:04 | |
*** ozialien10 has quit IRC | 03:18 | |
*** ozialien10 has joined #openstack-swift | 03:19 | |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 03:23 | |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 03:38 | |
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift | 03:40 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 03:41 | |
*** duobei has quit IRC | 03:46 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 03:50 | |
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift | 03:52 | |
*** hosanai has joined #openstack-swift | 03:54 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v hosanai | 03:54 | |
*** _JZ_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:55 | |
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift | 03:56 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
*** rickyrem has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 04:04 | |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 04:05 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-swift | 04:16 | |
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 04:16 | |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 04:20 | |
*** can8dnSix has joined #openstack-swift | 04:21 | |
mahatic | good morning. -meeting scrollback done | 04:21 |
*** adu has quit IRC | 04:29 | |
*** adu has joined #openstack-swift | 04:29 | |
openstackgerrit | Tony Breeds proposed openstack/swift: [WIP] Testing latest u-c https://review.openstack.org/318441 | 04:30 |
mattoliverau | mahatic: morning | 04:41 |
mahatic | mattoliverau: o/ | 04:41 |
*** adu has quit IRC | 04:43 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 04:47 | |
*** eranrom has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 04:54 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 05:09 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 05:11 | |
*** can8dnSix has quit IRC | 05:12 | |
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 05:12 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 05:17 | |
*** zaitcev has quit IRC | 05:20 | |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 05:24 | |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Fix probe failure and small things https://review.openstack.org/315918 | 05:25 |
*** ChubYann has quit IRC | 05:28 | |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 05:28 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 05:30 | |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Fix probe failure and small things https://review.openstack.org/315918 | 05:38 |
*** duobei has joined #openstack-swift | 05:48 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 05:51 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 05:56 | |
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 05:58 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 06:00 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 06:05 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift | 06:13 | |
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 06:18 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 06:22 | |
*** _JZ_ has quit IRC | 06:23 | |
*** duobei has quit IRC | 06:39 | |
*** duobei has joined #openstack-swift | 06:45 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 06:54 | |
*** jmccarthy has quit IRC | 06:54 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 06:56 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 06:58 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 06:58 | |
*** jmccarthy has joined #openstack-swift | 07:06 | |
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift | 07:10 | |
*** duobei has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC | 07:35 | |
*** admin0 has joined #openstack-swift | 07:45 | |
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 07:46 | |
*** dmk0202 has joined #openstack-swift | 07:50 | |
*** duobei has joined #openstack-swift | 07:57 | |
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 08:05 | |
openstackgerrit | Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/swift: [WIP] Testing latest u-c https://review.openstack.org/318441 | 08:10 |
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift | 08:21 | |
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift | 08:25 | |
*** jordanP has quit IRC | 08:27 | |
*** ozialien10 has quit IRC | 08:27 | |
*** ozialien10 has joined #openstack-swift | 08:27 | |
*** hezhiqiang has joined #openstack-swift | 08:27 | |
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 08:30 | |
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 08:38 | |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 08:39 | |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 08:48 | |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 08:52 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-swiftclient: Use application/directory content-type for dir markers https://review.openstack.org/254921 | 08:53 |
*** nadeem has quit IRC | 08:59 | |
*** duobei has quit IRC | 09:06 | |
*** duobei has joined #openstack-swift | 09:08 | |
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles | 09:09 | |
acoles | mahatic: hi - did you see the discussion re. post-as-copy of unencrypted object in the meeting log? | 09:10 |
acoles | conclusion was that its ok for post-as-copy to encrypt the object data, so nothing for us to fix. | 09:11 |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 09:15 | |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 09:27 | |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 09:31 | |
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift | 09:33 | |
