| opendevreview | Jianjian Huo proposed openstack/swift master: Sharder: add a new probe test for the case of slow parent sharding. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/867121 | 06:34 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Jianjian Huo proposed openstack/swift master: Sharder: add a new probe test for the case of slow parent sharding. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/867121 | 06:38 |
| timburke | #startmeeting swift | 21:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Dec 14 21:01:41 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is timburke. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 21:01 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 21:01 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'swift' | 21:01 |
| timburke | who's here for the swift team meeting? | 21:01 |
| acoles | o/ | 21:02 |
| mattoliver | o/ | 21:02 |
| kota | o/ | 21:02 |
| timburke | as usual, the agenda's on the wiki | 21:02 |
| timburke | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift | 21:03 |
| timburke | and as usual, i only just updated it immediately before the meeting ;-) | 21:03 |
| timburke | first up | 21:03 |
| timburke | #topic parse_request bug | 21:03 |
| timburke | we've still go issues with func tests, and they're starting to turn up on stable branches :-/ | 21:04 |
| mattoliver | I'm in the middle of reviewing your inline patch. Never quite got the end yesterday arvo. But will finish it this morning | 21:05 |
| timburke | clayg seems generally on board with the idea of just re-writing all of parse_request to suit our needs -- but i'm curious about how everyone else feels about it, too | 21:05 |
| timburke | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/866801 | 21:05 |
| timburke | thanks mattoliver! | 21:06 |
| mattoliver | there is alot of new code, so just comparing to the eventlet version and making sure it covers our needs.. which I know you've done.. but just double checking | 21:06 |
| timburke | i appreciate how it means we can address https://bugs.python.org/issue33973 much more directly, but it's still nowhere near enough to get us to a net-negative (or even break-even) line change | 21:07 |
| mattoliver | yeah, totally understand, and thats fine :) | 21:08 |
| timburke | speaking of testing... | 21:10 |
| timburke | #topic testing under py310 | 21:10 |
| timburke | we do it now! | 21:10 |
| mattoliver | \o/ | 21:10 |
| kota | excellent | 21:11 |
| timburke | not much else to report, there :-) there's still a follow-up to clean up some deprecation warnings, but it's fairly low-priority | 21:11 |
| acoles | 👍 | 21:11 |
| timburke | at some point, i'll look at switching func tests from py38 to py310, too | 21:12 |
| timburke | next up | 21:13 |
| timburke | #topic 2.31.0 release | 21:13 |
| timburke | now that we've got py310 testing (and once we address the func test failures) i'd like to get a release out! | 21:14 |
| timburke | there's been a bunch of stuff that's landed in the last few months, and it'll be good to put it out in the world | 21:14 |
| mattoliver | yeah sounds good, though I guess we should wait for the embargo bug too? | 21:15 |
| timburke | i don't have a firm timeline on when i want to get it out yet, but if you know of any other issues that should get in, let me know! | 21:15 |
| timburke | mattoliver, the first rule about embargoed bugs is.... ;-) | 21:16 |
| mattoliver | lol | 21:16 |
| mattoliver | didn't say what it is :P | 21:16 |
| mattoliver | but true, sorry | 21:16 |
| timburke | but yes, that is on my radar | 21:16 |
| mattoliver | cool cool | 21:16 |
| timburke | no worries | 21:17 |
| timburke | that's all i've got for this week | 21:18 |
| timburke | #topic open discussion | 21:18 |
| timburke | what else should we discuss? | 21:18 |
| acoles | are we meeting next week? I for one will def not be here the week after (28th) | 21:19 |
| timburke | oh! good call! | 21:19 |
| mattoliver | oh yeah, me either | 21:19 |
| timburke | i propose we cancel the next two weeks' meetings and reconvene in January | 21:19 |
| acoles | +1 | 21:19 |
| mattoliver | +1 | 21:19 |
| acoles | +A :) | 21:19 |
| mattoliver | lol | 21:19 |
| kota | :D | 21:19 |
| timburke | that puts the next meeting Jan 4 | 21:20 |
| timburke | for some local definition of 4 ;-) | 21:20 |
| mattoliver | lol, so long as it's in UTC :P | 21:21 |
| timburke | all right, i think i'll call it for this year, then | 21:22 |
| timburke | enjoy the holidays everyone! | 21:22 |
| mattoliver | seeing as it the last meeting for the year, I don't have too much to talk about. if anyone gets bored and wants to start reviewing tracing, great, it although it still needs tests | 21:22 |
| mattoliver | otherwise happy holidays! | 21:22 |
| timburke | thanks for coming, and thank you for working on swift! | 21:22 |
| timburke | #endmeeting | 21:22 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Dec 14 21:22:57 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 21:22 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/swift/2022/swift.2022-12-14-21.01.html | 21:22 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/swift/2022/swift.2022-12-14-21.01.txt | 21:22 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/swift/2022/swift.2022-12-14-21.01.log.html | 21:22 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!