opendevreview | Jianjian Huo proposed openstack/swift master: Container-server: add request timing metrics for PUT object/shard/container. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/898700 | 05:15 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: s3api: Stop propagating storage policy to sub-requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/897864 | 09:53 |
opendevreview | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Delete s3api MPU segments when the manifest expires https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/800701 | 09:53 |
opendevreview | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: s3api: Stop propagating storage policy to sub-requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/897864 | 10:27 |
opendevreview | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Delete s3api MPU segments when the manifest expires https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/800701 | 10:27 |
opendevreview | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: sharder: reduce rate of 'Reclaimable db...' warnings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/898742 | 14:54 |
opendevreview | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: sharder: reduce rate of 'Reclaimable db...' warnings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/898742 | 15:02 |
opendevreview | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Move InputProxy back to proxy-logging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/898748 | 17:00 |
opendevreview | Clay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift master: WIP: Refactor SLO size/etag sysmeta tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/896466 | 20:06 |
opendevreview | Clay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift master: WIP: slo: refactor GET/HEAD response handling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/893578 | 20:06 |
kota | morning | 20:57 |
mattoliver | morning o/ | 21:01 |
timburke | #startmeeting swift | 21:03 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Oct 18 21:03:27 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is timburke. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 21:03 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 21:03 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'swift' | 21:03 |
timburke | sorry i'm late | 21:03 |
timburke | who's here for the swift meeting? | 21:03 |
mattoliver | o/ | 21:04 |
kota | y/ | 21:04 |
timburke | big topic for this week -- PTG's next week! | 21:05 |
timburke | thanks everyone for voting for times on https://framadate.org/liKzqQw5lZQW8Pvf | 21:05 |
timburke | looks like while the block starting around this time would work fairly well for Monday, the rest of the days 1300-1800 UTC might work better | 21:06 |
mattoliver | yeah, well having the ops feed back session at busy time always makes sense. | 21:07 |
kota | sounds ok | 21:08 |
timburke | mattoliver and kota, am i right to think it'd be better to not try to shift the times around? i feel like that'd make for a really long first day for you guys | 21:08 |
mattoliver | But I'm easy.. I just wont be as productive during work during normal hours :P | 21:08 |
kota | any of things is ok because i'm at home those days for some reasons | 21:09 |
timburke | we can also aim for somewhat shorter sessions -- i don't really *want* to keep mattoliver up until 5am | 21:09 |
kota | i got conjunctivitis in the last weeks and i have to stay home until the end of this month. | 21:09 |
mattoliver | 1800UTC is getting a little late, that'll be 5am | 21:09 |
kota | so there is no plan to go outside. | 21:10 |
timburke | oh no! hope you feel better soon kota | 21:10 |
mattoliver | oh yeah, obviously my irc is lagging :P | 21:10 |
mattoliver | oh no kota :( | 21:10 |
timburke | seems like all the more reason to make sure you can get a good night's sleep | 21:10 |
kota | :) | 21:10 |
timburke | i'll start booking rooms after this meeting | 21:12 |
mattoliver | kk | 21:12 |
indianwhocodes | o/ | 21:13 |
timburke | and i'll try to flesh out a few of my topics some more on https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/swift-ptg-caracal | 21:13 |
timburke | if you have anything else you'd like to bring up at the PTG, please add it to the etherpad! | 21:14 |
mattoliver | yeah I just added a new one based off discussions with SRE yesterday | 21:14 |
mattoliver | will keep adding as we think of things | 21:14 |
timburke | i saw that! i think i like it | 21:14 |
timburke | i was having some other thoughts around recon recently, but somewhat going the other way -- have recon-cron emit gauges that could get picked up by something like statsd_exporter | 21:16 |
timburke | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/895737 | 21:16 |
mattoliver | oh yeah, well seems like a good topic to talk about at the ptg then! | 21:16 |
timburke | it also got me thinking about two directions we could take on recon-cron -- (1) fold it into the object-updater, making it the only place that crawls async dirs, or (2) expand it to also do other monitoring, like counting primary/handoff parts and dropping that in recon/stats, too | 21:19 |
mattoliver | oh, interesting idea. both have merits. I like less things walking the dirs.. but having the primary, handoff, deep handoff stats is so useful I think upstream should get that data | 21:21 |
timburke | absolutely -- though it could also be done in some extra process/thread the replicator/reconstructor spins off | 21:22 |
mattoliver | cough audit watcher cough :P | 21:23 |
timburke | the biggest hesitation i've got about folding it into the updater is losing visibility when you've got your updater paused for whatever reason | 21:23 |
mattoliver | yeah | 21:23 |
mattoliver | that's not great | 21:23 |
mattoliver | random thoughts, link into the kernels inotify and look for asyncs that way, get triggered to run rather then walking? | 21:24 |