*** ZZelle has joined #openstack-swift | 09:36 | |
*** hezhiqiang has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
*** porunov has joined #openstack-swift | 10:01 | |
porunov | Hello everyone! I am trying to install swift without others products but I have problem with adding drives to the swift ring. I use this command: "swift-ring-builder account.builder add --region USA_east --zone New_York --ip 192.168.57.51 --port 6002 --device d1 --weight 100" . It shows me: "Usage: swift-ring-builder [options]. swift-ring-builder: error: option --region: invalid integer value: 'USA'". What's wrong with a name of the region? How can | 10:07 |
porunov | I add new regions/zones into swift? Please help me | 10:07 |
*** mvk_ has quit IRC | 10:15 | |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 10:16 | |
*** duobei has quit IRC | 10:22 | |
*** d0ugal has quit IRC | 10:24 | |
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift | 10:28 | |
*** duobei has joined #openstack-swift | 10:30 | |
*** d0ugal has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift | 10:31 | |
*** jordanP has quit IRC | 10:36 | |
*** duobei has quit IRC | 10:39 | |
*** duobei has joined #openstack-swift | 10:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: CompositeRing Support https://review.openstack.org/271920 | 10:49 |
acoles | porunov: region and zone values need to be integers. it's not well documented, but there is a mention for zones here http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/deployment_guide.html#preparing-the-ring | 10:49 |
*** mvk_ has joined #openstack-swift | 10:50 | |
*** duobei has quit IRC | 10:50 | |
kota_ | acoles: yeah, that's what I sent a response for porunov E-mail in openstack-dev mailing list. | 10:54 |
kota_ | I'm too late :/ | 10:54 |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 10:55 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 10:55 | |
acoles | kota_: hi! I didn't see the email yet :) | 10:56 |
kota_ | acoles: :-) | 10:57 |
kota_ | acoles: small notice, I updated probe test failure fix at patch 315918 | 10:57 |
patchbot | kota_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/315918/ - swift - Fix probe failure and small things | 10:57 |
mahatic | acoles: yeah, I did. thanks. less code and less testing | 10:58 |
acoles | kota_: yes I saw, I will try to review again today | 10:58 |
kota_ | acoles: thank you very much! | 10:58 |
acoles | kota_: I filed bug 1583551 | 10:58 |
openstack | bug 1583551 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "docs should say more about ring regions and that regions and zones are ints" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1583551 | 10:58 |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 10:58 | |
kota_ | acoles: great. yeah, we need better docs always. | 10:59 |
acoles | mahatic: so I suggest, if you can, to focus on patches 315588 and the test you were working on to verify encrypted data on disk | 11:00 |
acoles | mahatic: fyi I am probably not here tomorrow | 11:00 |
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 11:03 | |
mahatic | acoles: oic. okay. have a fun long weekend! | 11:04 |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 11:04 | |
kota_ | is heading for home | 11:04 |
acoles | mahatic: I was thinking more about the test to verify on disk content, and realised that the test_context has a tuple with all the test servers including the object servers, so you could just make a GET request direct to the first object server to get the object back. | 11:04 |
acoles | kota_: good night | 11:04 |
acoles | mahatic: sorry I didn't think of that before, i was thinking how could you get a handle on the object server DiskFileRouter, then realised you could just make a request! | 11:05 |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 11:07 | |
mahatic | acoles: hmm would i still not need the node port etc? to be able to access ondisk data (and not pass on the proxy_app/crypto_app)? | 11:12 |
acoles | mahatic: no. similar to this line https://review.openstack.org/#/c/318167/1/test/unit/common/middleware/test_encrypter_decrypter.py@40 you should be able to find the obj server app then use it in a similar way to the requests to put object to the proxy e.g. line 77 | 11:15 |
patchbot | acoles: patch 318167 - swift (feature/crypto) - crypto - test varying proxy pipeline configs | 11:15 |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 11:16 | |
acoles | mahatic: in fact you could create a _direct_get_object method as a helper | 11:16 |
acoles | mahatic: I haven't tried it but I think that should work | 11:16 |
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 11:17 | |
mahatic | acoles: oic! makes sense, we have access to obj server. I will try that. thanks much! | 11:20 |
acoles | mahatic: unlike the requests to the proxy app, these requests to obj server don't have /v1 at start of the path | 11:24 |
mahatic | acoles: oic | 11:26 |
*** porunov has quit IRC | 11:27 | |
mahatic | acoles: why is that the case though? | 11:30 |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 11:33 | |
acoles | mahatic: the 'v1' part is removed in proxy server so requests to obejct servers don't have it | 11:34 |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 11:35 | |
acoles | mahatic: but you DO need the device and partition at start of path (sorry I may have isunderstood you earlier question about needing node & port) | 11:35 |
acoles | misunderstood* | 11:36 |
mahatic | acoles: right, I thought something like this: http_connect(node['ip'], node['port'], node['device'], part, 'GET', path) | 11:37 |
mahatic | acoles: which the direct_get_object does (in direct_client | 11:37 |
acoles | mahatic: that's what you'd need connect to the server socket, but you have a handle for the server app so you're just calling the __call__ method of the server's ObjectController | 11:39 |
acoles | if you follow through the http_connect function you'll see it builds a path /dev/part/a/c/o - that's what you would need a swob Request path to be | 11:40 |
acoles | something like swob.Request(/dev/part/a/c/o).get_response(object_server_app) | 11:43 |
