| mnaser | I want to raise https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/970328 to the TC, it's getting frustrating to get people excited about writing code to OpenStack only to have it pulled out and moved to the place that they don't like working on (opendev/gerrit/etc). | 18:14 |
|---|---|---|
| mnaser | I get it, people don't like GitHub here, but if we want to keep the growth of OpenStack, if people want to innovate in the ecosystem elsewhere, let's not just actually take this away from them | 18:14 |
| mnaser | I have concerns about how we're taking apache 2.0 code and stripping it from licensing headers and plopping it in there. I've pushed our customers that innovate in the open in our ecosystem that we should keep it apache 2.0 -- but I can't keep doing that if they're going to see this stuff happen, they will just either want to keep it closed, or much more closed down licenses. | 18:16 |
| fungi | i guess i don't understand why distrtos can't just package keystoneauth-websso | 19:51 |
| fungi | the rationale in the change seems like a slippery slope argument that ultimately leads to vendoring every openstack dependency so that people using distro packaged openstack don't need distro packages of openstack's deps | 19:53 |
| mnaser | If the issue is packaging, ill gladly contribute that in that case. | 20:38 |
| fungi | it also seems fundamentally illogical to me. someone still has to update the python3-keystoneauth1 (or whatever) distro package to the version that vendors keystoneauth-websso, which is probably on the same order of delay as adding a new package for the plugin | 22:04 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!