| mikal | Noting that mikal doesn't really care what the policy is. He will comply with whatever is decided. He just wants people to stop negative voting in code reviews for non-compliance with a policy which doesn't appear to be written down anywhere. Mikal is also confused about why this seems to be a controversial concept. | 01:32 |
|---|---|---|
| mikal | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/1011797/2..3//COMMIT_MSG#b23 is my canonical example -- a reviewer -1'ing a patch for non-compliance with a policy that I think you've all just said isn't actually written down anywhere. | 01:35 |
| mikal | That seems like a thing which people should be uncomfortable with. | 01:35 |
| mikal | Personally, I think that noting which model and effort level was used for the assistance is meaningful because it speaks directly to the likely quality of that assistance, but again I don't really care. I only put it there because that was my reading of the policy web page at the time, along with the requirement for a "prompt" paragraph. | 01:36 |
| mnasiadka | TheJulia: as a maintainer I would be glad if people would indicate which parts have been assisted by an LLM | 05:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!