Thursday, 2016-11-03

notmynamehttp://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20161028-native-english-speakers-are-the-worlds-worst-communicators and I feel I should apologize to most people in here00:09
zaitcevYou mean apologize for not realizing how statistics work?00:14
timburkenotmyname: don't worry; we don't speak english, just american00:15
zaitcevapropos http://www.sandraandwoo.com/2013/12/19/0538-butterfly-vs-statistics/00:15
notmynametimburke: I think that's the problem00:17
timburkei'm curious about the particular word from the lede00:19
mattoliveraunotmyname: that's right, you should all speak real english.. like us Australians :P ... lol almost kept a straight face there :P00:24
notmynamemattoliverau: did you mean "speaky engly"?00:25
mattoliveraulol00:25
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Make NullLogger more logger like  https://review.openstack.org/37378400:29
notmynamemattoliverau: after I saw a polly in budgie smugglers this arvo, I went to the beach to have a think about it. had to drink heaps of cab sav to get over it, then took a liquid laugh. decided to go on walkabout just to get away from it all. found a station, became a jackaroo, never been happier00:38
notmyname(I only had to look up some of those)00:38
mattoliveraunotmyname: I'm very impressed. and see doesn't that make much more sense! And alot easier to write :P00:38
mattoliverautimburke: ^^ what do you think00:39
claygtimburke: did you happen to try `exception = critical = ... = lambda *args: None`00:39
claygi think `warn` as an alias to `warning` had bit us in the past on logger-likes00:40
timburkeclayg: eh, w/e. *you* weren't pushing over it00:40
claygit's on a list somewhere00:40
timburkenotmyname: mattoliverau: that is a... curious... euphemism. what about when it's chunky?00:40
*** vint_bra has quit IRC00:46
claygnotmyname: right i want to know what the word was00:46
claygit's all rubbish00:46
*** zhengyin has quit IRC00:50
*** zhengyin has joined #openstack-swift00:51
*** vinsh has quit IRC01:02
zhengyingood morning01:03
*** klrmn has quit IRC01:07
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift01:08
*** klrmn has quit IRC01:10
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Add unit test content  https://review.openstack.org/35344401:16
mattoliverauzhengyin: morning!01:19
zhengyinmattoliverau:morning :)01:19
*** jerrygb_ has joined #openstack-swift01:30
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift01:30
*** jerrygb has quit IRC01:31
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift: Bad error reporting on config permissions error  https://review.openstack.org/27332501:32
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift01:45
*** jerrygb_ has quit IRC01:45
*** dmorita has quit IRC01:55
*** jerrygb has quit IRC01:59
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift01:59
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Use more specific asserts in test/probe tests  https://review.openstack.org/34276502:00
*** manous has quit IRC02:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Make NullLogger more logger like  https://review.openstack.org/37378402:07
*** jerrygb has quit IRC02:17
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift02:18
*** jerrygb has quit IRC02:22
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift02:27
*** bkopilov has quit IRC02:51
*** vinsh has quit IRC02:51
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift02:59
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift03:04
*** blair has quit IRC03:05
*** blair has joined #openstack-swift03:06
jrichlimattoliverau: I wasn't able to listen in on the container sharding discussion, but I saw that you were displaying some document with info.03:11
jrichliwas that the same doc that you had created after the San Antonio Hackathon?  or something new?03:12
mattoliveraujrichli: it's the inital shard vs subsequent sharding doc I have linked on the info page.. I just added updates to the end03:27
mattoliverauI should do something nicer at some point. but that was an already easily accessable document :)03:27
jrichliyou mean the one linked off the ideas page?03:30
mattoliverauyup thats what I mean, turns out I'm still jetlagged and what I type and think are 2 different things :P03:31
jrichliah, ok.  thanks!03:32
mattoliveraujrichli: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16rPdDrT-4G6hcen_6no8cr8KbxUqbcvsSkOfxxu0EBE/edit#03:32
jrichligreat, thx!03:32
*** arunman has joined #openstack-swift03:39
charz_good morning!03:52
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift03:54
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift03:55
mattoliveraucharz_: morning03:55
charz_Guys, if i would like to clean up old .ts file manually without apply the patch from 2.10.0. Can I just find all .ts files and delete them? I'll stop objcect replicator and auditor on the cluster before I delete them.03:58
charz_mattoliverau: o/03:58
*** jerrygb has quit IRC03:59
*** dmorita has quit IRC04:00
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift04:00
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift04:01
mattoliveraucharz_: that could be dangerous, the reason we place .ts files is because somewhere else in the cluster the object may not have gotten the delete yet. If you delete all the .ts's and an object still exists then you could be undeleting the object, but it would still potentially be missing from containers creating dark data.04:01
