*** dmorita has quit IRC | 00:02 | |
*** jamielennox_ has joined #openstack-swift | 00:02 | |
*** jamielennox_ is now known as jamielennox | 00:06 | |
*** klamath has quit IRC | 00:13 | |
*** catintheroof has quit IRC | 00:29 | |
kota_ | good morning | 00:47 |
---|---|---|
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 00:57 | |
MooingLemur | goedemorgen | 01:06 |
*** gatuus has quit IRC | 01:07 | |
kota_ | jrichli, clayg: AFAIK, the prob tests doens't expect to work on non-default config (not only reconstructor thing, i mean) | 01:25 |
kota_ | and we already have some probe tests for non-default config https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/test/probe/test_account_reaper.py#L155-L195 | 01:25 |
kota_ | w/ modification of config file | 01:26 |
kota_ | jrichli, clayg: thinking of that, if the probe tests found the non-default value in the running, skips or warnings seems good to me, probably a bunch of test goes to fail | 01:26 |
kota_ | jrichli, clayg: and even if they're using default config (i.e. handoff_only = False), the better thing i think is run a (new) handoffs_onlly mode probe tests with config modification. | 01:28 |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 01:38 | |
kota_ | and thanks jrichli for writing unit tests! | 01:42 |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 01:48 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
mattoliverau | kota_: morning (sorry been busy away from IRC). | 01:55 |
kota_ | mattoliverau: good morning! | 01:55 |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 01:56 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 02:00 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 02:04 | |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift master: Follow up on reconstructor handoffs_only https://review.openstack.org/434018 | 02:04 |
charz | kota_ and mattoliverau good morning | 02:15 |
kota_ | charz: o/ | 02:15 |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift master: Follow up on reconstructor handoffs_only https://review.openstack.org/434018 | 02:22 |
mattoliverau | charz: morning | 02:23 |
jrichli | hello kota_ ! just a heads up - I am about to make a comment on handoffs_only pointing to your follow-up and +2 +A the change. | 02:28 |
kota_ | jrichli: maybe i should reload the page? | 02:28 |
jrichli | i haven't done it yet - i will in a moment | 02:29 |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
kota_ | jrichli: I'm just about to finish up the review with comments and +2 +A | 02:29 |
jrichli | ah, ok! | 02:29 |
kota_ | racing :D | 02:29 |
jrichli | great, i see you have this handled. I will take a break then :-) | 02:30 |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 02:34 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 02:34 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 02:35 | |
kota_ | jrichli: done ;-) | 02:37 |
kota_ | jrichli: and hopefully you like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/434018 | 02:37 |
patchbot | patch 434018 - swift - Follow up on reconstructor handoffs_only | 02:37 |
kota_ | and I have to start to rebase my ec duplication on the reconstructor change :\ | 02:37 |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 02:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Matthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift master: Add container sharding to Swift containers https://review.openstack.org/423906 | 02:47 |
mattoliverau | ^^ that just includes v 0.1 of the documentation. Putting is somewhere as I have some coworkers who are going to read through it and correct my Australian (bad) english | 02:48 |
*** bkopilov has quit IRC | 02:56 | |
*** bkopilov_ has quit IRC | 02:57 | |
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC | 02:59 | |
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift | 03:01 | |
*** robcresswell_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:04 | |
*** nottrobin_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:05 | |
*** janonymous_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** tonyb_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** dmellado_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** serverascode_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** _d34dh0r53_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** sudorandom_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** clayg_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v clayg_ | 03:06 | |
*** pdardeau_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** remix_auei has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** jarbod__ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:06 | |
*** mmmucky_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:07 | |
*** tmoreira_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:07 | |
*** alpha_ori has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** sudorandom has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** cppforlife_ has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** dmellado has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** serverascode has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** nottrobin has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** Tahvok has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** janonymous has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** calebb has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** tmoreira has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** tonyb has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** robcresswell has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** pdardeau has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** mmmucky has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** mlanner has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** clayg has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** jarbod has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** etienneme has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** remix_tj has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** ahale has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** d34dh0r53 has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** sudorandom_ is now known as sudorandom | 03:07 | |
*** mlanner_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:07 | |
*** mlanner_ is now known as mlanner | 03:07 | |
*** alpha_ori has joined #openstack-swift | 03:08 | |
*** etienneme has joined #openstack-swift | 03:08 | |
*** Tahvok has joined #openstack-swift | 03:08 | |
*** calebb has joined #openstack-swift | 03:08 | |
*** ahale has joined #openstack-swift | 03:09 | |
*** robcresswell_ is now known as robcresswell | 03:09 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 03:09 | |
*** janonymous_ is now known as janonymous | 03:09 | |
*** nottrobin_ is now known as nottrobin | 03:11 | |
*** serverascode_ is now known as serverascode | 03:18 | |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 03:20 | |
*** tonyb_ is now known as tonyb | 03:21 | |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 03:25 | |
*** mmmucky_ is now known as mmmucky | 03:39 | |
*** mmotiani has joined #openstack-swift | 03:42 | |
*** Jeffrey4l_ has quit IRC | 03:43 | |
*** Jeffrey4l_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:43 | |
*** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift | 03:53 | |
mahatic | good morning | 03:54 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift master: Deprecate broken handoffs_first in favor of handoffs_only https://review.openstack.org/425493 | 03:54 |
mahatic | kota_: sorry I couldn't get to your comments on EC duplication yesterday - other than just a glance. will try to reproduce a test maybe on one of the comments | 03:55 |
mahatic | notmyname: thanks for the follow-on mail on the Outreachy one! | 03:55 |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 03:58 | |
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift | 04:01 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 04:04 | |
notmyname | good evening | 04:16 |
notmyname | mahatic: np :-) | 04:16 |
*** bkopilov_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:17 | |
notmyname | yay https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425493/ landed. thanks jrichli and kota_ | 04:18 |
patchbot | patch 425493 - swift - Deprecate broken handoffs_first in favor of handof... (MERGED) | 04:18 |
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift | 04:19 | |
*** klrmn1 has quit IRC | 04:20 | |
notmyname | I'm finishing up the authors/changelog patch | 04:25 |
notmyname | I think it's pretty safe to say that what's on master right now is what will be in the release. neither increasing sharding ( cschwede_) nor ec frag replication ( kota_) will be in the ocata release | 04:26 |
*** links has joined #openstack-swift | 04:34 | |
*** cppforlife_ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:01 | |
kota_ | mahatic: good morning | 05:03 |
kota_ | notmyname: you're welcome for the path 425493 landed | 05:04 |
*** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 05:12 | |
*** caiobrentano_ has quit IRC | 05:14 | |
kota_ | mahatic: if you need help on that, please feel free to poke me. I am able to stay online today | 05:20 |
*** rickyrem has joined #openstack-swift | 05:29 | |
mahatic | kota_: sure, thanks | 05:34 |
mahatic | kota_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219165/56/swift/obj/reconstructor.py@825 - Here I was referring to a possibility of duplicates in "ordered_fis" list" | 05:37 |
patchbot | patch 219165 - swift - EC Fragment Duplication - Foundational Global EC C... | 05:37 |
mahatic | kota_: for eg: is it possible to have a stub_hashes like this - http://paste.openstack.org/show/598934/ over here in this test https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219165/57/test/unit/obj/test_reconstructor.py@1767 | 05:38 |
patchbot | patch 219165 - swift - EC Fragment Duplication - Foundational Global EC C... | 05:38 |
*** rickyrem has quit IRC | 05:42 | |
mahatic | For data like this - http://paste.openstack.org/show/598936/, I believe my fis will be [0,1,2,1,0,2] not in that order specifically..but it will still have duplicates. Unless this gets filtered out somewhere? | 05:42 |
* mahatic brb | 05:43 | |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 05:44 | |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 05:49 | |
kota_ | back, sorry, I was asked about small things from my collegue. | 05:49 |
kota_ | mahatic: probably, you find good point but I'm still not reach out the state. | 05:52 |
kota_ | mahatic: let me make sure the thougt | 05:54 |
kota_ | mahatic: looking at http://paste.openstack.org/show/598936/ | 05:55 |
kota_ | it looks like each device has only 1 fragment, right? | 05:55 |
openstackgerrit | John Dickinson proposed openstack/swift master: 2.13.0 authors/changelog updates https://review.openstack.org/434081 | 05:56 |
notmyname | there's the first draft of the 2.13 changelog | 05:56 |
kota_ | and a reconstuct job should be for each (device, policy, partition) | 05:56 |
notmyname | kota_: mahatic: cschwede_: mattoliverau: I'd definitely appreciate a quick check of it while I'm sleeping :-) | 05:56 |
kota_ | so it will be 6 jobs | 05:56 |
mattoliverau | notmyname: sure thing | 05:57 |
kota_ | mahatic: not a 6 items in ordered_fis in a job... right? | 05:57 |
notmyname | doh! I didn't pick up the handoffs_first -> handoffs_only patch | 05:57 |
kota_ | notmyname: will do | 05:57 |
notmyname | mahatic: kota_: thanks (but let me get that last patch referenced--new patch set in a few minutes) | 05:58 |
* kota_ is thinking the notmyname's response is for mattoliverau | 05:59 | |
notmyname | oh yeah. thanks kota_ | 06:00 |
notmyname | m+<tab> :-) | 06:00 |
kota_ | notmyname: i know ;-) | 06:00 |
notmyname | kota_: I'm sure that's *never* happened to you | 06:00 |
mattoliverau | should I change my nick to start with something unicode, so I'm the only complete ;P | 06:01 |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 06:01 | |
notmyname | that would be a fantastic way to get nobody to talk to you ;-) | 06:01 |
kota_ | notmyname: i just open the link, do we need to add release note anymore? | 06:01 |
notmyname | kota_: yeah, there will be a later patch set for that (after the one I'm working on) | 06:02 |
kota_ | notmyname: ok, gotcha, thanks | 06:02 |
notmyname | I want to get the words right, then I'll do the translation to yaml | 06:02 |
