Thursday, 2018-09-06

openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Move KMIP conf validation out of _get_root_secret  https://review.openstack.org/58967300:03
*** spartakos has quit IRC00:30
openstackgerritTimur Alperovich proposed openstack/swift master: Allow for backwards compatibility with swift3.  https://review.openstack.org/60028500:45
*** rcernin has quit IRC00:50
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift00:51
*** gyee has quit IRC00:53
*** tonyb has quit IRC01:07
*** tonyb has joined #openstack-swift01:09
*** tonyb has quit IRC01:27
*** tonyb has joined #openstack-swift01:31
*** spartakos has joined #openstack-swift02:09
*** two_tired has joined #openstack-swift02:17
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift02:45
seongsoochoAfter add new container server and push the new ring, there are a huge tmp file on /srv/node/[disk]/tmp. Should I wait some time? or Is there a problem?.. I really worry about this.03:00
seongsoochoHere is the result of disk usage03:01
seongsoocho4.1Maccounts03:01
seongsoocho51Gcontainers03:01
seongsoocho36Gtmp03:01
seongsoocho86Gtotal03:01
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift03:31
*** spartakos has quit IRC03:35
kota_seongsoocho: IIRC, adding brand new container server causes the tmp dir size increasing because existing container servers attempts to push their local container dbs into the new container-server's tmp dir.04:02
kota_seongsoocho: however, it's odd because the rsync'ed db should rename into the container dir (i.e. /srv/node/[04:02
kota_(i.e. /srv/node/[disk]/containers)04:03
kota_so the tmp dir should be decreased immediately if container-servers get correct communications.04:04
seongsoochokota_:  thank you for your kind reply.  I added a new node about 2hours ago.  Still waiting...  thanks!04:06
*** UnfairFunction has joined #openstack-swift04:15
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Add IPv6 DSVM tests  https://review.openstack.org/59149704:46
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: Import legacy jobs  https://review.openstack.org/60015404:53
AJaegernotmyname: I had the wrong filename in the playbook, check the diff between my patch sets05:00
AJaegernotmyname: argh, misread your question05:00
AJaegernotmyname: you define jobs - like you declare functions. And then you call them from main - I mean define when to run in the projects list. the base job is not listed in the projects stanza, so will not run.05:01
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: py3: get proxy-server willing and able to respond to some API requests  https://review.openstack.org/57895805:02
AJaegernotmyname, timburke, I think in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/600152/ we can remove the v2 job - looking at the log files, it's nearly everywhere v3 usage...05:24
patchbotpatch 600152 - swift - remove legacy-swift-dsvm-functional jobs - 3 patch sets05:24
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/swift master: remove legacy-swift-dsvm-functional jobs  https://review.openstack.org/60015205:29
AJaegernotmyname, timburke, updated ^05:29
*** two_tired has quit IRC05:30
*** links has joined #openstack-swift05:33
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: Use Swift's in-tree DSVM test  https://review.openstack.org/59152805:35
AJaegertimburke: I updated your change to remove legacy jobs - this is a better way forward ^05:35
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: Use Swift's in-tree DSVM test  https://review.openstack.org/59152805:36
*** gkadam_ has joined #openstack-swift05:41
*** gkadam has quit IRC05:43
*** gkadam__ has joined #openstack-swift05:45
*** gkadam_ has quit IRC05:47
*** links has quit IRC05:57
*** UnfairFunction has quit IRC06:04
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift06:25
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift06:34
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: Use Swift's in-tree DSVM test  https://review.openstack.org/59152806:35
AJaegertimburke, notmyname, I backported the swift-dsvm-functional job to all branches. Do we need an identity v2 job for some branches?06:48
*** rcernin has quit IRC07:00
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift07:14
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC07:34
*** pcaruana has quit IRC07:36
*** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift07:47
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift07:48
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift07:53
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift07:59
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift08:11
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift08:49
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:51
