| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 00:01 | |
| *** jfluhmann has quit IRC | 00:03 | |
| *** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-telemetry | 00:06 | |
| *** yassine__ has quit IRC | 00:07 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-telemetry | 00:18 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 00:19 | |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 00:39 | |
| *** yuntongjin has joined #openstack-telemetry | 00:49 | |
| *** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
| *** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-telemetry | 00:59 | |
| *** ljxiash has quit IRC | 01:03 | |
| *** rohit_ has quit IRC | 01:06 | |
| *** ljxiash has joined #openstack-telemetry | 01:07 | |
| *** Liuqing has joined #openstack-telemetry | 01:29 | |
| *** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 01:31 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 01:41 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #openstack-telemetry | 01:44 | |
| *** yuntongjin has quit IRC | 02:03 | |
| *** yuntongjin has joined #openstack-telemetry | 02:08 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 02:16 | |
| *** yuntongjin1 has joined #openstack-telemetry | 02:18 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-telemetry | 02:20 | |
| *** yuntongjin has quit IRC | 02:20 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 02:24 | |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 02:47 | |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 02:48 | |
| *** hparekh has joined #openstack-telemetry | 02:51 | |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 02:52 | |
| *** yuntongjin1 has quit IRC | 03:15 | |
| *** vishwanathj has quit IRC | 03:17 | |
| *** yuntongjin has joined #openstack-telemetry | 03:20 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-telemetry | 03:22 | |
| *** yuntongjin has left #openstack-telemetry | 03:23 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 03:26 | |
| *** yuntongjin1 has joined #openstack-telemetry | 03:27 | |
| *** yuntongjin1 has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
| *** changbl has quit IRC | 03:34 | |
| *** boris-42 has quit IRC | 03:38 | |
| *** ljxiash has quit IRC | 03:46 | |
| *** changbl has joined #openstack-telemetry | 03:47 | |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 03:49 | |
| *** liamji has joined #openstack-telemetry | 03:58 | |
| gzhai1 | r-mibu: are you for lunch now? | 04:00 |
|---|---|---|
| *** ljxiash has joined #openstack-telemetry | 04:00 | |
| r-mibu | gzhai1: yep | 04:01 |
| r-mibu | i'm reading your comment now | 04:01 |
| gzhai1 | thanks for your comments! | 04:02 |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 04:02 | |
| r-mibu | np | 04:02 |
| r-mibu | i cannot see good approach to implement timeout... | 04:03 |
| r-mibu | so, sorry for many questions that seems like i'm objecting... | 04:04 |
| r-mibu | do you have time to discuss right now? | 04:04 |
| gzhai1 | not at all. I saw some good points in your comments. | 04:04 |
| gzhai1 | for the issue (2) "each event has to be passed to relevant evaluator that makes difficult to implement multi worker." | 04:05 |
| gzhai1 | i don't get the point. | 04:05 |
| r-mibu | this is regarding to work partitioning | 04:06 |
| gzhai1 | timeout event just like normal event, so should be handled by partitioning. | 04:06 |
| gzhai1 | It cludes alarm_id and desired event info. | 04:06 |
| gzhai1 | regardless partitioned by event or alarm, we can handle it. | 04:07 |
| r-mibu | i had some talk with Lianhao and other folks what is the best key to partition | 04:08 |
| gzhai1 | You know, I'm not clear about current partitioning design. | 04:08 |
| r-mibu | but there is no conclusion yet | 04:08 |
| r-mibu | at that time, candidates are event_type vs project | 04:09 |
| gzhai1 | ok. timeout event includes info for both candidates. | 04:10 |
| r-mibu | we cannot partition by alarm, since we cannot know which alarm may affect before evaluation | 04:10 |
| *** ViswaV has quit IRC | 04:11 | |
| r-mibu | you mean send out new event as timeout event after event evaluation? | 04:11 |
| gzhai1 | send out timeout event when no desired event comes then timeout expires. | 04:12 |
| gzhai1 | 'alarm.timeout.end' evnet with project_id, alarm_id,... | 04:13 |
| gzhai1 | When receiving it, we can route it to right evaluator according to the partitioning policy. | 04:13 |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-telemetry | 04:14 | |
| *** ViswaV has joined #openstack-telemetry | 04:15 | |
| gzhai1 | timeout.end event need to be evaluated to change related alarm to 'OK' or 'TIMEOUT' state | 04:15 |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 04:18 | |
| r-mibu | you mean the first evaluator which received timeout.end event, then repush that event to the other queue? | 04:18 |
| r-mibu | or event can be consumed by the same evaluator? | 04:19 |
| fabian1 | Hi, alarm-action log:// , where is log:// ? | 04:19 |
| gzhai1 | nop. if partitioned by event, the timeout event should be routed to the right evaluator by something like master? | 04:20 |
| r-mibu | fabian1, log of aodh-notifier process | 04:21 |
| gzhai1 | if partitioned by event, we need a listener master to get all notifications from 'alarm.all' topic then route them, right? | 04:21 |
| r-mibu | maybe not | 04:22 |
| r-mibu | we'll create more topics like alarm.project.abc | 04:22 |
| gzhai1 | ok. then we can send the timeout event to different topic accroding to partition. | 04:23 |
| r-mibu | that's the reason why we add 'all' | 04:23 |
| r-mibu | right | 04:23 |
| gzhai1 | as long as we have the info of project_id, alarm_id and the desired_event in the timeout event. | 04:24 |
| gzhai1 | then we can do the partition. | 04:25 |
| fabian1 | r-mibu: i have a alarm ,and alarm state is alarm, config alarm-action 'log://', but I don't log to report alarm message | 04:26 |
