Tuesday, 2026-02-17

*** bauzas8 is now known as bauzas00:49
noonedeadpunk#startmeeting tc08:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Feb 17 08:00:57 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.08:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.08:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'08:00
bauzaso/08:01
noonedeadpunkWelcome to the weekly meeting of the OpenStack Technical Committee. A reminder that this meeting is held under the OpenInfra Code of Conduct available at https://openinfra.dev/legal/code-of-conduct.08:01
noonedeadpunkToday's meeting agenda can be found at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee08:01
noonedeadpunk#topic Roll Call08:01
noonedeadpunko/08:01
gtemaO/08:01
frickler\o08:01
noonedeadpunknoted absence m n a s i a d k a08:03
noonedeadpunkI'm not sure if we are waiting for more attendees for morning meetings though08:04
fricklerwell t o n y b is mainly the one we're doing this for ...08:05
noonedeadpunkyes, true... 08:05
bauzasmaybe he's on PTO08:06
noonedeadpunk#topic Last Week's Action Items08:06
noonedeadpunkas far as I know, there were no new action atiems last week08:07
noonedeadpunkwe are getting to the end of nomination cycle for upcoming elections, and have quite some low participation numbers08:08
noonedeadpunkincluding TC nomenees08:08
fricklermaybe it is time to shrink the TC once again?08:10
noonedeadpunkwe are still having only 2 candidates for 5 seats08:10
bauzasI guess more people will nominate themselves closer to the deadline08:11
noonedeadpunkand if not - maybe we indeed should consider shrinking then08:11
bauzasthere are more than 24 hours before the end08:11
bauzaslast rounds, people usually provided their nominations on the very last end08:12
noonedeadpunkyes, true08:12
bauzaslet's not overthink a process change before we know the numbers at least :-)08:12
noonedeadpunk++ good point08:12
noonedeadpunkI just wanted to raise the point also for the people on this meeting to not forget about this08:13
bauzasgood call 08:14
noonedeadpunkgoing next, I have a note to discuss the issue with amount of contributors/maintainers for requirements team08:14
noonedeadpunkas they, as well as all other projects, may need some help with reviewes08:15
noonedeadpunklast cycle me and m n a s i a d k a agreed to come up with some plan to make requirements more "friendly" place to deployment projects, and hopefull to get some more eyes there08:16
frickleralso lacking a PTL candidate after the DPL team wasn't confirmed08:16
noonedeadpunkbut I personally failed with time arrangement to proceed on this activity08:17
frickleralso that, yes, though I'm not sure whether it should happen within the reqs team or better be a SIG?08:17
noonedeadpunkand t o n y b is not on the meeting and he's likely the most aware person on the situation around the project08:18
bauzasyeah, sounds a good plan to ask deployment experts if they can give a hand08:19
noonedeadpunkwell, I'm kinda not fan of SIGs right now, as it's never clear if there's anybody behind the sig, and also no clear continuity plan for them08:19
bauzasdownstream owners should matter too08:19
noonedeadpunkI know we planned to improve that state, but have not followed the progress closely08:20
noonedeadpunkso looking at the DPL reset patch, it seems that it was missing tonyb vote ?08:22
noonedeadpunk#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/97492708:22
noonedeadpunkwhich makes a risk of getting to appointment stage quite high08:24
noonedeadpunk#topic Open Discussion08:25
noonedeadpunkI don't have much more points to discuss here08:26
bauzas-08:28
fricklerwell we could mention the setuptools situation is getting better slowly08:28
fricklerbut some things to do in particular for stable branches08:29
noonedeadpunkyes, master looks way better now08:32
noonedeadpunkok then, I guess I will end the meeting early, given there are no more topics to discuss08:34
noonedeadpunk#endmeeting08:35
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Feb 17 08:35:48 2026 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)08:35
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2026/tc.2026-02-17-08.00.html08:35
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2026/tc.2026-02-17-08.00.txt08:35
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2026/tc.2026-02-17-08.00.log.html08:35
gtemathks, cy08:36
bauzasthanks 08:37
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/election master: Add Dmitriy Rabotyagov PTL candidacy for OpenStack-Ansible  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/97705109:10
opendevreviewRafael Weingartner proposed openstack/election master: Adding Rafael Weingärtner candidacy for CloudKitty  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/97707112:06
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/election master: Add Takashi Kajinami candidacy for Puppet OpenStack  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/97707612:42
*** croeland1 is now known as croelandt15:25
tkajinampy310 job of the election repo is broken now and we need https://github.com/mtreinish/stestr/pull/377 or pin testools to fix it16:59
tkajinamit might affect the nomination deadline I'm afraid16:59
tkajinamtc-members ^^^16:59
gtema"not" a surprise nowadays17:00
tkajinamX-(17:12
gtemaI am since a while struggling to get simply tox running for ANY openstack project (defaults to 313, setuptools, missing pip, etc). This is a complete disaster17:14
cardoegtema: been using tox-uv which is better18:24
fungithe upstream zuul project and most of opendev's own tools switched to nox instead of making the various adjustments that updating to tox v4 would have required a couple of years ago18:27
fungiwe've been quite pleased with it18:28
sean-k-mooneyfungi: the main pro and con of nox is its just python19:00
fungiright19:00
opendevreviewGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/election master: Add py313 testing and drop EOL python versions  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/97715920:02
opendevreviewGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/election master: Temporarily pin testtools  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/97716020:17
gouthamrnoonedeadpunk: ty for running the meeting today! a bit disappointed to see the diminishing value/participation in this alternate slot :( like frickler noted we'll revisit this when the new TC is formed. 20:32
fungiat today's opendev meeting i just talked to myself for half an hour, so by comparison that was a lot of engagement ;)20:34
gouthamroh :D 20:35
gouthamrregarding the tc-members nomination window closing; i think i've had stray conversations with those of you with your terms ending.. but, for transparency, allow me to gently nudge you here to either nominate yourself ( yay! ) or send a note of non-candidacy ( meh :( ) to the ML.. 20:36
gouthamras you're aware, we may have folks not nominate out of their perception that you may run again or with the hope that you will.. we're known to be nice/weird that way 20:36
opendevreviewAmy Marrich proposed openstack/election master: Add Amy Marrich candidacy for TC  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/97716120:54
spotz[m]Ok I've submitted as we're lacking candidates, if we get more candidates I am willing to remove my candidacy. I just didn't want to forget and to be short candidates20:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!