notmyname | and, as is proper, every time I mention yaml, I must also mention that yaml is terrible and has 69 ways to declare a multi-line string and requires a turing-complete parser to parse | 06:03 |
notmyname | ;-) | 06:03 |
kota_ | kk | 06:03 |
mattoliverau | notmyname: lol, you should have an irc bot that says that triggered on yaml ;) | 06:05 |
notmyname | mattoliverau: yes! | 06:05 |
notmyname | mattoliverau: or actually not. that sounds like making IRC more like slack ;-) | 06:05 |
mattoliverau | lol | 06:05 |
mahatic | sorry was away, reading backlog | 06:05 |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 06:06 | |
notmyname | slack's advantages over IRC: (1) blinding white background you can't change (2) clippy has been renamed to "slackbot" and will helpfully past animated gifs in your chat window | 06:06 |
kota_ | mahatic: np | 06:06 |
mattoliverau | notmyname: sounds awesome, but we all know the new awesome is matrix, which has a slack and irc bridge | 06:07 |
notmyname | mattoliverau: what is the matrix? (I"m assuming I can't be told; I can only be shown) | 06:08 |
notmyname | mattoliverau: I've not heard of this thing | 06:08 |
notmyname | I used the slack/IRC bridge for a little bit. until it started dropping messages | 06:08 |
mattoliverau | its the slack, but opensource and end to end encryption (like signal). | 06:09 |
notmyname | sounds like somethng the sales team will never buy in to ;-) | 06:09 |
mattoliverau | lol | 06:09 |
mattoliverau | csmart has been playing with it, so he's the man who can answer all your matrix questions.. but not what pill to take | 06:10 |
notmyname | slack == IRC that a sales team will actually use. (this is why they're valued at a brazillion dollars or something) | 06:10 |
mattoliverau | sorry, had to add some kind of matrix joke | 06:10 |
notmyname | I will not ne taking pills that csmart offers | 06:10 |
notmyname | again | 06:10 |
mahatic | kota_: I could be wrong. Could you tell me what this list "ordered_fis" might have in here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219165/56/swift/obj/reconstructor.py@816 | 06:10 |
patchbot | patch 219165 - swift - EC Fragment Duplication - Foundational Global EC C... | 06:10 |
csmart | notmyname: lol | 06:10 |
kota_ | mahatic: with http://paste.openstack.org/show/598934/, if i understand correctly, the ordered_fis will be [(frag_index, 2), ] because fi == None will be ignored previous for-loop. | 06:10 |
mattoliverau | ahh, well for matrix you could just use riot.im, and it works as a bouncer too. | 06:11 |
mattoliverau | lol | 06:11 |
mahatic | kota_: for a 2+1*2 setup | 06:12 |
csmart | matrix.org is open, distributed, federated next-gen messaging platform | 06:12 |
openstackgerrit | Matthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift master: Add container sharding to Swift containers https://review.openstack.org/423906 | 06:12 |
csmart | Which in my opinion is what the world needs, not slack | 06:12 |
mahatic | notmyname: sure thing. A quick look shows a big red thing which indicates extra space ;) | 06:12 |
kota_ | it looks like the ordrered_fis are a list of tuples which includes (count, suffix) | 06:13 |
csmart | riot.im is a front end to matrix.org | 06:13 |
notmyname | mahatic: ah yes. that part is just indicating my terribleness | 06:13 |
kota_ | ah not a [(frag_index, 2), ] but [(2, frag_index), ] | 06:13 |
mahatic | kota_: it's a tuple of (count, fi) | 06:13 |
mattoliverau | ^^ csmart that's a version that has mcarden's improvments. you can now go fix my english as well ;) | 06:14 |
kota_ | but i just now find the count is never used anywhere even in older code. | 06:14 |
csmart | mattoliverau: rgr 👍 | 06:14 |
kota_ | what we need looks just fragment_index in the suffix. | 06:14 |
mahatic | notmyname: lol | 06:15 |
notmyname | mattoliverau: mcarden == crash? | 06:15 |
mattoliverau | yup | 06:15 |
mattoliverau | notmyname: I don't know why he didn't try and get crash as an IRC nick, I assume it was taken :) | 06:15 |
notmyname | mattoliverau: it's very confusing when I only see you once per year and you use different names all the time (/cc csmart) | 06:15 |
mahatic | kota_: right. and I mean fragment_index would end up with duplicates (if I didn't misread). And I'm trying to know if it's ok | 06:15 |
csmart | notmyname: yep, crash | 06:16 |
kota_ | no mahatic, the data source (i.e. data_fi_to_suffixes) is a dict | 06:16 |
kota_ | strictly speaking, data_fi_to_suffixes = defaultdict(list) | 06:16 |
kota_ | so the key should not be duplicate | 06:16 |
mahatic | key is len(suffix) | 06:17 |
kota_ | no? | 06:17 |
mahatic | sorry key is suffix | 06:17 |
kota_ | data_fi_to_suffixes[fi].append(suffix) | 06:17 |
kota_ | no, the key *should be* fi | 06:17 |
openstackgerrit | John Dickinson proposed openstack/swift master: 2.13.0 authors/changelog updates https://review.openstack.org/434081 | 06:17 |
kota_ | fragment index | 06:17 |
notmyname | mattoliverau: kota_: mahatic: ok there's the new version. thanks for your eyes | 06:17 |
kota_ | notmyname: oh, probably the new version includes my nits in the gerrit draft comment ;-) | 06:18 |
kota_ | it's only white space in a line though | 06:18 |
notmyname | mattoliverau: kota_: mahatic: the first three sections are all a Big Deal in the terms of release notes. an upgrade warning, a warning about data loss, and a deprecation issue. so I tried to group/order them appropriately, but please let me know if you have other suggestions | 06:19 |
notmyname | kota_: oh yeah. I fixed that (if it's the one that mahatic mentioned) | 06:19 |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 06:20 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift | 06:20 | |
mahatic | notmyname: ack. kota_ ok, I'm looking. you're right about fi being key. I need to recheck and reaffirm with a test :) but looks like you added an assert in the newer patchset | 06:21 |
kota_ | mahatic: yeah, the assertion is for the check the build job report nodes only ec_duplication_factor nodes in the sync to list ;-) | 06:26 |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift master: EC Fragment Duplication - Foundational Global EC Cluster Support https://review.openstack.org/219165 | 06:27 |
