| opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/election master: Add Doug Goldstein candidacy for TC 2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957994 | 01:48 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/election master: Add Doug Goldstein candidacy for TC 2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957994 | 02:26 |
| opendevreview | chandan kumar proposed openstack/election master: Add Chandan Kumar candidacy for TC 2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958005 | 04:33 |
| opendevreview | Tim Burke proposed openstack/election master: Tim Burke candidacy for Swift PTL (Gazpacho) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958007 | 05:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Carlos da Silva candidacy for Manila PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957987 | 07:26 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Yasufumi Ogawa candidacy for Tacker PTL 2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957986 | 07:26 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Ghanshyam candidacy for QA PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957963 | 07:37 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Pierre Riteau candidacy for Blazar 2026.1 PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957961 | 07:37 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Dmitriy Rabotyagov candidacy for OpenStack-Ansible https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957965 | 07:37 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Fix missing space in error message https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957688 | 07:37 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: [Rally] Add Andriy Kurilin candidacy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957852 | 07:38 |
| opendevreview | Tony Breeds proposed openstack/election master: Add Tony Breeds as TC candidate for 2026.1/Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958029 | 08:32 |
| opendevreview | wu.chunyang proposed openstack/election master: Add Chunyang Wu PTL Candidacy for Trove https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958050 | 11:01 |
| *** clarkb is now known as Guest24535 | 11:02 | |
| opendevreview | Mauricio Harley proposed openstack/election master: Adding Mauricio Harley candidacy for Barbican https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958078 | 13:01 |
| fungi | yay! assuming the currently passing tc nominations get confirmed, we'll have enough for a runoff poll! | 13:13 |
| fungi | looks like there are 3 pending nominees to go along with the 3 already approved candidates | 13:14 |
| fungi | and quick math says that if these 6 are the only candidates on the ballot, then no matter which ones win we won't be at risk of exceeding 50% co-affiliation of seated members | 13:15 |
| noonedeadpunk | soundslike great news then! | 13:20 |
| fungi | and still 10 hours left for more people to put in nominations | 13:21 |
| opendevreview | chandan kumar proposed openstack/governance master: Use DPL model for watcher project leadership for 2026.1 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/958085 | 13:42 |
| opendevreview | chandan kumar proposed openstack/governance master: Use DPL model for watcher project leadership for 2026.1 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/958085 | 14:05 |
| gmaan | tc-members: one of the TC member needs to volunteer for watcher DPL model https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/958085/comment/20df22d1_649bb06a/ | 15:33 |
| chandankumar | Hello, I have sent this cr https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/958085 to use DPL model for watcher project for 2026.1 release. We have a query, Under loasisons, email field needs to be the same email coming from ubuntuone account or work email will work? | 15:56 |
| JayF | I believe the email that matters is actually foundation membership email; like what you'd use to login to e.g. openstack.org | 15:58 |
| JayF | (via the openinfraid) | 15:59 |
| chandankumar | JayF: ah, thank you! | 16:00 |
| chandankumar | Let me update my cr. | 16:00 |
| opendevreview | chandan kumar proposed openstack/governance master: Use DPL model for watcher project leadership for 2026.1 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/958085 | 16:03 |
| gouthamr | hmm, so i can just abandon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956913 once we get a few acks on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/958085 | 16:07 |
| opendevreview | chandan kumar proposed openstack/governance master: Use DPL model for watcher project leadership for 2026.1 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/958085 | 16:11 |
| fungi | JayF: chandankumar: what matters is that the address you use in your nomination is your "preferred" gerrit address and is added in any one of the three available address fields (primary, secondary, tertiary) in your foundation member profile | 16:23 |
| *** Guest24535 is now known as clarkb | 16:25 | |
| JayF | fungi: thank you for the clarification :D | 16:31 |
| opendevreview | Tim Burke proposed openstack/election master: Tim Burke candidacy for Swift PTL (Gazpacho) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958007 | 16:39 |
| gmaan | tc-members: it seems some volunteer to maintain monasca https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/953671/comments/215ca9d1_6597600b | 16:50 |
| gmaan | maybe we can give one more cycle to stay this project in inactive (means delay the retirement for one more cycle if no maintenance) | 16:51 |
| gmaan | anyways, something to re-discuss/re-consider | 16:51 |