| r-mibu | maybe yes, let me draft partitioning bp, but you don't have to wait it | 04:27 |
| gzhai1 | fabian1: if repeat-actions == False, alarm-actions would not be called again. | 04:27 |
| gzhai1 | r-mibu: ok | 04:28 |
| r-mibu | fabian1: yes, you should set repeat-action true and wait next evaluation if you are not using event-alarm | 04:28 |
| *** yuntongjin has joined #openstack-telemetry | 04:29 | |
| gzhai1 | r-mibu:for alt1-2, I think they are for a little bit different purpose. event-alarm is for real-time... | 04:29 |
| fabian1 | gzhai1: r-mibu ok, I try again test | 04:30 |
| gzhai1 | for the new-type evaluator infrastructure. Should we add a master listener, and trigger the evaluation for different evaluators? | 04:31 |
| r-mibu | gzhai1: no, if we have evaluator for each new event_* type alarm, that makes hard to maintein codes iguess | 04:34 |
| r-mibu | oh, s/no/yes/ | 04:35 |
| r-mibu | maybe we should have similar code placement as periodic evaluators have | 04:36 |
| gzhai1 | so, i'm correct? | 04:36 |
| r-mibu | you are correct | 04:36 |
| gzhai1 | btw, there is another BP https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199005/, which have alarm fired when receive *.start, for one instance, but no *.end comens. | 04:39 |
| gzhai1 | s/comens/comes | 04:39 |
| r-mibu | yes, i like its api | 04:39 |
| r-mibu | i haven't memntioned current api design for timeout param | 04:39 |
| r-mibu | but, it seems not so good to add that param in event_rule | 04:40 |
| gzhai1 | For me. it's a new type of alarm, as it will fire when not receive event(timeout). Different from event-alarm | 04:40 |
| r-mibu | that timeout should be set against event_sequence just like #199005 | 04:40 |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 04:41 | |
| r-mibu | yep | 04:41 |
| gzhai1 | My bp is just a new parameter for event-alarm. when not receiving event, set alarm to 'ok' or 'timeout'. | 04:41 |
| *** Liuqing has joined #openstack-telemetry | 04:42 | |
| r-mibu | but, criteria is "not received after event.start received" | 04:42 |
| gzhai1 | It's so confused that everybody always ask me similar question. | 04:42 |
| gzhai1 | yes. | 04:42 |
| gzhai1 | so mine is event-alarm-timeout. 199005 is event-timeout-alarm. | 04:43 |
| r-mibu | which is different from current event type alarm which is checking each alarm | 04:43 |
| r-mibu | ok | 04:43 |
| gzhai1 | latter need new type evaluator infrastructure | 04:44 |
| gzhai1 | it still need check all event-timeout-alarm, right? | 04:44 |
| gzhai1 | say one for instance.create.end, another for image.create.end... | 04:44 |
| gzhai1 | one event comes, it probably trigger any type alarm,and all alarms of one type. | 04:45 |
| r-mibu | right, but it can be limit the scope by project id | 04:48 |
| gzhai1 | sure. it is already there. | 04:48 |
| gzhai1 | From your point of view, which has high priority or more useful, event-alarm-timeout, or event-timeout-alarm? | 04:49 |
| *** yuntongjin has left #openstack-telemetry | 04:49 | |
| r-mibu | sorry, i cannot pick since i didn't understand well about timeout use case... | 04:51 |
| r-mibu | but, neutral | 04:51 |
| r-mibu | anyhow having new type of evaluation for event is good for us to find way to add further evaluation mechanism | 04:51 |
| gzhai1 | Just want list all the TODOs and put priority for them... | 04:52 |
| gzhai1 | ok. 1. new type infrastructure. | 04:52 |
| gzhai1 | 2. event-alarm-timeout or event-timeout-alarm. | 04:52 |
| gzhai1 | forget 0. partitioning :) | 04:53 |
| r-mibu | yep :) | 04:53 |
| r-mibu | so, if you are not adding new alarm type for event-alarm-timeout, I may ask you to improve data format of alarm definition later on | 04:54 |
| r-mibu | but it shoud be small change | 04:54 |
| gzhai1 | ok. I'll start a new BP for new type infrastructure, and polish my MP at the same time. | 04:54 |
| gzhai1 | data format is also ok for me. | 04:54 |
| r-mibu | sorry what is MP? | 04:55 |
| r-mibu | BP? | 04:55 |
| gzhai1 | BP | 04:55 |
| r-mibu | ok | 04:55 |
| r-mibu | btw, | 04:55 |
| r-mibu | those proposal regarding timeout seems to be related to taskflow | 04:55 |
| r-mibu | is someone from taskflow? | 04:56 |
| gzhai1 | not catch you. | 04:56 |
| r-mibu | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TaskFlow | 04:56 |
| gzhai1 | taskflow is used for each service, right? like aodh-notifier? | 04:57 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 04:57 | |
| r-mibu | i just though taskflow team may want to have timeout/watch dog mechanism in aodh | 04:59 |
| r-mibu | right, my misunderstanding | 04:59 |
| r-mibu | forget it | 04:59 |
| *** achatterjee has joined #openstack-telemetry | 05:00 | |
| gzhai1 | ok. | 05:00 |
| gzhai1 | I'll write a new BP for new type evaluator. | 05:00 |
| r-mibu | gzhai1: thanks for good discussion | 05:00 |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 05:00 | |
| gzhai1 | Now i'm in US trip with thanks giving holiday approaching, so may be a little bit late. | 05:01 |
| gzhai1 | Do you know the due data for aodh/ceilometer BP? | 05:01 |
| r-mibu | no, i don't think so. i personally disagree to have deadlines as the same as neutron team. i'll check your further proposals :) | 05:02 |
| gzhai1 | great! Thanks for your comments again. | 05:03 |
| r-mibu | np :) | 05:04 |
| gzhai1 | BTW. last question: If partioned by event, and have them sent to differnt topic, we need configure event_pipeline.yamal in deployment, right? | 05:04 |
| gzhai1 | It's static way. | 05:04 |
| r-mibu | sorry, I'm back from coffee server | 05:08 |
| r-mibu | right | 05:08 |
| r-mibu | we need new pipeline/pubisher in ceilometer | 05:09 |
| gzhai1 | got it! Thanks a lot! | 05:09 |
| *** tomoiaga has joined #openstack-telemetry | 05:09 | |
| r-mibu | np, enjoy the holidays ;) | 05:10 |