*** links has joined #openstack-swift04:01
*** arunman has quit IRC04:01
mattoliverauwhat is suppose to happen is after reclaim age the we assume the .ts has definitely been synced around the cluster meaning the old data should04:02
mattoliveraushould've been deleted and then is safe to delete them too.04:02
mattoliverauThis is why the patch only marks the hashes as dirty if the .ts file is older then reclaim age.04:03
mattoliverauIf you searched for .ts files older then reclaim age then they'd probably be safe to delete. Cause otherwise your recliam age isn't big enough and you'd have other issues.04:05
charz_mattoliverau: okay, you're correct. I forgot it would be some data haven't delete yet around the cluster.04:05
charz_mattoliverau: it sounds like a good idea to check the timestamp before delete it.04:06
charz_mattoliverau: thx04:08
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift04:10
*** arunman has joined #openstack-swift04:21
*** vinsh has quit IRC04:27
*** jerrygb_ has joined #openstack-swift04:28
*** jerrygb has quit IRC04:29
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift04:44
*** jerrygb_ has quit IRC04:45
*** jerrygb_ has joined #openstack-swift04:59
*** jerrygb has quit IRC04:59
*** jerrygb_ has quit IRC05:15
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift05:15
*** jerrygb has quit IRC05:33
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift05:33
*** jerrygb has quit IRC05:33
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC05:48
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift05:48
*** ppai has quit IRC05:53
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift06:03
*** klrmn has quit IRC06:09
*** nizam037 has joined #openstack-swift06:21
*** sheel has joined #openstack-swift06:24
*** nizam037 has quit IRC06:26
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift06:27
*** vinsh has quit IRC06:33
*** McMurlock1 has joined #openstack-swift07:05
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift07:09
*** suresh has joined #openstack-swift07:13
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift07:14
*** tesseract is now known as Guest2520907:14
sureshhii all, I deployed openstack swift with two nodes (one proxy and one storage) and my storage node has one disk with 475GB space07:18
sureshbut if i am running three parallel uploads of 5.1GB with 512MB segment size07:18
sureshit is giving 503 service unavialable07:19
sureshplease someone help on this is there any parameter i need to set to accept more requests?07:20
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift07:34
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift07:34
*** jerrygb has quit IRC07:39
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift07:45
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC07:48
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift07:48
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift08:19
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC08:19
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift08:19
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift08:21
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej08:35
sureshhi08:35
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift08:38
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift08:48
*** hseipp has quit IRC08:56
*** ChubYann has quit IRC09:07
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC09:29
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift09:32
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift09:35
openstackgerritRomain LE DISEZ proposed openstack/swift: Fix old-style container-sync and doc  https://review.openstack.org/39296209:38
*** jerrygb has quit IRC09:41
*** mvk has quit IRC09:51
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles09:56
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift09:58
*** jerrygb has quit IRC10:03
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift10:26
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift10:29
*** vinsh has quit IRC10:34
openstackgerritGábor Antal proposed openstack/swift: Use more specific asserts in test/unit/common/middleware  https://review.openstack.org/34277010:34
*** links has quit IRC10:40
openstackgerritGábor Antal proposed openstack/swift: Use more specific asserts in test/unit/common  https://review.openstack.org/34278110:43
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift10:56
*** dmorita has quit IRC11:00
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift11:26
acoleskota_: clayg timburke notmyname mitaka backport to fix bug 1633647 here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38974611:29
openstackbug 1633647 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "bad fragment data not detected in audit" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/163364711:29
patchbotpatch 389746 - swift (stable/mitaka) - Make ECDiskFileReader check fragment metadata11:29
*** links has joined #openstack-swift11:30
acoleswe (and I guess admin6 and others) would like to have that land11:30
kota_acole: thanks, will look at tommorow11:31
kota_acoles:^^11:31
admin6acoles: you’re right ;-)11:31
acoleskota_: thanks11:31
*** rvasilets___ has joined #openstack-swift11:33
*** suresh has quit IRC11:37
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/liberasurecode: WIP: ISA-L Cauchy support  https://review.openstack.org/39326311:58
*** bkopilov has quit IRC12:02
acoles kota_: clayg timburke notmyname ...and the newton backport to fix bug 1633647 is here https://review.openstack.org/39326512:06
openstackbug 1633647 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "bad fragment data not detected in audit" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/163364712:06
