| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Appoint Dale Smith as Adjutant PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849606 | 09:37 |
|---|---|---|
| *** jungleboyj_ is now known as jungleboyj | 11:06 | |
| *** seongsoocho_ is now known as seongsoocho | 11:06 | |
| *** knikolla_ is now known as knikolla | 11:06 | |
| *** rpittau_ is now known as rpittau | 11:06 | |
| *** TheJulia_ is now known as TheJulia | 11:06 | |
| *** clarkb is now known as Guest1034 | 11:14 | |
| *** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk | 11:14 | |
| *** arne_wiebalck_ is now known as arne_wiebalck | 11:24 | |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Define 2023.1 cycle testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854375 | 12:12 |
| *** pojadhav|afk is now known as pojadhav | 12:35 | |
| gmann | tc-members: please review these two patches, 2nd one is testing runtime for 2023.1 cycle https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/849606 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854375 | 12:35 |
| knikolla | gmann: the `appointed` field marks the cycles in which the ptl was appointed by the tc, rather than elected? | 12:54 |
| gmann | knikolla: yes | 12:55 |
| gmann | and we append the cycles data there just for history reference | 12:55 |
| frickler | calling CS9 stable still seems to be a pretty ambitious claim IMO. the devstack job still hasn't made it to voting status for reference. how about at least allowing some variants like RL? (not that devstack would have a job for that yet) | 13:01 |
| fungi | i think rocky linux 9 is a promising option once we're sure it's booting reliably, but we've had a few missteps getting to that point | 13:04 |
| fungi | it's probably ironed out now, but hard to be sure until we go a while without seeing any new problems | 13:04 |
| gmann | we discussed about cs9 with centos stream maintainer and in TC followup meeting, and outcome was 1. keep it in runtime 2. make testing as periodic 3. report bugs with initial triage to centos stream team | 13:05 |
| gmann | RL can be good candidate for next cycle or so | 13:06 |
| *** kopecmartin_ is now known as kopecmartin | 13:10 | |
| fungi | also as indicated in the proposal for antelope, debian 11 (bullseye) has the same minor revision for default python so could also be used for py39 tests in a pinch | 13:15 |
| fungi | we do already maintain nodes for that anyway | 13:16 |
| frickler | good point, currently they still seem to be running on focal, we might want to switch that once zed is done | 13:20 |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 13:27 | |
| dansmith_ | calling something a supported runtime that we only test periodically also seems a bit weird to me | 13:27 |
| gmann | +1, on doing py39 on debian 11 | 13:30 |
| gmann | for c9s case, in that case we can mention it in separate section in runtime. something like 'Other distro tested periodically' | 13:33 |
| dansmith_ | or "best effort" | 13:36 |
| dansmith_ | we could easily have the last month of the cycle be one of those "things are broken in cs9" periods | 13:36 |
| frickler | so according to the criteria listed in https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/project-testing-interface.html#linux-distributions, Centos would need to be dropped from required testing runtime | 13:51 |
| knikolla | this may be a stupid question, but are centos 9 stream and rocky linux 9 different enough that claiming one is supported doesn't imply the other is supported too? | 14:10 |
| dansmith_ | yes, quite different | 14:19 |
| *** mnasiadka_ is now known as mnasiadka | 14:25 | |
| knikolla | dansmith_: so there isn't/isn't likely gonna be an upstream runtime that matches RHEL 9 unless we do Rocky Linux 9 | 14:27 |
| knikolla | just finding it curious :) | 14:29 |
| dansmith_ | CS9 != RHEL9, so I guess rocky is the option if we want it | 14:29 |
| *** dansmith_ is now known as dansmith | 14:29 | |
| *** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|out | 15:18 | |
| spotz | CS9 is ahead of RHEL 9 | 20:24 |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 21:32 | |
| opendevreview | Amy Marrich proposed openstack/election master: Start the Antelope Elections for PTL and TC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/854453 | 21:38 |
| opendevreview | Amy Marrich proposed openstack/election master: Start the Antelope Elections for PTL and TC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/854453 | 21:55 |
| opendevreview | Amy Marrich proposed openstack/election master: Start the Antelope Elections for PTL and TC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/854453 | 22:04 |
| spotz | If anyone is around we need to get that merged quickly as it has the nomination directories as part of it | 22:13 |
| spotz | Ok I put a lot of reminders in my calendar but I will need someone else to run the commands for the voting reminder and the end of the voting if we even need voting | 22:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!