| *** yprokule has joined #openstack-telemetry | 05:12 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-telemetry | 05:18 | |
| *** yuntongjin1 has joined #openstack-telemetry | 05:23 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 05:23 | |
| *** yuntongjin1 has left #openstack-telemetry | 05:43 | |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 05:47 | |
| *** Liuqing has joined #openstack-telemetry | 05:48 | |
| *** nadya_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 05:56 | |
| *** nadya_ has quit IRC | 05:58 | |
| fabian1 | gzhai1: r-mibu alarm-notifier.log appear alarm message, when i execute ceilometer resource-list in resource_id user_id apear openstack:fffb9a50-8c28-4cdf-be64-f878b72689da | 06:03 |
| fabian1 | gzhai1: r-mibu The openstack:fffb9a50-8c28-4cdf-be64-f878b72689da resource_id or user_id , where it come from? | 06:06 |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-telemetry | 06:20 | |
| r-mibu | hi | 06:23 |
| r-mibu | fabian1: it depends on event or sampled data source | 06:24 |
| r-mibu | see etc/ceilometer/event_definitions.yaml | 06:24 |
| fabian1 | r-mibu: about pipeline.yaml event_definitions.yaml ,how can i configure ? my syslog appear DuplicateKeyError: insertDocument ,This is mongodb insert smaple id repeat | 06:27 |
| fabian1 | r-mibu: now the pepeline.yaml and event_definitions.yaml use default configure | 06:28 |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 06:28 | |
| r-mibu | i7m not 100% sure, but you can edit the yaml file | 06:29 |
| r-mibu | note you have to use relevant parameter which has to be in the sample or event | 06:29 |
| r-mibu | can you see raw data (sample or event)? | 06:30 |
| r-mibu | that may help you to configure | 06:30 |
| r-mibu | others, does anyone know if there is a doc to do such configuration? | 06:31 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 06:33 | |
| *** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-telemetry | 06:33 | |
| fabian1 | r-mibu: do you email give me ? i send the two files | 06:34 |
| r-mibu | r-mibu@cq.jp.nec.com | 06:34 |
| *** Liuqing_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 06:38 | |
| fabian1 | r-mibu: i send email to mailbox, please help me | 06:38 |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 06:39 | |
| r-mibu | i got your email | 06:40 |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 06:47 | |
| *** anton has joined #openstack-telemetry | 06:58 | |
| anton | hi all.. | 06:59 |
| anton | am looking to collect resource usage in openstack via ceilometer can anyone pls help me out | 06:59 |
| *** achatterjee has quit IRC | 07:01 | |
| *** achatterjee has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:01 | |
| *** hparekh has quit IRC | 07:02 | |
| *** nadya_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:02 | |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:05 | |
| *** hparekh has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:09 | |
| *** achatterjee2 has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:09 | |
| *** shardy has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:10 | |
| *** achatterjee has quit IRC | 07:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Béla Vancsics proposed openstack/ceilometer: Reduce code duplication https://review.openstack.org/249317 | 07:22 |
| openstackgerrit | ZhiQiang Fan proposed openstack/aodh: initialize ceilometerclient when we use it https://review.openstack.org/248651 | 07:22 |
| *** anton has quit IRC | 07:24 | |
| openstackgerrit | ZhiQiang Fan proposed openstack/ceilometer: don't pass ceilometer options to oslo.db engine facade https://review.openstack.org/245744 | 07:27 |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:29 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 07:34 | |
| *** toddnni has quit IRC | 07:38 | |
| *** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:44 | |
| *** rcernin_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:47 | |
| *** Ala has joined #openstack-telemetry | 07:54 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 08:22 | |
| openstackgerrit | Shuquan Huang proposed openstack/aodh: Delete python bytecode before every test run. https://review.openstack.org/249629 | 08:22 |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-telemetry | 08:23 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 08:27 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 08:30 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 08:35 | |
| EmilienM | sileht: hey - have you already seen that ? http://logs.openstack.org/93/239293/8/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-scenario001-dsvm-centos7/ff2725c/logs/apache/aodh_wsgi_error.txt.gz | 08:38 |
| EmilienM | I now use aodh 1.1 | 08:38 |
| sileht | EmilienM, why the policy.json is the example one instead of the default shipped one | 08:42 |
| sileht | EmilienM, checks https://github.com/openstack/aodh/tree/master/etc/aodh, you should use the policy.json not the policy.json.sample | 08:43 |
| EmilienM | sileht: http://logs.openstack.org/93/239293/8/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-scenario001-dsvm-centos7/ff2725c/logs/etc/aodh/policy.json.txt.gz | 08:43 |
| EmilienM | sileht: weird | 08:43 |
| EmilienM | sileht: let me check | 08:43 |
| sileht | EmilienM, I'm guessing for a package issue | 08:43 |
| EmilienM | #policy_file = policy.json | 08:43 |
| EmilienM | that's the default | 08:43 |
| EmilienM | in aodh.conf | 08:44 |
| sileht | EmilienM, here package override the upstream one: https://github.com/openstack-packages/aodh?files=1 | 08:44 |
| *** yuntongjin has joined #openstack-telemetry | 08:44 | |
| EmilienM | sileht: https://github.com/openstack-packages/aodh/blob/rpm-master/policy.json.sample | 08:44 |
| EmilienM | sileht: The two files are identical | 08:45 |
| sileht | EmilienM, This 'policy.json.sample' is a sample, not a working configuration file | 08:46 |
