Friday, 2025-06-27

opendevreviewCyril Roelandt proposed openstack/upstream-institute-virtual-environment master: Zuul: do not use USE_PYTHON3  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/upstream-institute-virtual-environment/+/95352001:01
cardoefungi: mnaser isn’t wrong though. There’s a number of downstreams like his org and my org that fight to get backports seen. I dunno what the answer is. I’ll happily merge stuff for mnaser if I had the powers.05:08
fricklercardoe: mnaser: sadly the only feasible solution I see is to really get involved in the affected team instead of expecting others to deal with your patches07:15
noonedeadpunkwell, to be honest, situation with reviews and landing bug fixes in this specific project is really problematic07:22
noonedeadpunkhttps://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/ovn-bgp-agent+status:open07:23
noonedeadpunkand we're also affected by quite some of them with little to no progress on merging already existing stuff07:23
noonedeadpunkI get that effort started on moving from the agent to OVN native implementation, but this is not gonna be that fast, and in the meanwhile bare minimal expectation would be to get reviews on proposed fixes at very least07:25
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/governance master: Add service-types-authority to SDK deliverables  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/95354809:30
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/governance master: Deprecate shade, os-client-config  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/95354909:30
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: docs: Replace reference to README  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95355511:59
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: docs: Clarify required vs optional keys  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95355611:59
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: docs: Remove crud from conf.py  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95355711:59
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: tox: Rework for tox 4  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95355811:59
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Replace deprecated classes, functions  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95355911:59
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Use argparse  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95356011:59
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Bump JSON Schema version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95356111:59
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Apply ruff  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95356211:59
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Remove packaging files  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95356311:59
mnaserfrickler: how would we "get involved"?  and they're not even major things we're looking at, they're clean backports...12:06
cardoefrickler: yeah I'm curious on your take cause as downstreams we're mostly involved in filing bug reports and submitting patches for fixes and advocating for backports. I know the projects I'm thinking of I provide a large percentage of reviews. I know mnaser is providing reviews as well. We're just not active in new feature work.13:16
fungithere used to be a central stable branch review team, specifically because many project teams didn't have time or interest to review backports to stable branches. maybe it's time to revisit that if there are people interested in helping keep backports moving more smoothly13:17
fungiunrelated, but on the ops radio hour just now they've highlighted the neutron ovs->ovn migration for existing deployments is a major stumbling block due to lack of any clear documentation or migration tooling13:22
fungimultiple accounts of people reverse-engineering old tripleo playbooks and adapting rh and ubuntu cloud implementations to try to piece it together13:23
fungisomeone's going to put in a forum session proposal to talk about it13:29
mnaserfungi: that's what we ended up doing, and i think that's largely because it doesn't make sense for neutron to document this since its specific to the deployment method, and the community deployment methods haven't (afaik) added anything to handle this13:39
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Mark retired APIs as such  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/93081114:38
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Add retired attribute  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/95358414:38
-opendevstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is being restarted to pick up a configuration change. You may notice a short outage.17:37
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/governance master: Remove Monasca from active project  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/95367118:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!