acoles | (not literally that of course!) | 11:43 |
mahatic | :D | 11:44 |
mahatic | yeah, (I'm following through the http_connect) | 11:44 |
*** NM has quit IRC | 11:46 | |
*** Shashikant86 has joined #openstack-swift | 11:54 | |
*** hosanai has quit IRC | 11:56 | |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 12:00 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 12:04 | |
admin0 | hi all .. i I see a db does not exit error like this: http://pastebin.com/BEGpLG99 — what could be the error ? | 12:05 |
admin0 | DatabaseConnectionError(self.db_file, "DB doesn't exist")#012DatabaseConnectionError: DB connection error | 12:06 |
admin0 | DB connection error (/srv/node/data13/accounts/311400/0e7/980d086aa111aa719d770f136d6cc0e7/980d086aa111aa719d770f136d6cc0e7.db, 0):#012DB doesn't exist | 12:07 |
*** jistr has quit IRC | 12:08 | |
*** raildo-afk is now known as raildo | 12:15 | |
*** kei_yama has quit IRC | 12:19 | |
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift | 12:28 | |
*** jistr is now known as jistr|bbl | 12:28 | |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 12:32 | |
*** CaioBrentano has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 12:36 | |
*** Shashikant86 has quit IRC | 12:43 | |
*** duobei has joined #openstack-swift | 12:50 | |
*** Shashikant86 has joined #openstack-swift | 12:50 | |
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift | 12:52 | |
*** klamath has quit IRC | 12:57 | |
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift | 12:57 | |
*** hseipp has quit IRC | 13:00 | |
*** ppai has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
*** vinsh_ is now known as Vinsh | 13:16 | |
*** pauloewerton has joined #openstack-swift | 13:16 | |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 13:17 | |
*** duobei has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
*** _JZ_ has joined #openstack-swift | 13:20 | |
pdardeau | good morning | 13:25 |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 13:30 | |
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift | 13:32 | |
*** BigWillie has joined #openstack-swift | 13:37 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/89250 | 13:37 |
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift | 13:40 | |
tdasilva | worth reading: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/095452.html | 13:41 |
*** ametts has joined #openstack-swift | 13:52 | |
jrichli | tdasilva: thanks! | 13:53 |
*** Shashikant86 has quit IRC | 13:57 | |
openstackgerrit | Alfredo Moralejo proposed openstack/swift: Fix locale directory in MANIFEST.in https://review.openstack.org/318686 | 13:59 |
*** jistr|bbl is now known as jistr | 14:00 | |
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift | 14:02 | |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 14:04 | |
*** Shashikant86 has joined #openstack-swift | 14:06 | |
*** Shashikant86 has quit IRC | 14:06 | |
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 14:06 | |
*** vint_bra1 has joined #openstack-swift | 14:08 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 14:11 | |
*** vint_bra has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
*** pauloewerton has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
*** pauloewerton has joined #openstack-swift | 14:13 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 14:15 | |
jrichli | hello everyone. the crypto code has been in flux for quite some time, but has finally become stable enough to now get confirmation on our encryption scheme. | 14:25 |
jrichli | if you are knowledgeable about cryptography, we would like to hear your opinion. | 14:26 |
jrichli | please visit https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swift_encryption_issues and let us know your thoughts. torgomatic : would like to know your thoughts in particular. | 14:27 |
* jrichli will be away for the next couple hours | 14:30 | |
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 14:33 | |
admin0 | hi all .. if i see a line like "GET /data09/159382/AUTH_66797544cf82404bb4122b97b5e2c934/handleidingen/pdfjs-viewer/web/images/toolbarButton-search.png" 200 503 "GET http: | 14:47 |
admin0 | is this a 200 or a 503 ? | 14:47 |
admin0 | where can i learn more about swift log formats | 14:48 |
*** fesp has joined #openstack-swift | 14:54 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 15:06 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-swift | 15:11 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
notmyname | good morning | 15:19 |
notmyname | admin0: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/logs.html | 15:19 |
notmyname | oh boy http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/095452.html | 15:21 |
*** links has quit IRC | 15:26 | |
*** dmk0202 has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
ahale | a wild mailng list thread appears.. | 15:34 |
openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: crypto - add overview doc (WIP) https://review.openstack.org/312096 | 15:37 |
*** asettle has quit IRC | 15:37 | |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift | 15:40 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev | 15:40 | |
*** admin0 has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
acoles | timburke: you have a +1 on patch 313640, were there remaining issues to address to convert you to a +2? there was some discussion about using ECB and re-use of IV, but we have those on trello https://trello.com/b/63l5zQhq/swift-encryption so I'm wondering if you feel we could land this and follow up with any change in strategy? | 15:53 |
patchbot | acoles: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313640/ - swift (feature/crypto) - crypto - wrap random body key | 15:53 |
* swiftfan goes to get some popcorn | 15:53 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: Use the same key for memcache and env['swift.infocache'] https://review.openstack.org/310566 | 15:53 |