kota_ | just rebased (merge conflict resolved) | 06:27 |
kota_ | oops, I had said a rebased comment on patch set 56 but the newest is 58 | 06:28 |
*** Jeffrey4l__ has joined #openstack-swift | 06:30 | |
mattoliverau | wow, ok so that documentation has taken alot longer then expected. but at least for the rest of the week I can focus on patches and reviews. Time to look at the state of the part power increase again. | 06:32 |
mattoliverau | oh and the change log | 06:32 |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 06:32 | |
*** Jeffrey4l_ has quit IRC | 06:34 | |
*** dja has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 06:40 | |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift master: Optimize ec duplication and its md5 hashing https://review.openstack.org/421673 | 06:40 |
kota_ | rebased | 06:40 |
*** abqkawi1000_ has quit IRC | 06:59 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift | 07:07 | |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 07:22 | |
*** ChubYann has quit IRC | 07:26 | |
*** silor has quit IRC | 07:28 | |
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift | 07:31 | |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 07:46 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 07:49 | |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 07:50 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/liberasurecode master: ISA-L: free matrix on exit https://review.openstack.org/431812 | 08:01 |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 08:08 | |
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift | 08:10 | |
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 08:12 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 08:21 | |
openstackgerrit | Béla Vancsics proposed openstack/swift master: Use more specific asserts in tests https://review.openstack.org/434132 | 08:22 |
kota_ | oh...what? | 08:23 |
kota_ | timburke: do you notice test/liberasurecode_test is not a binary but it looks like a script | 08:24 |
kota_ | timburke: probably that is a reason we cannot pick up the memory leak in the isa-l exit | 08:24 |
*** abhishekk has joined #openstack-swift | 08:24 | |
*** abhishekk has left #openstack-swift | 08:24 | |
kota_ | maybe it was affected from something at automake | 08:24 |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 08:25 | |
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift | 08:27 | |
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift | 08:32 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 08:36 | |
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 08:43 | |
*** kei_yama has quit IRC | 08:45 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-swift | 08:52 | |
openstackgerrit | Béla Vancsics proposed openstack/swift master: Use more specific asserts in tests https://review.openstack.org/434132 | 08:57 |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: WIP: Fix valgrind-check to use actual binary https://review.openstack.org/434162 | 09:19 |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 09:21 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 09:26 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 09:28 | |
*** dmorita_ has joined #openstack-swift | 09:30 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 09:33 | |
*** dmorita_ has quit IRC | 09:39 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 09:39 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-swift | 09:42 | |
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift | 09:54 | |
*** remix_auei is now known as remix_tj | 10:20 | |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: WIP: Fix valgrind-check to use actual binary https://review.openstack.org/434162 | 10:20 |
*** sams-gle_ has joined #openstack-swift | 10:26 | |
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 10:26 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 10:28 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 10:28 |
openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: WIP: Fix valgrind-check to use actual binary https://review.openstack.org/434162 | 10:33 |
*** mvk has quit IRC | 10:43 | |
*** silor has quit IRC | 11:01 | |
*** sams-gle_ has quit IRC | 11:13 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 11:13 | |
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift | 11:15 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 11:17 | |
*** gabor_antal has quit IRC | 11:22 | |
*** Jeffrey4l__ is now known as Jeffrey4l | 11:22 | |
*** gabor_antal_ has joined #openstack-swift | 11:22 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 11:57 | |
*** bkopilov_ has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
*** bkopilov has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift | 12:36 | |
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift | 13:27 | |
*** klamath has quit IRC | 13:30 | |
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift | 13:30 | |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 13:31 | |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
*** bkopilov_ has joined #openstack-swift | 13:45 | |
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift | 13:47 | |
*** tongli has joined #openstack-swift | 13:54 | |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 13:56 | |
*** ma91 has joined #openstack-swift | 14:02 | |
ma91 | Does anybody know, does Swift client work if I use Keystone + Keycloak? | 14:02 |
*** _JZ_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:06 | |
*** cshastri has quit IRC | 14:07 | |
*** mvk has quit IRC | 14:25 | |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 14:27 | |
*** dmellado_ is now known as dmellado | 14:27 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 14:31 | |
*** btorch_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:34 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 14:37 | |
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift | 14:39 | |
*** tongli has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 14:54 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 14:59 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 15:00 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
*** mvk has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 15:12 | |
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift | 15:19 | |