| sileht | EmilienM, the default policy.json that works is https://github.com/openstack/aodh/blob/master/etc/aodh/policy.json | 08:46 |
| EmilienM | sileht: arf | 08:46 |
| EmilienM | sileht: merci | 08:46 |
| * sileht double checks in the devstack plugin | 08:47 | |
| sileht | EmilienM, I confirm we take that one for gate: https://github.com/openstack/aodh/blob/master/devstack/plugin.sh#L192 | 08:47 |
| EmilienM | sileht: ok | 08:47 |
| EmilienM | I'll tell rdo to change the rpm | 08:47 |
| EmilienM | thanks sileht | 08:47 |
| sileht | EmilienM, cool the RBAC system seems to work as expected :p | 08:48 |
| EmilienM | lol | 08:48 |
| EmilienM | it does | 08:48 |
| sileht | EmilienM, Note that the default configuration is 'everything is open for authenticated user' | 08:49 |
| EmilienM | sileht: ack | 08:49 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/aodh: Update policy.json.sample with correct values https://review.openstack.org/249645 | 09:01 |
| sileht | EmilienM, I have fixed the sample one:https://review.openstack.org/249645 | 09:01 |
| sileht | EmilienM, the main issue was 'set_alarm' instead of 'change_alarm' | 09:02 |
| sileht | EmilienM, perhaps just changing this instead of using the openbar file will fix your issue | 09:02 |
| EmilienM | sileht: thanks | 09:03 |
| sileht | EmilienM, I'm surprise that nobody notice this the sample file in ceilometer have the same bug, I guess that everybody customise this file or use the openbar one | 09:04 |
| EmilienM | sileht: or do not use aodh | 09:05 |
| *** zigo has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:05 | |
| sileht | EmilienM, anyways thanks for the report | 09:05 |
| EmilienM | no prob | 09:05 |
| zigo | jd__: sileht: What's the endpoint URL looking like for Gnocchi? | 09:05 |
| zigo | I'm finally finding some time to finish the package in Debian ... | 09:05 |
| zigo | (sorry for being so late...) | 09:05 |
| EmilienM | zigo: http://logs.openstack.org/76/245076/10/gate/gate-ceilometer-dsvm-integration/8286c79/logs/etc/ceilometer/ | 09:05 |
| EmilienM | look for examples | 09:05 |
| zigo | What file over there? | 09:06 |
| sileht | zigo, http://127.0.0.1:8041/ | 09:06 |
| zigo | sileht: So, just "/" ? | 09:06 |
| sileht | zigo, yes | 09:06 |
| zigo | sileht: What's the service name and type also? | 09:06 |
| *** yassine__ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:06 | |
| EmilienM | zigo: look in puppet-gnocchi lol | 09:06 |
| zigo | EmilienM: :) | 09:06 |
| zigo | I prefer to annoy everyone ! :) | 09:07 |
| sileht | or in the devstack plugin | 09:07 |
| EmilienM | or in the FM | 09:07 |
| *** ViswaV_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:08 | |
| sileht | zigo, name=gnocchi type=metric desc="OpenStack Metric Servic" | 09:08 |
| sileht | zigo, name=gnocchi type=metric desc="OpenStack Metric Service" | 09:08 |
| *** ljxiash has quit IRC | 09:08 | |
| sileht | https://github.com/openstack/gnocchi/blob/master/devstack/plugin.sh#L65 | 09:08 |
| *** ViswaV has quit IRC | 09:08 | |
| zigo | Thanks ! | 09:08 |
| *** ljxiash has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:09 | |
| EmilienM | zigo: https://github.com/openstack/puppet-gnocchi/blob/master/manifests/keystone/auth.pp#L54-L65 | 09:09 |
| zigo | Do we now have a gnocchiclient ? | 09:09 |
| EmilienM | yes | 09:09 |
| EmilienM | https://github.com/openstack/python-gnocchiclient | 09:09 |
| jd__ | hi everyone | 09:12 |
| *** shardy has quit IRC | 09:12 | |
| EmilienM | jd__: o/ | 09:12 |
| jd__ | EmilienM: you scared me, I forgot you were in our TZ :) | 09:12 |
| zigo | Gnocchi doesn't use rabbit at all? | 09:13 |
| *** nadya_ has quit IRC | 09:14 | |
| *** yuntongjin has quit IRC | 09:14 | |
| EmilienM | jd__: lol - I'm in bordeaux this week | 09:14 |
| *** shardy has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:14 | |
| *** Liuqing_ has quit IRC | 09:15 | |
| *** Liuqing has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:15 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:18 | |
| openstackgerrit | zhanghanqun proposed openstack/ceilometer: Support using 'generated' as keyword to query events https://review.openstack.org/244606 | 09:21 |
| fabian1 | r-mibu: I have sendmail to you again | 09:27 |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:31 | |
| jd__ | zigo: no | 09:33 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 09:36 | |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 09:41 | |
| *** kbyrne has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:42 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/gnocchi: statsd have some required configuration options https://review.openstack.org/248621 | 09:45 |
| *** liamji has quit IRC | 09:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/gnocchi: statsd have some required configuration options https://review.openstack.org/248621 | 09:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ceilometer: remove config files when run clean.sh https://review.openstack.org/249114 | 09:50 |
| *** kbyrne has quit IRC | 09:50 | |
| *** kbyrne has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:50 | |
| tomoiaga | I'm wondering if there is any plan to change the events (how they are stored, or split from ceilometer like aodh). One of my main issues right now is that I can't query events "for all tenants" as an admin. | 09:51 |
| *** bapalm has quit IRC | 09:53 | |
| *** bapalm has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:55 | |
| *** nadya_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 09:58 | |
| *** Liuqing has joined #openstack-telemetry | 10:05 | |
| *** rcernin_ has quit IRC | 10:06 | |
| *** fabian1 has left #openstack-telemetry | 10:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | lixiangjun proposed openstack/python-ceilometerclient: Token will be lost when constructing a ceilometer client https://review.openstack.org/249690 | 10:16 |
