| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/openstack-manuals master: Fix release links for numeric series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-manuals/+/903498 | 08:47 |
|---|---|---|
| JayF | frickler: tc-members: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/902625/ might need to be reordered if we do not wish to mark ec2-api as inactive. C-2 is in Jan 11, so we have less than a month to land these. I don't know what the will of the TC is; but I know folks are in and out so just pointing out we have a deadline. | 16:52 |
| frickler | JayF: yes, I saw that, but as long as there is no negative vote on it, I decided to wait | 17:12 |
| JayF | ack; up to you, just wanted to make the implied deadline obvious to you+rest of the TC | 17:13 |
| frickler | yes, I'm not sure what to do about the perceived lack of activity. seeing tkajinam's mail about murano I'm thinking that should also be marked inactive, but I don't see the point in creating another review that will just slug along | 17:16 |
| gmann | reorder is ok but agree that we should merge them soon so that maintainers/users get notice about inactive status and have time to recover it | 19:17 |
| gmann | JayF: did you mixed the bylaw change topic with install guide update action item - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee | 19:18 |
| gmann | the last part 'Create TC resolution expressing approval for OIF bylaws change' | 19:18 |
| gmann | maybe be indentation issue ? | 19:18 |
| JayF | I think it was a failed to completely delete the item from last week | 19:19 |
| JayF | your action item to create the resolution | 19:19 |
| JayF | so I've finished removing it | 19:19 |
| gmann | ohk but let's add this as a separate topic for tracking | 19:19 |
| JayF | If you'd like to add a topic, you're welcome too -- my preference is for all debate on this topic to be done in gerrit; so I was going to stick to a reminder to vote and review during open discussion. | 19:20 |
| JayF | Really, I think frickler is the only person who has expressed concerns at this point. | 19:20 |
| JayF | and that makes sense, and he's the only tc member who was not present in the meeting with the OIF lawyer explaining the changes when we were talking through them | 19:21 |
| JayF | (and is maybe evidence as to why having some of that debate in that meeting, instead of in a public, async venue, might have led to context loss for the larger OpenStack community which frickler is representing) | 19:21 |
| gmann | I prefer to add a topic so that we can remind review as well as discuss in meeting if anything stuck | 19:22 |
| gmann | I will reply in gerrit and we can continue discussion there. agree but as this is one of the important thing for us to complete soon tracking in meeting will help | 19:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!