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift10:01
*** d0ugal has quit IRC10:14
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift10:23
*** ccamacho has quit IRC11:07
*** psachin has quit IRC11:51
*** hseipp has quit IRC12:04
tdasilvaAJaeger: I'd imagine we need to test against v2 for branches where v3 was not yet the default??12:32
tdasilvaor are we just going to test everything against v3?12:33
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift12:38
*** ccamacho has quit IRC12:38
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift12:38
admin6notmyname: timburke: Hey, I’d just like to thank you for your answer 2 days ago about swift upgrade, didn’t had the time to do so since. :-)12:44
kota_oh hi tdasilva, I'm just preparing to get back home from my office tho12:48
tdasilvakota_: must be late for you!12:58
*** links has joined #openstack-swift13:15
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC13:48
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift13:49
*** d0ugal has quit IRC14:05
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift14:10
AJaegertdasilva: that would be ocata and pike - correct?14:14
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift14:30
*** d0ugal has quit IRC14:50
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift14:52
*** itlinux has quit IRC14:56
*** hseipp has quit IRC15:07
tdasilvaAJaeger: yes, that would be my understanding15:08
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift15:09
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift15:11
AJaegertdasilva: updated ocata and pike changes15:16
*** d0ugal has quit IRC15:21
*** spartakos has joined #openstack-swift15:24
timburkegood morning15:31
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift15:34
*** ccamacho has quit IRC15:38
*** pcaruana has quit IRC15:42
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift15:55
notmynamegood morning15:56
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift16:01
*** cbartz has quit IRC16:07
*** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-swift16:08
*** itlinux has quit IRC16:12
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift16:12
*** links has quit IRC16:14
*** ccamacho has quit IRC16:22
*** hseipp has quit IRC16:26
*** silor has quit IRC16:32
*** itlinux_ has quit IRC16:33
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC16:34
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift16:37
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC16:37
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift16:55
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift17:03
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift17:05
*** gkadam__ has quit IRC17:09
*** spartakos has quit IRC17:11
*** ChanServ sets mode: -rf 17:13
*** rickflare has joined #openstack-swift17:14
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift17:18
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift17:19
*** psachin has quit IRC17:26
*** pcaruana has quit IRC17:27
*** spartakos has joined #openstack-swift17:35
*** links has joined #openstack-swift17:38
*** links has quit IRC17:38
*** mvenesio has joined #openstack-swift17:40
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift18:02
*** links has joined #openstack-swift18:02
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC18:05
*** mvenesio has quit IRC18:10
*** mvenesio has joined #openstack-swift18:11
*** links has quit IRC18:11
itlinuxgood morning notmyname;18:11
*** spartakos has quit IRC18:15
AJaegernotmyname: I updated the zuul jobs again - and backported. I also think timburke's change 591528 is ready.18:25
notmynamepatch KxPs7gu418:26
notmynamepatch KxPs7gu418:26
AJaegerI added for older branches an identity v2 job as well18:26
notmynamebah18:26
notmynamepatch 59152818:26
AJaegernotmyname: password?18:26
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/591528/ - python-swiftclient - Use Swift's in-tree DSVM test - 7 patch sets18:26
timburkenotmyname: i don't think there's a patch ********18:26
notmynameAJaeger: nothing important ;-)18:26
AJaegernotmyname: patch 600152 , patch 600342, patch 600344, patch 600349 , patch 60034918:27
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/600152/ - swift - remove legacy-swift-dsvm-functional jobs - 4 patch sets18:27
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/600342/ - swift (stable/rocky) - Move legacy-swift-dsvm-functional job in-tree - 1 patch set18:27
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/600344/ - swift (stable/queens) - Move legacy-swift-dsvm-functional job in-tree - 1 patch set18:27
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/600349/ - swift (stable/ocata) - Move legacy-swift-dsvm-functional job in-tree - 2 patch sets18:27