| gouthamr | ack, I do want to understand their motivation and the amount of work they’re willing to do; the volunteer’s domain seems to be the same as the existing PTL. | 16:53 |
| gouthamr | perhaps it’s just someone else from the same org stepping in to keep the lights on a useful project - I tried to explain that this certainly needs a team to be sustainable | 16:54 |
| gouthamr | I wasn’t aware of the TC resolution discouraging using the “x” namespace, ty fungi… I did imagine it’s a graveyard to some extent | 16:55 |
| clarkb | ya things ended up there when they didn't give us a better alternative when stuff moved out of openstack/ | 16:55 |
| gmaan | yeah, moving to other namespace is only option when we retire the project from openstack | 16:55 |
| fungi | tc resolution doesn't discourage use of the x/ namespace, it prevents moving repositories out of the openstack/ namespace | 16:55 |
| gmaan | gouthamr: i did not know it is same domain/org but yes good to understand their direction and plan for this project | 16:56 |
| fungi | opendev discourages use of the x/ namespace, because new namespaces are free and projects should do a better job of grouping | 16:56 |
| gmaan | anyways we are still in stage where we can give some time to them if they want but yes they should communicate/committed to plan and maintenance | 16:56 |
| fungi | so by openstack policy projects should fork to new copies and leave the retired ones in openstack/ behind as a tombstone. by opendev policy "new" projects should choose a descriptive namespace for themselves | 16:57 |
| gmaan | I commented on the repo cleanup change (only one) but maybe we can keep them WIP unless they started merging before this new volunteer show clear intension/plan | 16:57 |
| gouthamr | ah ack fungi clarkb | 16:58 |
| gmaan | yeah, as per resolution, any openstack official deliverable has to stay in openstack/ namespace. | 16:58 |
| gmaan | we did a lot of cleanup in past for that and then I think assert also somewhere in job but not know where | 16:59 |
| gouthamr | gmaan: yes, i can do that.. the project-config change to end gating can be reverted; but i won't propose it unless this heads in that direction | 16:59 |
| gmaan | gouthamr: ++ yeah, make sense. not to revert the retirement unless more clear intend and commitment from them. | 17:00 |
| fungi | and the reason is older projects like fuel back when we moved them to other namespaces, the redirects made it hard for downstream consumers to realize they had ceased being part of openstack so kept coming to openstack with complaints when it was in its death throes | 17:00 |
| fungi | and users were oblivious to the fact that fuel was no longer part of openstack, even years after | 17:00 |
| gmaan | gouthamr: that was one reason to split the project config change into two part so that project removal from infra should not happen before governance change is merged (governance change is something considered as official retirement and then cleanup in followup) | 17:01 |
| gouthamr | ++ | 17:05 |
| frickler | fwiw my vote is to continue with the retirement, people can fork the project and maintain it outside of openstack if they want to. we have waited like 3? years for real contributions now, enough is enough | 17:16 |
| JayF | ++ | 17:19 |
| JayF | We aren't the only place that projects can live, even projects that interact with us. | 17:19 |
| gouthamr | valid point, do mention this on the change, frickler | 17:32 |
| gmaan | well, I am more of giving more time if new volunteer show up instead of showing us as 'not welcoming for new volunteer who want to maintain inactive projects' | 17:49 |
| gmaan | one of the main thing in retirement process is to ask/wait for new maintainers to come forward and discuss their plan, If anyone there we should give time/discuss with them | 17:51 |
| gmaan | and the current election, coming PTG is good way to see if they are committed to that or not | 17:51 |
| gmaan | and sometime we have be little more flexible for that instead of going by book/process | 17:53 |
| gmaan | for me, that also falls under the "welcome new contributors" along with new contributors in existing active projects | 17:54 |
| spotz[m] | Still a few election patches to be merged in but looks like we might have a TC election | 20:28 |
| JayF | Better than the previous trend. | 20:29 |
| spotz[m] | Yep and Horizon I believe needs an election as well | 20:30 |
| JayF | And I'm probably a little more proud than I should be that we actually herded the cats to keep ironic DPL without having to work too hard 😂 | 20:30 |
| fungi | work is hard. my profundity for the day | 20:34 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Chandan Kumar candidacy for TC 2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958005 | 22:22 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Doug Goldstein candidacy for TC 2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/957994 | 22:22 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding Mauricio Harley candidacy for Barbican https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958078 | 22:22 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Chunyang Wu PTL Candidacy for Trove https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958050 | 22:22 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Tony Breeds as TC candidate for 2026.1/Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958029 | 22:22 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Tim Burke candidacy for Swift PTL (Gazpacho) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/958007 | 22:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!