tdasilva | acoles: i was just reviewing that too and running tests now | 15:54 |
*** lyrrad has joined #openstack-swift | 15:54 | |
openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: crypto - make some probe tests compatible with crypto https://review.openstack.org/316924 | 15:54 |
tdasilva | I think it is good to go | 15:54 |
acoles | tdasilva: great, thanks | 15:54 |
* notmyname needs to step out for a little bit for a kid's school thing | 15:56 | |
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 15:57 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright | 15:57 | |
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-swift | 16:01 | |
bkeller` | so i saw that with container and account metadata, you can set it to empty to remove the metadata, but with objects it just creates an empty metadata property | 16:01 |
bkeller` | is that supposed to happen? | 16:01 |
bkeller` | http://paste.openstack.org/show/497750/ | 16:01 |
ahale | you can send a X-Remove-Account-Meta-* header, about halfway down http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-objectstorage-v1.html | 16:03 |
*** marcusvrn_ has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
bkeller` | yeah, but it seems weird that accounts/containers act differently than objects for that header | 16:08 |
bkeller` | especially as it's a documented feature for accounts/containers | 16:08 |
acoles | bkeller`: Object metadata behaves differently to containers and accounts. Container/account metadata items can be individually updated or removed. Sending an empty meta header with an account or container POST will delete that header name from the account or container metadata. | 16:10 |
acoles | object metadata is always replaced as a whole on each POST to the object. | 16:10 |
acoles | I'd never noticed that the empty metadata was reported back in the object's case. | 16:10 |
bkeller` | that makes sense then | 16:11 |
bkeller` | i'm guessing the empty object metadata wasn't intentional then? | 16:12 |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 16:12 | |
bkeller` | test_POST_update_meta actually tests for it though | 16:16 |
acoles | I think it's more that the container/account handling of the empty meta header is different in order to support the act of deleting that item. Since an empty header in that case means to delete, it would not make sense to then return the empty meta. There's no such delete semantic with objects, so you just get back what you POSTed. | 16:17 |
acoles | that's my interpretation. | 16:17 |
bkeller` | alright, thanks | 16:19 |
*** xenthree3 has joined #openstack-swift | 16:20 | |
*** xenthree3 has left #openstack-swift | 16:20 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 16:20 | |
*** rledisez has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
*** fesp has quit IRC | 16:29 | |
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 16:32 | |
openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Fix probe failure and small things https://review.openstack.org/315918 | 16:37 |
*** jordanP has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift | 16:42 | |
*** vint_bra1 has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
*** vint_bra1 has joined #openstack-swift | 16:43 | |
*** vint_bra has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 16:50 | |
*** vint_bra1 has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
*** mvk_ has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
*** admin0 has joined #openstack-swift | 16:56 | |
* notmyname back | 17:07 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 17:11 | |
*** admin0 has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
*** admin0 has joined #openstack-swift | 17:15 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 17:17 | |
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift | 17:18 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 17:19 | |
*** joeljwright has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
*** zzelle_ has joined #openstack-swift | 17:26 | |
*** mmcardle has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
zzelle_ | zaitcev, hi | 17:31 |
*** nadeem has quit IRC | 17:33 | |
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift | 17:38 | |
clayg | anyone have time for a quick-y? lp bug #1583719 would be some good experience with db replicators (which are *always* fun!) | 17:47 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1583719 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "empty db hash/suffix directories can pile up" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1583719 | 17:47 |
*** daemontool has quit IRC | 17:47 | |
ntata| | notmyname, do you have interesting stuff to share about saio on ubuntu 16.04? | 17:49 |
clayg | it's kinda funny tracking that bug history back - we've "fixed" empty db dir cleanup at least three times ;) | 17:49 |
ntata| | it was by far the most smoothest saio installation for me | 17:49 |
notmyname | ntata|: not really. pretty much everything just worked | 17:49 |
clayg | notmyname: ntata|: nowhey! | 17:49 |
notmyname | ntata|: the only "gotcha" is that to enable rsync across restarts I I had to do `sudo systemctl enable rsync` instead of (just) setting the /etc/defaults/rsync RSYNC_ENABLE=true flag | 17:50 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: crypto - wrap random body key https://review.openstack.org/313640 | 17:50 |
*** Suyi has joined #openstack-swift | 17:50 | |
notmyname | and with the new bindep stuff in the swift repo, installing dependencies is `bindep -b | xargs sudo apt-get install -y` | 17:50 |
notmyname | so I think there are a few cleanups or reordering of the SAIO doc in order, but pretty much it Just Works | 17:51 |
ntata| | oh cool! I didn't try rsync yet.. will do now | 17:51 |