| *** ViswaV_ has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| zigo | jd__: sileht: http://paste.openstack.org/show/479968/ <--- WTF is going on ?!? :) | 10:19 |
| sileht | zigo, check your configuration file | 10:19 |
| zigo | sileht: What should I check for? | 10:20 |
| sileht | zigo, the database connection | 10:20 |
| zigo | sileht: It's correct, IMO. | 10:20 |
| sileht | zigo, what is the url ? | 10:20 |
| zigo | connection = mysql+pymysql://gnocchi-common:XXXXXXXXXXX@localhost/gnocchidb | 10:20 |
| zigo | The db has been created correctly by dbconfig-common ... | 10:20 |
| sileht | zigo, try just: | 10:21 |
| sileht | python | 10:22 |
| sileht | >>> from sqlalchemy import * | 10:22 |
| sileht | >>> create_engine("mysql+pymysql://gnocchi-common:XXXXXXXXXXX@localhost/gnocchidb") | 10:22 |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 10:22 | |
| zigo | >>> create_engine("mysql+pymysql://gnocchi-common:XXXXXXXXX@localhost/gnocchidb") | 10:23 |
| zigo | Engine(mysql+pymysql://gnocchi-common:***@localhost/gnocchidb) | 10:23 |
| zigo | So this seems to work ... | 10:23 |
| zigo | sileht: ^ | 10:23 |
| sileht | zigo, checks permission on the configuration file, because 'null' dialect means the database url have not been read from the configuration | 10:23 |
| *** Liuqing has joined #openstack-telemetry | 10:24 | |
| zigo | sileht: I have the error even if I'm root. Should I pass the --config-file=/etc/gnocchi/gnocchi.conf to the gnocchi-dbsync cli? | 10:24 |
| zigo | Nop. | 10:24 |
| zigo | It doesn't help ... :( | 10:24 |
| sileht | zigo, can you give a paste with the gnocchi.conf ? | 10:25 |
| zigo | sileht: It's an empty config file with just the [database]/connection string. | 10:26 |
| zigo | (nothing else is set...) | 10:27 |
| sileht | zigo, this is not the location of the indexer database you should use [indexer]/url | 10:27 |
| zigo | Oh... | 10:28 |
| zigo | sileht: The [indexer] section has only url =, nothing else. | 10:28 |
| sileht | zigo, yes | 10:28 |
| zigo | sileht: Should I put mysql+pymysql....... in it? | 10:29 |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 10:29 | |
| sileht | zigo, the format is exactly the same as [database]/connection | 10:29 |
| zigo | sileht: I have another error (alembic .ini file missing), though it seems working, thanks ! | 10:29 |
| zigo | sileht: So, I should set *both* the [database]/connection and [indexer]/url with the same value? | 10:30 |
| sileht | zigo, [database]/connection is not used by gnocchi | 10:30 |
| *** Liuqing has joined #openstack-telemetry | 10:30 | |
| zigo | sileht: How come it's present in the generated config file then? | 10:30 |
| sileht | zigo, because that comes from oslo.db lib not from gnocchi itself | 10:31 |
| zigo | Ok. | 10:31 |
| sileht | zigo, and we can't hide it | 10:31 |
| *** safchain has joined #openstack-telemetry | 10:33 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 10:33 | |
| zigo | sileht: Well, you could simply use [database]/connection instead of [indexer]/url, and be done with it! :) | 10:34 |
| sileht | zigo, no because we have different parts: indexer and storage, perhaps one day someone will write a driver for storage that will be a database | 10:35 |
| sileht | one | 10:36 |
| zigo | Ok, fair enough. | 10:36 |
| zigo | MUCH MUCH better now ! \o/ | 10:37 |
| zigo | sileht: Thanks so much. | 10:37 |
| sileht | welcome | 10:37 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 10:38 | |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 11:07 | |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 11:07 | |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
| *** yprokule has quit IRC | 11:27 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 11:34 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 11:39 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 12:02 | |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 12:09 | |
| *** ddieterl_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 12:10 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 12:13 | |
| openstackgerrit | lvdongbing proposed openstack/ceilometer: Use str(name) instead of name.prettyPrint(). https://review.openstack.org/244401 | 12:15 |
| *** yprokule has joined #openstack-telemetry | 12:17 | |
| *** thorst has joined #openstack-telemetry | 12:24 | |
| *** thorst has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 12:31 | |
| zigo | sileht: jd__: There's no release in PyPi for gnocchiclient? | 12:31 |
| zigo | Oh, saw it. | 12:31 |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-telemetry | 12:41 | |
| *** boris-42 has joined #openstack-telemetry | 12:49 | |
| gordc | jd__: apparently i don't even have power to add people in ceilometer-stable so ignore everything.lol | 12:49 |
| zigo | sileht: jd__: gordc: Houston, we have a problem !!! http://paste.openstack.org/show/479983/ | 13:00 |
| openstackgerrit | ZhiQiang Fan proposed openstack/ceilometer: re-implement thread safe fnmatch https://review.openstack.org/249764 | 13:01 |
| sileht | zigo, looks into the setup-tests.sh in the code tree | 13:01 |
| sileht | zigo, that looks like GNOCCHI_ENDPOINT is empty | 13:02 |
| zigo | sileht: It's *not* ok to require the gnocchi server to be running, together with keystone and all. | 13:02 |
| zigo | sileht: Most other clients are mocking the server, why isn't gnocchiclient doing the same? | 13:03 |
| sileht | zigo, it's just gnocchi, not keustone | 13:03 |
| zigo | Well, ok, not keystone. | 13:03 |
| sileht | zigo, this is required for functional tests, client doesn't really have unit tests | 13:03 |
| zigo | Oh... | 13:03 |
| zigo | sileht: Sorry then. So, there's only a single unit tests? | 13:03 |
| zigo | -s | 13:04 |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
| *** zqfan_AFK has joined #openstack-telemetry | 13:09 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 13:29 | |
