| *** jroll02 is now known as jroll0 | 06:52 | |
| spotz[m] | fungi: Yeah I think so | 14:03 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/governance master: Add separate freezer-api deliverable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/944781 | 15:09 |
| TheJulia | So I'll just toss a thought out here: Given services in constraints should be using the sdk at this point, any client tools likely can be re-evaluated and treated as matched with release of services since they are now effectively just human tools and not "client libraries" as they were originally classified. | 15:11 |
| TheJulia | (This came up in ironic's weekly meeting and there seems to be consensus over this general idea) | 15:11 |
| clarkb | a quick look in codesearch for 'from novaclient' and 'import novaclient' shows watcher, octavia, trove, heat-translator, and possibly others still using novaclient | 15:14 |
| clarkb | similar story for neutronclient | 15:15 |
| johnsom | There are a lot of end users still using the clients as libraries as well. | 15:19 |
| johnsom | We have not made the SDK transition “official” enough in my opinion. | 15:20 |
| TheJulia | In that case, i guess it is reasonable. | 15:30 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/governance master: Fix links to chair responsibilities in TC Guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/944802 | 20:24 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/governance master: Fix links to chair responsibilities in TC Guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/944802 | 20:26 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/governance master: [resolution] Extend scope of VMT to cover all project teams https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/944817 | 22:42 |
| fungi | thanks! | 22:43 |
| fungi | prometheanfire: JayF: rosmaita: tonyb: ^ | 22:43 |
| gouthamr | still polishing it, but that's the meat of it :) | 22:46 |
| fungi | following with great interest | 22:47 |
| gouthamr | ++ yes, ty for suggesting/supporting it.. | 22:47 |
| JayF | I put a comment on there with a -1, basically we need some kinda catchall/fallback for when inevitably a project leaves a security bug until it's dusty | 22:48 |
| JayF | and we'll look like buffoons if we embargo someones' security bug for 90 days to take zero action but sitting on it | 22:48 |
| gouthamr | yes | 22:48 |
| fungi | not a new topic either, we've brougt up that need before | 22:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!