ntata| | Yeah I believe, the right pip version solved so many problems I think | 17:52 |
notmyname | well, I still couldn't use the distro-packaged virtualenv (I think) because it didn't support the version designation on the requirements file. I think that was the one. point is, all that stuff we have to upgrade you still have to upgrade in xenial | 17:56 |
clayg | crazy systemctl | 17:56 |
notmyname | I mean, you might think that a distro released a few weeks ago would be "new enough" for openstack dependencies, but you'd be wrong ;-) | 17:57 |
acoles | timburke: tdasilva: thanks | 17:59 |
acoles | I'll be out tomorrow | 18:01 |
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift | 18:18 | |
*** ChubYann has quit IRC | 18:18 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 18:22 | |
*** admin0 has quit IRC | 18:23 | |
tdasilva | acoles: have a good weekend! :-) | 18:24 |
*** admin0 has joined #openstack-swift | 18:25 | |
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift | 18:26 | |
*** dosaboy has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
*** dmellado has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
*** mahatic has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
*** j_king has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
*** lifeless has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
*** timur has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
*** j_king has joined #openstack-swift | 18:26 | |
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-swift | 18:26 | |
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-swift | 18:26 | |
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift | 18:27 | |
*** dmellado has joined #openstack-swift | 18:27 | |
tdasilva | what's the hummingbird jenkins url again? | 18:28 |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
*** nottrobin has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
*** zhiyan has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
*** gmmaha has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
*** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift | 18:33 | |
*** timur has joined #openstack-swift | 18:33 | |
*** nottrobin has joined #openstack-swift | 18:33 | |
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-swift | 18:34 | |
notmyname | tdasilva: bah. I thought I had it, but it seems I lost that bookmark | 18:35 |
tdasilva | i've got a saio setup running, but it's failing some functional tests, so I don't know if that's "expected" or not... | 18:35 |
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC | 18:36 | |
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift | 18:38 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 18:38 |
*** admin0 has quit IRC | 18:42 | |
*** jistr has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
*** gmmaha has joined #openstack-swift | 18:44 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift | 18:46 | |
*** admin0 has joined #openstack-swift | 18:52 | |
ahale | googling for openstack swift libraries for apple swift is pretty tricky | 18:53 |
tdasilva | lol | 18:54 |
tdasilva | you might get some taylor swift results ;) | 18:54 |
klrmn | ahale: i think the answer is 'no', but i've been wrong before | 18:54 |
ahale | tdasilva: you think maybe she wrote such a library ? | 18:55 |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 18:55 | |
notmyname | she's a pretty sharp security expert | 18:55 |
tdasilva | ahale: hehe, never know, she might be a geek hidden in superstar front | 18:55 |
zaitcev | It's not like it requires super extensive libraries if you only want basics (e.g. no automatic segmentation with SLO). A simple driver fo CloudFiles was 50 lines in C. | 18:55 |
zaitcev | Unlike S3 you don't need to calculate HMAC and get it exactly right. Just pass a couple of strings around between HTTP requests. | 18:56 |
notmyname | tdasilva: https://twitter.com/swiftonsecurity | 18:56 |
tdasilva | notmyname: lol, i knew it! :) | 18:57 |
*** klrmn has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Make get_info requests useful with recheck_*_existence == 0 https://review.openstack.org/310216 | 18:57 |
clayg | has anyone been talking about a swift 2.8? | 18:58 |
notmyname | clayg: we did a little at the meeting yesterday | 18:58 |
*** bzurawski has joined #openstack-swift | 18:59 | |
clayg | notmyname: are we going to wait for crypto - or cut 2.8 just before? | 18:59 |
zaitcev | oh crap, the meeting! | 18:59 |
notmyname | clayg: summary is get probetests passting, land patch 317475 and do a release | 18:59 |
patchbot | notmyname: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317475/ - swift - Send correct size in POST async update for EC object | 18:59 |
notmyname | I really don't want to wait for crypto for the next release | 19:00 |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Make get_info requests useful with recheck_*_existence == 0 https://review.openstack.org/310216 | 19:00 |
notmyname | I think we should do one soon | 19:00 |
clayg | notmyname: we should get a patch chain to merge crypto soon! | 19:00 |
notmyname | yes! | 19:00 |
notmyname | also mentioned in yesterday's meeting | 19:00 |
notmyname | acoles and jrichli are on it. they have some reviews that need landing, and they're almost there for getting a patch chain ready | 19:01 |
notmyname | personally, I'm hoping for next week sometime, but I haven't told them that yet. shhhh | 19:01 |
acoles | notmyname: need those reviews... | 19:02 |
notmyname | the 3 crypto patches listed on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews are the stuff that's top of the list for them | 19:02 |
acoles | oh, one just got approved, let me update that | 19:02 |
timburke | acoles: too bad! | 19:04 |
timburke | already done | 19:04 |
acoles | timburke: thanks! | 19:04 |
acoles | I love people that clear up after a job is done :D | 19:05 |