| gordc | sileht: you undertsand what's happening on cdent's patch to enable cache? | 13:33 |
| gordc | seems like it fails pretty often: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1519477 | 13:33 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1519477 in Ceilometer "integration tests fail randomly" [High,Triaged] | 13:33 |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-telemetry | 13:35 | |
| sileht | gordc,this is perhaps due to: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249764/ | 13:36 |
| sileht | http://logs.openstack.org/32/243032/3/check/gate-ceilometer-dsvm-integration/a3c96a6/logs/screen-ceilometer-collector.txt.gz?level=ERROR#_2015-11-24_19_20_40_087 | 13:36 |
| gordc | sileht: hmm.. but the resource does seem to be present in indexer | 13:41 |
| gordc | should it not be visible even if it has no metrics? | 13:41 |
| sileht | gordc, if you looks at the end of the console.log, you will see 2 instances | 13:42 |
| sileht | 2 gnocchi resources associated | 13:42 |
| sileht | but only 1 of them have measures | 13:42 |
| sileht | the resource have perhaps been created by an other metric not cpu | 13:42 |
| sileht | but for sure the cpu measurement of the second instance are not in gnocchi | 13:43 |
| gordc | right. so when we call v1/resources/instance, should that not return both resources? | 13:43 |
| gordc | because that's where it seems to be failing | 13:43 |
| sileht | gordc, it actually returns both | 13:44 |
| gordc | FAIL: check gnocchi resources: Check the gnocchi resources for this two servers exists | 13:47 |
| sileht | gordc missing measurements can be shown here: http://logs.openstack.org/32/243032/3/check/gate-ceilometer-dsvm-integration/a3c96a6/console.html#_2015-11-24_19_21_12_016 | 13:47 |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 13:47 | |
| gordc | sileht: the failed check only looks for two id strings no? | 13:47 |
| sileht | gordc, oh it's just a timing issue | 13:48 |
| sileht | gordc, we have only two relevants log in collectors: | 13:49 |
| sileht | http://logs.openstack.org/32/243032/3/check/gate-ceilometer-dsvm-integration/a3c96a6/logs/screen-ceilometer-collector.txt.gz?level=ERROR#_2015-11-24_19_20_40_087 | 13:49 |
| sileht | and: | 13:49 |
| gordc | sileht: should we change something in configuration then to ensure resource is created in time? | 13:49 |
| sileht | http://logs.openstack.org/32/243032/3/check/gate-ceilometer-dsvm-integration/a3c96a6/logs/screen-ceilometer-collector.txt.gz?level=ERROR#_2015-11-24_19_13_47_250 | 13:49 |
| gordc | sileht: you notice this happening in a patch that isn't related to cache? | 13:52 |
| sileht | gordc, yes | 13:52 |
| sileht | gordc, on my keystoneauth1 and gnocchiclient patch too | 13:52 |
| gordc | sileht: kk. hopefully we can figure that out. | 13:53 |
| gordc | sileht: good to know it's not cache related. | 13:53 |
| *** claudiub_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 13:55 | |
| sileht | gordc, I have spoken too quickly, mine have failed at :'list servers: Wait the autoscaling stack shrink to one server' | 13:55 |
| gordc | sileht: let me check the other failures in cache patch. | 13:57 |
| gordc | sileht: if they are all the same. i'm hold off on it. | 13:57 |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-telemetry | 13:57 | |
| gordc | hmm.. yeah they are all the same failures | 13:58 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ceilometer: don't pass ceilometer options to oslo.db engine facade https://review.openstack.org/245744 | 13:59 |
| gordc | let's wait for fnmatch patch to see if it resolves anything | 13:59 |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 14:00 | |
| *** hparekh2 has joined #openstack-telemetry | 14:06 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 14:06 | |
| *** hparekh has quit IRC | 14:07 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-telemetry | 14:07 | |
| gordc | sileht: hmm... it looks like the gabbi check is calling //v1/resource/instance | 14:11 |
| gordc | 127.0.0.1 - - [23/Nov/2015:21:16:36 +0000] "GET //v1/resource/instance HTTP/1.1" 200 2154 "-" "gabbi/1.10.0 (Python httplib2)" | 14:12 |
| gordc | nm, it does the same thing when it works... :/ | 14:15 |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 14:19 | |
| *** thorst_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 14:21 | |
| *** thorst__ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 14:22 | |
| *** thorst_ has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
| *** thorst__ has quit IRC | 14:29 | |
| *** thorst_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 14:30 | |
| *** thorst_ has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
| *** KrishR has joined #openstack-telemetry | 14:45 | |
| *** sergio__nubeliu has joined #openstack-telemetry | 14:48 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 14:52 | |
| *** pradk has joined #openstack-telemetry | 14:54 | |
| *** llu_afk is now known as llu | 15:00 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-telemetry | 15:05 | |
| sileht | gordc, jd__ my oslo.messaging batch code finally works, first dirty bench with gnocchi(file): http://paste.openstack.org/show/480002/ | 15:06 |
| jd__ | sileht: reminds me the Monasca bp | 15:07 |
| sileht | I have deliberately choissen a scenario where we the gain would be big | 15:08 |
| gordc | sileht: lol | 15:08 |
| sileht | jd__, the summit presentation ? | 15:08 |
| gordc | nice start though | 15:08 |
| jd__ | sileht: no the bp r-mibu just sent | 15:08 |
| * sileht will checks | 15:09 | |
| gordc | jd__: rohit_? | 15:09 |
| *** rbak has joined #openstack-telemetry | 15:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: tools: fix default resource metadata for instance https://review.openstack.org/249841 | 15:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: POC: Use new oslo.messaging batch listener https://review.openstack.org/234831 | 15:12 |