timburke | oh, now *there's* a thought... wouldn't help with the async counting today... but maybe it'd be reasonable to have it attempt some kind of audit for those, too? | 21:25 |
mattoliver | ie when a new async it written or removed | 21:25 |
mattoliver | same could we said for an alert to quarantine | 21:25 |
timburke | it also seems to have a lot of overlap with some of clayg's overseer ideas | 21:26 |
timburke | anyway, we can discuss this more at the PTG :-) | 21:27 |
mattoliver | I feel a nerd-snipe coming one.. good thing PTG is soon ;) | 21:28 |
mattoliver | *on | 21:28 |
timburke | that's the only thing i wanted to bring up, and to thank everyone for being so flexible on scheduling | 21:29 |
mattoliver | async counting, when started could walk to get current count. Insert a inotify to the kernel and then start counting/decrementing based on events in the async folder to keep the count up to date. | 21:29 |
mattoliver | periodic walk to keep in line (if we don't trust it). | 21:29 |
mattoliver | Oh yeah, we're so close to PTG, no need to bring many more topics up in this meeting today :) | 21:30 |
timburke | heh | 21:30 |
timburke | #topic open discussion | 21:30 |
timburke | anything else we should discuss this week? | 21:30 |
timburke | seems like there's a good number of patches all making pretty good progress | 21:30 |
timburke | mattoliver, just as a heads-up i proposed (and merged) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/898440 as a follow-up to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/897108 (silly yaml) | 21:32 |
indianwhocodes | I was wondering if this patch was in our radar https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/799866 | 21:32 |
mattoliver | kk, thanks timburke | 21:33 |
indianwhocodes | 799866: Let WSGI apps signal that a client connection should be closed currently seems to have a merge conflict which I attempted fixing | 21:33 |
timburke | indianwhocodes, it hasn't been, but probably should be! | 21:33 |
mattoliver | yeah, timburke (not that I've looked) but maybe we should start using priority reviews page again | 21:34 |
mattoliver | I keep getting side tracked with other work. But slowly working through timburke swift-reload patch chain. We've been running it for a while in prod and it's pretty great. | 21:35 |
timburke | priority reviews page is a great idea -- i've been remiss in tending it | 21:36 |
mattoliver | chain starting: | 21:36 |
mattoliver | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/833174 | 21:36 |
mattoliver | we all have.. but maybe we should start using it. There are alot of patches out there that could do with some love. | 21:37 |
indianwhocodes | <3 | 21:37 |
mattoliver | I myself need to get better at reviewing again.. seems I'm not good at multi-tasking :P | 21:37 |
indianwhocodes | part-num api is wrapping up, so recalibrating my swift-priorities | 21:38 |
indianwhocodes | same here, can expect more reviews from me now. | 21:38 |
timburke | 👍 | 21:40 |
mattoliver | I got nothing else seeing as the PTG starts next week, can't wait to talk and see everyone again! | 21:41 |
mattoliver | just wish it was in person | 21:41 |
timburke | at least we did a pretty good job of merging what was on the priority reviews page -- 7 of the ten patches that were listed when i last updated it have now merged | 21:41 |
mattoliver | \o/ | 21:41 |
indianwhocodes | +2 | 21:41 |
timburke | ditto -- i'd much prefer being jet-lagged but all together to having nearly everyone awake at odd hours while still also needing to do normal life things | 21:42 |
mattoliver | ^ 100x this | 21:43 |
kota | agree | 21:43 |
timburke | otoh, i suppose it's nice that we'll get some kota time! idk that we would otherwise, with the conjunctivitis ;-) | 21:44 |
timburke | all right, i think i'll end the meeting a little early | 21:46 |
timburke | thank you all for coming, thank you for working on swift, and see you all next week! | 21:46 |
timburke | #endmeeting | 21:46 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Oct 18 21:46:35 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 21:46 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/swift/2023/swift.2023-10-18-21.03.html | 21:46 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/swift/2023/swift.2023-10-18-21.03.txt | 21:46 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/swift/2023/swift.2023-10-18-21.03.log.html | 21:46 |
kota | thanks | 21:46 |
timburke | feel better soon kota! | 21:46 |
opendevreview | ASHWIN A NAIR proposed openstack/swift master: slo: part-number=N query paramater support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/894570 | 22:08 |
opendevreview | ASHWIN A NAIR proposed openstack/swift master: s3api: Support GET/HEAD request with PartNumber https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/894580 | 22:08 |
opendevreview | ASHWIN A NAIR proposed openstack/swift master: proxy: handle ChunkReadTimeout in replicated GET path https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/897236 | 22:25 |
opendevreview | ASHWIN A NAIR proposed openstack/swift master: proxy: stop logging backend timeouts as client disconnects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/897343 | 22:25 |
opendevreview | ASHWIN A NAIR proposed openstack/swift master: proxy: don't send multi-part terminator when no parts sent https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/897566 | 22:25 |
opendevreview | ASHWIN A NAIR proposed openstack/swift master: proxy-server: de-duplicate _get_next_response_part method https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/890919 | 22:25 |
opendevreview | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: object: Return storage policy in headers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/898783 | 22:33 |
opendevreview | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: proxy: Move object storage policy to expected header https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/898784 | 22:33 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!