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 15:23 | |
*** oshritf has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
*** gatuus has joined #openstack-swift | 15:30 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 15:31 | |
*** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift | 15:32 | |
*** silor has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
*** silor1 is now known as silor | 15:33 | |
*** ma91 has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
*** gabor_antal_ is now known as gabor_antal | 15:46 | |
*** ma9 has joined #openstack-swift | 15:52 | |
cbartz | cschwede_: Currently, with the systemd services shipped by RDO (like swift-proxy-server) it is not possible to use the reload command (offered by swift-init for example), which is a little bit annoying. Are their intentions to support the reload command? | 15:58 |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 16:03 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 16:03 | |
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 16:06 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
*** mvk has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
*** gatuus has quit IRC | 16:15 | |
*** ma9 has quit IRC | 16:18 | |
*** ma9 has joined #openstack-swift | 16:21 | |
cschwede_ | cbartz: well, swift-init reload proxy-server will not really reload the proxy config only, but actually does a restart in the background? | 16:22 |
*** gatuus has joined #openstack-swift | 16:23 | |
cbartz | cschwede_: Yes. You are right. In principle its a graceful restart. Now, I see that reload for systemd is only a config reload. | 16:24 |
cschwede_ | cbartz: you can define reloads in systemd services using the ExecReload setting in the service definition, but that won't help in this case... | 16:26 |
cschwede_ | cbartz: and then there is systemctl daemon-reload, which actually reloads systemd's own config | 16:26 |
cschwede_ | cbartz: ie if you changed a systemd service config | 16:26 |
cbartz | cschwede_: Yes, I see. Thats a little bit annoying, because one has to wait until there are no more requests within a proxy, before a restart is possible. A graceful restart like with swift-init proxy reload would be nice. | 16:28 |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 16:35 | |
*** silor has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
*** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift | 16:38 | |
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift | 16:38 | |
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift | 16:38 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
*** silor1 is now known as silor | 16:40 | |
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 16:41 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
*** yuan has joined #openstack-swift | 16:45 | |
*** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift | 16:46 | |
*** silor has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
*** silor1 is now known as silor | 16:47 | |
yuan | Hi all, I have a question about swift object deletion behavior. If a delete a already deleted object 204 or 404 should return | 16:48 |
yuan | and if I delete a non-existent object, 204 or 404 should return | 16:48 |
rledisez | cbartz, cschwede_: i'm thinking also about this systemd stuff. maybe using the socket proxy of systemd would be nice. systemd listen on network and pass the socket to the processes. it could help getting zero downtime reload. i'm not systemd expert yet, but i'll have to learn soon as we will start upgrading our OS | 16:49 |
rledisez | related: does anybody use swift-init to manage processes in production? | 16:50 |
cschwede_ | cbartz, rledisez: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422614 | 16:52 |
openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1422614 in openstack-swift "Enable graceful reloading of Swift services" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to zaitcev | 16:52 |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 16:55 | |
*** tesseract has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
rledisez | cschwede_: to be clear, this is not what i call graceful reloading because there is a downtime (between the stop and the start of the processes). we use since few years a patched version of swift with so_reuseport so we have real zero downtime. i tried to upstream it but i failed (mainly because of a lack of time): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137659/ | 16:59 |
patchbot | patch 137659 - swift - Support of the Linux socket option SO_REUSEPORT (ABANDONED) | 16:59 |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 17:00 | |
cschwede_ | rledisez: ah, yes, i remember - you had something different in mind | 17:01 |
rledisez | personal opinion: i don't think swift must provide a process manager (swift-ini). it is the job of the distribution to do that (systemd, sysv, supervisor, whatever...). Swift should just integrate well with major processes managers (aka systemd today :)) | 17:01 |
*** ma9 has left #openstack-swift | 17:02 | |
*** jordanP has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift | 17:07 | |
*** klrmn has quit IRC | 17:08 | |
cbartz | cschwede_: Many thanks for the bug report! | 17:10 |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
*** oshritf has quit IRC | 17:12 | |
notmyname | good morning | 17:14 |
notmyname | rledisez: you're going to ATL next week for the PTG, right? | 17:14 |
caiobrentano | yuan: I think it should return 404 | 17:15 |
*** d0ugal has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 17:16 | |
rledisez | notmyname: good morning. yes, i'll be here (with some code and bench ;)) | 17:16 |
notmyname | rledisez: great! | 17:16 |
rledisez | i'm arriving tuesday afternoon so i'll be present frmo wednzsday to friday | 17:17 |
notmyname | good to know | 17:17 |
notmyname | tdasilva: mahatic: mattoliverau: thanks for comments on the changelog. I'll update that ASAP and push a new patch set (likely also with the yaml stuff too) | 17:18 |
tdasilva | notmyname: ack | 17:19 |
*** cbartz has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 17:26 | |
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift | 17:30 | |