| jd__ | gordc: yeah | 15:12 |
| jd__ | bad tab completion | 15:12 |
| sileht | jd__, since the cdent move pollster transformation in notifier, I'm thinking that the collector is not really useful | 15:14 |
| sileht | s/in notifier/in ceilo-anotification/ | 15:14 |
| jd__ | likely | 15:16 |
| jd__ | publisher directly? | 15:16 |
| sileht | jd__, yes | 15:16 |
| jd__ | cool | 15:17 |
| sileht | I have to change a bit the oslo.messaging batch patch to make driver aware of the batching. | 15:18 |
| sileht | the in-review kafka driver in oslo.messaging can directly do the batching | 15:18 |
| gordc | sileht: i'm going to make new ceilometerclient for you. anything i should wait for? | 15:31 |
| sileht | gordc, perhaps we should fix the ceilometerclient gate first ;) | 15:32 |
| sileht | http://logs.openstack.org/83/247583/2/check/gate-ceilometerclient-dsvm-functional/92f112e/testr_results.html.gz | 15:32 |
| gordc | lol | 15:33 |
| gordc | is this because we removed alarms? | 15:33 |
| sileht | yes | 15:33 |
| gordc | dammit jd__! :P | 15:34 |
| sileht | jd__, gordc https://review.openstack.org/249853 | 15:34 |
| * zigo uploaded gnocchi and gnocchiclient to Sid. | 15:35 | |
| gordc | sileht: i think we need to make it mitaka specific? | 15:35 |
| sileht | gordc, correct | 15:36 |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 15:36 | |
| *** ddieterl_ has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
| *** claudiub_ has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
| *** boris-42 has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
| gordc | sileht: jd__: any idea how this can happen (see last comment) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1519477 | 16:01 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1519477 in Ceilometer "integration tests fail randomly" [High,Triaged] | 16:01 |
| *** tomoiaga has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 16:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: POC: Use new oslo.messaging batch listener https://review.openstack.org/234831 | 16:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: DO NOT MERGE: test next oslo.messaging https://review.openstack.org/249879 | 16:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: DO NOT MERGE: test next oslo.messaging https://review.openstack.org/249879 | 16:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Mehdi Abaakouk (sileht) proposed openstack/ceilometer: POC: Use new oslo.messaging batch listener https://review.openstack.org/234831 | 16:14 |
| *** yassine__ has quit IRC | 16:18 | |
| *** rohit_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 16:23 | |
| jd__ | gordc: not really | 16:30 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
| *** Liuqing has quit IRC | 16:40 | |
| *** ViswaV has joined #openstack-telemetry | 16:48 | |
| *** ViswaV has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
| *** ViswaV has joined #openstack-telemetry | 16:53 | |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 16:57 | |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** yprokule has quit IRC | 17:12 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 17:12 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #openstack-telemetry | 17:20 | |
| *** lsmola has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-telemetry | 17:30 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #openstack-telemetry | 17:32 | |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer-specs: rolling upgrades https://review.openstack.org/242216 | 17:36 |
| openstackgerrit | Edwin Zhai proposed openstack/ceilometer-specs: Add spec for event-alarm timeout https://review.openstack.org/239312 | 17:40 |
| *** changbl has quit IRC | 17:46 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** shardy has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** r-mibu has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
| *** ildikov has joined #openstack-telemetry | 18:06 | |
| *** r-mibu has joined #openstack-telemetry | 18:11 | |
| *** toddnni has joined #openstack-telemetry | 18:17 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-telemetry | 18:20 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** prashantD has joined #openstack-telemetry | 18:33 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 18:40 | |
| *** KrishR has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 18:45 | |
| openstackgerrit | Béla Vancsics proposed openstack/ceilometer: Reduced the complexity of the get_events method https://review.openstack.org/242516 | 18:48 |
| *** nadya_ has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
| *** safchain has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| *** alextricity has quit IRC | 19:05 | |
| *** jwcroppe has joined #openstack-telemetry | 19:09 | |
| *** barra204 is now known as shakamunyi | 19:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed openstack/gnocchi: tests: improve fake Swift client delete_container https://review.openstack.org/249916 | 19:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed openstack/gnocchi: carbonara: deprecate TimeSerieArchive https://review.openstack.org/240905 | 19:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed openstack/gnocchi: carbonara: move aggregated() to AggregatedTimeSerie https://review.openstack.org/248087 | 19:17 |
| openstackgerrit | Julien Danjou proposed openstack/gnocchi: tests: block when acquiring processing lock https://review.openstack.org/249130 | 19:17 |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 19:17 | |
| *** tomoiaga1 has joined #openstack-telemetry | 19:27 | |
| *** tomoiaga1 has quit IRC | 19:32 | |
| *** Ala has quit IRC | 19:36 | |
| pradk | gordc, you around? | 19:38 |
| *** nadya_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 19:40 | |
| *** changbl has joined #openstack-telemetry | 19:45 | |