clayg | hooray tdasilva zaitcev timburke for merging patch 280978 !!! | 19:08 |
patchbot | clayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280978/ - swift - Fix up get_account_info and get_container_info (MERGED) | 19:08 |
zaitcev | clayg: I have to say, I did it purely because of elves | 19:09 |
zaitcev | I mean, spent time reviewing it | 19:09 |
zaitcev | And now I feel like venting about Ceph's build and test system | 19:09 |
clayg | zaitcev: you preach brother! | 19:10 |
zaitcev | I see Tim found something lucking with it though... | 19:10 |
zaitcev | s/lucking/lacking/ | 19:11 |
clayg | hooray zaitcev and mattoliverau for merging patch 310608 | 19:11 |
patchbot | clayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310608/ - swift - Use smaller quorum size in proxy for even numbers ... (MERGED) | 19:11 |
clayg | zaitcev: is on a roll! | 19:11 |
zaitcev | Umm, that one is super old. We discussed it in person in Austin. | 19:11 |
zaitcev | It sounded convincing | 19:12 |
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 19:12 | |
zaitcev | clayg: the rolling 90-day says that acoles is far and far away the champion with 157 reviews | 19:13 |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 19:15 | |
zaitcev | My official highest priority for today is to buy a workstation with 32 GB because our OpenStack installer will not install anything, including Swift, on the 12GB box that I have now. | 19:17 |
zaitcev | Man, I sure wish 640 KB were enough for everybody. | 19:18 |
notmyname | that sounds like you're getting into the "real server + thin client" realm | 19:18 |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
zaitcev | To tell you the truth, I have a 64 GB box in the lab, but I hosed it and accessing it remotely requires installing Fedora 12 (because it has a proper 32-bit Java that's compatible with Dell DRAC5 console). | 19:19 |
notmyname | zaitcev: I'm sure you saw https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/41713.html. watch out for skylake (at least for mobile stuff) | 19:20 |
openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Make SLO manifest copies retain correct content-type https://review.openstack.org/318891 | 19:23 |
acoles | zaitcev: I'm slipping - done so little reviewing recently :/ | 19:24 |
zaitcev | notmyname: I'd need to know what Skylake was first, before that post begins to matter to me. Also, if the CPU melts down because Linux wasn't idling it? I win a new workstation. | 19:24 |
notmyname | skylake is the current newest generation of motherboards from intel (or motherboard platform? I'm not sure exactly how that works) | 19:25 |
zaitcev | neither do I :-) | 19:25 |
zaitcev | am | 19:25 |
clarkb | it is the codename for the intel microarchitecture | 19:25 |
zaitcev | That much is obvious. | 19:25 |
notmyname | yeah, I don't know if it's an actual intel product line or just a intel-defined standard | 19:25 |
clarkb | it describes a family of cpus all built on the same process | 19:26 |
notmyname | from what I've seen, it's pretty nice. unless you're needing to run linux on a laptop, I guess | 19:26 |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 19:27 | |
zzelle_ | zaitcev, hi, could you have a look to https://review.openstack.org/303863 ? It needs an extra +2 since a month | 19:31 |
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC | 19:31 | |
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift | 19:33 | |
zaitcev | zzelle_: But I don't know a thing about client certs. Not to mention the whole idea seems odd when applied to Swift. Why in the world are you authenticating with a certificate in addition to a password? | 19:34 |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 19:37 | |
zzelle_ | zaitcev, it's for double-factor authentication like credit card with passwords or signature | 19:37 |
clayg | mattoliverau: lol @ ETOOEARLY | 19:40 |
clayg | logs are fun | 19:41 |
clayg | crap - i was hoping to get the update from tdasilva on liberasure? | 19:41 |
acoles | notmyname: i updated the priority reviews for crypto. | 19:41 |
clayg | the *stupid* error/warning about he plugin's not loading is *soooo* annoying | 19:41 |
clayg | timur: fixed it ages ago - I think tsg even merged it - but no new version tagged/released | 19:42 |
clayg | I'm going to end up just packaging some random liberasure sha <grrr> | 19:42 |
acoles | notmyname: there's a couple there that do not require great familiarity with the feature/crypto to review | 19:42 |
acoles | clayg: everything will be ok ;) | 19:44 |
clayg | thanks bro | 19:44 |
* acoles back on Monday | 19:44 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 19:45 | |
zzelle_ | zaitcev, two-factor auth increases security by using different ways to auth (what i own, what i know, what i am) which increases the difficult to hack someone auth as each way requires a different approach to steal/falsify it | 19:45 |
zzelle_ | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-factor_authentication | 19:45 |
*** acoles is now known as acoles_ | 19:48 | |
*** McMurlock1 has joined #openstack-swift | 19:49 | |
*** McMurlock1 has quit IRC | 19:49 | |
zaitcev | zzelle_: I know what 2FA is. | 19:50 |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 19:55 | |
tdasilva | clayg: on liberasure code, things have been moving...slowly ;) | 19:56 |
tdasilva | clayg: both projects have been moved over | 19:56 |
tdasilva | but no builds yet on the gate | 19:56 |
tdasilva | i'm currently working on pyeclib gate jobs | 19:56 |
tdasilva | and then will work on liberasurecode | 19:56 |
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
notmyname | acoles_: thanks | 19:58 |
notmyname | tdasilva: ah, thanks for the info | 19:59 |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 20:02 | |