*** d0ugal has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift | 17:30 | |
*** rledisez has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 17:33 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
*** d0ugal has quit IRC | 17:42 | |
openstackgerrit | John Dickinson proposed openstack/swift master: 2.13.0 authors/changelog updates https://review.openstack.org/434081 | 17:44 |
notmyname | updated without the yaml files yet (I have a meeting in 15 minutes and won't finish that before the meeting, so wanted to push up the fixes) | 17:44 |
timburke | kota_: i did notice -- wasn't sure how to try to fix it though http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-swift/%23openstack-swift.2017-02-13.log.html#t2017-02-13T21:48:44 | 17:46 |
*** mmotiani_ has joined #openstack-swift | 17:51 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 17:52 | |
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift | 17:54 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 17:57 | |
timburke | yuan: i'm not sure i saw a question -- but yes, you can expect either a 204 or a 404 on an object DELETE. during normal operation, it will be a 204 if the object previously existed and a 404 if the object either never existed or was previously deleted -- there isn't a good way as a client to distinguish between the two | 18:01 |
yuan | thanks | 18:03 |
timburke | (i have some memory that the object server will send an X-Timestamp header if it was previously deleted, or no header otherwise, but that seems to not make it back to the client) | 18:03 |
timburke | in the presence of failures, you may get a 204 on a previously deleted object -- if, for example, the first delete was recorded on a handoff, and the second found the primary that didn't receive the previous delete | 18:05 |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 18:06 | |
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 18:11 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 18:12 | |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 18:13 | |
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 18:13 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 18:16 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 18:16 | |
*** tqtran has quit IRC | 18:17 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 18:24 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift | 18:31 | |
openstackgerrit | Gábor Antal proposed openstack/swift master: Use more specific asserts in test/unit/obj tests https://review.openstack.org/342830 | 18:35 |
*** yuan has quit IRC | 18:37 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 18:43 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 18:48 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 18:48 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 18:53 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 18:56 | |
*** tnovacik has joined #openstack-swift | 18:57 | |
*** mmotiani_ has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
*** mmotiani_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:02 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
*** mmotiani_ has quit IRC | 19:13 | |
*** geaaru has quit IRC | 19:15 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 19:27 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 19:29 | |
*** mmotiani_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:30 | |
*** mmotiani_ has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 19:32 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 19:36 | |
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 19:36 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 19:40 | |
*** perm has joined #openstack-swift | 19:41 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 19:42 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 19:48 | |
*** chlong has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 19:52 | |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 19:57 | |
*** mmotiani_ has joined #openstack-swift | 19:59 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 19:59 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 20:00 | |
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 20:03 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
*** acoles has joined #openstack-swift | 20:05 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v acoles | 20:05 | |
*** joeljwright has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 20:06 | |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 20:06 | |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 20:07 | |
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 20:09 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright | 20:09 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 20:12 | |
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift | 20:16 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 20:17 | |
*** acoles has left #openstack-swift | 20:17 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 20:18 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 20:23 | |
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles | 20:24 | |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 20:31 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 20:36 | |
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift | 20:36 | |
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 20:36 | |
*** NM has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 20:41 | |
*** tonanhngo_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:43 | |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 20:44 | |
*** caiobrentano has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 20:45 | |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 20:49 | |
notmyname | meeting in #openstack-meeting in a few minutes | 20:56 |
mattoliverau | Morning | 20:57 |
*** tnovacik has quit IRC | 20:57 | |
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: We're currently battling an increase in log volume which isn't leaving sufficient space for new jobs to upload logs and results in POST_FAILURE in those cases; recheck if necessary but keep spurious rebasing and rechecking to a minimum until we're in the clear. | 20:57 | |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: Fix memory leaks in liberasurecode_test https://review.openstack.org/434513 | 20:58 |
