| tkajinam | gmann, hi. will we have the policy meeting today (June 14th) ? | 03:53 |
|---|---|---|
| *** gthiemon1e is now known as gthiemonge | 13:15 | |
| gmann | tkajinam: hi, we do not have meeting today. I am still collecting feedbacks from etherpads and will schedule the next meeting next week or so. | 14:06 |
| tkajinam | gmann, ack. understood thanks | 14:06 |
| tkajinam | I haven't get any useful input from our partners so far. I'd check status of our internal discussion/checking | 14:07 |
| gmann | tkajinam: ack, that will be helpful | 14:07 |
| tkajinam | but atm I'm not sure whether we can get actual feedback and we might need to depend on feedback only from ops/users. | 14:07 |
| tkajinam | anyway let's see | 14:07 |
| gmann | yeah, that's true. we will take call based on that or if any other we are able to get. | 14:08 |
| dansmith | the feedback from the etherpads I've seen has been pretty much what I expected, | 14:08 |
| dansmith | which is "reader role: yes, service role: yes, system scope: wtf is system scope?" | 14:08 |
| tkajinam | yeah | 14:09 |
| dansmith | and also some of "people are already confused enough with admin, system scope will create more issues" | 14:09 |
| tkajinam | it might be enough to prioritize reader and leave scope now, as we discussed earlier. or leave scope just optional... a problem with that would be we'd need a different mechanism to differentiate project reader and system reader | 14:13 |
| tkajinam | it might be a problem, though. since we required project scope for project resources, a project reader can't get list of all instances while system reader can't access project resources | 14:13 |
| tkajinam | it might be already a problem * | 14:14 |
| gmann | yeah, if we leave scope then there is no system reader | 14:14 |
| * tkajinam does not have full understanding about the current implementation of reader | 14:14 | |
| dansmith | yeah, my suggestion is that we decouple scope, move it to the end of the list and pursue the persona roles, service role, etc and get this actually turned on for people | 14:14 |
| gmann | anyways let me schedule meeting next week and will send invite and discuss the feedback and the next step | 14:15 |
| tkajinam | yup | 14:15 |
| gmann | yeah, that seems reasonable step in current situation | 14:15 |
| dansmith | tbh, we could have a standard role called system_reader (we need a better name to avoid confusion) and handle the system reader thing without any more complication than that | 14:15 |
| tkajinam | it's all good, as we are getting feedback what we expected and was concerned about. | 14:16 |
| tkajinam | yeah > the system-reader role. | 14:18 |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 14:31 | |
| *** lajoskatona_ is now known as lajoskatona | 15:24 | |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 21:02 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!