zaitcev | zzelle_: You wrote in the bug 1565112 that "other clients (nova/neutron/glanceclient) allows to specify them using --os-cert, --os-key". But a quick look at python-novaclient fails to identify where it actually happens. It seems that nova only takes CA certificate (for the server). Do you know where it is actually done? Depths of Oslo somewhere? | 20:02 |
openstack | bug 1565112 in python-swiftclient "Client certificate/key are not supported " [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565112 - Assigned to Cedric Brandily (cbrandily) | 20:02 |
zzelle_ | zaitcev, iirc, it's provided by keystonemiddleware or keystoneauth | 20:03 |
zzelle_ | zaitcev, let me check | 20:03 |
zaitcev | zzelle_: What do you mean? We're discussing the client now, not middleware. | 20:03 |
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 20:04 | |
zaitcev | zzelle_: Anyway, all I need is to make sure we're not going to rename --os-cert soonish because the rest of OpenStack implements something like --os-client-certificate | 20:06 |
zzelle_ | zaitcev, iirc --os-key and --os-cert is inherited by novaclient from keystoneauth/keystonemiddleware | 20:08 |
zaitcev | that just makes no sense | 20:08 |
zaitcev | client cannot inherit from middlewares, or can it now | 20:08 |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 20:08 | |
zaitcev | Well, I see that your change for the common client went in, so we have that. | 20:09 |
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 20:09 | |
bzurawski | hello | 20:10 |
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift | 20:11 | |
bzurawski | sorry for interrupting but i want to ask, what do you think about removing all loggers from swiftclient/client.py as it's causing problems for users, it's bug 1213179 | 20:12 |
openstack | bug 1213179 in python-swiftclient "swiftclient logs all ClientException (404) at ERROR (with traceback)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1213179 - Assigned to Bartek Żurawski (bartekzurawski1) | 20:12 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: Fix locale directory in MANIFEST.in https://review.openstack.org/318686 | 20:12 |
zaitcev | oh, wait | 20:12 |
zzelle_ | zaitcev, novaclient inherits it through https://github.com/openstack/python-novaclient/blob/master/novaclient/shell.py#L392-L393 | 20:12 |
zaitcev | zzelle_: thanks | 20:13 |
zzelle_ | and define --os-key/cert in https://github.com/openstack/keystoneauth/blob/c5738b9055bfb9c12abe6792dc7ed0d782f120dd/keystoneauth1/loading/session.py#L105-L115 | 20:14 |
zaitcev | zzelle_: thanks... I also checked that our shipped nova takes those | 20:14 |
zzelle_ | i doubt the option will change has some clients had different options for client certs and moved to --os-key/cert | 20:15 |
timburke | bzurawski: removing all loggers seems like a bad way to go; we'd lose a lot of info/debug logging that can be useful, especially on the CLI. i think i'd be on board with not logging an exception when we're about to reraise, though | 20:24 |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 20:25 | |
bzurawski | timburke: but isn't swiftclient/service.py is using for CLI not client.py? I can be wrong, but client.py is used mostly by devs who want's to create they're own solution to talk to swift | 20:28 |
bzurawski | timburke: shell is using swiftclient/client.py only for importing logger config, so maybe we can move this logger definition to service.py? | 20:29 |
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 20:29 | |
clayg | bzurawski: service api is also for applications - not just CLI | 20:31 |
bzurawski | timburke: but if we will be on board with not logging as exception, you mean then change logger.exception to logger.debug for example ? | 20:31 |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 20:31 | |
zzelle_ | zaitcev, thx | 20:32 |
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift | 20:32 | |
timburke | bzurawski: all of service goes through client. i mean that i very much *want* the logging at info/debug going on in http_log - see https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient/blob/master/swiftclient/client.py#L159-L168 | 20:33 |
timburke | but i think we can remove *all* of the logger.exception calls, as we only ever do it before raising | 20:33 |
clayg | timburke: I think it's weird that we re-raise this one w/o first translating to ClientException -> https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient/blob/master/swiftclient/client.py#L1539 | 20:35 |
clayg | timburke: hurrmrm... this one too -> https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient/blob/master/swiftclient/client.py#L305 | 20:36 |
clayg | idk, the whole thing probably requires a lot of thought - maybe I haven't put in enough - changing to debug seems like an easy way to cut down the noise without having to think about it too hard | 20:37 |
timburke | clayg: yeah, probably not the best. i've always found those a little weird; i guess i could see it if there's a timeout or something, but i don't think retrying will help with DNS failures or refused connections | 20:37 |
clayg | timburke: the other thing it would be *nice* to have logs around is like what was the history of retried attempts that lead to a "failed with XXX after X attempts" | 20:39 |
*** dmk0202 has joined #openstack-swift | 20:39 | |
clayg | but logging the traceback on a valid wellformed well known http client error status seems so stupid :'( | 20:39 |
timburke | true. they may not have all been the same types of failures | 20:40 |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
*** zzelle_ has quit IRC | 20:49 | |
bzurawski | clayg: timburke so maybe removing logger.exception from function _retry from ClientException block, would be good as a first step, but what about this re-raise things, should we do something with it ? | 20:57 |