patchbotpatch 393265 - swift (stable/newton) - Make ECDiskFileReader check fragment metadata12:06
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/pyeclib: WIP: ISA-L Cauchy support  https://review.openstack.org/39327612:19
*** arunman has quit IRC12:25
*** jerrygb has quit IRC12:30
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift12:37
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift12:46
*** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift12:53
*** silor has quit IRC12:54
*** silor1 is now known as silor12:54
*** david-lyle has quit IRC12:55
*** silor has quit IRC13:02
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift13:07
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:10
*** klamath has quit IRC13:10
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift13:10
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:11
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift13:18
*** jerrygb_ has joined #openstack-swift13:21
*** jerrygb has quit IRC13:22
*** StraubTW has joined #openstack-swift13:22
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift13:24
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch13:25
*** ppai has quit IRC13:36
*** arunman has joined #openstack-swift13:51
*** links has quit IRC13:52
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC13:53
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift13:53
*** arunman has quit IRC13:55
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift13:55
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift13:57
*** sheel has quit IRC14:00
*** jerrygb_ has quit IRC14:00
pdardeausuresh: you mentioned that you have a single storage node with a single drive. you're effectively stress testing write throughput of that single drive.14:02
pdardeausuresh: use tools such as iostat and nmon to watch what's happening when you try that out again14:02
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej14:03
*** arunman has joined #openstack-swift14:16
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift14:18
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC14:20
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift14:21
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC14:25
*** bkopilov has quit IRC14:28
*** arunman has quit IRC14:28
notmynamegood morning14:36
notmynamefrom the ML, looks like keystone is changing the default token type to fernet tokens instead of uuid tokens14:36
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift14:38
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC14:40
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift14:41
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC14:42
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift14:45
stevemarnotmyname: indeed we are14:45
stevemarnotmyname: shouldn't impact you folks...14:45
stevemarnotmyname: to openstack services it'll look like any other token14:46
rlediseznotmyname: i guess migration should be pretty smooth from swift pov, are you expecting any weird behavior in swift? i'm currently working on our move to fernet so it's interesting to see that keystone will set it as default soon14:46
stevemarwe've had it since kilo, with people using it in production since liberty, so its about time :D14:46
rledisezstevemar: let's all upgrade! :) thx for the confirmation of no impact expected14:51
*** d0ugal has quit IRC14:57
*** arunman has joined #openstack-swift14:58
notmynamerledisez: yeah. what stevemar said :-)15:01
*** sgundur has quit IRC15:02
notmynamestevemar: I think the only question mark I have is around relative performance. I heard some rumors that fernet tokens were slower. or required network validation for every token. or generated a new token every request, thus removing cachability. but I admit to not knowing details15:03
notmynameacoles: so now maybe not brexit? crazy. at least is seems good for the £15:04
notmynamerledisez: before you take off for the day, I have a question. what's the EC parameters you're using?15:05
acolesnotmyname: it's a significant ruling but not sure it will ultimately change the outcome15:08
rlediseznotmyname:15:08
rledisez[storage-policy:1]15:08
rledisezname = Policy-115:08
rledisezdefault = 115:08
rledisezpolicy_type = erasure_coding15:08
rledisezec_type = jerasure_rs_vand15:08
rledisezec_num_data_fragments = 1215:08
patchbotError: 'supybot.=' is not a valid configuration variable.15:08
rledisezec_num_parity_fragments = 315:08
rledisezec_object_segment_size = 104857615:08
rledisezif i had to change one thing, it would be segment size. put it lower to limit latency and "slow connection" issues15:09
notmynamerledisez: cool. thanks. kota_ is working on an issue he found if you have 5 or parity fragments. nothing for you to worry about there15:09
rledisezbut it can't be changed AFAIK, so...15:09
notmynamethat's interesting15:10
notmynameyeah, we found that increasing it for workloads with larger objects can really help throughput. makes sense that lowering it could help for reducing issues if connections are slow15:11
notmynamestevemar: are we going to be hit with any cachability issues for fernet tokens?15:11
*** jerrygb_ has joined #openstack-swift15:12
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift15:13
*** jerrygb has quit IRC15:13
notmynameacoles: thanks for the backports. I'll look at them this morning15:15
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Fix KeyError when auditor finds an expired object  https://review.openstack.org/39336915:27