kota_ | morningg | 20:58 |
timburke | kota_: ^^ | 20:59 |
mattoliverau | kota_: morning | 20:59 |
kota_ | timburke: nice! | 20:59 |
timburke | feel free to squash it in; luckily, most of the leaks were due to bad test code (as best i can tell) | 20:59 |
kota_ | mattoliverau: o/ | 20:59 |
kota_ | timburke: great work! | 20:59 |
timburke | kota_: thanks for figuring out how to get valgrind to test what we wanted it to test. i still don't entirely understand it, but i guess it works? seems better than --trace-children=yes which (OMM) complained about a bunch of problems in bash, sed, gcc... | 21:01 |
kota_ | timburke: ah, it sounds an option, --trac-childrean | 21:02 |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 21:03 | |
timburke | yeah, option to valgrind to have it *also* look at child processes. got noisy real fast | 21:03 |
kota_ | k, i'll try it | 21:04 |
*** silor has quit IRC | 21:05 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
*** mkaminski has joined #openstack-swift | 21:12 | |
*** clayg_ is now known as clayg | 21:16 | |
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift | 21:30 | |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: Fix memory leaks in liberasurecode_test https://review.openstack.org/434513 | 21:30 |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 21:33 | |
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 21:34 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 21:35 | |
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift | 21:35 | |
kota_ | timburke: great, your fix got much less definitely lost from older one but unfortunately it looks like a few place to leak the mem remaining | 21:36 |
kota_ | http://logs.openstack.org/13/434513/2/check/gate-liberasurecode-unit/17ca93d/console.html#_2017-02-15_21_33_44_176953 | 21:37 |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 21:39 | |
mattoliverau | clayg: storyboard will hopefully be the launchpad replacement one day, some projects (new ones I think) already use it. I thought it died ages ago, but turns out it's still a thing | 22:01 |
notmyname | i've looked at storyboard before. it's very different than LP | 22:02 |
notmyname | but yeah, the plan, as I've heard it, is that storyboard will be the new thing for everything | 22:02 |
tdasilva | i guess OVH guys should talk to iQiyi guys: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers#/17465 | 22:02 |
*** mmotiani_ has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
notmyname | the release goals like py35 and wsgi will be important for us to be represented in | 22:02 |
tdasilva | that looks interesting | 22:03 |
notmyname | tdasilva: what?! different storage layout on top of hummingbird?! | 22:03 |
*** perm has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
*** oshritf has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
clayg | that's awsome | 22:05 |
notmyname | how are these goal rooms supposed to be organized? from the etherpads, it looks like there's not much there | 22:05 |
notmyname | tdasilva: do you know? | 22:06 |
tdasilva | goal rooms? | 22:06 |
*** joeljwright has quit IRC | 22:06 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 22:06 | |
notmyname | tdasilva: the py35 and wsgi one. for the TC goals | 22:06 |
tdasilva | notmyname: sorry, not sure what you are talking about | 22:06 |
tdasilva | link? | 22:06 |
notmyname | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-pike-python35 and https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-pike-wsgi | 22:07 |
clayg | How to implement a background garbage collector to reclaim deleted spaces <- that part is a hozer | 22:07 |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 22:07 | |
tdasilva | clayg lots of cool talks! | 22:08 |
tdasilva | clayg: looks like you and notmyname have competing talks ?? :) | 22:08 |
notmyname | we do? | 22:09 |
tdasilva | idk, they sounded similar, but i only read really quick | 22:10 |
tdasilva | https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers#/18286 | 22:10 |
tdasilva | https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/vote-for-speakers#/18490 | 22:10 |
notmyname | I asked about the goal rooms next week in #openstack-dev | 22:10 |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
notmyname | tdasilva: hmm...I'll have to look back at my notes | 22:11 |
notmyname | tdasilva: I suspect there may have been some miscommunication ;-) | 22:11 |
sgundur | notmyname, r u referring to this wsgi ? - https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/pike/deploy-api-in-wsgi.html | 22:12 |
sgundur | or a new item ? | 22:12 |
notmyname | yep | 22:12 |
notmyname | well that's the tc goal. so there's a PTG room for it | 22:13 |
notmyname | here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-pike-wsgi | 22:13 |
sgundur | notmyname, I was looking into that; but thought we (Swift) already complies to it | 22:13 |
notmyname | but the etherpad doesn't really give any info | 22:13 |
notmyname | sgundur: yeah, i think swift is likely already ok on the front | 22:13 |
clayg | notmyname: i that is mostly going to end up being devstack work | 22:13 |
notmyname | sgundur: but I've been surprised before by what I think swift is good with vis-a-vis openstack and what other people in openstack think about that ;-) | 22:14 |
clayg | like I'm sure whoever acctaully tries to pick that up is going to find "swift is different" and there's gunna be some hubub we could avoid maybe if we test/fix the current devstack deployment | 22:14 |
sgundur | notmyname, do we need to come up with some write up or something like this - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/keystone/apache-httpd.html and link it on that governance page ? | 22:14 |
clayg | e.g. when we looked it - it seemed like it tried to do the storage nodes - which we could be bad | 22:14 |
notmyname | sgundur: like https://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/apache_deployment_guide.html ? ;-) | 22:14 |
jrichli | i still dont understand how to know where to go on monday. i have a list of rooms, and a list of etherpads. i have no mappings between them. correct? | 22:14 |