*** BigWillie has quit IRC | 20:58 | |
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 20:58 | |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 21:00 | |
*** raildo is now known as raildo-afk | 21:10 | |
clayg | yeah anytime you see `logger.exception(); raise` it smells | 21:14 |
bzurawski | clayg: timburke Oki, so I'm starting fixing this issue, if any question or troubles i will be asking :) BTW. thanks for you're help with understanding how it can be corrected :) | 21:20 |
clayg | bzurawski: thanks for working on it! | 21:20 |
*** dmk0202 has quit IRC | 21:22 | |
*** pauloewerton has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
ntata| | clayg, I'm working on bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1567105.. and am wondering if the "[]" need to be added only to the ipv6 addresses and not for ipv4? | 21:36 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1567105 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "swift-ring-builder output display bad column alignment with ipv6" [Wishlist,New] - Assigned to Nandini (nandini-tata) | 21:36 |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 21:37 | |
zaitcev | ntata: What makes you think that brackets are needed in that bug, at all? The bug is that the column alignment is bad. The [] syntax is only needed when a colon may be adjacent to the address, as in URI's netloc. This is not the case in the outout of swift-ring-builder. | 21:41 |
zaitcev | ntata: actually, never mind, I see Clay's comment now. | 21:42 |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
*** daemontool has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
notmyname | maybe next week will have less 'epic mailing list threads' in it, /me says hopefully | 21:58 |
timburke | notmyname: time to go camping for a week? | 21:59 |
notmyname | lol. I actually am going camping not this weekend but the next :-) | 22:01 |
*** rickyrem has joined #openstack-swift | 22:05 | |
*** nadeem has quit IRC | 22:07 | |
mattoliverau | Lol, notmyname epic thread master | 22:13 |
jrichli | mattoliverau: i know, I didn't realize swift was so controversial :-) | 22:14 |
notmyname | mattoliverau: no. please no. nooooo. don't make me do another one | 22:15 |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 22:16 |
tdasilva | is the new dashboard missing a scrollbar or is it just me? | 22:17 |
notmyname | tdasilva: like mattoliverau, you must have a really wide browser window ;-) | 22:17 |
tdasilva | i think it's a 22 or 24 | 22:18 |
notmyname | tdasilva: I've got a stylesheet on it that over a certain width it reformats to be good on a wall-mounted TV. since that doesn't have any keyboard/mouse, I have the overflow: hidden on it to prevent scroll bars | 22:18 |
notmyname | so if you narrow your browser window, it will look more natural | 22:19 |
mattoliverau | tdasilva: notmyname doesn't believe in scroll bars. He was going to write a mailing list thread on it :p | 22:19 |
notmyname | and since you're the 2nd person to say something, it's probably actually a bug | 22:19 |
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift | 22:19 | |
tdasilva | lol | 22:19 |
* tdasilva goes to refresh mailing list page | 22:19 | |
bkeller` | there's an @media tv { } you can use if your tv actually advertises itself correctly | 22:20 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-swiftclient: Support client certificate/key https://review.openstack.org/303863 | 22:20 |
mattoliverau | jrichli: yeah, we're the black sheep of the OpenStack world, probably cause ops know our stuff just works ;) | 22:20 |
notmyname | bkeller`: yeah. just need to actually figure out if the raspberrypi driving the tv display has anything like that | 22:20 |
clarkb | mattoliverau: you only have to look about 14 messages above this one to find a real example of why people may feel that way ;) | 22:22 |
clarkb | (I get the reason for that but it does make swift different) | 22:22 |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 22:23 | |
pdardeau | notmyname: so are your epic ML threads the result of you trashing the movie script? ;-) | 22:30 |
mattoliverau | clarkb: it's not different it's called special :) | 22:30 |
*** _JZ_ has quit IRC | 22:39 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 22:42 | |
*** bzurawski has quit IRC | 22:42 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 22:50 | |
tdasilva | if anybody is interested, I just updated my ansible saio script to add support for hummingbird: https://github.com/thiagodasilva/ansible-saio | 22:53 |
*** diogogmt has quit IRC | 22:56 | |
*** klamath has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
*** ametts has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: Fix probe failure and small things https://review.openstack.org/315918 | 23:13 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift: disable_fallocate also disables fallocate_reserve https://review.openstack.org/317158 | 23:13 |
*** ChubYann has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC | 23:26 | |
*** sorrison_laptop has joined #openstack-swift | 23:27 | |
*** lcurtis has quit IRC | 23:27 | |
*** admin0 has quit IRC | 23:27 | |
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift | 23:28 | |
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift | 23:28 | |
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift | 23:31 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 23:47 | |
*** sorrison_laptop has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 23:49 | |
*** sorrison_laptop has joined #openstack-swift | 23:49 | |
*** sorrison_laptop has quit IRC | 23:52 | |
*** sorriso__ has joined #openstack-swift | 23:52 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 23:55 | |
*** sorrison_laptop has joined #openstack-swift | 23:56 | |
*** sorriso__ has quit IRC | 23:56 | |
*** jmccarthy has quit IRC | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!