Thursday, 2026-01-29

*** ricolin_ is now known as ricolin00:16
*** vhari_ is now known as vhari15:00
opendevreviewGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/openstack-manuals master: TrivialFix: Fix order of redirects in www-generator.py  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-manuals/+/97519718:43
gouthamrcould i get another TC member vote here please? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/974926 19:59
sean-k-mooneydoug is goign to ruhn presumablly unoposed for watcher ptl instead of staying with dpl since i will be spending some time lookign at cyborg this release we will still proably have relase/secirute/tach liasosn however so it more a case of designating a single person to fall back on rather then any  real dislike fo the DPL approch20:02
opendevreviewGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/election master: Add watcher nomination dir for 2026.2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/97521520:02
gouthamrsean-k-mooney: ++ ack20:02
sean-k-mooneyby the way i started teh "[tc][cyborg] Proposal for Cyborg Project Revitalization and Maintenance" thread on the mailing list and i reached out to zhipeng about makign openstack-admins the owner of the cyborg team in lauchpad about an hour ago. ill let folks knwo if i get a responce.20:07
fungithanks!20:14
fungiin theory i'll see an automated notification from lp if/when it happens20:14
gouthamr++20:17
gouthamrsince you’re an active committer to cyborg, contesting PTL elections would be a good way to take over and form a new team20:21
sean-k-mooneyi guess i could i dont know if li liu inteded to run but i can submit my candicy if that is simpler form a tc point of view20:21
gouthamrit’d be, for transparency, I’ll add my long form response to your thread20:22
fungiright, it's rather late in the cycle for a team to voluntarily convert to dpl20:22
sean-k-mooneyack sure in that case i can run for ptl and we could move in 2026.2 or continue under ptl20:23
fungibut you could run for ptl on the platform of "i'm going to work on switching cyborg to dpl governance first thing"20:23
fungiyeah, that20:23
sean-k-mooneyi mostly want to make sure that ther isint a single point of failure going forward20:23
sean-k-mooneyhehe it remiens me of stephen when he ran for ptl of docs on the single point of disbanding the docs team and moving the docs into the projects20:24
sean-k-mooneyto be fair to him that had already been started but i always found that funny20:25
fungifor a while, mtreinish would regularly threaten to run as candidate of last resort for teams that had no ptl candidate, on a platform of disbanding the team20:29
fungithough i think that was mostly a ploy to get people to volunteer20:29
gmaanI think easy and less paperwork will be let it leaderless in the election if no candidate and then TC can move it to DPL as sean-k-mooney proposal 20:30
gmaannote, even sean-k-mooney run and get PTL seat does not mean core group will be updated too to have sean-k-mooney in core, that anyways has to be done as a separate request to current core or TC20:31
gouthamryeah, but, you probably don't want someone contesting just because there isn't any other candidate too? 20:31
sean-k-mooneyyep20:31
sean-k-mooneyim hoping lilu woudl be willing to do that as an exsiting core member20:32
gmaanif anyone contest then its good to discuss with them if it can be move to DPL. because PTL-> DPL can happen after election and anytime in ccycle20:32
fungii can take care of core team updates in a pinch, in cases where an outgoing ptl is unavailable to do it20:32
gouthamriiuc, that was liliueecg's conundrum.. just wanted to keep the project alive/active after the Inspur pull out20:32
gmaanyeah, unless there is zero current core active I think we should let them decide and modify the core grouip20:33
sean-k-mooneyit has not be actully 0 unlike with watcher where it basiclly was20:33
gmaanit will be good to point out the sean-k-mooney email link to candidacy if there is any and they can rethink or discuss it20:33
sean-k-mooneyso im hoping that the exisitng cores will respond in some way20:34
gmaansean-k-mooney: yes. the transition here should be via current core team not like watcher where TC re-initiated the groups/things20:34
sean-k-mooneyWenping Song has also one 1 or 2 revies in the last year20:35
sean-k-mooneyalotugh there email in gerrit is still inspur so i dont knwo what if ahy time they have for cybrog currently20:36
gmaanthey responded to me last time when I proposed project for inactive state. i also email them to their direct email pointing to respond to gerrit/ML20:36
gmaanmaybe you can do the same20:36
sean-k-mooneyyep i cc'd liliueecg but ill try to remember to cc them onto the thread when i next respond20:37
gmaani sent to both their gmail as well inspur one20:37
gmaan++20:38
opendevreviewGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/openstack-manuals master: Documentation main page - add link to Glossary  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-manuals/+/94705822:59
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-manuals master: Add bug tracker link for Freezer  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-manuals/+/97004323:04
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-manuals master: Glossary - add information about 2026.2 Hibiscus release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-manuals/+/97465223:06
opendevreviewOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/security-doc master: Updated from openstack-manuals  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/security-doc/+/97523423:07
opendevreviewGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/openstack-manuals master: Documentation main page - add link to Glossary  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-manuals/+/94705823:20
opendevreviewOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/security-doc master: Updated from openstack-manuals  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/security-doc/+/97523423:21

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!