notmyname | jrichli: correct! | 22:15 |
sgundur | notmyname, yep saw that earlier today! thanks :) | 22:15 |
notmyname | clayg: yes. | 22:15 |
clayg | notmyname: our docs make the same mistake -> For an account service create /var/www/swift/account-server.wsgi: | 22:15 |
notmyname | our docs were written before we broke that on storage nodes. (doesn't make it right, but that's why) | 22:16 |
clayg | right of course - i'm opening the bug | 22:16 |
notmyname | clayg: thanks | 22:16 |
sgundur | notmyname, even that TC page mentions Swift as one of the projects already deploying devstack with API with WSGI; | 22:16 |
sgundur | so I am confused, abt the work left to do ! | 22:17 |
notmyname | sgundur: well, it depends on what they mean about "wsgi". we already produce wsgi apps. however, some other words seem to indicate what they really want is to run behind apache and mod_wsgi | 22:17 |
sgundur | notmyname, yes that's right. apache + mod_wsgi ; nginx + uwsgi | 22:19 |
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC | 22:19 | |
clayg | sgundur: there's code in devstack that says it does it - everyone is pretty sure it doesn't work | 22:22 |
clayg | but *I've* never tested it? | 22:22 |
sgundur | clayg, thanks | 22:23 |
sgundur | clayg, havn't been using devstack; will look for this | 22:24 |
clayg | I think it *used* to work probably - but I think maybe it regressed and no one noticed - we think the proxy still supports mod_wsgi deployment - and the storage nodes will not into the mid term future | 22:24 |
sgundur | clayg, by testing you mean we test the REST api calls using some tool like - gabbit ? or different ? | 22:25 |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 22:26 | |
clayg | i mean like spin up a devstack node twiddle the bits that should make swift deployed behind mod_wsgi - verify it is - and that you can still talk to swift | 22:26 |
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift | 22:26 | |
clayg | if you can put and get data out of swift through an apache front end the rest of the stuff will probably work to | 22:27 |
sgundur | clayg, that's helpful. thanks for explaining :) | 22:28 |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 22:31 | |
clayg | sgundur: basically this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1665156 | 22:32 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1665156 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "apache docs should be proxy only" [Undecided,New] | 22:32 |
clayg | sgundur: step 1) try to figure out how to devstack apache + swift 2) fix it 3) fix docs to reflect a working state | 22:33 |
notmyname | sgundur: I hoping you're asking cause you'll be able to work on it? yeah? yeah!?! yeah!! | 22:33 |
clayg | then at some point *probably* someone will do something in the gate and the chance of future regression goes down significantly | 22:33 |
sgundur | clayg, yep; thanks | 22:33 |
sgundur | clayg, step 0 - install devstack ;) | 22:34 |
*** acoles is now known as acoles_ | 22:35 | |
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles | 22:35 | |
clayg | sgundur: right there with you bro! If you're at the PTG come find me on Monday - i'm going to be swift+devstack *master* by wednesday! | 22:35 |
clayg | acoles: you here or not? | 22:35 |
clayg | :p | 22:35 |
acoles | clayg: IDK | 22:36 |
sgundur | clayg, lol :) | 22:36 |
timburke | kota_: yep, down to one last leak. the odd thing is that we *do* call liberasurecode_encode_cleanup in test_get_fragment_partition, so i guess some backend isn't doing the right thing for its hook there? https://github.com/openstack/liberasurecode/blob/master/test/liberasurecode_test.c#L907 | 22:37 |
timburke | at least, i *think* i'm reading that failure correctly | 22:37 |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 22:38 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 22:38 | |
kota_ | Will take a look, now finding breakfast, timburk | 22:39 |
timburke | (also worth noting: that's one last leak *in the gate* -- i have no doubt that there are other leaks scattered about, and i've in fact had to remove my libJerasure.so so i don't get overwhelmed with errors) | 22:39 |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 22:47 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 22:52 | |
*** mmotiani_ has joined #openstack-swift | 22:53 | |
*** mkaminski has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
*** mmotiani_ has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
*** catintheroof has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift | 23:01 | |
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
*** mmotiani_ has joined #openstack-swift | 23:02 | |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
*** _d34dh0r53_ is now known as d34dh0r53 | 23:09 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 23:10 | |
clayg | timburke: kvm supports aarch64 virtualization | 23:10 |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 23:14 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 23:20 | |
*** NM1 has joined #openstack-swift | 23:25 | |
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 23:27 | |
*** NM has quit IRC | 23:27 | |
*** _JZ_ has quit IRC | 23:28 | |
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift | 23:29 | |
*** acoles is now known as acoles_ | 23:30 | |
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles | 23:32 | |
*** JimCheung has quit IRC | 23:32 | |
*** mmotiani_ has quit IRC | 23:33 | |
*** dja has joined #openstack-swift | 23:36 | |
*** chsc has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
*** NM1 has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
*** sams-gleb has joined #openstack-swift | 23:50 | |
*** klamath has quit IRC | 23:51 | |
*** jerrygb_ has joined #openstack-swift | 23:52 | |
*** jerrygb has quit IRC | 23:53 | |
*** mmotiani_ has joined #openstack-swift | 23:56 | |
*** sams-gleb has quit IRC | 23:56 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 23:58 | |
*** jerrygb_ has quit IRC | 23:59 | |
*** jerrygb has joined #openstack-swift | 23:59 | |
openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: Fix memory leaks in liberasurecode_test https://review.openstack.org/434513 | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!