kota_notmyname: + isal for the condition. Jerasure works, fyi.15:27
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift15:28
notmynamekota_: ah right.15:31
notmynamekota_: also, shouldn't you be asleep? ;-)15:31
kota_notmyname: will do soon :-)15:32
acoleskota_ has had a transfusion of clayg blood and now he never needs to sleep ;)15:38
*** d0ugal has quit IRC15:39
notmynamejrichli: tdasilva: did I capture the plan accurately on patch 232162?15:46
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/232162/ - swift - Symlink implementation.15:46
*** sgundur has quit IRC15:47
jrichlisounds good to me15:48
* jrichli puts symlinks higher in priority list15:48
jrichliI still haven't done a lot of testing with it : so I will focus on getting some time allocated for that over the week15:49
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift15:49
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:56
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:56
*** rcernin has quit IRC16:02
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift16:03
*** chsc has quit IRC16:03
*** sgundur has quit IRC16:05
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift16:05
openstackgerritChristian Hugo proposed openstack/swift: Raise ValueError if a config section not exists  https://review.openstack.org/39338816:08
notmynamebah! the wiki spam filter doesn't let me use goo.gl shortlinks any more16:15
jrichliinteresting.  so we have to have a paragraph for a link16:18
notmynameyeah. doesn't let me replace an existing one for the new one. but it's ok with the existing one staying there16:19
notmynamehttps://goo.gl/WiDneY16:19
*** pcaruana has quit IRC16:20
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift16:20
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift16:25
notmynamethere. http://not.mn/reviews.html16:25
*** McMurlock1 has quit IRC16:28
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift16:29
notmynameat some point if I'm using a page on my own site, I could combine the priority reviews wiki and the gerrit dash and have one place to go look at stuff16:31
*** bill_az has quit IRC16:38
notmynameacoles: backports +A'd16:48
acolesnotmyname: thanks!16:48
*** sgundur has quit IRC16:48
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift17:00
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift17:03
*** rcernin has quit IRC17:03
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift17:03
timburkeacoles: that backport looks hairy. lot of changes to TestObjectController in the original that didn't make it into the stable patch? i suppose all of the changes under swift/ look good though...17:05
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: EC: reconstruct using non-durable fragments  https://review.openstack.org/37663017:08
*** rcernin has quit IRC17:08
claygform the pep8 jobs now require bindep thread "If your17:08
patchbotError: No closing quotation17:08
claygproject needs a specific binary to be installed to compile your project"17:08
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift17:08
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift17:08
claygoh i guess it means to install a dependency?17:09
acolestimburke: IIRC lots of new tests went into TestObjectController since Mitaka that needed fixing up to use valid EC fragment data17:09
claygi thought wheels removed the compile requirement?  like you could install python-mysql with out mysql-dev or some crazyness?17:09
notmynameclayg: yeah. bindep isn't really just for "binaries needed to compile your project". it's more like "dependencies that aren't on pypi"17:10
acolestimburke: there shouldn't be any tests directly verifying the fix that did not get backported17:10
timburkecool. i hadn't looked too closely, just figured i ought to do my standard backport sniff-test17:11
*** cbartz has quit IRC17:11
timburkenotmyname trusts it; why shouldn't i? ;-)17:11
acolestimburke: please, do. it was not a straightforward cherry-pick, but also not as bad as I feared.17:12
acolestdasilva: I had to fix merge conflicts on this and so it lost your +2 https://review.openstack.org/37663017:13
patchbotpatch 376630 - swift - EC: reconstruct using non-durable fragments17:13
acolessome trivial assert method cleanup created conflicts17:14
*** hseipp has quit IRC17:23
*** rledisez has quit IRC17:24
*** daemontool has quit IRC17:28
*** silor has quit IRC17:30
tdasilvaacoles: ack, will look17:41
tdasilvanotmyname: your comment on  patch 232162 looks good17:42
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/232162/ - swift - Symlink implementation.17:42
notmynametdasilva: ack. thanks17:42
acolesclayg: timburke notmyname do you think we should backport this fix to newton? https://review.openstack.org/39336917:51
patchbotpatch 393369 - swift - Fix KeyError when auditor finds an expired object17:51
notmynameacoles: IIRC that was primarily (only?) resulting in a bunch of log spam, right?17:53
acolesnotmyname: correct17:54
acolesnotmyname: only17:54
notmynameso we expect an upstream release soon. it will be 2.11.0. so the backports we're doing to newton could be tagged as a 2.10.1 (but we've not done tags before and the distro packagers last week said "whatever")17:56
*** Guest25209 has quit IRC17:57
*** sgundur has quit IRC18:00
notmynamehonestly, with the various backports we've been doing, I'm thinking that we should take over our own tagging of releases on stable branches. (which probably means us proposing a tag instead of nobody proposing a tag)18:00
