| *** abhishekk is now known as akekane|away | 05:37 | |
| *** akekane|away is now known as abhishekk | 05:37 | |
| *** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 08:17 | |
| ttx | zaneb: ++ | 08:37 |
|---|---|---|
| ttx | Yeah, the idea was to apply a layer of 'common sense' and avoid Boaty McBoatFace... have a good discussion at filtering down the list to good options, then have a preference ranking | 08:39 |
| *** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav | 11:51 | |
| zaneb | gmann: you are the pre-trademark check | 13:05 |
| spotz | ttx - Hey we have Stacky McStackface! | 14:06 |
| *** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk | 14:09 | |
| *** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav | 14:48 | |
| gmann | zaneb: ttx humm, it is actually difficult to implement in current process until in TC we all discussed to eliminate some name for vote. and how to do that is again question like why we eliminated and how to cordinate to eliminate or so. because that should be common from all TC. | 15:05 |
| gmann | may be adding something "TC can eliminate the names as per their sense to avoid trademark" and 'let all community to vote on final eligible list' | 15:05 |
| gmann | but I think we need more discussion on this so I am not going to push it to change immidetialy but something to discuss in next PTG or so then take any decision. | 15:06 |
| zaneb | we tried that and there were hurt feelings all around and massive pointless distractions | 15:06 |
| gmann | zaneb: i remember that but having that in process as explicit mentiuon can help. but yes it has to be very clear with some criteria | 15:07 |
| fungi | also potential trademark infringements were the least of the concerns, it's more about weeding out candidates which could be culturally insensitive or just wouldn't make good release names for other reasons | 15:08 |
| fungi | the tc can try to filter for trademark name collisions, but it's often not obvious when something which seems like it could pose a trademark problem actually does, and you're unlikely to find them all anyway which is why the foundation employs a company to perform trademark searches | 15:10 |
| zaneb | some are less non-obvious than others :) | 15:10 |
| fungi | sure | 15:10 |
| gmann | yeah. | 15:10 |
| ttx | and some companies are also... well-known to aggressively defend (beer required to share stories) | 16:04 |
| yoctozepto | ooh, beer attack? you sure it was not bear attack? | 16:26 |
| fungi | attack of the beer bears | 16:37 |
| yoctozepto | imgur has you covered: https://imgur.com/gallery/MVuJy0z | 16:42 |
| fungi | why am i not surprised? | 16:43 |
| gmann | tc-members: can anyone review these repo retirement patches | 16:54 |
| gmann | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-specs/+/796963 | 16:54 |
| gmann | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-navigator-data/+/796965 | 16:54 |
| gmann | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/arch-wg/+/796964 | 16:54 |
| gmann | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/workload-ref-archs/+/796967 | 16:54 |
| gmann | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-uc/+/796970 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/enterprise-wg/+/796966 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ops-tags-team/+/796968 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/uc-recognition/+/796969 | 16:54 |
| yoctozepto | gmann: they need to be redone | 17:10 |
| yoctozepto | you should remove the "optional" part from README :-( | 17:10 |
| yoctozepto | otherwise it reads bad | 17:10 |
| gmann | yoctozepto: oh, thanks for cathing it. doing | 17:11 |
| gmann | yoctozepto: done | 17:17 |
| yoctozepto | gmann: ok | 17:18 |
| yoctozepto | gmann, one -1, seven +2 | 17:22 |
| gmann | yoctozepto: thanks, fixed for -1 | 17:24 |
| yoctozepto | +2 | 17:27 |
| gmann | thanks. | 17:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!