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/600349/ - swift (stable/ocata) - Move legacy-swift-dsvm-functional job in-tree - 2 patch sets18:27
*** ccamacho has quit IRC18:28
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC18:29
*** AJaeger_ has joined #openstack-swift19:00
*** AJaeger has quit IRC19:02
*** AJaeger_ is now known as AJaeger19:03
tdasilvaAJaeger: looking at patch 591528, why the need to define the two jobs?19:07
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/591528/ - python-swiftclient - Use Swift's in-tree DSVM test - 7 patch sets19:07
tdasilvai'm assuming the second one makes sure to use the python-swiftclient src dir, which would allow for actually testing the patch under review, but what's the point of the first one then?19:08
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift19:08
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Allow for backwards compatibility with swift3.  https://review.openstack.org/60028519:08
AJaegertdasilva: let me dig into this...19:09
timburkeyowza! 15hrs from +2/+A to merge??19:13
tdasilvajust saw the note about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589382/ merging soon19:13
patchbotpatch 589382 - requirements - Bump eventlet to 0.24.1 - 1 patch set19:13
AJaegertimburke: huge backlog ;(19:13
tdasilvawe should get back to this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591034/19:13
patchbotpatch 591034 - swift - WIP: Test with newer eventlet - 3 patch sets19:13
AJaegertimburke: merging https://review.openstack.org/600152 will help - removes two jobs from swift ;)19:14
patchbotpatch 600152 - swift - remove legacy-swift-dsvm-functional jobs - 4 patch sets19:14
timburkeAJaeger: true. sadly, those aren't the really painful ones (for me, anyway)19:14
timburkei'm thinking of dropping the neutron jobs from our check/gate queues... i can't imagine that it makes sense to test all of that for swift-only changes...19:16
timburketdasilva: yeah -- we'll need to figure out what to do about probe tests though. i suppose it's not actually required that we bump the min version until we want to declare support for py319:18
timburkeand by that time, whatever repo we use to install python-eventlet may have a newer version packaged19:19
tdasilvayeah, we have been using centos-release-openstack-queens so far. Today I tried testing with centos-release-openstack-rocky, but I'm not really sure if it has been officialy released already, I ran into some problems with it19:25
tdasilvathere were packages that were in the queens repo that are not in the rocky repo, so I'm not sure if it was removed on purpose or what...19:26
timburketdasilva: i'm inclined to not worry about it yet. getting 0.24.1 into upper-constraints will unblock further py3 work; that's the important thing19:26
*** spartakos has joined #openstack-swift19:30
*** pcaruana has quit IRC19:35
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: DNM: Testing swift functional jobs  https://review.openstack.org/60054019:51
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: Use Swift's in-tree DSVM test  https://review.openstack.org/59152820:06
*** amrith has joined #openstack-swift20:16
*** UnfairFunction has joined #openstack-swift20:53
*** drewn3ss has joined #openstack-swift21:03
*** UnfairFunction has quit IRC21:04
*** mvenesio has quit IRC21:18
*** mvenesio has joined #openstack-swift21:19
*** mvenesio has quit IRC21:25
*** clayg has joined #openstack-swift21:32
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v clayg21:32
claygam I logged in now21:33
notmynamewoooo21:33
notmynameclayg: were you in the -unregistered channel?21:33
claygyeah i guess so :'(21:34
notmynameit's not your fault! we still want you here. (we just don't want all the spam bots here)21:34
claygidk, I feel like my irccloud tends to want to start joining channels before I've identified and it doesn't work itself out21:39
notmynameyeah, I've heard of people having that issue. using SASL auth avoids that because you're authenticated before you connect (or as you connect?).21:40
*** clayg has quit IRC21:54
*** clayg has joined #openstack-swift21:54
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v clayg21:54
claygit says: SASL authentication successful21:56
claygI ... don't really know why i was having trouble - I didn't change anything - i just reconnected a few times?  🤷‍♂️21:56
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift22:29
*** itlinux has quit IRC22:34
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC22:46
DHEall that auth stuff still depends on nickserv being available, and responsive... :/22:46
*** drewn3ss has quit IRC23:06
*** drewn3ss has joined #openstack-swift23:07
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:22
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift23:45

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!