notmynameso with this patch, it doesn't seem like a major thing. but it seems scarier than it is (the errors in the logs). so yeah, I'd be fine with backporting it18:01
notmyname(I wouldn't lose any sleep about not backporting it, though)18:02
*** geaaru has quit IRC18:02
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift18:05
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift18:07
notmynameacoles: what do you think?18:07
acolesnotmyname: it's just log noise, but on other hand it's noise that could result in "support" requests (here in irc, launchpad, elsewhere) so given that the patch is relatively small and should be trivial to backport...I'd vote to do it. But I'm not sure I know what a normal "threshold" would be to warrant a backport?18:14
notmynameacoles: I think the threshold is whatever we the maintainers want to deal with18:15
notmynameso yeah...small patch, makes things clearer for users? do it. big patch? maybe not18:15
acolesk. I'll propose a backport once it lands (tomorrow) and others can vote if they disagree on the worthiness18:17
claygnotmyname: I like this bit about us taking over tagging backports - sounds like we get more control and you're the only one that has to do more work18:20
notmynameclayg: I've never known you to be opposed to me doing more work ;-)18:21
notmyname(that's a joke)18:22
acolestimburke: why do we need this condition https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347538/9/swift/common/middleware/slo.py@622 ? I'm not saying we don't, just trying to grok - isn't content-length already 0 for a 304 or 412?18:32
patchbotpatch 347538 - swift - Reduce backend requests for SLO If-Match / HEAD re...18:32
*** mvk has quit IRC18:32
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Fix KeyError when auditor finds an expired object  https://review.openstack.org/39336918:33
timburkeacoles: we may not need it; it's been a while since i wrote it18:36
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Reduce backend requests for SLO If-Match / HEAD requests  https://review.openstack.org/34753818:38
acolestimburke: heh. I know that feeling - been so long you lost the context.18:38
timburkeunit tests pass fine without it, so... gone!18:38
acolestimburke: but, but...you must have had a reason :)18:40
timburke"it seemed expedient at the time"18:40
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift18:41
acolestimburke: oh it really has gone. ok, I'll continue on patchset 10 tomorrow.18:43
*** acoles is now known as acoles_18:45
timburkeseemed better than forever wonder "now why did we do that, again?"18:45
*** _JZ_ has joined #openstack-swift18:49
*** jordanP has quit IRC18:52
timburkeacoles_: notmyname: fyi, backport is up as https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393444/18:55
patchbotpatch 393444 - swift (stable/newton) - Fix KeyError when auditor finds an expired object18:55
notmynametimburke: thanks. I'll let it sit just a bit to see if someone wants to comment18:56
*** sgundur has quit IRC18:56
notmynametimburke: looks like a clean cherry-pick18:56
timburkeyup18:57
notmynamecool18:57
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift18:58
notmynameFYI I'm paying attention to http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/106680.html (specifically the "hash ring library" part)18:58
notmynameI'm planning on responding based on how the thread goes. but not yet18:59
*** asettle has quit IRC18:59
*** sgundur has quit IRC19:03
*** sgundur has joined #openstack-swift19:03
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift19:10
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift19:14
*** sgundur has quit IRC19:16
*** bill_az has quit IRC19:25
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-swift19:31
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off19:35
mattoliverauMorning19:43
timburkemattoliverau: either you're still getting up early, or my day is slipping away far too quickly19:48
mattoliverautimburke: it's ok, it's early :) unless you were really wanting the day to end, in which case I'm sorry ;p19:50
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift19:51
*** jerrygb_ has quit IRC19:54
*** rvasilets___ has quit IRC19:58
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift20:14
clayg+1 this day is going to fast and also sucks20:22
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift20:23
*** StraubTW has quit IRC20:30
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift20:32
*** silor has quit IRC20:33
*** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift20:33
*** silor1 is now known as silor20:35
*** rcernin has quit IRC20:57
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift21:24
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC21:34
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift21:35
*** bill_az has quit IRC21:39
*** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift21:51
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-swift22:03
*** _JZ_ has quit IRC22:07
*** silor has quit IRC22:08
*** jerrygb_ has joined #openstack-swift22:29
*** jerrygb has quit IRC22:32
*** lcurtis has quit IRC22:35
*** klamath has quit IRC22:55
claygwhoa... is it still this same day?22:57
notmynamestill for another 8 hours23:02
claygi bet this crap day is over in bcn already23:12
claygCatalans knew23:12
timburkeclayg: eh, you'd still be up right now. it's barely past 1am there23:13
mattoliverauclayg: if it helps tomorrow is much better23:19
claygknew it!23:25
*** chsc has quit IRC23:32
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:36
*** gyee has quit IRC23:49

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!