| *** tomoiaga has joined #openstack-telemetry | 19:47 | |
| gordc | now i am | 20:05 |
| gordc | pradk: ^ | 20:06 |
| pradk | gordc, hey | 20:07 |
| pradk | trying to figure out why gate is failing on me - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248241/ | 20:07 |
| gordc | pradk: only your patch? | 20:08 |
| gordc | or whole ceilometer gate? | 20:08 |
| pradk | gordc, i only looked at mine so far | 20:08 |
| *** changbl has quit IRC | 20:09 | |
| pradk | gordc, not sure if the failure is related to my change or not.. as based on the logic i have it should work and passes for me locally when i run functional tests | 20:09 |
| gordc | http://logs.openstack.org/41/248241/3/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-ceilometer-mysql-full/5a4d387/logs/screen-ceilometer-collector.txt.gz#_2015-11-25_03_01_11_194 | 20:10 |
| gordc | pradk: payload is a list apparently | 20:11 |
| pradk | wth hmm | 20:11 |
| pradk | gordc, i missed that log, thx i'll chase it from here | 20:12 |
| *** nadya_ has quit IRC | 20:13 | |
| gordc | pradk: np | 20:13 |
| *** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 20:19 | |
| *** khushbu_ has quit IRC | 20:20 | |
| *** KrishR has joined #openstack-telemetry | 20:21 | |
| *** changbl has joined #openstack-telemetry | 20:22 | |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 20:34 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-telemetry | 20:35 | |
| *** ddieterly has joined #openstack-telemetry | 20:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: clean up integration test urls https://review.openstack.org/250019 | 20:55 |
| *** prashantD_ has joined #openstack-telemetry | 21:06 | |
| *** prashantD has quit IRC | 21:08 | |
| *** KrishR has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
| *** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 21:20 | |
| openstackgerrit | Pradeep Kilambi proposed openstack/ceilometer: Change to allow non-metric meters https://review.openstack.org/248241 | 21:20 |
| *** ddieterly has quit IRC | 21:21 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-telemetry | 21:37 | |
| llu | looks python-ceilometerclient gate is blocked | 21:40 |
| llu | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249449/ | 21:40 |
| llu | anyone knows why? | 21:41 |
| llu | I tried it locally, and it passed | 21:41 |
| *** prashantD_ has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
| gordc | llu: it's becasue alarm code is removed | 21:45 |
| gordc | llu: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248050/ | 21:45 |
| gordc | err.. wrong patch | 21:45 |
| gordc | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249853/ | 21:46 |
| gordc | llu: ^ | 21:46 |
| llu | gordc: got that, thx | 21:49 |
| *** tomoiaga has quit IRC | 21:53 | |
| *** liusheng has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
| *** liusheng has joined #openstack-telemetry | 21:55 | |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: build metric list on init https://review.openstack.org/250033 | 21:59 |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: build metric list on init https://review.openstack.org/250033 | 22:03 |
| *** pradk has quit IRC | 22:20 | |
| *** safchain has joined #openstack-telemetry | 22:25 | |
| llu | just found about https://github.com/openstack/gerrit-dash-creator | 22:27 |
| llu | cooked an patch for ceilometer https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250041/ | 22:27 |
| llu | the example output would be | 22:28 |
| llu | https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=%28project%3Aopenstack%2Fceilometer+OR+project%3Aopenstack%2Fpython%2Dceilometerclient+OR+project%3Aopenstack%2Fceilometermiddleware+OR+project%3Aopenstack%2Fceilometer%2Dspecs+OR+project%3Aopenstack%2Faodh+OR+project%3Aopenstack%2Fgnocchi+OR+project%3Aopenstack%2Fpython%2Dgnocchiclient%29+status%3Aopen+NOT+label%3ACode%2DReview%3C%3D%2D2&title=Tel | 22:28 |
| gordc | llu: you have an example of what happens? | 22:29 |
| gordc | i don't like new processes.lol | 22:29 |
| llu | https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=%28project%3Aopenstack%2Fceilometer+OR+project%3Aopenstack%2Fpython%2Dceilometerclient+OR+project%3Aopenstack%2Fceiit create an url for gerrit review dashboard | 22:29 |
| llu | sorry the url is toooo long | 22:29 |
| gordc | lol | 22:30 |
| gordc | so it's just a shortcut? | 22:30 |
| llu | you could see the example by trying the url at http://paste.openstack.org/show/480056/ | 22:31 |
| *** shaleh has joined #openstack-telemetry | 22:31 | |
| gordc | hmm.. interesting | 22:32 |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 22:34 | |
| *** sergio__nubeliu has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
| *** tschrock52_home has joined #openstack-telemetry | 22:42 | |
| *** tschrock52_home is now known as tschrock_afk | 22:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: simplify collector cache https://review.openstack.org/250051 | 22:55 |
| *** safchain has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/ceilometer: clean up integration test urls https://review.openstack.org/250019 | 23:04 |
| *** tschrock_afk has quit IRC | 23:07 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-telemetry | 23:07 | |
| *** jwcroppe has quit IRC | 23:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/aodh: initialize ceilometerclient when we use it https://review.openstack.org/248651 | 23:18 |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/aodh: clean up integration test urls https://review.openstack.org/250058 | 23:19 |
| *** rbak has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
| *** ljxiash has quit IRC | 23:27 | |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/gnocchi: clean up integration test urls https://review.openstack.org/250065 | 23:32 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!