| frickler | fyi I won't be around next week, already added my absence for the meeting to the wiki earlier | 09:08 |
|---|---|---|
| slaweq | dansmith gmann hi, regarding ssh timeout issues which we were talking about on our Tuesday's meeting, I checked some of the failed jobs and opened neutron bug for it https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2052787 | 10:01 |
| slaweq | I have no idea for now what can happen there but will try to maybe add some extra logs or something to better understand that issue on the Neutron side | 10:01 |
| slaweq | it's just FYI | 10:01 |
| dansmith | slaweq: cool, thanks | 14:24 |
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/governance master: Migrate eventlet usages to asyncio https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/902585 | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/governance master: Migrate eventlet usages to asyncio https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/902585 | 14:56 |
| elodilles | JayF: hi Jay, a quick question: i wanted to +2+W the .gitreview patch of ironic's unmaintained/yoga branch, and cannot do that since the openstack-unmaintained-core group is not added as member of ironic-unmaintained-core group, on the other hand the new ACL overrides the openstack-unmaintained-core group's right ( | 18:08 |
| elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/338621b254db5f73639b981241df483b5d761495,members ) | 18:08 |
| JayF | elodilles: can we 301 this discussion to #openstack-ironic? | 18:08 |
| JayF | elodilles: this is essentially a question about core group membership which I'd prefer go to the larger Ironic community | 18:08 |
| elodilles | JayF: but this is afaik, not team related | 18:09 |
| elodilles | JayF: it's more like the stable-maint-core vs ironic-stable-maint group relation as i understand | 18:10 |
| JayF | Yes, it is. The policy, as written explicitly does not *require* openstack-unmaintained-core to ahve access. | 18:10 |
| JayF | I *think* the current configuration is an accident | 18:10 |
| elodilles | as stable-maint-core is added to all the <project>-maint groups | 18:10 |
| JayF | but in general for sake of openness and inclusivity, I want the people impacted to be able to see the chat | 18:10 |
| JayF | This is not a no, this is a "lets make sure this isn't a smoke filled back room before making decisions" :D | 18:11 |
| fungi | it's team related if you want to get the attention of ironic-unmaintained-core in order to ask them to merge that change, or to agree to add access for openstack-unmaintained-core | 18:11 |
| JayF | +++ | 18:11 |
| JayF | In the case of many projects, unmaintenance and core teams are not hte same, that's not currently shaping up to be the case for Ironic | 18:11 |
| JayF | so I appreciate if you're trying to keep the core team unresponsible, but in this case, it's basically the same set :D | 18:12 |
| fungi | i agree the policy, as written (and i think as intended?) allows project teams to take over management of unmaintained/.* for themselves or grant it to a project-specific group instead of having openstack-unmaintained-core take care of it | 18:12 |
| JayF | Again, I suspect the answer will be "of course we'll add it, help is always nice" | 18:12 |
| JayF | but I want that conversation in a channel with Ironic cores :D | 18:12 |
| elodilles | ACK, let's move to the ironic channel then | 18:12 |
| gmann | slaweq: ok, thanks for looking | 20:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!